FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF ETHIOPIA
MINISTRY OF WATER RESOURCES
BARO-AKOBO RIVER BASIN
INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT
MASTER PLAN STUDY
FINAL REPORT
ANNEX 3 PT. 2
f v-i/• *• '-jX-? k iv*- < -k k* ' -
k
:
-
ig
■ y
MAY 1997
UL'7 CO! r -jLYA: • ! 'VAHkKXO ?FEDERAL DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF ETHIOPIA MINISTRY OF M ATER RESOURCES
BARO-AKOBO RP/ER BASIN INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN STUDY
ANNEX 3
SOCIO-ECONOMICS
Part 2
Annex 3E
Annex 3F
Economic and Financial Analysis
institutional Support
TAMS.UK[NDEX OF VOLUMES AND ANNEXES
Volume 1:EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Volume II:RESOURCE BASE AND DEVELOPMENT OPTIONS
Volume ill:............................................. MASTER PLAN DEVELOPMENT Volume TV:PROJECT AREA MAPS
Volume V................... *........... ........-...........PREFEASCBLLm STUDIES
ANNEXES
/
Annex! A
R£50l:/?C£V
Climatology
Annex IB Hydrology Annex 1CFlood Studies Annex ID
.... GroundWater
Annex IE Reservoir Operation Studies Annex IF Sediment Studies
Annex 1G
Annex 1H Irrigation Projects Annex H ...
Water Resources Cost Estimating Water Supply Projects
Annex 1J 
2. ATI TLIMA 1?£5<?(//?CES Annex 2A
Hydropower Projects
Land Evaluation
Annex 2B Soils and Soil Conservation Annex 2 C
Annex 2D Mineral Resources
Geology
Annex 2E .............................................. Forestry
.Annex 2F
.................. Wildlife
Annex 2G ............................................ Tourism Annex 2H Apiculture
Annex 21 ......................................... .Agriculture
.Annex 2J 
-Annex 2K
Annex ZL
Renewable Energy .. Fisheries
Livestock
5. 5OC/O-EC0VOWC5 Annex 3A
Population Aspects
.Annex 3B Socio-Ethnic Groups Analysis
Annex 3C Economic Infrastructures
Annex jD.. Social Infrastructures
.Annex 3E Economic and Financial Analysis 
Annex 3F .............................................. Institutional Support
< EATWOWENT
Annex4 ...
Environment
TAMS-L'LG Baro-Akobti River Basin Inic^raletl Development Master Plan'ASOCIO-ECONOMIC ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
ANNEX 3E
ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
TAMS-LTG Bartk-Akobo River Basin Integrated PeTdDpTncni Master PlanSOCIO-ECONOMIC
ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
CONTENTS
L INTRODUCTION 2. METHODOLOGY-..................................................................................................................................... * 3. hydroelectric POWER“
3.1. Scope.
........
3 2 Mcthodoiogv ........................ ........................................... . ................
3.3, Results
4. WATER SUPPLY PROJECTS♦«-.................................................................................. -................
4.1 Scope ..................... >....................... ........................................................ ......... ............. . ............
4 2. Methodology 4.3. Results 
............... ............................................-............... ......... ........................
.......................................................................................... ...........
5> AGRICULTURAL PROJECTS—............................................................................-..................... —
5.1 Introduction
5 2 Rainfcd Agriculture- -
5.27 Scope.................... .
-
—
....
5.2.2. Specr/k- merAoc&’togy ...................... ............................. ...................... .................
5.23 Results..,................................. ................ ..................................................... ,....................... ........ 7-
5 3 lmgatcd Agriculture
................................................................... 14
5 3/ Scope.......... ......................................... ................... ........................ ...... .......................74
5 3-2. Specie fftediodp/qgv........................................ ................. ..............................................................J 4
5.3.3. Ttendfj.......... ...................................... ................ ............. .................................. ................... -79
5.4 Agroindustry......................................................................................... ....20
5.4J Commercial Sugarcane ant! Ethanal Plant................................ ...................„........... .............. 20
J 4.2 Small Scale Indusrnal Development ................................. , ............................................................ 24
6 MULTIPURPOSE PROJECTS
6.1 General
6.2 Dual Purpose Use...,......................................
6.2. J Irrigation and hydropower........___________ 6.2.2 Hydropower and flood control
6 3 Conjunctive Use
6.4 Secondary benefits................ ...................... „....... .
.27
27
27
7, ENVIRONMENT AND CATCHMENT PROTECTION................................
7.1 Scope
7.2 Catchment Degradation the Problem
Z 2.1 National issues' policy and strategy1
7.2.2 Sot7 erosion .............
Z2 3 SedrwfJTtorror?
7.3 Available Data ............................... 4
7 3.1 Farming systems 
7.3.2 Son and land resources 
7 3 3 Soh degradation.....................,.................
r
7.3.4 C7’ male and rai nfall crosiviry,..........
7 4 Specifications
7.5 Specific Methodology-
7.6 Catchment protection and its costs
TAMS-ULG Baro-Akobc River Basin Integrated DeTdopmcnt Master Plan
3E - i
27
28
29
.29
. 29 39 3/
.31 3/ 32 33
.. 34 35
.36
.37SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
S. OTHER SECTORS
9. REFERENCES............................................................................................................................................
APPENDICES.................................................................................................................................................
TABLES
Table 1 Agriculture economic farmgate prices of outputs and inputs. Table 2 Agriculture - Derivation of export and import parity prices 
g
...... 9
Table 3 Future cropping patterns in the Baro Akobo Basin (proposals for rainfed
agriculture)
.Areas (Ha)
II
Table 4 Rainfed agriculture development
TableS Impact on rainfed agriculture production (t)..
. 11
.................................. ]]
.............................................. 12
Table ft Economic benefit of rainfed cropping (Birr ha)............................................................................... ] 2
Table 7 Selected irrigation schemes 
Table 8 Cropping Patterns for Proposed Irrigation Projects 
Table 9
Table 10 Soil
Soil
losses 
different
14
IS
treatments33
losses 
for
for different
Table 11 Mean rainfall erosivities and annual rainfall Master Plan area
land uses 34
.34
Table 12
Terrain
and
slope
classes 
35
35
Table 13 SCS land capability classifications 
Table 14 Person-days labour..................................................................... ....... ........... ................................ 36
Table 15 Unit costs soil conservation
.................................................... ...37
Table 16 Land allocations (hectares) for soil conservation ..................................................................... 38
T.AMS-l LG Bam-Akobo River Bavin Integrated Development Masler PlanSOCIO-ECONOMIC ANNEX 3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
1. INTRODUCTION
The main purpose of undertaking an economic analysts of the proposed intervention was to assess the projects' capacity to maximise the efficient use of the nation’s resources and indirectly indicate whether the projects could be partially or completely self-financing.
TAMS-ULG Bam-Akobo River Basin Inicgraied Development Mister Plan
3F.-1SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
2. METHODOLOGY
In this context, economic viability is measured by the Economic Internal Rate of Return (EIRR) and the Net Present Value (NPV). For the purpose of this analysis, the opportunity cost of capital has been taken at 13% (shadow discount rate)
The analysis permits a tentative ranking of projects according to the above criteria it should, however be emphasised that a multi-critena analysis including other criteria has been applied for screening hydropower and irrigation schemes
The methodology used and the basic assumptions are briefly outlined for each sector or group of projects, following the general scope of the analysis and preceding the reported results
The various supporting tables and analyses are reproduced in the Appendices
TAMS-ULG Biro-Akobo River Basin lntecrated Development Mavter PlLT
3E-2SOCIO-ECONOMIC
ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FIN ANCI AL ANALN SIS
HYDRO ELECTRIC POWER
3.1. Scope
The two previous studies of the water resources in the Basin have identified a number of hvdropower schemes, some including regulating dams and some mn-of-nver plants AJ1 these projects were reviewed and 23 schemes have been selected I sec Annex J
3.2. Meihodology
The pre-selected dams considered as hydro power options in the Baro Akobo Basin have been divided into small hydro projects of less than 40 MW and hydro projects of more than 40 MW (national or interregional interest), for the purpose of economic analysis In each category, the options have been ranked according to the following criteria
Criteria
1. Cost per kWh
2 Operating costs
3 Resettlement
4 Transmission costs
Weighting
factors
50
25
12
0
'I
The results of the weighted ranking of dams are presented in Appendix 9, Table 1 below
Sor and Gumero were selected from the first category (less than 40 MW) Gumero is interesting as it is in three phases, with five options in the second phase If it is considered in its entirety, it becomes a project of more than 40 MW
From the financial point of view, two selected options could be put on second priority level because of their high cost, i e Sor in the category below 40 MW (installed capacity 14MW) and Gilo in the category of more than 40 N1W (installed capacity 80 MW)
3.3. Results
Table 2 in Appendix 9 provides some figures of estimated EIRR (before depreciation) considering two scenarios, rhe long-term marginal cost of power at 0 36 Birr/per kWh and at 0.45 Bin per kWh
Attractive levels have been reached by the Gumero 2 and 3 options in the category below 40 MW (EIRR at 16%) and by Kashu in the upper category (EIRR at 21%).
It should be noted that low cost options in the second category have been low ranked given their high operating costs In this case, the weighting factor shows the capability of the
TAMS-ULG Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Master PlanSOCIO-ECONOMIC
ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
option to supplv hi«h level of demand (between 170 to 210 MW installed capacity) but also
that these options could not be phased e g. Baro 1 and 2. Geba 1 and 2
The following hydropower plants should be elevated to the ievel of prefeasability stud Gumero. Geba and Baro
____ ____________ __
---
—— -
TAMS-ULG Baro-Akobo River Batin Integrated Deidopment Master Plan
3E-4SOCIO-ECONOMIC
ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
WATER SUPPLY PROJECTS
4,1. Scope
The Water Supply Projects cover three major groups:
• Small. Medium Towns and Villages (Appendix 8-1)
0 Summary of all towns (50) Water Supply Program Financial & Economic Cost Estimates (Table 1)
»
Medium Towns (15) Water Supply Engineering Cost Estimates (Table 2)
c
Small Towns (28) Water Supply Engineering Cost Estimates (Table 3}
«
Villages (7) Water Supply Engineering Cost Estimates (Table 4)
• Cities
°
All Cities (10) (Appendix 8 2)
Water Supply Program Financial and Economic Costs Estimates (Table 1)
-Asosa Water Supply Engineering Cost Estimates (Table 2)
-Dembidolo Water Supply Cost Estimates (Table 3}
-Gambela Water Supply Cost Estimates (Table 4)
-Metu Water Supply Cost Estimates (Table 5)
-Tepi Water Supply Cost Estimates (Table 6)
-Mizan Teferi Water Supply Cost Estimates (Table 7)
-Bengi Waler Supply Cost Estimates (Table 8)
-Gore Water Supply Cost Estimates (Table 0)
-Maha Water Supply Cost Estimates (Table 10)
• 
Rural
Rural Community Water Supply Program Cost Estimate
4.2,
Method
ology
The engineering costing sheets were used in presenting and analysing the proposed water projects in all areas. They provide relevant data on each of the above categories and encompass.
0 Water supply requirements
L Proposed construction program
_ Cost breakdown by foreign and local components
.J Operation and maintenance costs
_ Unit cost for O & M, Capital, Total Costs
TAMS-ULG llaro-Akubo River Basin Integrated Development Matter Plan
3E-5SOCIO-ECONOMIC
j 3 Results
ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSE __________________ _____ __________ __________
Append,SI,
• , . „,h water supply system it mu
Ba
st be recognised that a significant portion of
To implement such a W
be funded exlema y or Vtty
|i internally It is 
the capital costg suwm be insufficient to meet the expenditures required for
s The Operation and Maintenance of the system can probably be covered by 
XesXtb be.™ levied A detailed senshivity analysis should be prepared to illustrate
how much subsidy would be required al various user rates.
The Government of Ethiopia is committed to providing a phased national water supply system The proposals will offer guidance as to the financial requirements necessary to implement such a policy. It is assumed that all areas, rural, semi-urban, and urban areas will be developed simultaneously.
TAMS-ULG Baru-Akobo River Ba»n Integrated Dcvdopmem M^FFlaF
3E-6socio-economic
ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
5. AGRICULTURAL PROJECTS
5.1- Introduction
A series of budaets has been prepared for the different crops which have been included separately in the rainfed agriculture and in the irrigation schemes
Crop budgets have been established for each of the selected crops in both the existing and the new technology i e in scenarios without and with interventions, the last comprising boih improved technical input packages and improved management practices. It includes estimates 
□f the gross value of production and all production costs (e g seeds and planting material, fertilisers, insecticides and pesticides, labour, oxen ploughing and machinery).
The physical parameters used in the derivation of the crop budgets have been based on different sources Existing yield data have been provided by the .Agriculture study (see Annex 21), while data on cunent and improved input usage, labour, animal and machinery requirements have been derived from recent feasibility studies of rainfed cropping (eg coffee) and irrigation schemes International technical and economic literature has been intensively reviewed.
For rainfed agriculture, it has been assumed that it would take 40 years to achieve the yield levels under improved technology' with a progressive linear build-up from the start of the project. For irrigation schemes it has been assumed that the yields would be achieved in the first year of the agriculture development. Each scheme could be developed at a rate from between 2000 to 3400 ha of cropped area per year.
The rainfed crops listed in Section 5 2 have been chosen on the basis of a number of physical and economical factors These include
except rice, the crops chosen arc commonly grown in the project area, and do not require complicated husbandry techniques.
L crops providing food security have been given priority,
□ the improvement of husbandry techniques is relatively simple and inexpensive.
Table 3 shows that the most popular food crops account for more than 65% of the total proposed future cropping intensities A number of environmentally suitable crops have not been included for various reasons. Vegetables and fruit would have been acceptable to the list of proposed rainfed crops However, not only is the lower basin climatically unattractive to most types of vegetables, but they are also perishable, the transport facilities are poor and distances too great to population centres and markets
Fruit in general and citrus in particular have similar constraints to development opportunities in the project area Furthermore the present market price for this crop is too low to be economically viable and cannot compete with established and traditional supply areas
TAMS-ULG Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development .Master PlanSOCIO-ECONOMIC ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL AN’ALy^
—-
far irrigated crops. It should be noted that about 1%
Table 8 shows the cropping Pancrn'
been allocated to vegetable crops, 
he just over 100 ha per season This limited
|
ocal and
markets Under
“ is beLeved to ^ter b«'n7»«ld be too risky to recommend any l„
a
so
In order to achieve the new technology proposals, capital and recurrent costs of the necessary supporting actions have been included, except technical assistance needs.
Economic analysis is only concerned with flows of real resources, so it was necessary to re
evaluate the financial prices in terms of their real opportunity costs In this exercise, tradable
goods i.e goods to be traded on the international markets e g cotton, sugar, wheat, maize,
rice and fertilisers) were valued at a farmgate parity price
All transfer payments within the economy (eg. taxes, subsidies, and interest charges) were removed The prices of non tradable items were converted to border prices by the use of the appropriate conversion factors a standard conversion factor of 0 85 and a specific conversion factor of 0 5 for unskilled labour, while the foreign element is retained at its full value. A shadow exchange rate of Bin 7.47/USS I 00 has been considered for items expressed originally in foreign currency (e g capital costs for irrigation schemes)
Table I Agriculture economic farmgate prices of outputs and inputs
Commodities
1
Birr/Ton
Inputs Costunit
Fertiliser 2247
Bin/kg
Insecticide
80
Bin/kg
Pesticide
67 5
Bin/kg
Herbicide
200
63.75
2.50
Bin/kg
Draught animal
Bin/tillage
Labour (family)
Btn/maa'day 
Maize Sorghum Teff
Pulses Oilseeds Coffee
| Cotton
Rice Bananas Green fodder
1373 1334 1065
1350
1350, 9350 4512 1740
1323
083
Labour (casual) Seeds Maize
Sorghum Teff Pulses Oilseeds Coffee Cotton Rice Bananas
i
4 50 Bm/man'day 2.47 Bin/kg
Shallot 081
Green fodder Shallot
1.87
3.06
2.12
1 70
425 3 40
1.70 170
2 55 1 10 1
Bin/kg
Bin/kg
Bin/kg
Bin/kg
Bin/ha
Bin/kg Binkg
Bin/ha
Birr/kg Birr/kg
The import and export parity prices have been calculated
- nroiections (1996) quarterly published by the World Bank 1 The figures in Appendix 1 show the price trends for maize, sugar, coffee and cotton
using the commodity prices and
1 Commodity markets and the deseloping countries 1996
- A U orld Bank Quarterly - February
TAMS-ULG Baro-Akobu Rher Basin Integrated Development .Master PlanSOCIO-ECONOMIC
ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
Table 2 Agriculture - Derivation of export and import parity prices
______ .__________ ■
1
World market
Unit
USSfton
Maize 124
Sorghum
119
Wheat 177
Rice
330
Bananas
445
Sugar
243
Coffee 2250
Cotton
2130
DAP 217
Quality
%
95
95
95
100
90
100 "
90
[00
100
World market || '’lqiiii valent
USS/ton
us
113
168
330
400
243
2050
2130
217
Freight and insurance
L’SS/ton
60
60
60
104
no
60
80
------- ■
100
—----
60
CIF Port entry
1
1
USS/ton
17S
173
228
434
290 Fob Assab
303
1970
Fob
Assab
2030 Fob Assab
277
Unloading and port handling
USS/ton
1
10
10
10
26
25
25
25
173.4
10
Value;
Ethiopian 
border
in USS
USSAon
188
183
238
460
265
323
1945
1857
______ 287
| in Birr (2)
BirrAon
1194
1162
1449
2920
1683
2085
12350
11789
1822
Handling i transport
margin
Bin‘ton
239
(3}
232(3)
290(3)
300
300
300
(5)
300
265
Processing
ratio
%
IOC
100 '
100
100
100
100
(5)
(6)
100
Wholesale
1
Birr/ton
1433
1394
1739
3220
1383
2385
(5)
4896 (7)
2187
| Transport to/frum farm
Bnr/ton
(60)
(60)
(60)
(60)
(60)
275(4)
(3)
384
60
|| Farm gale
{price
| Birr; ton
IJ / J
! 1334
_______ | 1679
,3160
1323
9350
4512
2247
(l) 199t> World Bank
_______
2110
(2) 6.35 BtrrTJSS
(3) 20% of bolder price
(4 ) Processing costs, esiic oxerheads plus value of molasses
(5) All costs included in border price
<61 1 tonne seed cotton = 350 kg lint and 650 kg seed, of which 300 kg is seed meal and 100 kg seed oil
(7) seed cotton
In the derivation of the economic prices for tradable inputs and outputs, the parity pricing procedure is as follows: maize, sorghum, wheal and rice have been assumed as beins substituted for imports ar.d all types of fertilisers, insecticides, pesticides would be imported In lhe case of sugar, import parity pricing has also been adopted, as sugar has beeti considered as being produced lor the domestic market and therefore would be a substitute to imports. This choice is made in accordance to the future increase in domestic demand1
‘ The actual consumption level is considered to be low, close to 5 kg per capita, per year and the 1995 planted area is only a 23000 ha, according to the last available data
TAMS-t LGBom-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Master Plan 3E-9SOCIO-ECONOMIC
ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANaLYj^
• • hat been applied io bananas, coffee and cotton Food crops such
Export parity P™ 8
n
m the £lure as wport crops, but they have not been considered «
in "" ‘‘'ve'opm'"'of ,he domes,ic d ! run
!„ order to calculatean
SXdS- capW and recurrent coats of the new technology systems, expressed in
economic terms, have been deducted from the economic benefits
Finally, a sensitivity analysis has been carried out to assess the implications of changes in the cost and benefit streams on the economic viability of the various systems
5.2. Rainfcd Agriculture
5.2.1. Scope
As explained in Volume 11, Chapter 5. the total area of each farming system existing in the Basin has been distributed into categories according to the following criteria
the population density,
the Population Support Capacity model,
the land capacity and
current land use
Taking into account 20% of each area allocated to infrastructure, the remaining area has been divided, for each farming system, into three categories - agriculture land
- catchment protection
- forest protection
and the corresponding land resources allocated, applying a multi-criteria analysis from the criteria mentioned above
Volume II, Chapter 5 provides details of this allocation of the resources model
5.2.2 Specific methodology
From the same database, the most probable cropping patterns have been identified in each tarming system, taking into consideration the recent evolution in the cropping patterns of each farming system This evolution could be seen when comparing the traditional system, and the data on each crop collected by the counterpart team in the Project (See Annex 21
Agriculture)
'
The corresponding area has been allocated for each cropping patient, considering the
allocation of land resources for the planning period, and a potential area for each crop has 
been determined for the whole Basin
F
TAMS-L'LG Baro-Akobo Rbcr Basin Integrated Development Master PlanSOCIO-ECONOMIC
ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
Type of crop Maize
Table 3 Future cropping patterns in the Bare Akobo Basin (proposals for rainfed
agricuJtii re)
22.1 %
Areas (Ha)
936 000
Crop pattern
33 8 %
Sorghum
612 500
Coffee
462 300
16.7 %
Teff
329 570
11.9%
Pulses
253 200
91%
Oilseeds
5.3 200
1.9 %
Rice
38 500
1.5%
Green fodder
34 000
1.2%
Bananas
34000
1,2 %
Cotton
17 000
0.6 %
Total
2 771 470
100.0%
The figures in Table 3 should be seen as a potential that could be developed during the next 35 years From this, a first hypothesis has been elaborated, taking into account the population growth (see .Annex 3 A) One half of the annual crops' potential is to be used
Z to cover the food needs and meet the food security objectives
Z to create a tradable surplus of food crops and increase the rural cash income
□ to increase the exportable coffee production
IZ to reduce the pressure on land
As a consequence, the Basin should become a net export region in 2035 The data are summarised in table 4 below.
Table 4 Rainfed agriculture development
Type of
Baseline [9%
Type of crop
Target 2035
___
Maize
Year
incremental
207080
33.9%
Maize
468300
33.2%
13380
Teff
138600
22.7%
Teff
164785
11.7%
4708
Sorghum
115100
18.9%
Sorghum
306300
21 7%
8751
; Coffee
95160
15 6%
Coffee
231400
16 4%
6600
Pulses
37561
6.2%
Pulses
126600
9 0%
3617
Oilseeds
15391
2.5%
Oilseeds
53200
3 8%
1520
Rice
1220
0.2%
Rice
19250
1.4%
550
Cotton
130
-%
Cotton
8500
0.6%
243
Bananas
17000
1 2%
486
1
Green fodder
17000
1.2%
Total
486
610242
i 100%
Total
1412335
100%
22917 ■
For each crop listed in the previous table, a separate crop budget has been elaborated, which can be found in Appendix 2: Table 1 to Table 10
TAMS-ULG Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Master Plan
3K-11SOCIO-ECONOMIC
5.2.3. Results
ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
Major economic benefits of the proposed allocation of resources arc the increase in grain and coffee production, mainly for local consumption and export, through
Q expansion of the cropping area
□ increased crop productivity
□ change in the cropping patterns by introduction of new crops
The impact on agricultural production is summarised in the following table
Table 5 Impact on rainfed agriculture production (t)
Crop
Without project
At full development
Incremental
production
Maize
265,000
1,879,000
1,614.000
Sorghum
111,000
919.000
808 000
Tcff
90.000
379.000
289,000|
Bananas
0
262.000
262,000
Coffee
26,000
184,000
158,000
Pulses
17,000
160,000
143,000
Oil Seeds
4.000
80,000
76.000
Fodder
100
25,000
24.900
Rice
700
19,000
18.300
Cotton
6
363
357]
Total
513.806
3,907.363
3.393.557
The total incremental production is estimated at 3393.5 (*000 tonnes); the optimum yield for each crop will be reached at the end of the planning period, e g 2035
Crop production models have been developed, taking into account the areas listed in Table 5 above and the crop budgets in Appendix 2 The crop production models are presented in Appendix 3 (Tabic 1 to 10)
The net economic benefit per hectare (after labour costs) is summarised in the following table
Table 6 Economic benefit of rainfed cropping (Birr/ha)
Crop
Benefit per ha (Birr)
Benefit per ha (USS)
Coffee
6750
1080
Maize
4892
783
1 Sorghum
3206
513
Tetf
1939
310
Oil Seeds
1418
227
Pulses
1381
221
Rice
1227
196
Fodder
80
13
Bananas
Cotton
TAMS-ULG Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Deveiopment Matter Plan
3E-12SOCIO-EC
ONOMIC
ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL AN
ALYSIS
All costs,
converted
into economic terms have been included in the cost
streams for the
calculation
of the e
conomic rates of return These costs include: direct
production costs 
comprising
labour, at
farm level, investments and operating and maintenance
costs (recurrent
costs) at the level of the programme.
The global results of the cost benefit model for the Baro Akobo Basin rainfed agriculture are recorded in Appendix 4 (Table I).
The EIRRs have not been estimated for each of the proposed crops but for the rainfed crop pattern as proposed for the total Basin in order to test their viability globally Indeed, al the ievel of master planning it is not recommended to test this viability individually for each crop as the management and capital costs of the programme cannot be related to an individual crop
The total costs comprise the inputs supply to the farmers and the management costs of the program (capital and recurrent costs), the last ones representing:
research
 adaptive research
i_ extension
□ co-operatives support
I institutions establishment- management and organisation support
J training
Considering the farm inputs supply, it should be noted that the use of animal draught power has been generalised on a technically improved basis as recommended in the livestock sector development report (Annex 2L). Even at higher cost, the feasibility of using improved technology does not seem to be endangered
The fertilisers and improved seeds inputs reflect the feasibility of their application as demonstrated by countrywide trials over several years which have established the profitability of fertiliser use In this respect, there is significant scope for increasing the coverage and the dosage of fertiliser use
1 able 1 in Appendix 4 indicates that the proposed allocation of resources is economically justified, as it generates an adequate rate of return calculated at 33.6 %
Nevertheless, the implementation of the programme must consider the following factors that can reduce its profitability or slow the pace of the implementation:
1. Acceptance by (he population at farm level
2 Soil degradation as a crop reduction factor (see Appendix 2)
3 Contingencies
4. Conflicts between users
5. Marketing prices, of commodities and supplies
6. Young age of the population, those age groups being less interested in peasant fanning
TAMS’L’LG Bara-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Master Plan
3E- )3SOCIO-ECONOMIC
5.3. Irrigated Agriculture
5.3.1. Scope
ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
According to the preliminary screening, (see Annex I H Irrigation) three schemes have been pre-selected as the most interesting ones for developing irrigated agriculture
Table 7 Selected irrigation schemes
System System 9 Gravity 
1
Project No. I* '
Location
R. Alwero, left bank A bo bo dam
Gross area (Ha)
13,600
Net area
(Ha)
10,400
Total cost (US $)
87,410,940
Unit cost (Birr/Ba)
53.370
System 10 A Gravity Project No 2’l>
R. Alwero right and left banks,
Dumbong dam
23.192
15,000
131,024,496’
55,470
System 1 Gravity Project No 3 ;1)
R. Baro, right bank. Itang dam
66.600
50,900
419,139,017
52,290
System 14 Project No 4<IJ
R. Gilo, right bank Gilo 21 dam
61,235
46,900
432.023,725
58.49S
(1) For the specific purposes of the economic anal) sis
Three of the above schemes have been analysed choosing Project No. 3: Baro right bank, Itang dam, as being similar in terms of structure to project No 4 The definitive choice should be done when the prefeasiblity phase is reached
For costing purposes, the irrigation schemes development schedule has been divided on a year by year basis and the cost of each component streamed into the schedule, as shown in the next figure For each scheme, a specific agriculture development build up has been derived from the necessary' construction time schedule and is the basic feature for the progressive yield development as detailed in figure 1 below. This figure presents the costs of the Selected Scenario of the Master Plan which is the Scenario V, including the three Irrigation Projects (See Volume III. Master Plan Development)
5.3.2. Specific methodology
For each project, specific parameters of agriculture development have been applied :
0 cropping patterns
cropping intensity
□ agricultural input package
In addition, specific institutional and management proposals have been associated with the technical parameters
The cropping patterns and cropping intensities are detailed in Table 8 and figures 2 and 3 and the general characteristics of each project are presented in the following paragraphs
TAMS-ULG Baro-Akobo River Buin Integrated Development Matter Plan
3E-14
JSOCIO-ECONOMIC ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS Table 8 Cropping Patterns for Proposed Irrigation Projects
Crop Season
Project
No.l
Alwero-
Abobo
10.400 ha
Project No.2
Alwero- Dumbong
Project No.3
Buro-Itang (51,000 ha)
15.000 ha
r
(a) 8.5M ha (b) 8.500 (c) 17,000 (d) 17.0001|
ha ha ha
WET SEASON
Cation
2.5%
2,600 ha
30%
5.100 ha 1
Maize
40%
4,160 ha
40%
3,400 ha 
50^
8.500 ha ||
Sorghum
!9%
1.976 ha
35%
2.975 ha
|Soybeans
/0%
1,040 ha
jl
Vegetables
1%
104 ha
..
___________
1
Green Fodder
5%
520 ha
10% 20% |
850 ba 
3 t400ha
Wheat
15%
1.275 ha
Sugarcane
100% 100%
8,500 ha 17.000 ha
Rice
15,000 ha
DRY SEASON
Cotton
15%
1,560 ha
1 
25% |
4.250 ha ,
Maize
15%
1,560 ha
15%
1.275 ha 
35% j
5.950 ha ,
Sorghum
10%
1.040 ha
15%
1,275 ha
Groundnuts
15%
1,560 ha
30%
2,550 ha
I----------
Vegetables
1%
104 ha
—
'Soybeans
79%
1,040 ha
..
1.
Green Fodder
596
425 ha 
5%
85Q ta
Rice
■------ —---------------
----- ---------------- -
100%
15,000 ha --------- -
Sugarcane
1
Total Cropping Intensity
166%
17,264 ha
200%
30.000 ha
165% 100% 100% 165% 14,025 ha 8.500 ha 17.UO0 ha 28.050 ha ,
TAMS-ULG B ar o-A kobo River Basin integrated Development Master Plan
3E-J5t igiitr I • //j
f9r t/tc Haiift »nd K'S, CofHowrrial Irrigodon Projecti, Scwwlo k, Cotts (l/SS otHfioo)
fi
rr*-
PBS* 7Figure* 2. Cropping Patterns and Intensity for Alwcro/Abobo (R. &
Crap*
WET SEASON
Cotton
Maize
Sorghum
Soybean*
Vegetable**
Green fodder
DRYSEASON
Cotton
Mai/c
Sorghum
Groundnut*
Vegetable* A
Soybean*
Vo leafy vegetables Vegetables could be replaced by shallots
Jul Aug
Oct
No*
Dec
% of Cropping Intensity
(at 166% annual
cropping intensity)
aMi
SO W
■•-•
r- •
gi
^52^'*
25
40
19
10
1
5
I.3. Crop ring-Fattens and Intensity for Barn (R.B.j/jlfliig - 8,500 ha
Aug
3A
% Eif (Tupping Inlemity
cru ( pat p Ii fHifgflainat /einNsniatyt ■
WETSEASON Maize
Sorghum Green Fnilikr
Sl-ASt >N "
I V C .V WvEA*oR_7"':"^|
11
DRYSEASON Ground mi h Maize
Sorghum Green Eudiler
#V<j
«RBsr
*
cfwM Ae repMuec/ Av rJiaZ/u/.TSOCIO-ECONOMIC ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSE
Project No. 1 Alwero/Abobo
L cropping patterns: food crops (maize sorghum, soybeans, groundnuts, vegetables)
green fodder and cotton
U cropping intensity 166%
input package comparable to the package proposed for rainfed agriculture
management: smallholders
Project No. 2 Alwero/Dumbong
Z cropping patterns : rice
□ cropping intensity : 200 %
Z input package specific, in accordance with international practices
U management commercial estate and or smallholders
Project No. 3 Baroltang is divided into three subschemes each of 17000 Ha, one of them being divided into 2 parts of 8500 ha each:
Subscheme a (8500 Ha)
f, cropping patterns selected food crops (maize, sorghum, w'heat, groundnuts) and green fodder
. cropping intensity : 165 %
fl input package comparable to the package proposed for rainfed agriculture
J management smallholders
Subscheme b (8500 Ha)
□ cropping patterns : sugar cane
C cropping intensity: 100%
□ input package: specific from the Awash Valley and in accordance with international practices
□ management smallholders, possibly in association with commercial estate
Subscheme c (17000 Ha)
L cropping patterns sugar cane
□ cropping intensity: 100 %
input package specific from the Awash Valley and in accordance with international practices
management commercial estate
Subscheme d (17000 Has)
\ 1 cropping patterns cotton, maize, green fodder
Z cropping intensity: 165 %
17 input package comparable to the package proposed for rainfed agriculture
□ management smallholders
TAMS-IJLG Baro-Akobo Riser Basin Integrated Development Master Plan
3E - 18SOCIO-ECONOMIC
A.NNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
The capital costs are derived from rhe irrigation schemes costing method in Annex 1H. The recurrent costs are calculated at the rate of 0.5 % of the cost of the civil works and oi 1 3 % of the cost of the irrigation development (downstream).
Crop budgets have been established for each of the selected crops, according to the general method presented in the introduction It includes estimates of the gross value of production and all production costs eg, seeds and planting material, fertilisers, insecticides and pesticides, labour, oxen ploughing and machinery for sugar cane commercial estate
Detailed crop budget tables are presented in Appendix 5 (Table 1 to 9)
In order to calculate an incremental net economic benefit stream, cropping patterns have been applied to the economic crop budgets to build up the appropriate crop models and the derived net benefits This is reflected tn Appendix 6, Crop models (Table 1 to 9).
Then, capital and recurrent costs, expressed in economic terms, have been deducted from the economic benefits.
This exercise has been repealed for each project and for each scheme in project No. 3
It should be noted that, for project No 3 Bare RBfltang, a specific agricultural development stream has been prepared to reflect the necessity of building a sugar factor) (time constraints) and the need for developing a positive net economic benefit from different crops that all are far io be highly profitable in irrigated conditions (profitability constraints). This schedule is presented in figure 4
5.3.3. /tesufts
The EIRR for the Master Plan proposed projects is estimated respectively at 1 I 4% for
Project No 1. 10 0% for Project No 2, and 12 6% for Project No 3 over a 40 year period
This is below the threshold rate of 14 percent generally assumed for agricultural projects in
Ethiopia
But the following should be considered
- international standard costs have been applied to the different schemes , when adjusted costs to local contractors prices arc applied, a decrease of 25 % in capital cost can be considered
- costs of irrigation schemes include all preliminaries, from prefeasibility study to tender process, this represents 20% of the capital cost
TAMS ULGBaro-Ahcbo River Basin [mefiraffid Development Master Plln
3E - 19SOCIO-ECONOMIC
ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALy^
5.4 Agro-industry
5.4.1 Commercial Sugarcane and Eth anol Plant
Introduction
The Baro-Akobo River Basin has a considerable area of land which is suitable for sugar-cane cultivation This area can be developed to feed a phased development of sugar factories, Two phases are recommended due to resource constrains and considering the high level of economies of scale in the sugar technology industry
The minimum capacity plant available is for processing about 4.500 tonnes of cane per day The sugar yield from such a plant would be about i 00,000 tonnes of refined white sugar, operating continuously for a period of 192 days per year
Considering the very low per capita consumption of sugar in Ethiopia, currently slightly ever 3 kg, additional sugar factories would be required even after the Fincha plant starts lull production At that time the per capita consumption should have increased to about 5 kg
As the country’s population is increasing at about 3 % per year, the per capita consumption of sugar would have to decline over the next few years. In order to augment the shortage, a phased programme of establishing sugar factories could be justified
Accordingly, about 7,000 hectares of land, sufficient to feed a sugar factory' slightly bigger than the Fincha plant can be planned Allowing a period of about 3 years for detailed project formulation, approval and finance mobilisation, developing the sugar estate (field development) can start after 3-4 years. The canc plantation could be made ready 3-4 year? after planting by which time the factory could be ready to go into production The civil works part of the factory can start some 2 years earlier and erection of the production machinery 6 - 9 months before that
The second phase of development of the estate for a similar capacity plant could then be planned taking into account the gap between the supply of and the demand for susar at that time This is necessary because there could be other projects in the planning stage, elsewhere in the country'.
A scheme layout for the development of a factory, with a maximum cane crushing capacity o- 4,000 tonnes cane per day ls provided in the following paragraphs.
TAMS-ULGBtroAkobo Riw B«in lm rat^Devdopm
e£
eilt Master Plan
3E-2HSOCIO-ECONOMIC ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS 5’tr^flr Factory Infrastructural and Field Development
Sugar Factory and Ethanol Plant
Factory capacity- TCD (tonnes cane per day )
Actual Operating days
Total tonnes cane per annum
Recovcry/yield (commercial sugar on cane)
Average annual sugar production ( tonnes)
.Average annual molasses production. 4.2% on cane (tonnest Average ethanol production, 26.8% on molasses, (cubic meter)
Actual operating days of ethanol plant Actual ethanol production per day (litres)
Plantation details
4,500 864,000
11 5% 99,360 j6,288
9,725
200
48,625
Commercial cane
Plant cane
1 st ratoon 
2nd ratoon
3rd ratoon
Nursery cane
1 st ratoon
2nd ratoon
Total area under cane, (hectares)
Irrigation details
Estimated cane age (months)
22
15
15
19
15
7,000
Maximum monthly irrigation requirement ApnLMay (mm) 300
Maximum daily irrigation requirement (mm) Gross application rate (l/sec/ha)
Infrastructure
No of towns No of villages
jq C
.
Approximate No of employees
Total for villages
Total
Main town
Per village
I
6
2,000 800
4.800
6.800
TAMS LLC Baro-Akobn River Basin lnttK7u ,]
e Development Master Plan
3E -2|SOCIO-ECONOMIC
ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL
Roads - Approximate length Primary haulage (km)
20
Secondary haulage (km) 40
Escarpment road
5
Secondary' roads. (Town) 15
Power Supply
Total estimated peak demand in
Town
28
megawatts
Villages
1.0
Pump stations
2.4
Factory
32
Total
Capital Investment Cost ('000 USS)
9.4
Local
Foreign
Total
Agricultural Development
Wheel tractors
1,700
1,700
Harvest tractors
3.450
3,450
Trailers
500
500
Cultivation equipment
300
300
Vehicles
3,300
3,300
Workshop equipment
2,500
2,500
Heavy construction equipment
2,950
2.950
Cane load / transport equipment
6,200
6,200
Fuel storage tanks
500
500
Nursery exploration equipment
450
450
Land clearing
1,200
700
1,900
Land preparation
600
600
1,200
State farm costs
1,700
1,700
Total
3,500
23.150
26,650
Irrigation Development
Irrigation civil works 
10,550
14,050
24,600
irrigation pumps
20.250
20,250
Imgation field equipment
24.000
Ocean freight
24.000
5,400
Total
5.400
15,950
58,300
74,250
TAMS-ULG Baro-Akobo Rher Basin
3E-22
Mancr PkllSOCIO-ECONOMIC
Infrastructure Development
Infrastructure civil works Materials for infrast civil works Light construction equipment Electrical distribution networks Electrical net work installation Water treatment
Office fumiture/equipment
ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
33,650
1,150
1.500
1,680
Total
37,980
21.170
Sugar Factory & Ethanol Plant
Factory
[7,280
69,120
Cane yari'mills
14,200
Total
3.000
83,320
Project Sen ices
Internal transporvstarage
15.000
insurance 510 Project management services
1,400 35,050 6,000 6,000
750 750 11.700 11,700
1,150 1,500
1,320 3,000
59.150
86,400
14,200
100,600
15,000 1,390 1.900
13,800 13.800
Vehicles for PMS 600 600
Equipment for PM office 350 350
Training
Consultancy
Total Capital Investment Cost 92.500
2.280
17,790
720 3,000
2,250 2.250
19,110 36.900
205,050 297.550
Operating Costs to First Cropping Year ('000 OSS)
Cane Harvesting and Transport Agriculture
Irrigation
factory
Infrastructure
1 4.6 Overhead
Total Operating Cost
1,050
350 1,400
5,500 2,250 7,750
1,850
2,900
1.650
800 2,650
700 3.600
250 1,900
8,400 2.400 10,800 21450 6.750 28,100
5.4.1.5 Iota! Project Cost to First Cropping Year C000 USSj
Capital Investment (net) Operating Expenditure Incremental Working Capital Financial Costs
Total Project Costs
92,500 205 050
21,350 6,750
25,900
900
9,000 19,000 148,750 238,450
297,550 28,100 26,800 28,000
380.450
TAMS-ULG Bar^Akobo River Basin InteRratr.i Dev elopment Master PI..7SOCIO-ECONOMIC
ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
5.4.2 Small Scale Industrial Development
Introduction
Any small-scale non-farm private economic activ ity pursued for commercial business reasons as a source of full or partial income and employment is considered as Small-Scale Economic activity (SSE). Examples include grain and oil mills and cane crushers
For several years, many attempts have been made to promote income-generating small-scale enterprises, but many of these schemes have been without adequate financing N’ot surprisingly, there has been failures because they did not have the capital to start the income generating activity Furthermore, there have been no policies that encourage private enterprises However with the present policy of the government to pursue the free market economy, promotion of small-scale industries is on the increase This will require an appropriate financial mechanism Small short-term working capital loans and medium term investment loans are the recommended mechanisms that could enhance the promotion of rural small-scale enterprises .As producers build up their amount of working capital they are encouraged to graduate to a higher level of credit, i.e to a larger income generating activity
The project area is under-developed, as many of the inhabitants live on a subsistence farming level Except for some scattered small flour mills, bakeries, and other small handicrafts, there are virtually no small scale industries in the project area
The present economy of the region is based mainly on agriculture The rural economy of the region mainly consists of mixed cropping and animal husbandry In addition fishing and hunting are practised to a significant extent Organised or commercial farm activity was earlier limited to one state farm Organised non-farm activity is not apparent A number of rural households are, however, said to engage in pottery and basket weaving For lack of data the significance of such activities could not be measured Compared to the farm activities, however, they may be negligible, at least as a primary activity
An inventory of economic activities in the project area reveals that the most dominant activity appears to be trade A recent survey in the project area has revealed that there are 6.973 retailers, 1,381 wholesale activities and 1,785 engaged in services Most of these are small traders with only two to three persons engaged in each activity
The survey conducted also showed that the project area has 265 small grain mills, 4 small conventional coffee pulpers, 13 coffee hullers, 30 small carpentry shops, 28 bakeries, and 3 oil mills, 2 in Asosa and 1 in Gimbi
The manufacture of the most basic urban goods is limited in the project area The remote
location of the region provides a favourable environment for locally produced goods The
market factor would improve with a growing population and increasing standard of living
the people
The number and size of small scale rural enterprises under consideration for the project are’ depends on many factors such as target groups, the number of households and the existing
TAMS-ULG Baro-Akobo River Batin Integrated Development Master Plan
3E-24SOCIO-ECONOMIC
ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
small scale enterprises. The availability of markets for the locally manufactured products, together with the availability of raw materials and inputs are also crucial factors
SSE in t/u* Project Area
The identification, based on the rather limited favourable conditions, discussed above is tentative At this stage, the basis for identification of small scale industries arc
• consumption and intermediate goods needed within the project area;
• local resource based, for basic (agricultural) raw materials.
Thus the products identified and proposed for possible manufacture by small-scale agro industries in the project area (with particular emphasis on food production) are those for which value added can be gained by local processing Al the same time items for local consumption would be produced and sold in the local markets and farmers would be able to take advantage of being able to sell their produce at local level thereby greatly promoting the trade activity in the project area The small-scale private agro industries recommended for the project area are described in the following paragraphs Technical details concerning project profiles, cost estimates and viability are provided in Appendix 12 Project Profile - Flour Mill, Appendix 13 Project Profile - Oilseeds Mill, Appendix 14 - Mini Sugar Plant
Cereals (flour) Milling
The main cereals that are cultivated in the project area are maize sorghum, barley, and wheat
It is recommended that for small scale milling, a machine with a throughput of 0 75 to I 5
tonne per hour is appropriate It is also envisaged that the milling machine would operate an
average working day of 10 hours The milling machines available are electrically or diesel
driven; final selection would depend on the type of power supply in the basin
Oilseeds Milling
Several varieties of oilseed bearing crops have been identified in the project area These are groundnuts, niger, safflower sesame, soybeans, and sunflowers seed Two products are obtained from processing these oilseeds; vegetable oil for human consumption and protein rich oil cake for cattle and poultry feed
It can be fairly stated that the processing results in terms of oil yield are not as high as those obtained from a fully equipped, large capacity oil mil! This is largely due to the exclusion of front-end preparation of the oilseeds This includes rolling and heat preconditioning prior to pressing, However, acceptable economic results are achieved by mini-mills and thev would certainly contribute to an added value to the oilseeds. It would provide a ready local market
There are a number of mitli-rr.ills available in the international as well as in the local markets which would be appropriate for, and acceptable to, the local processor.
TA.MS-ULG Baro-Akobq River Basin Intcgraied Development Maste^P
3E - 25
«°-r 4,SOCIO-ECONOMIC
ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANaLYs^
Sugar cane is planted at both large and medium scale in the project area It has been estimated
•hat the project area warrants the establishment of at least one large-scale sugar and ethanol plant with a capacity of 4,500 tonnes cane per day However for the small farmers, small, scale cane crushers with capacities from I to 5 tonnes of cane per hour are available In these crushers, the raw cane is fed into the crusher manually and juice collected in containers as it leaves the presses This juice syrup is crystallised by heating in locally made pans over an open fire to produce crude sugar
The crude sugar produced is used in the brewing of tej (local wine) as a substitute or supplement to honey (Honey is the major ingredient in the making of tej). The crude sugar is dark brown in colour and is also used for human consumption in the preparation of cakes Some people prefer crude brown sugar to refined white sugar for its unique flavour
The suear cane crushers, designed to work at 5 to 10 HP, are quite economical to the farmers having small acreage of sugarcane Sugar extracted from this type of crusher is of the order of 7% on cane, with a mill extraction of 60 to 65%
The empty cane or bagasse thus produced can be utilised for animal feed and also for fuel Further details with cost estimate and profitability are provided in below.
TAMS-ULG Baro-Akobo River Basin
JE-26SOCIO-ECONOMIC
ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
MULTIPURPOSE PROJECTS
6.1 General
Within the Baro-Akobo basin, the proposed reservoirs have pn manly been considered as hydropower. irrigation or flood control single purpose projects However the both tne multipurpose use of single projects and the conjunctive use of groups of single purpose projects has also been analysed in Section 6 of Annex IE In addition secondan benefits, such as fisheries, leisure and tourism can be derived from ail reservoirs
6.2 Dual Purpose Use
6.2.1 Irrigation and hydropower
Reservoir operation studies have been carried out for the two reservoirs that have the potential to provide regulated flows for both irrigation and hydropower, Gilo 1 and Gambela Of these Gilo 1 yields only an internal rate of return of 3% as a hydropower project and did not survive the initial screening as an irrigation project: as a dual purpose project it is uneconomic Gambela was eliminated in the initial cost screening as both an irrigation and a hydropower dam and is similarly uneconomic as a dual purpose project
6.2.2 Hydropower and flood control
The only reservoir that has a sufficiently large capacity to function as a flood control reservoir is the TAMS reservoir which, as a single purpose hydropower project, yields a return of just 7% Reservoir operation studies of the TAMS reservoir show that the penalty for using the reservoir for flood protection is a reduction of annual energy generated by 700 GWh, a loss of 13% ot its single purpose benefit. -Although it is not possible to quantify the benefit due to flood protection, it is very unlikely to equal the value of the energy foregone, equal to Birr 250 million a year.
6.3 Conjunctive Use
The conjunctive use of hydropower and irrigation projects has also been examined with the reservoir operation model. In pardcular the model shows that the best two medium scale hydro schemes. Geba and Baro provide sufficient regulated dry season releases for the best irrigation scheme without the need for Itang dam This would save the cost of the Itang dam less the cost oi the gravity intake and supply canal, a net saving of over USS 45 million, or 11Z6 of the Lota! capital cost. This would increase the internal rate of return of the liana scheme by i .8% from 12.6% to 14.4%
TAMS-VLG Baro-.Akobo Rher Basin integrated Development Masur Plan
3E-27SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALyS|
6.4 Secondary benefits
Most reservoirs also may generate other, secondary benefits, which could include leisure and fisheries 
0Ur’srn
j
The issue of tourism is hard to quantify financially Apart from safety considerations during periods of low water level, there is no reason why a reservoir should not be used fOr recreation purposes
Fishing should certainly be developed should any project be completed (as discussed in the Fisheries Annex 2K) The issue of fishing will have no influence on whether a scheme is to go ahead or not, but will certainly be a desirable secondary benefit if it does It should be examined during any feasibility study
Water supply requirements are small in comparison with available resources and can be met from run of river supplies (even dry season flows) or from groundwater supplies There is therefore no benefit from using the reservoirs for water supply, it is not that they may not be used, it is that it is not economic to do so, nor likely to be
TAMS-ULG Barn Aknbo River Bajjn
Integrated Devdopment Master Plan
3E -28SOCIO-ECONOMIC
ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL AN ALA SIS
7. ENVIRONMENT AND CATCHMENT PROTECTION
Implementation of the Master Plan is not without nsk to the landscape.
results from over-exploitation of soil and vegetation and tne use of unsuitable tarmin=
methods This chapter discusses land degradation and the means for its control.
7.1 Scope
The technical recommendations that follow result from a prefeasibility assessment of published information While they rely upon principles of agronomic, engineering, and silvicultural practice, thev are not suitable for design As such, they would require adjustment-using information from on-site investigations of soil, climate, and vegetation Ideally, this could be done by the Soil Conservation Project (Ministry of Agricultural working with the University of Bern) working with its collaborating agencies.
7.2 Catchment Degradation: the Problem
Only part of the problem of catchment degradation is technical. For technical solutions to be effective, they require a suitable legislative and policy base This extends beyond the bounds of the Master Plan area and is national in scope.
7.2.1 National issues: policy and strategy
Awareness of the dangers and consequences of soil erosion and land degradation developed as a result of major crop failures during 1973-74, 1984-85, 1987-88 and 1990-91, the worst occurring during 1984-85 Recurrent drought in northern Ethiopia and low yields caused food production to lag behind the rate of population growth. Cereal imports, mostly in the form of food aid, fluctuated between 500,000 and 800,000 tons per year in the late 1980s and early 1990s The 1973-74 drought provoked concern about environmental degradation in Ethiopia’s central highlands
The magnitude of annual soil loss in Ethiopia is currently estimated to be between 1.5 to 2 0 billion tons Its consequence is a productivity decline of about 1 per cent per annum. In the highlands alone, 27 5 million hectares of soils are said to show significant signs of accelerated erosion. Sustainable land use would require that 6 million hectares of seriously affected soils be completely withdrawn from agricultural production and reforested; another 8 5 million hectares should rover: to permanent pasture.
Part of the problem relates to how people view their land Proclamation No. 31 of 1975 made all rural land a "Public Property". Among its clauses it granted the free use of land to all who wanted to become farmers Although it granted usufruct, the security of holding, right of transfer to a third party, and conditions of land use were not clearly spelt out As a result land reallocation and fragmentation of holdings became serious problems. Furthermore conflicts among different types of land uses such as forestry, state farms, settlement, and livestock became serious problems,
TAMS-ULG Bai-o-Akobo River Basin Inte-mied Development Manter Plan
3E-29SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL AN*^
Proclamation No 192 of 1980 has no provisions for the development of private fOre \ccordmn to this proclamation, there can only be either state forests or community forests .4. a result of this, there has been no private forest development during the last 13 years. The assumption that this proclamation made (that the demand for national forest products can be met only through the community and state efforts) was inappropriate, and led to large-scale deforestation with almost no plantation development Ethiopia's current economic situation requires that large-scale forest development comes through combined private initiative and state efforts Because of the numerous uncertainties regarding communal holdings, community participation has been very low in the Master Plan area and, indeed, throughout Ethiopia Despite government's best efforts, land use in the Master Plan area lacks control
7.2.2 Soil erosion
Land degradation occurs in various forms throughout the project area water-caused soil erosion, chemical degradation (leaching of bases), physical degradation (loss of beneficial soil properties such as porosity), and biological degradation (loss of humus) Each of these poses a potent risk to food production, taken together, they threaten agriculture and the benefits of the many projects this master plan is charged with assessing
Factors that contribute to potentially high rates of land degradation include
□ high rainfalL
a high proportion of sloping lands, and
- a propensity on the part of most farmers, acting out of ignorance, to misuse iand
In contrast with many areas in Ethiopia, however, land degradation appears to be neither visually destructive nor spectacular gullies are rare, soils appear to be deep, and crops appear to grow reasonably well This belies the fact of diminishing soil fertility as one of the principal reasons that fanners shift their crops from one field to another and employ fallow, albeit often ineffectively, as components of their cultural practices
Soil erosion reduces plant productivity by decreasing soil depth, thereby reducing the capacity of soils to store water for plant use, and by selectively removing clays and other fines that adsorb soil nutrients essential to plar.t processes Soil erosion is a natural process ft becomes important to man only when soil is removed at a rate faster than it is produced In the humid uplands of the project area, weathering of basalts and granites will probably produce soil at a rate of about 20t/ha/a In the lowlands west of Gambela, soil production is probably about 6-8t/ha/a. Ln contrast, the erosion of upland fields laid bare by farming would vary' between 20 and 100t/ha/a Soil conservation practices are part of the answer, but these are unlikely to be technically effective and financially affordable on land slopes greater than about 18 percent, alternative forms of land use are another, and probably much larger , Par: of the answer
‘ Soil losses have been measured at Dizi Research Statton on soils typical of Nitisols found in the project area The site was only recently cleared of its original forest cover however, and is unlikely to be representative of locations farmed for many years
TAMS-ULGBaro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Master Plan
3E-30SOCIO-ECONO
MIC
ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANAL> SIS
7.2 J 
rw/ion
Soil erosion produces sediment It also produces runoff, and the two combined can be instrumental in changing the landscape Ln this Master Plan, sediment transport is important because of its influence upon potential reservoirs and the morphology of the lower basin.
The larger the basin, the greater the opportunity for sediment to become entrapped Known as sediment delivery4 ratio, the ratio is inversely proportional to basin size In the absence of other information, it is taken to vary with basin area to the -0 125 exponent.
If population pressure and lard use are to expand in the Master Plan area, their ramifications will extend to downstream reservoirs and the morphology of the lower basin The usual response to an increase of sediment load or discharge is an expansion of channel w idth. Ln the upper basin channel widths are largely controlled by topography Even so* bank cutting and collapse will contribute large-sized sediment directly into channels Accumulations ot boulders, cobbles, and gravels will expand into reservoir inlets to form deltas; clays will eventually settle, migrate, or flow towards the dam face. There are no salts such as calcium present that will cause clay flocculation and settlement.
Deltaswill expand in three directions The greatest expansion initially will be into the reservoir They will also gain elevation, particularly as phreatic vegetation takes root on their surface where ii entraps large-sized material In so doing, the delta will expand up and into the channel of the inlet, increasing the frequency of flooding near the reservoir as the channel loses its capacity
Where reservoirs have side bays formed from large tributaries, these will also develop deltas that expand into the reservoir On narrow reservoirs with large secondary tributaries, deltas could cut the reservoir into two portions, upper and lower, which isolate the upper portion from control by the dam
Lower basin channel widths and meanders will also react to changes in sediment concentration and discharge. Their effects will be unpredictable and damaging.
7.3 Available Data
Dau abou! the Master Plan area result principally from the studies bv Selkhozprornexport <1988 and 1990) and ARDCQ-GEOSERV (1995) These have been expanded where the terms of rhe contract permit The SotJ Conservation Project (Ministry of Agricultural work i rm
’he University of Bern) operates a runoff station near Dizi. for which it periodically publishes its results 
73.1 Farming systems
The project area contains five principal farming systems This chapter is concerned only with farms that occupy land where slope is a factor, that is to say soils located eastward of about
ongttude j4 E, it assumes soil erosion is not a factor on flat lands that are inundated for part
Sediment yield is expressed as annual kilometre, soil loss is expressed as annual
mass per unit area, usually metric tonnes mass per hectare or acre
per square
TAMS-LLC Baro-AJwbo River Basin Integrated Development Master Plan
3E-31SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL
of the year There are other forms of land degradation, but this chapter concentrates an
erosion.
Volume II. Chapter 5 describes the fanning systems of the Master Plan area, and its text is
be repeated here other than as a brief summan- Soil erosion is important on four farming
systems, the Sth system (4N) of the Master Plan is a pastoral transhumant system belonging
the lowland plains of the savannah
System IB, which lies in a band across the upper half of the Master Plan area, is a cereals farming type gram plough complex practised by the Welega Between February and July, sorghum and maize are grown under irrigation on extensively cultivated bottomlands Coffee is grown between 1200 and 1500 metres under remnant forest, teff dominates the cereal mi* with sorghum and field peas between 1700 and 2400 metres, wheat and barley grow betweer, 2400 and 2900 metres, with barley and horsebean above 2900 m Livestock are used for draught power
System 2C, which lies in the lower southeast of the Master Plan area, is dominated by tubers such as the eitseie root complex system It belongs almost completely to the Cushite speaking peoples of Ethiopia’s highlands between elevations of 1600 and 2300 metres. The system is made up principally of yams and taros interplanted with coffee, chat, and cabbage, maize and sorghum are included in the crop mix near homestead After two cultivation cycles the field is fallowed for 1-3 years. Livestock play a very minor role. Terracing, irrigation, and manuring arc unknown
System 2D, which lies along a broad band between 2C and IB, is an ensete system dominated by cereals It is practised by the lima group of Oromo people in Illubabor and Kefa. Teff dominates the cereal mix with maize, sorghum, finger millet, wheat, and barley as minor crops, lentil, chickpea, and taro complement the mix. Homestead gardens include ensete, galla potato, sweet potato, yam, and vegetables. The main cash crop is coffee. Animal traction plays an important part of land preparation. Despite the presence of draught animals, farm household size is less than one hectare.
Systems 3A, 3B, and 3Mc are components of shifting recessional agriculture dominated by sorghum Practised by the Anuak, Berta, and Mekam peoples, their respective crop mixes include maize, beans and sorghum, teff and chickpea, and sorghum, beans, tobacco, coriander and coffee Tsetse precludes the use of oxen. The system occupies a broad band that splits the Master Plan area north to south, and comprises alluvial terraces adjacent major rivers.
7.3.2 Soil and land resources
The mapping scale assigned to this Master Plan is insufficient for other than a fs*
generalities that can be gleaned from soil order according to the FAO soil legend and front
slope System IB is made up of rolling and hilly land with soils weathered in situ having - cambic (slightly altered) horizon, equivalent to an Inceptisol in Soil Taxonomy. The soils probably shallow with rapid productivity losses once the depth of the carnbic horizon is reduced. The gradient of the terrain would make the landscape susceptible to rill erosion, gullies might form where runoff concentrated. Subsurface drainage between the overlyh’S
soil and its parent material could be important. The base rock is probably decayed basalt-
which case the rate of soil formation could be fairly rapid When exposed by terraces °r
ditches, however, it would indurate and become unproductive
TA.MSrt.ILG Barn-Akobo River Ba Hn Integrated Development Master Plan ~~
3E-32SOCIO-ECONOMIC
ANNEX-3E economic and ftnancjal analysis
System 2C contains undulating and rolling lands made up of soils similar to those described
in the preceding paratiraph, but dominated by a much larger group, tne Nitosols, which are
broadlv equivalent to Ultisols in Soil Taxonomy The divisions between Nitosols and
Ferralsols might be slim in some areas, and these would have to be examined on the ground
to be certain Cambisms would carry many of the same characteristics described under IB
The Nitosols, which are deep and reddish, have an illuviation of clays that would provide an
unsuitable agricultural surface if exposed by bench terraces or soil erosion Yield
compensations between cut and fill prisms may not entirely balance, particularly it the bench
were to become waterlogged
System 2D comprises poorly drained Gieysols and Luvisols fEntisols in Soil Taxonomy)
located on flat and undulating lands on the eastern edge of the Master Plan area
Waterlogging and soil erosion are serious risks with these soils, but they car. be highly 
productive if drained
System 3A, 3B. and 3Me, as indicated by the soils map, contain Nitosols and Cambisols similar to those of 2C There are also depositional soils present that make up the alluvial terraces farmed by these groups, but these are not visible on the mapping scale available to this study.
7. J. 3 Soil degradation
Table 9 Soil losses for different treatments
Treatment
Soil loss (t/lm/a
Grain (control)
5 06
Grass strip
1 48
Graded Fanya Juu
0.46
Graded bund
0 66
Level Fanya Juu
0.76
Level bund
0.18
Source: Personal comitiunicauoa Soil Conservation Research Project.
Addis Ababa.
Hagmann, in a soil survey of Dizi published in 1991. observed a soil that had lost approximately 30 cm of depth following 30 years of continuous agriculture Recent research by the Soil Conservation Research Project measured soil losses corresponding to 5 treatments and I control (Table 9) While the data give an indication of soil losses for different treatments, they nonetheless arc remiss because they fail to provide a runoff parcel in bare fallow needed to extrapolate data to other sites (see Lal, 1988). The soil losses given in Table 9 are much less than those observed by Hagmann The disparity may result from the location of the research plot on land recently cleared from forest, whereas that surveyed by Hagmann had already undergone cultivation for a lengthy period
Structural and mechanical soil conservation, implemented to control the tractive shear of ox er and flow, cause a reduction of cultivated area because they occupy a portion of the field witn grass strips, sione walls, or ditches In addition, methods such as fanya juu and level or
TAMS-ULGBaro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Dcvelopmem Master Plan
3E- 33SOCIO-ECONOMIC
v • v 
ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANai yS|$
A portion of the subsoil. which is less beneficial for plant 8n)M
the Kx<s of field area and exposure of subsoil, reduce crop yields There may
v ^nsadon from accumulated top soil at the head of a terrace nser or, in |0',
moisture storage, but this is usually less than would be expected frOtn»
SSn field The treatments listed in Table 9 all resulted in reductions of grain yield, varvm8
benreen 17 4 and 38.6 per cent These would change from year to year due to variables such
as the amount of ponding caused by level bunds or fanya juu
Soil conservation can be effective Where the risk of land degradation is great, howev r alternative land uses are may be called for Table 10 gives an indication of soil losses T’ tropical forests, coffee, and tea
Table 10 Soil losses for different land uses
Land use
Pnmary forest Woodland
Bare fallow
Coffee
Tea, year 1
Tea, year 2
Tea. year 3
Location Soil loss 
(t/ha/a
Kenya 0.09 Burundi 0-1 Burundi 173-880
Burundi 0-0.4
Brazil 1 79
Columbia 5.81
Kenya 161
Kenya 48 3 Kenya 1.23
Slope (per
cent)
♦
45-50
40
45-50
♦
♦
■
•
•
Reference
Dunne, 1978
Taupiac, 1983
Taupiac, 1983
Taupiac. 1983
Mitchell. 1965
Mitchell, 1965
Thomas, 1988
Thomas, 1988
Thomas, 1988
Sources See references cited * = slope unknown
7.3.4 Climate and rainfall erosivity
Table 11 Mean rainfall erosivities and annual rainfall, Master Plan area
System
IB
2C
2D
3A, 3B. 3ME
Erosivity’
(MJ/cm/ha/h)
300-500
500-700
700-900
300-700
Rainfall (mm)
1250-1750
2000
2000
1500-1750
Kraier, in 1988. computed a rainfall erosivity and iso-erodent map of Ethiopia, which sho"' erosivity values for the project area to vary between 300 and 900 MJ/cm/ha/h His wor shows that erosivity varies more or less directly with altitude. Table 11 lists average rainfa • depths and rainfall erosivities corresponding to the systems summarised above
TAMS-ULG Biro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Master Plan
3E-34SOCIO-ECONOMIC
ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
7.4 Specifics I ions
Table 12 Terrain and stope classes
Terrain
Flat
Undulating Rolling
Hilly
Steeply dissected Mountainous
Slope, (%)
<2
2-8
Relief, (range)
8-16
16-30 Moderate 3(X Moderate
30r Soil Profile Dtxrtjrlions
The recommendations that follow refer to land in terms of its terran features (Table 1_) rather than its slope Similarly, the farming system descriptions (Volume II, Chap 5) list lana capability class, which follow the U S Soil Conservation Service classification (Table 13)
Terraces, berms, ditches, waterways, spillways, and chutes tor soil conservation works a<e normally designed to convey runoff corresponding to the 2-vear 6-hour design storm This requires an analysis of design storm ffequency-depLh-duratioti, which has not been conducted for this Master Plan area Coefficients for evaluating frequency-depth-duration have been calculated for Kenya and Saudi .Arabia, however, and these have been extrapolated la Chad. Sudan, and Gojam. Ln the absence of better information, unit volumes and costs estimated by Halcrow in its study of the Rift Valley Lakes Basin (1992) arc applied
Table 13 SC3 land capability classifications
■-
Class
Suitable for arable cultivation
1
No risk, only good management necessary
II
Some risk., moderate conservation practices necessary
ni
Considerable risk, intensive conservation practices necessary
IV
Great risk, best for perennial vegetation and infrequent cultivation
Suitable for pasture, hayland, woodland and wildlife
V
No restriction
M
Moderate restriction in use required
vn
Severe restrictions in use required
vm
Suitable only for wildlife and recreation
Conveyances such as waterways and graded narrow-based terraces require velocities that are non-erosive but also self-cleaning In the general case, this would require an upper velocity of abour 0,60 m's Level tetTaces or berms are generally unsuitable for areas with ‘annual rainfe]] higher than 1,000 mnVa, where the problem is to evacuate excess rainfall rather than store it
TAMS-L'LG Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Develop mt at Master Pl*o
3E-35SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALySjs
Spacings of berms, ditches, and other hydraulic works must take into account fii.
practices Oxen for example, would find it difficult to turn in widths tighter than 5
horizontal.
7.5 Specific Methodology
A range of practices is required for the Master Plan area These include choice of land use (forestry, pasture, agriculture), choice of crop (some are unsuitable); and soil conservaticr. practice (where sustainability requires a specific practice). In each case our recommendation will be for the minimum expenditure required to stabilise land degradation
Areas needing soil conservation were identified in terms of their soil capability group (Table 13), which is listed for each farming system in Volume II Chapter 5 Two categories of land require no soil conservation practice:
(1) land capability group 1, and
(2) land allocation group 6, which is made up of seasonally flooded land
Land capability groups 5 and higher have been classified as foresi or catchment protection, portions of which would be suitable for controlled livestock use Lands in capability group ID and higher have been assigned to coffee, which is intercropped during its first 3 years with maize, sorghum, tcfT. pulses, or oilseed Ln general, terrain that is hilly is unsuitable for maize or sorghum unless extraordinary precautions are taken to control runoff, land other than flat or undulating is unsuitable for teff Some undulating land would require grass strips, land (hat is rolling would require bunds
Soil conservation assumes the farmer is the master of his land and will take measures to protect it The costs presented in this paper represent the worth of farm household labour, or by a group of farmers should they choose to organise their work among themselves, they are not costs preparatory to a soil conservation project
Table 14 Person-days labour
II Conservation work
Soil bund
Fanya juu
Broad-base terrace Bench terrace
J Grass strip ij Check dam i Cut-off drain
Person days/lon
0 70
200
150
375
0 16
1000
400
Sourer HaJaw and Partners 1992
The amount of work required to construct grass stops or bunds was computed bv dividing land slope (percent) by 20, which gives length in kilometres per hectare Table 14 gives the
number of person days required for unit lengths of different types of Mil
;
con ervat,on
construction.
TAMS-ULG Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Master Plan
3E-36SOCIOECONOMIC ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
The qualitv of data available to this Master Plan required analyses to be conducted in broad categories of land type These assume
3 Hat and most undulating terrain require no soil conservation practice other than
improved management.
□ some undulating lands require grass strips if they are to be planted to annual crops;
□ rolling terrain in annual crops require bunds; and
□ terrain steeper than rolling require perennial cropping such as cofFee or tea. catchment protection, or forestry
Using the above scheme, cropping widths between bunds would average about S m. between crass strips they would average about 20 m.
7.6 Catchment protection and its costs
The following recommendations and costs are presented in order of farming system They are provisional as they result from a review of published information, much of which is unrelated to the needs of agricultural engineering or soil conservation Table 15 gives the framework used to assign land uses and compute the cost of soil conserv ation The costs of catchment and forest protection are included within the institutional operating costs of forestry; land allocation costs, for example, installing coffee plantations, are given under agriculture
Ta hl c 15 L‘ n it costs: so il con sen at i on
! Terrain Method Km/ha ’ Person days 4 |
L
___________
Undulating Grass strip
Base Cost
("Birr/ha)<J)
Cost plus per j
cent w(Birr|j
0.27 4.32 21.6
21 60 ,|
Rollins Bunds
0.63
44 10 220.0
264 00
Hilly Terrace
1.18
177.00 885.0
1194.75 ,|
l/ Estimated as slope (per ccnt)'2O,
l * Per Halcrow, 1992, At 5 birr, person day,
Plus 20 per cent for waterways, 35 per cent for drop structures
Table 16 lists the results of land allocations and soil conservation practices identified for the Master Plan area The cost table (Table 17) lists the cost of erosion control and identifies land use allocations for each farming system. The total farm labour cost of soil conservation is 72 I million Birr (USS 11.54 million)
TAMS-L'LG Barft-Akobo River Basin [ntegrated Development Masicr PlanSOCIO-ECONOMIC
ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL
Table 16 Land allocations (hectares) for soil conservation
li Farmins svstem Land allocation Protection forest'
~■
Soil conservation
IB 2C
1 2D 3A 3B
(coffee)
119,600 57,200
108,900 85.500
catchment 154.800
Bunds GrassStnJ 64.500
89.600 30.900 540.500
843,100 24,000
228,370
Note Blanks mean no allocation within that farming system Lands allocated to lnfrastrucixt and lands requiring neither a use allocation nor a conservation treatment not included
TA MS-L LG Baro-Akobo Riter Birin Integrated Development Master PlanSOCIO-ECONOMIC ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS Table 17 Cost and allocation table
Fanning
system
Generalised Area (ha)
land
capability
Soil erosion
risk
Terrain Treatment Conservation , Costs (Birr)
IB AG 1 251.800 None I adulating
J
119,600 High Rolling Coffee
64.500 H High
Rolling | Bunds 17.028.000
Area IB Ag
435.‘)00
I
IB For 1
77,400
77.400
High Hilly Forest protection '
High Hilh Catchment
projection
1
__
Area IB For
154300
1
Total area B
590.700
2C Ag
1
487.900
None Undulating
3 57.200
Huhl Rolling
Coffee
- 1
30.900
High Rolling”]
Bunds
576.000
8.157.O00
L rI
. -
Area 2C Ag
2C For 6
—
89,600 | Moderate Mountainous '
Catchment
protection |
1
Total arra 2C
665.600
3B: As
1 96.00G
None
Undulating
1
Recession
14.500
None Flat
Unsuitable
128.100 None Undulating
Catchment
protection
Area 3B Ag
238.600
■B For
F 1 24.000
None
Rolling Woodland resent
Total arra JB
262.600
2D Ag
1
324.600 None Flat
1
2
228.370 Low
Undulating Grass strips 4 932.792
3
108.900 High
Rolling Coffee
Area 2D As
—
661.870
—
2D For
6
540,500
Moderate Mountainous Forest and
catchment
protection
r--------------------- 1
Total area 2D
1.202J70
JA Ag
1 74.200 None
Flat
3 159 000 High Rolling Bunds 41,976,000
- -
3 85.500 High Rolling Coffee
______ Recession 15.200
None
-A?a3A Ag
i
333,900
JA For 5
128.000
None Hilly Forest protection
—5
380.400 None Hilly Dense woodland -L I
6
3
304.300
Moderate Woodland resen e
Mountainous
. n
—.
1 ——
,
30.400
High Rolling Banana agro-
forestr.
Ar ajAFor
area
local cost
843.100 T--------------------
1.177.000 T-------------------
1
lA
I
11
72.094.392
Q,c Recession = land allocation rvpe 6 on the agronomic tables ci Vol II,
TA.MS-ULG Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Master Plan
3E-39SOCIO-ECONOMIC ---------L------------- -------------
4WTX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL AN*^
8. OTHER SECTORS
The economic analysis of the proposed road network can be found in Annex 3C, Econom,- Infrastructure, the economic analysis of the forest intervention are included in Annex 2E M(j of the livestock intervention in Annex 2L
f\MS-l'LG Baro-Alobo River Basin Integrated Development .Master Plan
3E --<0SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
9 REFERENCES
Dunne, T and L. Leopold 1978 Wafer tn Environmental Planning H Freeman San Francisco
Hagmann. J 1991. The soils of Dizt lllubabor. Soil Cons Res Proj, U Berne. Min Ag Eth Rep 18 136 pp
Halcrow and Partners 1992 Recontxnssance Master Plan for the Development of the Natural Resources of the Rift Valley Lakes Basin Addis Ababa.
Krauer, J 1988 Rainfall Erosivity and Isoerodenl Map of Ethiopia Soil Cons Res Proj , U Berne. Min Ag Eth Rep 15 132 pp.
Lal. R (ed) 1988 Soil Erosion Research Methods. Soil and Water Cons Soc .Ankeny Mitchell, HW 1965 Soil Erosion Losses in Coffee Tanganyika Coffee News Apr-Jun.
Thomas, D 1988. Conservation of Cropland Conservation Farming on Steep lands. Moldenhauer, W C and NW. Hudson, ec World Association of Soil and Water Conservation pp 141 * 149
Baro-Akobc River Basin Integrated Develapmem Master Plan
3E-41SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL a.\.u '
APPENDICES
TAMS-LLG Baro-Akobo River Basin Integra fed Development Master Pi^
JF-42APPENDIX 1 COMMODITIY PRICES AND PROJECTIONS
Figure 1 Maize Prices and Projections Figure 2 Sugar Prices and Projections Figure 3 Coffee Prices and Projections Figure 4 Cotton Prices and ProjectionsFigure 1 - Maize Prices and Projections
MAIZEand Projections
Figure
2 - Sugar Prices
SUGAR
YearsI
and projections
Figure
3-Coffee prices
GOCF^e
1004 
|
con EE
1970
1980 1985 1990 1992 199J 199*
1995 199ft 1997 1998 2QC0 2005
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030prices and Projections
Figure 4
- Cotton
COlTON
COTfON
1970 1900 WOO 1990 
1902 1993 199* 190* ’.996 1997 i«e 2000 
2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030
yearshAPPENDIX 2
RAINFED AGRICULTURE CROP BUDGETS
Table 1
Rainfed Crop Budget Maize
Table 2
Rainfed Crop Budget Sorghum
Table 3
Rainfed Crop Budget Teff
Table 4
Rainfed Crop Budget Rice
Table 5
Rainfed Crop Budget Pulses
Table 6
Rainfed Crop Budget Oilseeds
Table 7
Rainfed Crop Budget Bananas
Table 8
Rainfed Crop Budget Coffee
Table 9
Rainfed Crop Budget Cotton
Table 10
Rainfed Crop Budget Green FodderTable 1
TAMS ULG Baro Akobo River Basin Master Plan Rainfed Crop Budget
for MAIZE
EXISTING
TECHNOLOGY
NEW TECHNOLOGY
1 to 35
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4-35
--------elements
Units
production
INPUTS quantities Seeds
Fertilizers
Insecticides
Pesticides
Draught Animals Water Requirements
LABOUR
Total Labour
Kg/ha
Kg/ha Kg/ha Kg/ha Kg/ha
till/ha
Kg/ha man/days
1.280
1,500
1,800
2,000
4.000
30
-
•
3
30
50
-
3
30
75
2
3
30
100
3
3
25
120
3
4
75
75
100
100
100
REVENUE
Birr/ha
1,757
2,060
2,471
2,746
5,492
*PUT COSTS
Q-
^rtilizers
,n *«ctkides
p «Ucides
^ughl Animals ‘“’-total input costs Fut' Costs
Lab°to C08ts
^COSTS^
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
74
90
74
112
•
192
74
189
120
192
74
255
240
192
74
270
240
255
164
378
575
761
839
188
188
250
250 250
352
566
825
1,011
1,089Table 2
TAMS ULG Baro Akobo River Basin Master Plan Rainfed Crop Budget
for SORGHUM
EXISTING
TECHNOLOGY
NEW TECHNOLOGY
1 to 35
Year!
Year 2
Year 3
Year d.35"
ELEMENTS
PRODUCTION
INPUTS QUANTITIES
Seeds
Fertilizers
Insecticides
Pesticides
Draught Animals Water Requirements
LABOUR
Total Labour
Units
Kg/ha
Kfl/ha
Kg/ha Kg/ha Kg/ha
till/ha
Kg/ha man/days
970
1,000
1,400
1,600
15
-
3
25
50 '
-
3
25
75
2
3
25
100
3
3
25
120
3
4
75
75
100
100
100
REVENUE
Birr/ha
1.294
1,334
1,868
2.134
40
INPUT COSTS
Seeds
Fertilizers
Insecticides
Pesticides
Draught Animals Sub-total input costs
Fuel Costs
Labour costs
TOTAL COSTS
Birr/ ha Birr/ha Birr/ha Birr/ha Birr/ha
Birr/ha j Birr/ha Blrr/ha
28
-
-
-
90
47
112
-
-
192
47
169
120
-
192
47
225
240
*
192
118
351
528
704
47
270
240
25^
B1£
188
188
250
250
306
539
778
954
250
1.06£]TAMS ULG Bara Akobo River Basin Master Plan
Table 3
Rainfed Crop Budget
forTEFF
EXISTING
TECHNOLOGY
NEW TECHNOLOGY
1 to 35
Yearl
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4-35
ELEMENTS
Units
production
Kg/ha
650
800
900
1.000
2,300
inputs quantities
Seeds
Fertilizers
Insecticides
Kg /ha
Pesticides
Kg/ha
Kg/ha
Kg/ha
Draught Animals
tifl/ha
Kg/ha
25
-
5
35
100
5
30
90
5
30
80
5
25
60
5
Water Requirements
LABOUR
Total Labour
man/days
150
150
150
150
150
REVENUE
Birr/ha
692
852
953
1,065
2,450
INPUT COSTS
Seeds
Fertilizers
insecticides
Pesticides
^9ht Animals SuiMotal input costs Ft »< Costs
Llb°ur costs
SIJLCOSTS
Birr/ ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Blrr/ha
Birr/ha
Blrr/ha
76
-
319
107
225
319
92
202
319
92
180
319
76
135
319
395
651
613
591
530
375
375
375
375
375
770
1.025
988
966
905Table 4
TAMS ULG Baro Akobo River Basin Master Plan Rainfed Crop Budget
for RICE (Broadcasted)
EXISTING
TECHNOLOGY
NEW TECHNOLOGY
1 to 35
rear 1
Year 2
Year 3
ELEMENTS
PRODUCTION
INPUTS QUANTITIES
Seeds
Fertilizers
Insecticides
Pesticides
Draught Animals Water Requirements
LABOUR
Total Labour
Units Kg/ha
Kg/ha
Kg/ha
Kg/ha
Kg/ha
till/ha
Kg/ha man/days
YearTST
550
1.000
1,000
1.000
UN
80
150
150
150
150
3
3
3
3
100
100
100
100
100
REVENUE
Birr/ha
957
1,740
1.740
1,740
1.740
INPUT COSTS
Seeds
Fertilizers
Insecticides
Pesticides
Draught Animals Sub-total input costs Fuel Costs
Labour costs
TOTAL COSTS
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
136
255
255
255
255
191
191
191
191
191
327
446
446
446
446
250
250
250
250
250
577
696
696
696
69®JTable 5
TAMS ULG Baro Akobo River Basin Master Plan Rainfed Crop Budget
for PULSES
EXISTING
TECHNOLOGY
NEW TECHNOLOGY
1 to 35
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4-35
p-—elements
Units
production
mputs quantities
Seeds
Fertilizers
Insecticides
Pesticides Draught: Animals Waler Requirements
LABOUR
Total Labour
Kg/ha
Kg/ha Kg/ha Kg/ha Kg/ha
till/ha
Kg/ha man/days
450
540
550
780
900
50
-
4
50
75
4
50
80
4
50
85
4
50
100
4
55
80
80
80
80
revenue
Bi rr/ha
608
729
878
1,053
1,215
WPUT COSTS
Seeds
FtrtilizerB
insecticides
Pesticides
draught Animals ub l°tai input costs
Costs
^bour costs
^i^COSTS_________
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Sirr/ha
106
255
106
169
255
106
180
255
106
191
255
106
225
255
361
530
541
552
586
138
200
200
200
200
499
730
741
752
786Table 6 TAMS ULG Baro Akobo River Basin Master Plan Rainfed Crop Budget
for OILSEEDS
EXISTING
TECHNOLOGY
--------------
NEW TECF1NOLOGY
1 to 35
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year £35"
ELEMENTS
PRODUCTION
INPUTS QUANTITIES
Seeds
Fertilizers
Insecticides
Pesticides
Draught Animals Water Requirements
LABOUR
Total Labour
Units Kg/ha
Kg/ha
Kg/ha Kg/ha Kg/ha
till/ha
Kg/ha man/days
300
360
450
540
650
80
-
3
80
35
3
80
45
3
80
45
3
80
45
3
65
90
90
90
90
REVENUE
Birr/ha
405
486
607
729
822
INPUT COSTS
Seeds
Fertilizers
Insecticides
Pesticides
Draught Animals Sub-total input costs Fuel Costs
Labour costs
TOTAL COSTS
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Blrr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
136
-
•
191
136
79
-
191
136
101
191
136
101
-
191
136
101
240
1«
327
406
428
428
660
162
225
225
225
225
489
631
653
653
893TAMS ULG Baro Akobo River Basin Master Plan Rainfed Crop Budget
for BANANAS
EXISTING
TECHNOLOGY
NEW TECHNOLOGY
-
1 to 35
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4-35
M E NTS
9,000
15,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
INPUTS QUANTITIES
tacds
Fertilhters
Insecticides
pesticides
Draught Animals
labour
Family
C a usual
Total Labour
Units
Kg/ha
Kg/ha Kg/ha Kg/ha Kg/ha
till/ha
man/day man/day man/days
850
4
100
200
300
1,000
1,300
8I
3
4
100
200
300
1,300
8
3
4
100
200
300
1,300
8
3
4
100
200
300
1.300
8
3
4
100
200
300
REVENUE
Birr/ha
11,907
19.545
26.460
26,460
INPUT COSTS
Seeds
Fertilizers
insecticides
Pesticides
Draught Animals Sub‘lotal input costs
Family Labour
Labour
costs
S^lCOSTS
Birr/ha
Birr/ha Birr/ha Bin/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha Birr/ha Binr/ha Birr/ha
170
255
170
2.926
1.200
203
255
170
2,925
1,200
203
255
2,925
1.20O
203
255
2,925
1,200
203
255
425
4,753
4,753
4t553
4,563
250
800
250
800
250
800
250
800
250
800
1.050
1.050
1,050
1,050
1,050
1.475
5.803
5.803
5,633
5,633I
Table 8 TAMS ULG Baro Akobo River Basin Master Plan Rainfed Crop Budget
for COFFEE
EXISTING
TECHNOLOGY
NEW TECHNOLOGY
1 to 35
Year!
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4^T
ELEMENTS
PRODUCTION
INPUTS QUANTITIES
Seeds
Fertilizers
Insecticides
Pesticides
Draught Animals Water Requirements
LABOUR
Total Labour
Units Kg/ha
Kg/ha Kg/ha Kg/ha Kg/ha
till/ha
Kg/ha man/days
675
-
-
-
-
12
-
2,500
150
3
-
375
3
-
375
3
375
3
180
280
280
280
280
REVENUE
Birr/ha
2,571
-
-
-
2,805
INPUT COSTS
Seeds
Fertilizers
Insecticides
Pesticides
Draught Animals Sub-total input costs
Fuel Costs
Labour costs
TOTAL COSTS
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birc/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
-
425
338
600
844
600
844
600
844
600
-
1,363
1,444
1,444
1.444
450
450
450
450
450
450
1,813
1,894
1,894
1,894]Table 9
TAMS ULG Bare Akobo River Basin Master Plan Rainfed Crop Budget
for COTTON
EXISTING
TECHNOLOGY
NEW TECHNOLOGY
1 to 35
Year 1
ear 2
Year 3
Yaar 4-35
--------- ELEMENTS
pflODUv IM’
in pltts quantities
Seeds
Fertilizers
Insecticides
Pesticides
Draught Animals Water Requirements
labour
Tout Labour
Units
Kg/ha
Kg/ha Kg/ha Kg/ha Kg/ha tillfha KgJha
man/days
450
520
600 I
625
800
30
-
■■
-•
4
30
200
■
5
30
200
■
5
30
200
8
10
5
25
250
B0
20
5
150
160
150
150
150
REVENUE
Birr/ha
2.030
2.346
2,707
2.820
3,610
niPtrr costs
Seeds
Milas fe
insecticides
Pesticides
D ™ght Animals St Motal input costs
Wi,er Costs
Costs
^iUcsrs
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Blrr/tia
Birr/ha
Blrr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
102
w
255
102
450
319
102
450
1,209
675
319
102
450
1,200
1,350
319
85
562
1,200
1,350
319
" 357 I
871
2,746
3,421
3,516
375
375
375
375
375
732
1,246
3,121
3,796
3,891Table 10
TAMS ULG Baro Akobo River Basin Master Plan Rainfed Crop Budget
for GREEN FODDER
EXISTING
TECHNOLOGY
NEW TEC HNOLOGY
1 to 35
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
YearTJT
ELEMENTS
PRODUCTION
INPUTS QUANTITIES
Seeds
Fertilizers
Insecticides
Pesticides
Draught Animals Water Requirements
LABOUR
Total Labour
Units Kg/ha
Kg/ha
Kg/ha
Kg/ha
Kg/ha
till/ha
Kg/ha man/days
500
600
720
860
1,040
850
850
850
850
850
3
3
3
3
30
30
ad
30
REVENUE
Birr/ha
702
829
829
829
829
INPUT COSTS
Seeds
Fertilizers
Insecticides
Pesticides
Draught Animals Sub-total input costs Fuel Costs
Labour costs
TOTAL COSTS
Birr/ha Birr/ha Birr/ha Birr/ha Birr/ha
Birr/ha Birr/ha BirT/ha
638
638
638
638
638
64
191
191
191
191
702
829
829
829
S29
702
829
829
829
_ _ _ _ _ 829JAPPENDIX 3
rainfed agriculture crop production models
Table 1
Table 2
Rainfed Agriculture Crop Production Model for Maize
Rainfed Agriculture Crop Production Model for Sorghum
Table 3
Rainfed Agriculture Crop Production Model for Teff
Table 4
Rainfed Agriculture Crop Production Model for Rice
Table 5
Rainfed Agriculture Crop Production Model for Pulses
Table 6
Rainfed Agriculture Crop Production Model for Oilseeds
Table 7
Rainfed Agriculture Crop Production Model for Bananas
Table 8
Rainfed Agriculture Crop Production Model for Coffee
Table 9
Rainfed Agriculture Crop Production Model for Cotton
Table 10
Rainfed Agriculture Crop Production Model for Green FodderTablo 1 Ralnfed Agriculture - MAIZE Production Model
P»(J» 1 Qi 4
[ECONOMIC MODEL
III AR
IbtaaiRf □•••
«• • 'mpcnwad
I Haw U4»a_
IVIaM par ha
I _Sw» ’»tN fKM
___ i—— -
—
“— —~’l
2 ~ _ .1,030
Z ~ “207 000
r
t
~20T<>«0 P
_ __-_H_t._,_«1.-.7• 0tc0. .
1*31_r* 5*7* 7
177.200
747 413 120
711 511 440
105 24* ' 5,*f*
i
203 tlM 1*0 7
57.1*5
Jk.070
7 403 13 43*
1 5uo
TH in *70 220.51®
5«r®
9 3 7$* 4 OCf)
215,024 000
/*« 730 0Q0
TOTAL YIELD
TOTAL HECTARES
£<PUTHHIrr p«rK») _
__
Fom«<o<i
I YMarllC.vMl
I l‘C«Upd««
I I fcwjM Animal
244 cm 2 ♦'*0
nr oao
040,022 NKJ
242 *04
rwv
m; *sb u'jc 541,702 TO
-*»■ —— 757.*)4
7 4*1
Mjjr
400 37* ZW2 000 I
mn.’
107_‘ ’2__ 4 000
420 04*000
*33*1* »OO 277. .’CO
ll.-i.’.a
revenue
INPUT COST*
I %<**•
I ryr^>Z«il
I inMcIrAda*
I PoH«**o»
| Ut».I^N Artrr«4_________
ISmU ToU< input Com [revenue off ore labour
L rImxx Loll*
VuCOUL AFTER L ARrj»jRCQ61X
443 'Wj.M*
f»8O37 . MC
r
I
15 323*20
*70 29**0*
'*,4*1*72 3 *2* SM
1* JW 1*0
>3 ur 1 120
2 500 700 IB 301 *W
Ml,002.430 40 >34 D*4
320 720, MR
3WM£ 2501OJ13
417.240*17 | 45*3**20
371 000 531
1 423 *45
o!.; rat o*«
!4 *42«<M 1*20030
» 577,520
342* *45 40*73.131
MUI.’II 10) Mtur.Mrt
■jeo.3,n>sJabfe 1 Rafofed Agriculture - MAIZE Production Model
P»Q* 1 Crf 4
ECONOMIC MODEL
TFAR
2 lHlirig IUid
Lail 1-hti‘uvMl l%»
•Juw bna
ViBki per tui
5^»~<4UI ><-m
WM
______ r^ii
ton
>»n*
5,B?B
1*1,320
1,?*C
IM.MM fflJO '
POT
14F32Q
4 *r*
141 Ml
1 no
1W.IF2O 3M
141 J44 3 Orc
LM M* 11«0
i/ijfri mo
2,«r* 1J$3M
son
m MJ 1 ISO
iTO.ari Mw
2,01a 12? in
5,IM m.4tt i I'ua
i4?.s rj 4HU
___
toih
9) 5M
1 2H0
II It, 7 J* MO
120,1)51
5.UT* '
.
7 *51
134 300
4 OOP
S3 7 wj.ooa
__________ L
~2S 12D.&O2
S>1 V<<XXi
7« maid
nil
2*7.12* A 9 70
7.463 501 JOB
4000 845.073 0*0
141,2M 5.DFB
7W 1 M T07
e»a ati ggp
1*4,701 s sra
_ 7,403 lea m
4.-—
T$2 WOOD
i« 1 40 SOTO
1.4*3
SB
TOTAL TlELD
IQ'AL HECTJlftFS
NPUT&IHfrU p^tMh!
nav&nua
Elibili
I aitaljuri
lllMllfata*
Arjrn.il
111.4*4
5,6?B
xn.«n
1 J*J
1H JJ4 W
315.024
i»/a
I 4&1
3TO.W
4
| 104* AM M0
5 970 __ TO,St!
1 TBO
’J’ I,". V<
320.461
0/0
J 46)
wiMfc
__ 4 000 _W7 BO* Odd
f
3O2.01S
3MO75
517 JM
BOB SO QOO
r
n »a aw zw VS.001
V3CB TM92Q J3J«>4
12».0?F
wr «d
T 141 LrtlO cwo ’
JM.M.1
______ Ml MO _____ __ 5,47fl
_______ ST.MB _.i :k
lli.Vf» n<w
2M- M'
s.gjo
r mj
___ jM.ifci 4000
3.07* 130 OM 1.W W BOO
W 114
MfflMil
WJC.U11.120
’.Ip 120,431
1 2M IM 744 M,7ur*x
1 >1>
INPUT COSTS
Serui
* tb n'i
PtWbn
C* l j-jftl Anrr.il
■'-• Ti'iUl Inpul CMll
REVENUE' LiEFDRE LAjQCrJR
IW&kir Cutli
INI L>M|LMRI4LAhLRJH C I?* ’;
1 4*0.0* I 2!J
a 1 1 an u h,
t jrt 7 MOM
J* V*«24 ______ >4 J* UQ
4MSS.oy
i «n im& S0M4.H7)
21 Ml 412 3 8?*, *53
^MS^Tn
1 ?t?F
•l.UB.kjl
mii.ur* rts
1414*41)
•J mi fir
1.121,4*1.311 OH, 003.444
1 0&b DUDBOS
ifla.wc
S* rH 1JD
SIMM nil ' G>1
1 mnw 113 M J]*
1,111 w>4Qi
1 4/fi M< '
■'0 I ') 1103 ‘
1 M3.2H *13
?2.4r4 OFO i
1
1 170 TQT.IMS !
1
n ?»a m I 303 H«) n?
J.22*
i/»mi T ?,4Q4,«J
1 56B0rSS?£
JI ,'M *U0
_3.O2O 530
S< ATI IM
‘ 426WS |
1 CTI M2.C4H}
33 14) *00 1 IN BSD
5 fl O5ft 4M
14n>44 Hb»4TT —MrtVrw
r 4jj sis.an ____ F» 1*3 rr<«
I.W Mt
i mi am ij i
11,*2C CH*
1.M1.W.W*
*3 W) JOG |
’ jwsm ioi
1.41B.mo MtTablo 1 Ralnfed Agriculture - MAIZE Production Model
ECONOMIC MODEL
3 o<4
'EAR
2017 2.011
2*11
2.020 2.621 2022
2.023
2 024 2.025
2.02* 7,077
_
F.eliten^ Dai*
i * > i ai p - -«d Na
07 980
01 M4
75 006
0*032 63 656
57 6*0 61,704
4* 72*
M 752
5*?e
5 ira
5 970 5 ore 5 978 5678
» iaM pot ha
33 rze
*,*76
2.’ 60©
If *Or)
'•t>’6
1700
1 ?BO
1 7*0
Sutlolal
e|i»orM Hat larva
"npro^o^ Haeta,*!
Fajn Nat*
ijao 1 ?«0
1 240
& 076
45 72*
1 240
6,*76 » *76
1 290 1 210
1 26D 1
KM <27 520
96 771 240
01.12* *40 at ar*oao 73*30 400
08.141 120
54M1 *40
5C M2 560 43 733.260
35.5*4 030
27 914 770
2*6 7B0
8.070
2*2 219
5 970
205 AM 30*0*7 122 53*
362 *53 >r* 2*2
l.W*
5*7*
tacremartar
’ 3«*l '"ijwTrfd Im
3M 731
5 9M
7 403
7 403
5*rt
7 463
4*70 5*2*
1 *6) 7 4*5
335.975
5.97*
7.463
340 414
5 9T6
7 4*3
7 403 7.4*3
7.4*3
202.21 »
795 *54
30*017 322 536 135 175 149 414 M9-' 95 J
378 292
369 731
403 1 70
t «r* **• Na
4 000
4 OOO
4000 4 000 4.000 4 OOO
4 OOO
403.170
5*7*
7 401
4'«eoe
4 000
Subtotal «»V'*ved
TOTAL YWLD
TOTAL MEC TAMf B
lArf"JlS4B*rr par Na)
R««WK«
5aa*t
fartanor»
IrwclicjAx
PailicMet
1 v* •-•* ooo
___ i.iwenooo
4 doo 4,000 4 000 1 23C 104 000 1.290.144,000 1,343,900 000
i 3*7 4M OOO 1 461 412 DOO i y» •*• coo
’ 55a 024 000
* *12 690 OOO 1 866 43*000
1 273.303 520 17?* 410.740
^25 41* 4*0 1 371 LJ3 6*0
1.417 no 400 1.403,437 120
1,506.943*40
1 5M 060 560 1 002 167,2*0
1 *4* 2*4 000 1 «*4 >70720
3BB.77B
3 77 242
>44.705 397.160
>•*.*31
407 094
414 557
422 070
47* 4*3
4M *46
*44 400
L_____
5 4W
0,4*2
5 4*2 4 4*2 5 4*2
5 4*7
5 <12
62
s«;
5492
*-■ *92
02
270
*2
270
U *2
270 270
*2
270 270
02 02
62
270
240
240
UrwgN Arwna War
Lapojt
255
-
250
’ 693,2*0 *36 1 75G 506 Q42
240
ns
240
240 240 240
-
255 265 755
240
255
___ no
260
270
240
-
255
_ no
270
240
255
750
5 4*7
62
270
240
770
240
•
250
250
_____
REVEMUF
__________ ___________________ | INTUT COST*
5aad<
Fartaz»->
M 7*4
3.02* 830
73 *23 7M
) *2* 530
Jnwctddaa ________ P*»a«.Ua«
j au^* '’ Aim tn a1
Sub Total Input Cvati
RE VI HUE BCFOAE LAOQUW Labour C&»U
01 2*1 MO M 107 200
_________
3.420 M5 3 425 MS
---------------------------- 1
1 fl 11 904 14* 1,*63 2M >04
24 JIB ,762 >4 707.776
•3 02* 530 3,628.510 67 712 MO 70,*57 *?O
>42**45 1*3* 146
1,046.516 4*0
MOM 770
3 02 B 530
74,1*1.2*0
□ 426 *45
—
2 006 *25 *14
25,4*1 7*4
3624
77 400 640
3.42* *44
2«
-
250
--------- --
2 Oto 132 772
23,MO 754
3.628 510
HO634 coo
3 42* 946
2.130.43**79 2 1*9 747.0*4 2*271.752 ?O t<- 746
255
250
2 2*1 054 240
2 320.3*1 TM
3 62* 530
3.O2B53O
27 053 740
3 *28 MO 90,310.0*0^
1 426 MS
77 444.734
1428 530
W 535.440
3 42* Ml
T
• U 3 1O)
*5 4M 463
»• 104 817 102 721 171 106 117 825 100*51 17* 113 570 733
*3 fl'-9 3*0 *7.0*4.220
3.426 045 1 420 *49 117 1*0 587 *20 102.941
124 419 295
1.001.417 111 1 M1 10*526
—I
1.720,799 331 1 710.490,133 1*40 1*0*15
*5*97 542
**.<2**04
90 365 OCO
32.W1 !?• *4*37.5*0
INC: 0*87 AFTER LABOUR COSTS
1*10*71737 97 073 552
1515 575 105 1 572 9’• 7/0
1 630 414 ?»*•
,
1 697*0*605 1.745.343 344 1 602 79? Ml
1.051 502 539 201*253 341 2.076 *44 143 **310.114 I 10* 5*4 17* 1 03.7*2 636
1 MO 257 475 1 D17 706 M5 1 W/ft 161 50?
7.13*634 MS
106 31* WO 7.032 BM 045
12* 015 649
2 19* .325 7*7
iQ* 255 162
J <?ta. 070 585P »QO 4 Ot *
Table 1 Rain fed Agriculture • MAIZE Production Model
ECONOMIC MOO EL VtAk
>.en
j.in
----- ---- * I
i»i
OB72
3 806 |
sirs
5«m 1
3 MX
J 04Q ]
1 200 |
1 200 1
70 745 440 naaejeb
4.MO 440 ■
2 062 400 1
I
410 •©•
stro
7.401
430 044
S 070
443 4O7
_
5.4TB
4M 420 1
5.070 1
7 403
7 403
> 403 I
430 040
443 44/
4X &-'<!
4 TO 365 I
4 LOO
4X0
•*» L
4 OOO I
' Tt^ s,?.0Q0
1,027 704 OOO '
1
1 M1 4O0.CCCJ I
ioIm vao
1./40 in <ic
1 HA2 t>'AI OOO
1 470 7a/ OOO |
TOTAL MtLCIAKF*
bten
440 330
_
**» 7M
474 rat I
—
"5 4W
•3
220
>40
~2S5
240
5 443 _____ <2
3/0 __ 240
~”Z—
240
1—
|
0 402
270
“ 233
.I
----- 1
W
— — «| 170 I
_ >«•
355
MFVENUe iWI COOTB
____ ”0l_ 2 4»o.2iy404 |
|
— ,30 I
1 5ru SDQ CLM 1
- ----- =7= I
1*
--- I
___
20 4V TH
3 024 33C
1 I _ ■'>321* 4/r
mvENwr blfojw i ajjduh Labour Cam
*tCO»r MTtRLAIMXJB ccraia
___ UI.OMOOi
3 230 014 540 1*0.401 «J4
2 jotmtra'
wrap >3 __ 2 iv ror
iuw |
2,204 or®/
*
J 3,420 04 134 Ml 71
i I 2 3/r.mH
• 
114 M3 04
3 203 5S5 I
• __ 117 200.210 1
r.’1,
,-fv-Tabl. 2
a ,.
9 SORGnu„ 
Model
1
•7077
♦05.733 iDj.o/e 010
nsawj
I. <'-V.
01,2*. f
<2 C<M orxi
t. V DOO 703.897 000
105 77i coo
2Jt ooo y«o 147410
f« 023 020 ’
210 024 JOO 2.vr' too 230.*40 XX) 310.711 9X1
1)1 4M
153 334
2/1 OH 430
331427.004 3*14 W5 610
->34 j az?
474 071 TOO
_14 511 940 27 70 1 1’h ’89 434 220
MMfQM 143 LO ~ 174
‘A 100 060
70 0.10 475
33 S10.7K
3M WO 7M
29 48S.MQ
9 130 030
B4M.IM0
71 971 970
32 0/J 730
5.457 215
WH.U
I0 501 XO
23 007 4C5
735 5S3 674
31 045 K4 '
730474 H-Xl
4? 770 670
12 t 546 -JIWi
1? <74 776
M?OOD
44 303,010
340 340 0(17
34 154 144
2G4 456 SM
i< /.0 45ti
50 030 \%0
374.733 IM
35 ZOJ V.J
2B» 322 742
314 145 010 ’
IIP 949 534Tabic 2 Ralnfod Agriculture - SORGHUM Productfon Model
Fag* I Ql 4
I . ’’
/ ECONOMIC MODEL
JWl
1
mu
70; 743,703
rj. JO ) 3*0
70 1?? ’ ' 105.01?
03.DM
970
M.ilHI 1RO1
3,013
IU 4M
1 240
W.1BT
9*70
-1—1 --
3,QU
FNl«lLngn**«
Lwll n>prv^>rrMi
S‘*w Olli
[rU)Up«rhi
tuttaw rni4
.Inifirovail Mju'Jarai
*n pen m In fl Had a• •»
|k«ii
Maim* r*U-
' Tciliii Itoto■ rd hi
10 OJl, "□
111.3M
‘ YM<| pM 111 3 000 MJ S3fl DOO '
JU 783 030
305 3 W 379
171 m
• -
1*0 01tJ
___ Jin
1<ft7
IM
I
M 107
V*
SIMM
wt
M 721.0G0
140TGF
____
TOTAL YIELD
IQTAL HECTMII'S
_ IlMPUTlJHI
HtairfllllM
i?] oia -4»a 4 40
1—
1 ~ ................................ 1____
!/e tt’. »i.
Mil
1 JW 17.600
IK0
' 030,730
H7 114 m+8
■
___ rw mH
J 300
i .«*□*«»)
s*9 Mir r wi
Jil itu
POklXllh^
I>k4jtll AtUlllll
34I.2J3 rno
IO* 7«
---------- - ------------------
4 000
47
170
14©
Mi
—
. --------------------- Sr
ISC
'
RF.VEMJf
INPUT CO5TI
FcrUMti'a
, hrM+eudM
' PiWuMt
DUhl||ht Ar<-iWl
Kfr'TriJ IrpMi Ceiu _
[itLVEWC 1H FORfcLAHDLJR
I nbek* C^ui
W> 411 f«3
-- _
041* urn
10 oai.&jO
4 Du5
>70
7*9
355
730
—
U/H.I TT*
' :■■• ini ______ynoo
115 0261WO
3M MB 041)
IK 04*
—
4 WO
47
J?Q
249
mb"
7W
M 7*1 MO*
7,Q» 70U a/wj /to
2 i.fl&j 4oo
33,0114 *40 04 MJ J70
341 IQ>J,QQG
411 491710
IM KHJ
— 4 QCO
47
J?Q
2*0
205
JOO 649 «2 MJ
<14 424 MO
1*1 *9
—
4,000
w
770
JM
«3
03 JB2 050
122 514
3 2HQ
5.M2
111.2CS
3 MC
*<
197 C JO
* GDC
«/
ira
MO
3 Mi
4 0QQ
' 4T
J 70
J«0
— -
---- ™
_
---- --------------- Mfl
4 OQO
4F 1 -
3?D
__ 9ffC
TH
- -------------- ---------------;
♦n «Tnu
—
-•■cw 2 _7 sgr
74Q
523*4T
JW
*.'u m.fita
•lo.mma
___ ________
a r>4 0"
3 JO J rr0
Ll 002 IM
—
2* ’13 UM 31 1)45 4.45
54 Ml 4OQ DQ 046 4*0
7,373 445 J1 *03,040
J5 52 J 435 <• :sa no
.' tai e/fl BO 141,0 76 24.2UJ MQ IF.tWJ ijo'I
3J*.«H SB M 1*1 1 4Ji
: 713.360
f? ceo 1«C
-
M 0u7 »4-4
I.3MO1U
, jtv 1 'o
21 401. Jfr5
41 Jjn
01421 1>J
II,0m» Jto
L >03,770
—
11 20/415 I
H- 'IO:
<QW
*7
7W
J+J
__*2®.
J4O
702 *r*4 012
—*-» —
_ |«M4K_
2J»4.r7C
- 9 00-' B4D |
------ L
11’ 010 1
K in«io |
'W 1«,M4
— flJtJ Ml
2MJ>U
n JM OM
47 JL>2
< *<17,SM
>i ItlUAD-J^H CC15T5
«■ 1J4 740
J7 JUW
M3.7U 7*0
427,01* M4
?ii uni in
mid,mo wo
4S>B»2,«a
40 4/1 BIC
41J4KJUJJ
*K XI *32
*j mi ;>i
430 JM J*1
UK in U20
4>«t4
SJJ.CV1 '20
'VBd’oro
55O.«M aM 543,17/ MO H2.J7! QCJ CM IIM .fuC
90,74* 440 I *1 MO.WO
*» OBI 3J4
M *37 747
40 J Of f u'4 M? OF|,tH45
517/Ji 17* 1 52J '.-0 007 M12 '12,flri 1 MJ ,->i IS*2 Ralnfod Agriculture • SORGHUM Production Modolfab/e 2 fainted Agriculture - SORGHUM Production Model
P<Q4 4 erf 4
ECONOMIC MODEL
win..
Luu mpi-ukMrf m
B4M
: f -.-ar
' Un
7 r:’<iSK
_J
-
■ —rf fiet m 1
III Till
] .'Sil
14.MU g ro
14W.IOO
2 mif 15 4)0
3 2M 13,141
■TO
177*0.170
ilflil— . ‘—■ *2»{*i” j|f’
J
is mi
3U0
■ •«
■70 I
O.eAJ
)2*» 1-
G 5*3
»7Q
n vi 3 1
> TN
3.27* |
m
'1
J
mp-c-iing
UFA
)2H
15
• ?0
|
15»4X) I
■ JMl'D
11 r- 7to
15556
Fr^un
j,m
>200
3.2»
i.m i
3 tub I
in*
flCI 1HrtiMN
R.MJ
m TFO
W.M0
5 402
S.4H2
JT 1,211
200 032
5 *fli '
210 0)2
TOi.ru
I
------------ 1
7M r*j .
W 4M
3,4fl2
J MkJ
T qLai kwijn Sa
2712*1
21F.M4
)« lift
T wrfif>* h«
3,00c
3 000
1.000
3 ooo
JOdO
>.«K)
<rpiEW3
TIT MihQQCll
413 04) 0X1
*#2C*e.OCO
h» ooq
D13 00/ OCO J
QU nil ooa
TO FAX VM'l.D
no * *3 r, ice
074 iOO 770
040
4 72 Fit. 1«l>
»V5 J77 7*ti
Q*a Md Vfl1
3
TOIALMtClAMtS
ZMJ.TO
3*4 422
111 M4
JM J4rt
1W4IM
wn.2 jo
iHPUTS^arr per M|l
H r*
r«ibtaiira
InWtlludtl
fHfejgitf Aa^m
LbM*W
-- hFVFNME
IM'JT COSI5
iiMflcUeM**
4 OW
47
J 70
740
7«
JM
1 071 1M
4 000
47
4«KJ
M
I Ml
WO
* wo
270
340
2?Q
240
«
2M
?M
4.003
*5
370
340
3K
4 006
H
no
240
m
2 MJ 1 102 129.4S4
260
1 H2VH 4M
L
TW 1 rt) W.ttt
3M
1 IM 122 5M
2W 1i’.‘. INWJ
umno
■ 3.110 IM 3.3OJ T ?0
WttflOtt)
ii.orr tin
3no
■3,00/ 2MJ
n 3*4 Oi-J
ta.6oe.ilU
MU MO
W 4W,(MJ
4 M." TFtJ
07 io? noo
[ _ __________________ in R43 255
Poilid d a i Drw^M
l.W FM)
e«,Qj no
7fi J3U 34S
74 230)31 TO.WJ.tN
1-----------
2.JBJ.TT9
••13U7_a2n
M 101 321
&A-total npul Coali
142 NT TV
14* F<F 230
15) >U 420
HJ FD7.TT4
NJ 1MUZ
100*17 270
- MEVtNUe BfcFDKt LABOUR
■79. RM •»
■35 »1 224
170.534 02
1 005 *57 1M
1 012 190,334
1 0M W W
c
1 atcv Cc-Mi
M.rj* WO
ra to: ’M
Il w:i ina
n 431 VW i
f4*M0t>
ri m>i *32
- IlhXQUt AF ’[R LADCHJR COjiU
MU^M ?*0
ih nwu «ee
507 4^89®
MT 422 55-4
M7 1B1.
0*1 F34.4WTable 3 Ralnfed Agriculture - TEFF Production Model
*' XTable 3 Rain fed Agriculture - TEFF Production Modol
2 of 4
I ECONOMIC MODEL
»VEAK
I
T
I
Fahbng »•«•
I Lan wpiovadtMi
Nmw (Java
v>wj p«w lia
SU> local »laM
1 T!T^WS2f
102.toO
tM 150 000
a QUO
M. DM. 000
41 na ooc
75. VW
1OU.24* OOP
110 H? 400
1»1 t>»7 OCC
zr: no 400
1S4.W4
24<l,U}MMr
150 040
150744
101
1VM4
mon
151.740
>JPUTH<M«T p«* Im]
R«V«nu4
I oi%U«r»
24D
?*O 740 140 240
Jia 114 214
JT4
V5
201.44? W
._ .---------------- — .
110 7»MO
11 27/aj*
U35 540
13424120
1 501 452
2»‘430 174
144 3»r oo»
15 02’ MX)
1JW774 >M
lie 031,120 ~ 77 7 425*00
Ma
_
V»
734410 nac
375 ___
Jia
_
145*11440 2_— ?M .04 240
[rtPVt NUE
11 MiJO M «*3.1M
________ ■_______!-----------
11 VW 014
CM S*'
• 601 MJ ij'aia rn
7*0 0*2 734 5 7 304. too
IT? ?m‘jM
T
I AtwtmI
*Sub »Xa<»ipMt com
'REVENUE et» UHE LAflOIIK
II loour Cm ito________ ______ IMt OME MirQlAII(JLW€O1 1
11JM4T2
4MMQ
13 444 0*0
2? 575.044 '
m wvn
‘A VOJ XlO
1J*i 103 170
an sou
’* naa oac
iM’;-.
M2U fli
iM«i: eno
sa »•! MC
'•*1.430 IM
•15 MO
15 aac
.a You.
7G7 JJu'tOO *
16 IM* too
« «At K!
3O5M24I
214
—
•Xi *v3 (XX> 1 M 743 MO
—
1M> 757,700
•M a* 112Table 3 Ralnfed Agriculture - TEFF Production Model ECONOMIC MOO EL
vrAM
[RalMfaM Baw
4 «1»1 VH0rwwwd rw_
Vi*M par N«
11 4*12.000
at Rao
8BD
4BW
34 m ooo
25.740 000
jnbia 6dq
’» oie.oot)
’< 4 44 000
111 624
744
7<8
3080
___/48
103 578
748
104 284
117 TOO
12? 118.
131 424
138,612
21€ MB ... i
227 W40Q
A**?
__ 2 SOU
2 X»
2 JOO
? TOO
__ ?.vw
244.0M.20Q
?ro TiQ ooo
7V3 ’AW.eqo
>14.023,500
Ha ira oob
28) i35 400
271 WBH.BOO
?y» $41,200
104 704.400
313 o^a.aoo
W J 13.200
1?Q 4A7 SOO
=
164.014
159 ?44
»<12,001
182.760
103.504
300.973 220
315.7M20O 335 700
360 94* 320
11 M7 852
II. 854 400
12,123 344
835 MO
835 580
0)1 VTO
24 864 240
25 048,100
28.377 020 j
_
**bl.»JW
1
1 901,052
1,301.852
1 501 452
1 501,452
1,501,453
1 301,052 !
_35
333,320
*
37,700 K8
34 47)024
41 287 IOC
42 4§ '< ■
245 257 T&Ci ’ 17 MS 500 I
137 342 Zfcf. ]
:
Z4J.290 xx>
59 258.000
224.02/ T.VTab/O 3 Rain fed Agriculture ■ TEFF Production Model
ECONOMIC MODEL
Pag« 4 o' 4
i
L
I
“ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- -
1
j-
3,0 it
73.7BC
JlLiJUiW!
11880
______3.W0
T.nra
ar>u
4 HD JUQ
-■’ • XW .......... ’. ._____ lliflJttl
Lilia .rtipiiartd Im
NiwEiu
VriMipwfiQ
SwU-War
hr^^vid i^cwwi '? i -rrgT ?:
3.M0 ‘S.OCrj
DM
10 400 ’ 3 900
13 HO
*50
IQJ'M OXI
16.840
1WG
11 jMO
•50
j.mjoti 1
2.DM 1
3MC
1840
•50 j
2 iM.DMi
32B0
3.EMO
.
*M
i ijni.wa
<
7
I’lpturng f-tarlnj_______
1HU2
141,240
•as.we
150 *M
1MM4
110022
r faro linit
3.fiM
1,0»
3,MM
3 win
1W0
' UlrJ
hiuriirta Ail
74*
F*4
T4B
*•
744
T«
ratal ImfrtvadlM
H1240
ni,(Mi
ISO IM
i«* W.4 1
1«,O7l j
M4?M
V-M pai- hfe
2 *X
4,100
J Hill
1 XK
2 SW ’
Z3M
h_6 IuLm terpiiiswl
124JS3 3DC
in**) a®
341 5M WO
38 F 31] 300
304 1415 401'
3TB.K4 QW
1O1M nlLC
117,723 300
Mn u n 400
3M ZW.BM
M2.*85 ?W
171, r h eoc
3Tfi.K4.OW
- TOTAL WCVMiet
lM”Jl5<Dlrr par MJ
ft*vafiu«
Sand*
FarL-rwH
NHHIrjrlwt
Waiu
I ■£.«*!
nEffltMur
—
CD" IB
SMdk
FflTtlMfl
hiua uddna
PauiudM
L**^* Ar«w»
Sm* Tsial -*tjmI Cd»I»
REVFMUE DEFORE LABDult
L al^j CDili
h>CQ4« TER LAhOJH COSTS.
SB'S WO 2 ABO
TB
w ran
2 4M
TO
IflJ 244
3 *30
*82.8*2
2.4*0
M 78
IM 740
2 4M
7*
135
34D
31B
US
240
3+1
lift
24C
JIU
‘35
340
3li»
110
m
IF* 376 128
25», 7JR *K
SMUl.llDU
Mfl.lMe
2 4M
r«
l»
240
310
1T5
377 338,100
■*4 12J.440
—
----------------------------------- ----------- -----------------------
12?»C4G
133 MO
H IV 0G
ujwW
•35 MW
12 Wt»
1 101.152
12 hT r»
835340
13,8*7 ecci
i.Ml.ttt
_
12 409 M4
•35 HD
M 027 5M
194 UM 7]Q ------------------ _
is,«m m
125.540
3ft »1F 440
1
I
1 M? HEiO
1,801.83/
*wi e»
40 J >11,DOO
12 W 2*3
■35 UO
-
1 Mii.ew
♦0JI4J32
11T7H 10 fl
80 HO XKJ 2JTIW5 »B
«> aci 6cu
• _■ 7*1 104 HMD 712
m sjjmo
80470 Ko
2*oec? mo
M 347 '04
32* MO |0] _____ 80*51000
2flF,G*8
4* 5T4.5«
331*47,884
fll.JJI 500
>78,315 4C4
144.155.414
• 1 512,000
' >82*42 411
XH.a'rO.J'M
*1 Ft] W3
W7 252,211
_Tabic 4 Rainfed Agriculture - RICE Production Modol
1 of 4
r
--
ECONOMIC MODEL
t iJiUne - o- ~3
r
.lOM M
. N-« !!■«■
i—i
—
i ' r~
___
1.H4
i3
—
•
■i
. ™ . - „
T
i 30
1.JTO 1,234
*»
»
_______________ _____
“SBliW’ ■WttA. -k-'MWj
• •»
•m
M
"r^-'-,rs • 1JM'- -------------------------------
34
1142 » 174
10W 1 054 1 014 666
*.Q°L wwz
34 D«»»
1 ’ - r,
Bi* «K»I
----------------------------
•64VXJ
MO
<174 700
454 ict>
550 IM 1O0
B1ft MO
599 500
5 74 TOO
----------------------------
M9 800 r-40 ion ’
520 330
••*rt®r«4 Had ora »
*nrw*r« ’lodar*!
From Qa>o
1
—
-
—
550
30
1 100 1450
M
34
DO
2 200
14
2750
3B
1 300
36
XB50 4 400
36 36
—-
TMai lmprvvo<J ha
—
1 IDO
1 450
>700
2740
3 300
3 MO
4.400 4 MO
tlnkd pMtto
' _ . . . — ~**? ■ **
S«< total »-<rcnMitf
1
MO
1 DOO
MOOOO
1000
1.000 1 000
1000
1 coo
1 000 1.000
i ooo
.
1 <550000
2 200 000
3 750 000
3 300.000
3460 000
4 400 000 -------------------- ,IlFiT Him.
4 MOOCH
fO»AL veto
•ee.too ’ 1.774 TOO
054 XO
7 7114 10O
7.414 300 1 344 SOO
3 474 .’no
4 4Dfi BOO 4 U40 1D0 T> 470 DOO
TOTAL DECVAAFS
I jro
two
p«/ Kai
' Saadi
Toitkaarv
Insaocidea P*t’.c«de!
957
136
1740
2 334
1 740
245
2.444
1 740
246
1342
1.740
W
3174
1.740
255
4 MO
1 740
255
4 034
1414 5 532
1.740
256
1.740 1.740
2M 2M
rXDt«/>l *AHF4i
Wkter
Hwrflw
BtfAia
arr'ha
—- --
161
—
------------------------------------
101
1«l
250
141 141
250 250
no
141
290
141
750
—----------------------- —
141 161
1 Uor
I—--------------------------------------- ------- -------- —
RFVFNUF
NPtlT COSTS
[ Fa^iaeri
vnatucAtoi
I'aiUestot
TMrnfia
2SQ
2sc
/%O
750
!
» J15 3OO 2 137 016
1040 440
3,M! 014
4K1M2
S#26 130
4 750 674
7 673770
6.664 7/4
>514,377
-
m.no
304 074
441.42#
-
474 742
714 134
-
449 440
-
464 644
-
• 120 16#
•
1.255 M2
1 JXJ.60B
-
1---------------
•
1 Dtmjjm Antanai
S» Total' CblTl
RFVF NUK W » OHE LAIKMIR
|l abo^ l u«l«
__________
!
1
.'<2 570 105 050
105 050
105 050
105 050
105 050
IQS 040
•05 050
41% 290 413124
544474
COD 432
■JIB 1M
105 (AC
1,360.407
105 OS)
1 495 956
#00,100 1 T24.W4 2 417 004
J 296 JO2 4 044 190
»M V*) 1 069 444 4 4/1540 5 460 764
1 2rt 246
6 447.974
7 736.177
4 077 see
I
317.500 444,000
574 500
940 MO 10MS00
1 257 000
IMCOML AFTFH LABOUR COS’S
«rj eoo 1 7/4 414 1 617 504
703 000
2 596722
451.500
3 754 #04
3 413 V40
4 5/2 264 | 5730 474
1 346 500 1.4/4 000 S. 469 67? 6.54# WTable 4 Ralnfed Agriculture - RICE Production Model
P«ga 3 o< 4
ECONOMIC MODEL
34
550
660
30
*’4
460
500
J4J700
514
•MJ
474
550
242 00
,^s>et»vo<l H«04f«4..
r impvOTQ ih>ct**«i
From Ba»e
•no om«r<«l
Tow
YmM (rar ha
ha
13 >50 *4 300
|
tag"
Sub lOWjHlfMOuW
TOTAL V1FIO
TOT Al HFCTARF5
1 OOP
11 MO 000
11.133 ?00
12 100 000
17 342 MO
17014
1,740
W 100
514 12 450 '
1 ooo 12 050 OOP 12 4 03 100 *
11.423 300
13,740 T 1 DOO
13.750 000 13—* ‘/oo
<CJOO 14 MW 000 t4 in Too
14 CM
1,70
13,134
1,740 ’ ___ 355
____ 141
14 >40 000 !5C<1W>
14.144
1740
14 430 000
iiioooo
It 074 Oi
1
r
34,270.000
HI VFNUC
M> 1 COMS
-- • —
=_q
~~~~~~
____
104—350
20 5—4— ___ 21.511 *46
73 330 542 3.421.214
21.201 4M
_____ 24 124 140 3.427,770
IO* ctxj 3 432 324
22,141 ®>« 3,747.000
H 4Q4 554
1 942 432
? 7 304 242 4.047 3ftC
>474 100
i — :
3015.1*4
3 .180 504
I------------- “77“
3 120 204
id*. o*o
__ 3 255 554 I
IB 235 04* T
3.14*500
15 111,144 I
10*. 030 119OJB12 19 0*3 042
3 .VI000 15,770 042
»C6 010
> <r i 420
20,417.470
3.550000
17—7.470
4 047M2 77 474 052 3 015 SOO
14 »i ss:
7Table 4 Ralnfed Agriculture - RICE Production Model
P *Q* A 04 4P»0® 1 Of 4
Tablo 5 Rainfed Agriculture • PULSES Production Model
ECONOMIC MOOEL
WW5
“EH l.MI
F
33
it bSjm
16 415 '
450
in 410,A00
M OH 0«
14.005 350
1.073
75 MB
*_2ooj
1 2M
1,053,100
4,7W 100
13.021 200
2?344 ’.•■
31 001 040
M■
i0 m'nc
X)»M 050
Tt V9i
33.477 <W
I TOTAL HFCTAMgl
S3 573MO 00 4S?
100
' T•Tl«lr*rt
rfdkktet
>» V Anima ___________
225
n. i.y.b
24 0JM0T
2/ sei tn
W 300 030 _____ iz.awl \n 45.210 600
55.637
61 334.010
F2 336.265
4 75’
• 11.273
4 52-2F04
051.060
5060 122
_____ 111075
5 320 766
5 590 4W
• 13 025
6 131,7 n
813 VS
6 400 44? 813 VS
0 ' •• OM
HkVEMJF OfFORt lABOuM
13 560.521
mr 046
7,335 010
7 606 >74
abnur C.mIi
|IW1 LMf AFTER LAtKXIW COS 15
HU 018
"
*44
002
I
M 153,752 ’____________48 307 278 0 J60.048 ______ 8.635 3/4
1C 053 704____________ HO 006 0Q2
S3 H2. ?45 9 2*0 700 |
44 522,048 '
• 214 0786020
40 1 77,188 '
<4 19)60)
10 381 352 S3 012 331Table 5 Rain fed Agriculture - PULSES Production Model
P*U« S o4 4Pago 3 ol 4
I
-
I
ECONOMIC MODEL
2.024/
X02B
Z0.7
It.'74 19 101 1,973 o_n
>,o»
LtM M
*••• •f?rFrr
’ 5QM
460
1
30.301
4M
12.002
480
f 245 450
C 702 000 ,
« 54l» 360
5 ■■■ 900
3 382 050
--------- -----------------------
Table 5
**K4**? .
R•ahrlnpf-e>d.r9Agriculture • PULSES ProductiMo7n73Model 77.340 |
r rtwn !Uu
»on
'.073
I
KJWnrMI 7 544 L____________7M<1 0'J40 400
no.M
1 7«KJ
'O' 778
1Q4 803
1 280
» »05 100
TOTAI n
TOTAL ICCTAHES
lf»TVT|<t1lrr^ MJ
•—
r—Af*i
IrtMCfccMtl
, FatikMw
Cv»jghl Aiwmd
_____________________________
1 laftcur
rlylwuf
■—ITCOBT1
*M4»
F«1Artn
teiMcCciOm
r«t«cMn»
DtajfH A/wn>
5^-Tnlai .’d Cou,
REVtNUE nfreme 1 ABOUR
I About C4M»
—
un mo •*:
-
■0 441
3.701
108
220
255
700 j
’12 ttO T40 j
1
• 374 74fl
•13 025 ’
972 »5
104 •7*>4RO H«'ai7 ioo
"4 OP7 »XI
ia706,700 '0' 301
I 020 >22—1 270
>03 200
'23.05* MO
'7< »16 w.i
lie 900 410 100,7*1
M'.332
1,701
’4> MO 142
10.1tt.7M
____ 013.025
10 773 060 013.825
'02 340 945
ii ooim 813.025
i--------
_____ 11.110 008
Hi.m M2
14.0tt,BM
•30 330 001
0044 410
013 025
W2 135
11 MO 570
120 050 IM
IT 785 284
*00 0—047
TOO 1,014
0,014 074 1.13.W5
m 335
__ 372 X33
11.01* 0*1
137.420 240
14,415 516
,1**004 333
T-
922 335
,'SCOME AFTER LABQJR COSH 1 105 034 804
142 650.711 1B.001 J42
1210*5 478
1/1 MO, 0 7*
11.282.3— 913 425
922.335 12 9*4 554
15*342 125 20.717.220
137 524 QQ5 ,
922 335 13A37.002
tM 003 003 21 M7 072 I
MO 934 'QI IP»UQ 4 ol 4
Tafrto 5 Rulnfod AQrlcuHura ■ PULSES ProduGtian WodoJ
ECONOMIC MODEL
^YtABl
tjiHina ©owXr?
LMI Mv>nvp4»1D
I
0 444 7I . 4,m
SJ
I3?3 1 D?3 1.073
_ 10?>
1311
iron
3.J75 21M
450
4W 450
*«
7<ie.G50 104 »)
10?3 __ aHi
100,410
1 CM/
I, 1
i 071I
___0
*50
2.7W
I
I
total kctahm
Hflvb'ljt
/"Ml
K KJuan
____ 130 T22,k» 1W.13G.5W
in mi
___
141 :mo?p <4J J14 I re
I ft
10B >»o 1 (ITS
2 Ml
IO fit
1
TOTAL Y®. D
7,M4
_____ 1 3<H
145.01? 440
HTTWfWO 1t» M1WW
__ J2I.4M
_I.W1
I.CTl
4to *•5 550
11GM1 ' 1073
2 U4_ i?2 170
1 2M 1HQ52-3W --------------------------
Irt *37.030 ' 124 lm/
I&9 MJ *fo 1211,001
IDO
100
|fttvcMir
im man
FM W Uf
17 01ft Hl_
11 IMJJM7
•13.025
C?J.3H
^■rtl 1<ri^ lnpi.1 r ...0a
12.QH MB
■Mtrti
335 1A AOJ h«<l
174 ft)) 11?
J2J431M’ 151 *W 1M |
t>2>35
J 13.341 JU
13,413MM 113 404
«7 m
■’ *•>—- r—»-Pago l of 4
Tabic 6 Ralnlcd Agriculture • OILSEEDS Production ModelTable 6 Rainfad Agriculture - OILSEEDS Production Model
ECONOMIC MODEL
•VFAR
~|
Enisling Rata
*1 ••• Wnrxovod ha
iNaw Oa»*
]v«afc3p*rf»a
Su* 4Mal yleM
Urvfirov»d Hactarwa' -
>.0U
.4,411
1
i 0'4 mxi
1
10.1 IB 440
oe/a 1 300
; voa mm:
’8 240 440
’ oao
tr
i toe
}f> 080 OOP ?• ?<a aoo
yr m
27 MM3 OOP
».4»n noo
• 1 3MICKX)
1.' eoo
34 aob
4? 321. 300 S3 430 BOO
_3S?3* MW
48 7M 140
W 034,190
M 65* W»J
moi rtc
JI JJ1I4O
__ iMPvJT CQB1S
i_So*rt«____
Fawfaiiara
3 708 5M»
1W 'JO
4 003 7M
_ i" ud
4 287 OW
»•- J 370
4 737 *JM
tW,W
I
MiKriiodaa
1 7B1 JOO
4o u wo
4 fU 4Q0
' awfleo
paB4».o»»
1 rwaijgM An>m
2-jO >70
' S Jfc TtrtiM k«M! CuM4
7.430 5 ro
REVI HUE IW» fim LABOUR
li afroui Coals _______ _______
IMCOMI ftFTI W I AIM mW flMfPag« 3 of 4
T.bto 6 Ralnfoti Agriculture -OILSEEDS Production Model
4-------------- ------
:.”^szaEPnw
'<11 0 M
h*
I nub-bHil fWd
ImfunMng H«t l*rei
J F-rorei
lrvj«nen|«|
Toini
Y W PK h«
fls
1 SuKtaial ■t>'uv»j
1
TOTAL 7IH.D
TOlALHFCTARtl
r
JlHO
**
1060
10 400 I
* •MX! i
45 000,000 '
-------- I
4M.O8OC
2»B
Fwblnn
lni«ac<6n
| N«UC<6h
Azintiii
IW
latoi*
-I—
ineviwuB
|<’«*VT CORTS
SMdi
| £y»MiTi
1n«4ciica6M_
j PlHe,tw
' O»^gN AlimW
— —i
m ail )Ki
___ W14M
279
H
225
71.730 360
5.325.216 ’W WO rmooo
MF2-0W _____ 153,520
7 660 600
75130 560
5 011.070 153.520 "
_______ 4025,000
229
a 1.030.160 | ’ ’ --------------------------
5 705 156
5612 730
6 J9Q 4O0 ____ ’53,520
_ ISMMMM bnpit c#*h
RFVTMM DU ORtAABQuR-
'-■tie Cmh ________
290 320
54 677 604 |
• ir>272
760.320
14 can 4io 1
260 370
_
260 320
[■frCOWt. AFTTR LABOURTotH
•1.742 164 j
57 750,732
14.000 005 |
*4 IM 164
1*
111 77®
M 511 404
• H7 117 1
54 'KO 132 ‘
____ 0
532.172
*4905 532 ’
ir mm.P»g« 4 nl 4
Hible 6 Hi/nftd Agriculture-OILSEEDS Production Model
1
ECONOMIC MODEL =f i
1
J >FAR ’ ‘ ____ *
rr
’- «*.■■-■?■•■
3,Mi . 1 W1 -*—■--- JJM-
1
. ■i.tm
ExkllisuSuw i
PJV hl
fltiti
] ndd |x»i ha
• Sufr-iaM vl*M
I IncmnwilHl
*
1
mpio.rij Hacla'U
Ftwh Hax
vial liaf-iwa* h»
Tleid par ha
FjuUdLaJ b.
TOTAL TTEL fl
TOTAL HECTARE 5
INWJT&ahr
Ravvna
Soe-H
FanLiari
tewaracuo-a
^aaiicMai
Orau^d AhIfiiJ
AMa
Utau'
JIM
+4£l
? 1»
300
AM II*
44 MC
4afr
1 MO
45,t«
v*«
M 400.000
M rt*.| «M
4*7*1
1.01S
1M
101
2W
111
ttS
l iw
440
I.M
440
1 "IL*
OF*
<M
440
1
440
•Fl
440
MO
1,314
Ton
da
4
300
300 wc
52***
3*4.1041 M3,SOO
IM BfiQ 1 JOO
45 400
47 120
S1.CB0
HD
IMO
440
bD 1«C
410
1 OH
44 140
440
i OKI
■1 0*0
440
1.t*Q
4T ’JO
41640
io 1*0 51 4K
53 2t»
1 WO
1 toO
1.000 1 ficc
i 500
r 0 fltlb MO rj.MWOCC
TB ,’40,000 77 520 COO
’O.UDQfflW
Tl ?M 4cM
Tl 354 axrs
Fb.bQQ.lOD 77 b(M
n m.Mo
*61M
50 3*6 51.4 Pl
bJ Mfl
7*rt
’M
101
74C
7 020
no
Ml
140
2.025
1M
Ittfi
it*
111
MO
111
101
j ae
10!
ST C M
7 025
IM
101
340
i»1
111
111
m
731
m
224
--------------- ------------ ---------------------------------- ’ --------------- —Trr-------- -
— -„„—
-
14* ---------- — ---------------------
|l>EVf«WB
Q3.7»M0
1
DD.17* ’M
w.wn.wu
101 ■LJirio
iix trn 500
107^1*40
INPVT COSTS
Saadi
■ rntUuu-t
' InaatmdBi
IMacldn
□Ui.gh* A/>r<al
|S*^e Tat* F^NJl Cora
IIEWEMUE BEPOfW i AQCMM
Lhbu»u cam
LM, I IMt AT TEW LAIICHrtl COSTS
nstf.aw
1714,010
tfcJ.BJC
t—
O.IMOM4
143 tMl
T Q*F TT0 151 UO
U214.4M
fl,MT IM
iM 120
10,1X1 MM
lil &2Q
HW(KKt
11 MU toil
Mir 1 ■■■-■-i
?•> IX
„ -------- --------
7 234 *Mt
li-1 T2U
!>an«toF
MM 1JO
HO IM
rwuo
V 1&n,4M
2*3 330
Ilfl^DIJW
14 1*1 Mfl
11.MO &M
IU.2M 210 Il 7-f 4 ■•]
,*®an.M4
7145*^4
43 73A >44
•5173 304
M 111 414
10 01 & r!J 10W»47I
fiCi|4? lH
iiv.' n
Il «r»u
,
11 *Hfl3J
05455 t» 07 57? iU
M OM 1IJ
Fl MF1JJ n 174 “tM
11 Ml 362
’■• MJ 1»Jp«o* 1 ot *
Table 7 Ralnfed Agriculture • BANANAS Production Model
ECONOMIC MODEL
.VI •-■{>0 PCO 43,600 000
TOTIU. TKlD
* TOTAL HECTAM S
ftooODQ
‘<X>000
U 250,000
53 750 000
•0 000,000
•0.000 000
ae,7M.000
"
no *60 000
I
73 500.000
BO 250 OOO
•0 250 OOO
15 OOP
•7 000 000
>' OOO OOO
, ...»
255
12M4.2SO
tIZ 747000
129 054 000
141.SB1 OOO
I
450.500 .
• ’435 OOO ’
2 040,000 1
_ 537 950*
Ml OOO [
• 435 000 J 
3.720000
• «b<7ui C<mI«
•<C6mE 43TLR LAD(X« CQVs
374000 4 435 OQQ
2.040 OOO j
444 400 |
____Ml OOO |
»0 454 OOOj
•_»><
> 310 ODO j
» e n ago
• 05.000
4 200 000
8 435 000
• 12000
Sfll O3<)
•03,350
. ____________ Ml. OOO
I _______ 12 1M 3M
1O5.M7.BB© .
____4.172 500 ’ J 100.014 150 ?
1?Table 7 Ralnfed Agriculture - BANANAS Production Model
"I-------------------------
, ECONOMIC MODEL
Pag* 2 Ol 4
l>7AM. ^ .• Jrv ...,-■
1 ail brprovrd hn
/<•* Rai«
/-
par ha
I , tafelolil ^Mld
>;;s
. — 
1
iwijpfirrrt Hidni
■> ■—-
|lmp-*Qfl Haaniai
. FroWB*L»
4.500
OJ /Mi fiflT
100 ’■W.DOT
ioo 500,oco
1O7.ZM.Ddp
107750 000
tin IOo ojo “■ ■ •
•O.MOciM
Jt 000 1J * VJO 000
15.000 134 2MOOO
J 3 4 ZW.OM
15.000
1«i OOO .POQ 14F .'50 DOO
141 DflO.aao
M7 TSO COQ
TOTAL HECTAMt
-MnlTOfltarTp.f |m)
"■
jo,»o ISUOc
■ M . 500 000
194UOOCO
r Jil-
On frit
tlUiJha
Ib-M-* W»nfii
4 KO
-------------------------- ---- 20,4M
>,m
+ zoo
MJ
0,?W
7 IM
—
M **0
Z E5 i ;->j
ZO *K
»»n
1 :-xi
hoc
J 025
OfafAit
714
ll/wflHi
____ two
Xis
M5
1 3M
i.MO
?-.5
1 DM
III I- vi Hi II
jib 37iooo
MM ftM CntJ
213,001 OQQ
774 fl 10.000
JJOUrgQo
M0A31 cw
3?2 «*OM
1 mooo
• 4J0.I.WO
a4»,lKM
7 MO,DOO ‘
U4J5 vgq
l*nK*ll
o.«jtr.aco
1,501 ?lo
1 401,4*0
435 COO
u.Htowi
4,435.000
'0 JW.0O0
—i
Ml CX»
551,00) ‘
________ 1 HOOSU
i ni jin
“•’5*
SliklnlMll'.pjf Coin
HEYEMJE BEFORE LABOUR
14,<4?, HW
_______ toidoo
i alMur Cnm
m jl<
17 041 MW
041 000
1O.477.BM
'iM&JMfc AFTER LABDUft €Qjl f
r soo coo 
i*5 fwico
TO1 3M MM
in H4jn> I
W?1fl4 M°_
jJV«*WQ 1
a 4U
I.D75 DOO
<II?34Q3M
D.3U7 UK
M 0H3 3GC
_»(.1 r t «W
1MJ4iflog
Md B40,»a' |
idilQ.DOO
Jl¥ /A'l.Bag
211,350 100Table 7 Ralnfcd Agriculture BANANAS Production Model
JB5.W
««a TOO
UG50.000 '
301 Wf. coo '
_M 595,000 ‘ 32/ 711 ?■.<•
35J.0S1 950
t 5. oar soo
33t 504.430
304 92? 600
»5.54O0M 349 JayrkXJTable 7 Ralnfod Agriculture - BANANAS Production Modol
zaoooo 24? 2M OOO
244 000 <f0O
?M>1COOO OOM_
?• «»O ? ■?*
7H
4l> 472,000
I
c
1ft >40 COO >jft».-fto
Ml OOP TPjufjw
421 Ml"aso 1/4J2 w
<v > an i r-3
•rPage 1 or 4
Table 8 Rolnfed Agriculture - COFFEE Production Model
i.i»r
23 17B.2O0
Ji 6M 300 33 000
JO,V» 050
70, 105.400
19 441.9M
0.000
-
13 TOO
52*000^
73 1 • • ► 45 631? SO
114.570
600
» 040 000
TOTAL r«L£>
(TUTAl MFC 1 AMT 3
•W>UT5|B»n par bej
■ Saoea_________
I
Hartaodaa
■ Draught Amaa<
J1 099.700
53 364 X» 110 432
62 429 400 120 210
47,520,QUO
OO 901 950
172.334
HOVENUC
jlWVT COOTS
5ead»
i afftaara
lntaetee««
i Traugnt ArwM*
Mbjem input Cm>>
KFVFFAfF BEFORE LABOUR
_llaOcw Com
[ INCOWr At TFW LABOUR COSTS
244.t6C.M0
237.000 307
29MOOO __ 2730 MX)
323.OW 420
4?5 701 4 ZD
541 310 514
5-53 090 530
5.670.400
5.5/0 400
5 035900 I
«• 211100 10B 413 aaj
5,570 400 725.110 004
49.S15W0
5 570 400
214177020 M 012 TOO
'«?D»32t
745 1K.040 50.400400
224 720 44A
0.085.000 4W.Q1M70 I
50 400 MO '
354 200 a 2Q |Tabic 8 Rain fed Agriculture - COFFEE Production Model
I ------------------------------------- ECONOMIC MODEL
vrArr ^~r-
_____
-.Z.7T
v >,013
EaKtinf Bo«o
__I Leia uryfcwO Aa
iNaw Paso
[VMM po* h*
' SiAi-4o<*4 yialO
L’M4
rue *0.826
273
7.710 '-
t 7 1W BOO *
Ifl 4*2,160
1.010
69 020
2.710
57.100
?*»
1011 37 iM
l.m
15 704 ?no
S4 100 STS
14 047 240
05,000
WOOO
ne ooo
TOTAL YlfUO
4NFU TSffWrr ••? he)
| Rnww#
I Far14i**>*_______
?1 4S4 Ute
so.ooo ooo /•oorooo
oc^aooo 141.744
’ T,4«0
•4 002 160
T3 020 OOP
M 024. KX
•4,157 350
oaiaas odq 1ST »7J_
?,4«0
101 222 )W 101.1*4
10? ?*4 4CO
•as oi*
___JOO.- _12S 400
117.707.430
7®
7SJ 210 024
uj.7M ”?
KEVtMUH
'iNPUl COSTS
j F »4U<*I •_____
’ inln»ttc>dck»>t4>*u( Coan_______ __ ___
710 BJ4«J
al? ora mo
•,•06
TH
rttCOMr AF1» M t AIICXHI COSTSTable 8 Ralnfed Agriculture • COFFEE Production Model
economic model
< 1,013
2,028
35 364
27.210
74 407
10 056
>710
37649
2>8
• 0 4 72 550
• 9' f 950
7.492,750
9 735 >0<1
4 w n'o
5 740 400
4 497
Pago 3 of 4
179.400
145 200
JH 4CO
WS 000
171.900
1 79 700
104 000
7 Mi
2.719
1 710
1.719
3,997
2,719
3,892
3 997
3 892
3 992
IM 000 000
177 BOO
1213*2 550
179 0(12
•4’. . . ' BO3
UO ' : • ■ 179 0M5 100
■SI <11X3
000
i m< t • BSC
ISO 400 120 770 DO(1 194 t>5O TOO
>95,000
•00 137 DOO OOP
139 49? 756
192.210
171 POO
tOTAL YltLO
/07M 1MC1AK9
144 DIS 300
14J 560 000 149,94 7,950
199 9 74
r»4 ODO 147 940 000 153.0410 400
191 4«2
900
157 017 950 707.7 39
HV1NUF
_ INFUf COSTI
1 F^Vinn
I bl>ncwj,1*»
: PMUddm
Af»-ai
5-6-1 CT* Utpu C«4l>
1 134 930.511
1 177 019.844
’2*9 398 960
1.281.776.986
1 304.156 910 ______ 1.346 538 932
1 389 916 954
1 431^86.976
e 685 800
•685 900
8995 000
07 3?o QOO
*1*95 800
9.595,800
O 995.900
nr vt Nur 98 fowTauoub
B C4". 900
5^5 900
income AFifcx y»noun cos>tt
|
1
1.170,331 044
____ 1,217 7 11 W
p ee& boo
117.451900
1 JO 950700
1 .09 851.132
n 995 500
1 052.777 244
1 coirwi
131 Ml 400
• 466 901 196
1 TOO ZO9/J2
»4 ». 13J »OO
>-> *»S> 099
7Table 8 Ralnfed Agricuftura - COFFEE Production ModelTable 9 Ralnfed Agriculture - COTTON Production Model
Pago 1 of 47
Tab/t? 9 Rafrtfed Agriculture - COTTON P rod uc lion Model
1-*^ 1 de 4
lECONOMTC MODEL
■ysm^TT
—--------
J ■•■ Inipnih-Dd
Np* liair
h*
SlHj lull- flaM
|iiii|iinviny HvriB'vi
2t Kia
.4
> re«n IUi«
__
i J dLM Improv'd ha
’ ^-1 f-* M
r
_ | Sul> lOl^Imprnyfid
11 * I'M
IOS DM
It J .'00
VfW
Jtm iwi
1 - j «LJ
aw.itto
TOTAL HECTAIU f
i ?>rs
IT
l«
IMO
1,«K
ir
WR
4*5
1 575
17
■.at
n*o
1»l 114 15
...
IT!
WPLfT [;(]ilfc ________
| 5«*n .______
F tltfllWI
bftaALilUdM ______
FigiMUdak_______
SjL-TdImJ p ! Ceil*
|lLEtftHVt OEPyWh I MJDVft
LnlKK* Cfiliil_____
140 ?it
a<!» 3 4’J JKI
|Uf W l FR kAEbunH QOS EU
110 CTJ
HJMtl
MITl
I, Flfl
•fl i'4F
I H IM
D 1.121
EHM1
02
CTtW
1 TW
E5
124 4 M
•»»
e.i :«
< STS IT
WO OW 11b
m
j fl
'aor.iii
3.5M 1 113
OJ.TM 1 TAS
2M
3T5
J 10 711
l"S.H
i 113
ar.Md
1 JDS
mi*4-
_ vu
1 104
ti.mo
■
I.FIS
K6 10I ________
04.fr! ■*
Qi ?<3
___ titt73
f-» 11?
OD Ml
O.N1
i4i.D ‘.a
HEATS
TS.iM
rs 1*0
isfl.r* M/K
H s.n
t4J LU
ng tin
76 44+
T»
3 Fl
7a si f '
Jdn
ij|]
th im
52 ™
rairt
W il lPaQ« 3 of 4
Table 9 Reinfed Agriculture • COTTON Production Modol
T
'ECONOMIC MODEL
,YtARZLenS3
I.
folilinaAmjttt
1 B>l imp< —■*
n
||a
I
' fret M
total |W4
7W00C
'rwruiSjewr—rFuj
i
I
D»«wg*« AnHiw
JNPU1 COSTS
Sm4i
, >arwr«r»
I IfMto-traMl _
Pattctdaa
OtaigM AnHiat
S<A> ToW kr^v* Com____ MVLMJE BEFORE LABOUR-
Itatohif Co^«
JoiCOBg AFTER LAROUQ COW11 |
3 MS
im
•*> 120
1M.VQ
n jvj
as
•c iw.iao
1?C _____ 74
00
7TaGte 9 RAlnfod Agriculture-COTTON Production Modol
P»{Fi4^4
■economy MODEL
...........■■ ' L " '
_ ____________________U
........ ”1»J
Wl|
edniftfi b4io
1 dt* H’ewntffc*
14
4
IJdtf fUl« YaMpir lui
w 4 MJ
10
4
0 450
2,700
2
>
4«l
KO'
I
4
4
4M
TVfib-
a
4
10
SmA 0M
wr****^ |***tij|**
ernnroww^i HkUfm
PrtNwItaM
lKJ«M«dtl|ll
4 V»
B
4
2
AH
M0|
111
4
1
»4
4M
1 LUO
M3
210
laui
h»
4
3
110
4
i
1U
224
4
1
221
231
4
3
7M
331
4
3
344
hM
I.KD
t 5Q0
:
t buo 1
t UJQ
t.MXI
1 M0
Sub-tahi impj»ad
lll.DOO
525.5®
)M 30U
M0, bOO
337,1)00
do F fioo
TOTAL Ylftfc
—"tz” r . - -
n»,Soc
v* JW
UO.DQO
144 000
154 TOT
10) CW
TOTAL itfCTAHrii
224
72)
JW
2»
ZJ4
«*
tfiPU TIfBIrr |»r IH.I
SomM
iMlhrflit
IrircUbdiM
1 S?5
i 571
tJ 100
MO
1 5?5
if
no
m
its
1 5J1 IT
100 *5
JM
1 VI
1?
440
11S
255
1
~.
1 ira
V
mi
MO
l»
- ______________
TM
__________________ JM
-
1 Bt>Q*r*
REVEWUf
«Purro9Ti
-
KwHifwra
___ “ ____
. _________ ____
___
JT* ~~ ~ia&,4to
3,H0 1.1M
121,440 1 7*B
1U«B 721242
H
ifll
Mfl *W TH
W M4«1J
1,WT \2lD1
1 F45 13* 7jf 207 N»»
ajaii l>4ttH
___
i«H 1.103
in kkj
^wiikidw ____ ____________ ___________
Chau^fl ArfrtflML
BabJeuM up'll L'qiII
-
RLVrwufi in ■■ nil P i Aijfjun
rj&Ow* £-&|l» ____
| income AFTER LABOUR CdSli
Kt W 120.753
l.fM 14*.J?O 712 520
■4 7W 127.773
_______ —«
______ K5_ 342171
10FF 1 143
114M0
~irt* 14^,713
iu.m it* Ara
111 fFS
art
322011
a too
1,141
141 300
UM
15Cljj4
«17M
IT 000
_
“W!
1 1U
MF *40
1 .'55
IM 7JJ
7» 422
■14
1M.?V1 014
Tabic 10 Relnfod
- GREEN FODDER Production ModelTafcJo 10 Rjtofcd Agriculture - GREEN FODDER Production Model
/ ECONOMIC MODEL
I iY&u? 1 . ■ -- ,
iexliUn« Ba«
i o«» iwc*Gvad Im
Nuto tLfci*
ViOll# p«r M
Sub IM yMId
--I I
r
•“■• i
W1 • •’
j.»13
1.014
J.ottl
ji.
-'
■
-
-
-
-
T
1
,
-
-
----------- >
_ .-
TJUO
•
7 77#
-
4DG 4M
-
4CC
-
e,F4#
MB
•W
1 T4d
• JM
1 M»
1 floa
1 5O(>
1JW
hlkbocq
1OT23 COO
lJ.3M.0Ml"
II 1»,DOT
13 «1 IaX!
TOTAL YIELD
7 JOO <HK>
II.Hit 7-7~
nJ 200 000
Ip M3 POP
'? 3M.M4
H 1M.OK'
1 » H .« 0OQ
r
TOTAL HEC1AM &
I,Ml
7 ?W
73
111 ¥1 **UE
4 B34 ,'JB
& no hia
#043,41#
« 444 MM
IMRJ1 COHS
f biUicptb
Iiia.uilaud4l
Pr»nUiuuiuUiai
l~Difcii||l< AHmd
Sub TtrttA InjMl COkfai
InEVUNUE IHI i lilt LADCilIM
l.abfe.ll Ceul«
J |lNCuW AFTEH LftlKiljlt COS1B
4 DM
■ .MCLiia
?,2» ■*/
' «M
»K SOO
4W,V#
4.5J4 will
•2 BM
<-jQ MM
m rrs
ft XM) 444 t?
4T3fiffl MU1B7Q
A 3*2 W nai
»iu Kia MV?I
32 flftl -
___ w.ii’n fl.MB 130
W.ttfl Ml 200 ■nit OJ*
fiJHJ Mft ___*7 tM
jhww
2'2 4,'e
r 544..4H £O
*M 1QQ
L^.V-L.
WJ M41 f as 3ft)Table 10 Ralnfed Agriculture -GREEN FODDER Production Modol
PBQ«
♦O -h‘ f«.»J i«i W 300
18 2>SOOQ
18 225 000
18,0413 000
IS308 KW
two
10.038*000 16.OM.QOO
17 800,000
M 854 OOO
18 1*54 OOO
20 412 000
21 181,000 M Ml 000
1
| TOTAL TWID
TOTAL. »<CTAWt~~
RPVTt(Qlrr|Mr ha)
' SaaiM
FwWwt
•*MCtc*8»t
[ PaaUUite*
Ajuniai
REVFNUC
INPUICOStt
ln(>KUMte^
101
75
1868 454 9M14M
101
n
10,077 MO lo.ozj.asa
101
75
10 475,244 10 475.244
101
75
10,8 78 138
10 878 1J0
11,281 OTJ
11 920 II Ml 020
I
PtMadn
' -4> 1"* •< lr<, It Q |
V
RE’.tMJt BEFORE LABOUR
______ 0 553 DOO
• 02 282
10.165.178
i SM 0/0
i
I. Bbnur Cmh
W828
S3 BM
720 000
n 828
801 WO
W AM
II 778 7&2
82.824
|
RC<jyt AF1 ER LABOUR COSTS
].
1174 800
• H MO
•2 828
t>4 728
047 TOO
Ml 828 ‘
1 004 a .'6
1 <H/.O5O j
1 MO 528
1 140 870 ITablo 1O Ralnfod Agriculture - GREEN FODDER Production Modal
IS.5S2
»a
_ ’ 'A?0 f wu
34.OM O00
>4 o*r ooo
714
M *09 H4
tLJW.BO*IAPPENDIX 4
RAINFED AGRICULTURE, ECONOMIC APPRAISAL
Table 1 Rainfed Agriculture, Summary of Economic Costs and Benefits and Economic Rate of ReturnmbH
Jm'milCC
I to MP i
ukW4it
iTW
IrtOOtLIG
OT KA j riM ] /rl »
i*i mi
ii uv
EDl >K /*■
FrsrWOk
—
iir•
ob'sc t»dt
net Uhll
>HM/c
err'iisi ii
ti rn»
Im r uzi
’4 *1M
imwijp
J Vi
WTM IN MJM I IN
IWU IHjO ill VU ’irsu JIM
HVlIhllftUI.' i III.Hl
rants;
■ nr-M
t Twcnrii
{■VIM 1
stOMp.H
Mt'KE .«* ~
i/r iM t|
..rn'*r: l
Ed El DU
OIL GDZ ■ iK MO'U
Ml 11 «J L
_______________
4—--------- ■ ■ ■
in irac ri
HI LLf *
■M'HElE
imTmToc'
GLl h< li ’
i
lifMiii
wi jljir
Nihil A3H3MW1J 1WPI .
5Wti atJMyiOi 1 MOMltsul I
s ii j
-j----- —
Sil
HI irS'Et!
ir
Lit roi'M Kit'pSUEl
tM'iWb
to, wr«
I
—-----------------------
f iioo
fj'w’ih'i ! hrt Wsfjf I
str it
i l«*K
mj'trim .
tirtc
—
ii-1 'i/t'BEL1/ — —
MS ?/c'pt
2~r -—
OQC'zrCUE
Wh il.fl'fiL
ESA sii’it
Mi bm'k
EjBUi la
<■■
l«l SWBiC'j I f-vaViM i t i t 111 ESt tW DJL CM'CE
1 Si.1L fife E 1 55E IM O'M
II lb Bin J ■ %;
vliiba'WMvS L
aimiNaD i’
1WIJ3MI ITL’Un ®13NI*
finj.1 11 I |H ill ITt'Si ‘
BLl'hLE lit
tli’Wi C/1
LH K HO Id (fit
| WL rar |
PFE'sWI L
rrr w to *lo «I
1 rk mj K
era jj-c t-i
m iMtfB i
! ha in sr:
ULi £t| B'4f
1 DI 1 HD'ltl
| *®'W CWT* M
Snr'4 /1 i
' Mi lu'or
! trii
ttiniij-jK i
Etr nr'sjr i
m'ih scr
«n iq rLi ;
tHmi+i
c/flWri
'ie? il/'m
iaa ora Wi
>4; ItOXm'i
>01 HO M i
IM MM ih
OCj'HMI
MW'MfrSt
6tK rat.i" e:<
1 —|
Wt (■'■I HE FH’EK'iE Off EMU
rii i s-e h
—1 ----------- -■
“S
i4lO3 JlT^Hi
(
sic bi Tint
Ji'lFUfi
NK Mf C* »
tft
lh 1
DM L
04 k 1
un
CHCL
f*l 1H
WwHw i
| N4<I1 Kl'i
’ WS Lt
j wotw
iTOll
_ I :oc rw
in ra'itf i
lr«c TGB'-pLit
JLV tilMl'i
UWflJ |EL
tw HI K
DM EM
Illi.’ EGG LE
WE fd
r« aS? srp i
1■=
ME
DMrtl ltt I
ME
IU 1 «.L
to.
or Pi
MT
m ii
5*2 111
CTilWIM L
ms/ol’isei
«TK
v.i Ul
I m'z.t
I “* IL
| ncc-’wr
WL
Di L I
flM
win
4l'Rd
UH I IK I'M »
tH'iiaL'Grj l
' UML?
Jen™
EMl EE
. L «» U 4' ±M_t
1 MitMMI E8t
1 tat
nt'tu
■>."
. Htftir
itn HL
to 7
at;
Hdll
| QIGtM
Ini'fiK •« L
j WlWiifl ~
l®<LE
»I I EK
| «*«
Mr n
(w‘ tl£
I Buj¥'V3g«IC
G’-.’l
nrinj^_____
I m it
. | ujm iNr
I . _____
9OT £00 im'il
Ml
~1
IE/ 1
KI
to'l
□Ji l
ISO
IM Mi'
fM’iff wx i
*flrl
Lfl .
«L
Wl
MB
JttOL
W Ih i
Ml H/rH-tT
JPMW&DkE
«e ejk’wb 1
OiW L
TOO E-TI st
swi run
tnr hoi. re
MM-gn rq
ntbatr
EH to UL I
ME____
izj i
a moo'i
firt'l
ttl
E/l Ok
irotti
'MS
Ki 1*1 :»r
KtW*
JfiBMi f
■SBOtH *1
tse t j t tz
PM »I1 LK
Hr M3 «
f K it Hi MCu'WL I
I K lEl'lDt
rftWl LKT I
«0 [ir taiL
fftt PGI t£
■sw'cn
oc-rijp; aii
WOIHOTto
rro'mr t»
HrmWi
wr m'ri;
anN3ft3Mi
K1I
GCL
jftjL
oi» l
ass
CAUL
LOO'CLl
Ihuutf U^nrci
ttl/fi 01 El OLCOJGitk L
___________ 1 -
5iiMr*M l KhODt IM
ZS5DJI KG
obiw'sis
<n»* 1*101
fllfr GlE Oil
oir’iG
«»■«
Mr Ji
1 nt m
I-
K/ «. IK
(CT Lt
its EC
wr ill
DMJ&E
-
Ttl 5L0Wr
Mb*C *113 L.
«<rr
wr'JL
EH EOL
Or/ txt nr
4D£
ZED r-E
tak ?l
h > th
irt
ML BL
■MMB
GK LM'iM
iwMw jm'Seu'hi
DKi'tntGt
m'lr
I '*?JM_
I wf ri
I «t «t
user
055 Lit ttt
> rr, *
, riwv
-■ W IL
I ttitsi
te*1!
-
1 -OMKAkL* nr»e i dr m Ml'Hi'LW DL1A5D Irir
. Ml 1
1 GMi'j-K*
'[ K> £L
, LOSE*
mH
1
sir Ei'
1 J-ii'in
Ebfe'B
I s£n r Q2I >
mi ires az r on h» %w
t J o I '4 II 1 J71
fit OH
inn
tlT Ok?
Silk 4 I
aiibi'i
fcTfTJ
5E1 *__________
0BF1W
Sri ter Srft
i kOfl'NA
«ti jj
;ae‘oi0
■KBHT5L5
«0r
jDFnir
thl
"ivsivwddv ^/wdnO33 '•DjfH/nafjBw'pajw/ey t w er tri
I * •'Table 1 Rain fedAflricu«ur<hECONOMIC APPRAISAL
economic model
TOR
1.911
i
299 »■ “ ••IL
249,Ml 470
If 4M
.CO 3J2 4 035
219 ;m 4*0
17^499 225 305
4 925 1O« 701,430
3_32j929 »*»
4431*4
_ ----------- ■=—
1
22 932 593542
loricni»9o
i Mioot.no
2.090 945 »W
1 273,039 230
1020.130
1,0*3 021
14«5.«3a.eM
TOTS 103
Mjr
Yob j/r; 17.496
241 001
4 924 JO* 400.0M
004 MO
’? 4M
22 6»
M4 <30
11
7 397 130 220 2 MH B25 MO
1 097 735
044 430
1 7 495
22 432 004 5M
31 NJQ 7 400 1/9 040 2 057 920 470
1 120 307
Page 2o< J
2,0 ill
m.w
• 2,400 1
n ’#•» 1
4 929 1
174003.920 I
504 505 I 17.409 1
»,»» | 924 004 I 31 MO
7 579 MO >00 I 2 754.023 290 1
1,142.999 1
5T« >*>
10,9*3
>0,M3
10 M3 I
OM
IM
on
1.120
1 170
l.t?O I
3*0
I win nut
pjpurcom
'•f9l«4n
I '•’MC*tJ4l
p
tut-1 Mai utpw* Cttfl
(MVBiUi BEFORE LABOUR
INCOME AFTER LABOUR COST* *NL1 BfcHEf IT rtR Aa ________
INCMMENTAL WCOME
? 4*3 DM 45.
Mt >40 20 ' 10.200 '
135X7.200 «.010.150
40 3700)1 ' 231.15003!
3 JOI.006 23? joo ni jto
3 002 3M 001
39.419
2 453 405 770
3 MA 1 OOM
2 659 289 020
2 770 <60 100
» $m 2 IMK5H4
I
1»?«e ok
i 3MJ1MM
1 ooo
135
1 721
250
-
2.W4.042J72
71 490*30 20 710 TOfl
••2 CUI 200 iJ73 VJO
97 >00 504 7IM 011 140
4 139 9/3 777 353 M9 Ml
1.7M 303 041 4 1 244
3.107.354 ?M
1 OOO
135
im
ISO
-
3 107 023 350
73.211 ill
20.716 200 149.390 000
2JO4.95O 59 042 003 305 53’ MO
4295 631 219
302 537 502
3 933 093 637
41 *67 1 134 144 037
-
1 '430 | 135 1
1.711 I 250 1
1
3 219J04 440
74 9M 346
70 710.736 I
•56 760 000 I
2 454 300 I 61.277 499
316 645,157 4 451 3M 714
371,505 263 4 079 64) 433
41 M7 I 3 49093) 949
*1
—
L
1 -------- 1
1
-—
n rri.iac
• wo 020
_____»»in n> ]
M 471 M7
11 It* 4/9
20 tr»a?>
>0i «
12.790 935 23.047 453
o Jjairt 13.03a FT4 24,992 623
wn Fr*Ufv 1 fWnfed Agriculture. ECONOMIC APPRAISAL
V»u« * -|1 3
€COW>^C MOOLI
r r nH
f ■ijffraj
,'L*to c^.ruHri' h»_______
iWjhs fins
I Tlf'-jf NW
I NwAlntd;
Htnlurw
f Hkii____________
'fitor lltlppnmil »i*_
___ | YlftldprrM
I--------- /
I ----------L-
1411
INK '
tup wi
«T4Mi
I77.M? I
< w>
14i MH *90 |
TDwCrt1 1WMJ
kJ 40S
itM >k3
< SJi
______ ”«•
11 AIT '
i >24 1
».4TT
W?fiT '
'1,1*4 .
W.WI
P 4M ’|-
U 411 50 411
• 02i
a on
Hi Hl *40
1 04! oh
M 1 lt*B^ H 33*1 3W M k>M4C | 4' UN 530 1
.1
•1
l 125 334
IT 4M
1MU
“ L
1 i«*S2
i r ion
T
' JOS we
1J4M
27*33 27412
..... L
I.IM.Til
•> 4M I
21 AM
» <4\ ,
11 4V1 1-
31 •>?* | "
A.«k |
h mtsti i
-1 _
• JM B«A
nm |
21.B33
MA 122
>1 MO
I UMB«
"I WO
1. IAS M3 1.10* 840 1245 Til
1 7B5 04N 1,115,IM
>1 MO
)1 MO
31. MO 31 MO 21 4fcO
5uN> h»W J
3 J43.DB3 IM 3 3TD 40C JMFCrS.WO 3 Ito Ml JW JAMON? Mi
-1
- j1
__ .1
.
.
TOTAL YIFID
I
J IM 111 AW 7,«M lONCOC MM JJOOOO' l
J,3>1,JM !AD njr mxi.qw
3MJ.IW 700 1 IflliTM.BTO
I >Tli,MI.M0
'■ Wb.KZ
>1 M£ 3 KO fits iflr
111? Ill 1»
rOTAl HECTAAf I
NPUTB^Birr p*r* |
a
-
» 141*11 1 IM MJ
3 IM MB ill!
1211.U?
3 *01115 000
•All M3
I4M FBI
14.BIJ 11.BH3
zzr 1
ZT EHiiipil AmmI
fawM
4 t-VlJti'k
lAkbdeUJK
Ptribaaii
i
WlHr
LjfcCuf
■'
4E.«Wt
I newt coil*
flint**
nitttha
BmTin
B*rJh»
BlrrBii
IF*
i ito
IMO
1>b
» 'JI
-J
*»
GM
1 IT®
litt
1J4
».r»i
?JC
-
3 L! ’.Jn5 514 1 2 44k iuil una
K Ml M3 I 3tJ.Hfl.7DD |
i r i ,<w <w
>w
-t
a.BBLMrvn
IOiNU.UK
JSC
-
3M<an jfw
11121 TIN
FhMm.__________
kAMCUOd*!
PbWMja »
Liii.^i ■Man'll i
U-TiW tafui. CMii
HIVE MUL DCF DRE LABOW
1. jbou E « til
----------------1
K71H 234 M TH Jllfl
jl
■AJfflJOA |
70 ?*■ ?HU
kfitijl DM
j M.' B» 2. bih nx
____________
rMMTS
J4F5M*
fli j u am
jfli.uirm
a,511 Kb 313
■ I Ml III
J* t.M2 150
4 JBO.bbl,/sU
MS At/ HA 1H 4*D*-IL
IHCulAP. AF TEA LAMuft COST!
1 HLT W Nll iT PL rum
1 .st REU£h IM INCOME
1 Fi.uriaiM: *Tt wwe-jjI uuhj tntTt
* CJkPTUH emit
1 GH DTr.tWH IjflMI Qian l*M**IM4l
44VKM*din.j««t( 1 Mi
i nnr ig*» tichamui M%
LOCAL CUHHERGY HUI U
1 RECLJRHFwT AHfAUHHQCOHl
.lS to juri* <^-n« rr.iru
A.lU 453,221
4* M3
5 SM . >£5.144
.
4 JH TASCji
•uri
3 T7J 101,140
ITU 4*1 JO4
J MO
Of MJ, BBS
MiM3,M1
4 utm^t 3&B,W8 3Bi
*,«U.2M Wl
Aa.tn
)Ui KJ7M
-
im tr.wiu
JI21.7W
•1,1 II,«to
Ml.UUb.1M
5 1/4.4 H ?O« 40? JT6 MF
4.M? MMlF
AMTA
4 UM irtUHA
•
] U4 IVBb
1F IW IJfl.Kik
Airs kto.uiairj
-
I.U4JM if, AR
JJ KU 1 1J1 MA
Ji MO 3 1M«C Mik IJM.W? 130
•
' >V. IH I4.BD3
BUB
IkTD
1 ODO
131
1.TJI
?ie
-
3 toQ.IWWC
■3,543 <»
IOjTH 2M 1D3.-.M MS
J.MI1 OW f*.4.M all
j r? 2’2 Ml b JX5 1.'0 701
Ain KJ,TBB a ns iq? All
ij.nr. AJ,«H’lB7B
1 3 to fttl
IN HI
*W
lira'
( KO
115
1.721
-
na
■
)IV 7W2M4
l W1.4M
H*A)
Mi 1
' Ito
1l4
‘ 'JI
rw
1 32A S3b
14 Ml
frH
i ir-a
1 UCu
135
1 ?2I
3W
j
1 346 98 ?
ll.Ml
TOT
1 'TO
1 WO
il.Ml
ru?
1 I TU
IBM
IM KI
1 TJI
350
4.004 aFJ, 021 4 11ll MT 111
1 FJI
;w
4.341 OK 240
■5 JU 4M MM/ Ilf
U.J0I1I0 UiiM U4 M.AC1 1LW
JO ? 'A JO4
200.Hf.WQ
1 Cv4 Anq
I} l/j HU
liilj* Ifg
1 >K ilk san
aysqu 4«q
A MO 123 luu
41 lAH
a.»i ori iii
rOJ_to:2M
;c-s si* aqn
3&41T60
?a >21 uaj
1N4 NM.dJl
■ .Ml,DU IK
414,274 IM
5.*n r,H j ooi
4j‘;nii
W J11 K4
jiiijri jot
} HF.»«
___ TJ2fll,KN
4D15i» Ito
)«|| 44NB0J
* 12 jm am
5 344/Mi No 1
4MW
Kf 11201
»32 »4 ecu
jjTO.ASO
to, IM UK J
4!N>:m IK
3 •' ? MS bU
45? Jf«,5W
fl.lHB FII.M*
H 142
io Hi KN
J)0 AllD NM
} MB 40?
H, »2kf HD
4 k] Elk. 44A
a O3K i-1-1112
4a»,iaj >m
k Mi.Ari im
4* 154
4 MN .412 420 *155,252 J IA
A 1W.KII FM 4,f4B SI | MA
» m,»M ju,r>*jr>i ?! r rnt-M
3,WI,1W U Mr Oil
4*1 iri Jii1
■ 1*2 Will 4ro.ua ,nga
aEiy iwsi? 44MHJ
S | 352
x» Oto W2 JC f 14 20*
30j/Ml DM I AU M* MWHM
41 a, i ja. ip*
A T*11 U.AM 1 fto/M.GM
44 INI 1112.144,494
a
-
•
T
I—
FDMtiuh
i ork ciirinrc* m ■1 bi
□e sc/its mnuM
11%
—
-4
4MM1 to J
U.HCMI
11,11 V J
*** tit w*
Al Ml Alt*
E ?J*1K
rtm.toj
MIMI'I
IT 3*7 Mi
JO Ui HJ
MB,5W2D2
U IM 144
ii bh hi
_________
00 MF UDQ
111H AOF
41 T4»7B7
14 ' W 155
U.lMtoJ 34 TI*Tto MM1.3I7
a? <W,3I>
jo . M MA
lH Ml M2
W TJT JB3
MfftMNAL HAT!’ UF Ht TO***
Nr.TWfifNTVMUC
■►FTflFNfT * PF H ha
m* m MJ IB
M .'01 Ml t| 144 MF
32 IflHJ
• to W2 M4
MU /
MFMN4M BMWfMF
L ’______________
i_____________ __ _______
_________ - ,.
5WD2
.....................-
Mill
53F44
Mi It
55 S »
Kf J4
01 Hi HO
JUN3B 4/1
2T All W
«• 111 MJ
5J? 1*
M Nf.Mi Ji irsJ4j 14 111 * JI J |
m uh »o
[
175'1'B
M tod MJ jiaiiiij
1B14IBH TV .411 .rm
Ml 42APPENDIX 5
IRRIGATED AGRICULTURE CROP BUDGETS
Table 1
Irrigated Agriculture Crop Budgets
Table 2
Irrigated Agriculture Crop Budgets
Maize
Sorghum
Table 3
Irrigated Agriculture Crop Budgets
Rice
Table 4
Irrigated Agriculture Crop Budgets
Table 5
Irrigated Agriculture Crop Budgets
Soyabeans Oilseeds
Table 6
Irrigated Agriculture Crop Budgets
Vegetables
Table 7
Irrigated Agriculture Crop Budgets
Cotton
Table 8
Irrigated Agriculture Crop Budgets
SugarCane
Table 9
Irrigated Agriculture Crop Budgets
Green Fodder]rrigated Agriculture, Crop Budget for MAIZE
Tab|e 1
EXISTING
TECHNOLOGY
NEW TECHNOLOGY
Year 1-35
Yearl
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Years
Year 6-35
■---- -ELEMENTS r^nnilCTlON
QUANTITIES
Seeds
ftrtiiaen
Insecticides
Pesticides
taught Antmils
LABOUR
Fniily Labour Causal Labour
Units
Kg/ha
Kg/ha
Kg/ha
Kg/ha
Kg/ha
tlll/ha
man/days man/days
-
•
•
2,210
3,140
4.070
5,000
30
75
0
0
3
30
100
2
3
30
120
3
3
25
120
3
3
•
•
•
•
•
•
0
100
0 100
0 100
0
100
^bHUE
Birr/ha
3,034.0
4,311
5,588
6.865
V JT COSTS
fwtlittrs
’nfcldes
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
74
169
0
0
191
74
225
120
0
191
74
270
240
0
191
62
270
240
0
191
'W costs
434
610
775
763
250
250
250
250
’tto?bour
Birr/ha
684
860
1.025
1.013
mmTable 2 Irrigated Agriculture, Crop Budget for SORGHUM
EXISTING
TECHNOLOGY
NEW TECHNOLOGY
Year 1-35
Year l
rear z
rear 3
Year 4
Years
ELEMENTS
PRODUCTION
INPUTS QUANTITIES
Seeds
Fertilizers
Insecticides
Pesticides
Draught Animals
LABOUR
Family Labour
Causal Labour
Units
Kg/ha
Kg/ha
Kg/ha
Kg/ha
Kg/ha
till/ha
man/days marVdays
_____________•
•
•
1,300
2.200
3.7of
25
50
•
•
3
25
75
2
3
25
100
3
3
2
2
•J
1
•
•
•
•
e
•
•
100
•
100
♦
100
REVENUE
Birr/ha
-
INPUT COSTS
Seeds
Fertilizers
Insecticides
Pesticides
Draught Animals Sub-total input costs
Family Labour
Causal Labour
TOTAL COSTS
BirT/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
• V. tSated Agriculture, Crop Budget for RICE
revenue
Blrr/ha
13.272
13,904
18,484
16.437
COSTS
S«*Oi
TOfrStrcitfes
’’•Hicidej
2ra«jhl Animals Sl *-tatal mp^ c«b
BirrJha
Birr/ha
Brrrflia
Bitr/ha
Brrrfha
164
405
4*0
1.620 1 233
,
3.897
154
405
480
1,620
143«
129
770
480
1,620
1,238
129
270
480
1.620
1,238
129
270
480
1.620
1.238
3.897
3,737
8.737
3.737
3,737
Fiiwl Llbour
&?* Labour
JjljLCOSTS
Birrfha
BirnTi*
225
720
225
720
225
720
225
720
225
720
129 270 480
1,620 1.238
225 720
Blrryha
4.842
4,M2
4,682
4.682
4.682
4,682Table 4 Irrigated Agriculture, Crop Budget for SOYABEANS
EXISTING TECHNOLOGY
Year 1-35
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
JEW TECHNi Year 4
ELEMENTS
PRODUCTION
Units
Kg/ha
□LOGY Year 5
»eat vj
2.105
2 970
4 QIC
IOC
INPUTS QUANTITIES
Seeds
Fertilizers
Insecticides
Pesticides
Draught Animals
Kg/ha
Kg/ha
Kg/ha
Kg/ha
till/ha
80
75
4
80
80
4
80
85
4
1
11
1
LABOUR
Family Labour
Causal Labour
man/days
man/dayi
-
-
80
80
80
i
REVENUE
Birr/ha
1.627
2.660
3.692
—
INPUT COSTS
Swdi
Fertilizers
Insecticides
Pesticides
Draught Animals Sub-total input costs
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
170
169
255
170
180
255
$05
170
190
255
615
ti
jb
Family Labour
Causal Labour
TOTAL COSTS
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
*
200
200
Birr/ha
794
805
200
—~^ij£a ted Agriculture, Crop Budget for OILSEEDS
■pt>le 5
EXISTING
TECHNOLOGY
NEW TECHNOLOGY
Year 1-35
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Years
Year 6-35 ,
——Elements
-irvin' rrTlON
n^U7S QUANTmES
5««is
Ffrtiltzars
intoGbeides
t*r*EJcid«
D-wghl Animal*
LWUR
-3rnity Labour
Causal Labour
Units
KgTha
Kg/ha
K»/ha
Kgrha
Kg/ha
ull/ha
man/daye man/days
•
■
2,600
3J6O
3 B50
r
4.5M
100
35
-
3
-
-
-
*
-
-
W
100
45
*
3
90
100
45
2
3
90
100
45
3
3
90
Birr/ha
*
2,999
3.665
4,340
5,035
**Krr costs
Seeds
Ftf Wiztfi
lr WOClt>K
p «tKides
Draught Amma|t
inputs
J^i-ibour
-^Jgsrs
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birrfha
Birr/ha
BirrtHa
-
•
170
7ft
191
170
101
191
170
101
160
191
170
101
240
191
-
-
440
402
622
702
Birdha
Birr/ha
Birrfha
-
-
225
225
225
225
-
-
565
687
M7
927Table 6 Irrigated Agriculture, Crop Budget for VEGETABLES
EXISTING
TECHNOLOGY
NEW TECHNOLOGY ------------ *
Year 1-35
rear l
Tear z
Year 3
Year 4
Year 5
ELEMENTS
PRODUCTION
INPUTS QUANTITIES
Seeds
Fertilizers
Insecticides
Pesticides
Draught Animals
LABOUR
Family Labour
Causal Labour
Units
Kg/ha
Kg/ha
Kg/ha
Kg/ha
Kg/ha
tilUha
man/days man/days
•
•
-
6 300
6,600
6.900
1.500
115
-
5
4
1.500
115
-
5
4
•
•
-
•
•
29D
5
300
5
1.500
115
5
4
300
5
UK
iS
1
1
revenue
INPUT COSTS
Seed*
Fertilizers
Insecticides
Pesticides
Draught Animals
Sub-total input costs
Family Labour
Causal Labour
TOTAL COSTS
Birr; ha
BirTfha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
BirTfha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
BinYhagated Agriculture, Crop Budget for COTTON
table
existing
technology
NEW TECHNOLOGY
Year 1-35
Year 1
Year 2
Yuri
Yw4
Year 5
Year 5-35
r-"—elements-
Units
-
950
1,000
1,500
2.000
tDQOUCTlON
WTS QUANTITIES
Strcte
Ftrtjiaare
irarficides-
RsticidM
DrjLiaht Animals
Trader
JLBOUR
Furuly Labour
"imal Labour
Kg/ha
Kg/ha
Kg/ha
Kg/ha
Kg/Ii a
nlVha
hra/hi
man/days man/days
30 .
200
B
20
5
12
1W
30
200
fl
20
5
12
150
W
260
8
20
5
12
150
25
250
8
20
5
12
150
2.500
25
250
fl
M
5
12
150 |
2.5C0
25
250
B
20
5
12
150
[®®IUE
| Birr/ha
4,286
4,512
6 768
r
9.024
11,280
11.2B0
[■^r costs
Tractor
Seeds
^rtUiwi
-feticides
^ticldti
****1 input coats
7™’ Labour
C^xoafs
—
Birr/ha Birr/ha Birr/ha Birr/ha Birr/ha Birr/ha
Birr/ha Birr/ha Birr/ha
619
102
4M
1.200
1 350
r
319
619
102
450
1.200
1,360
319
619
102
450
1,200
1.350
319
619
85
582
1.200
1.360
319
619
85
562
1,200
1,350
319
4,040
4,040
4.040
4.135
4,135
4.135
375
375
375
375
619
85
582.
1.2OO
1.350
319
375 375
4.415
4,415
4,41 S
4,510
4,510
4.510Table 8 Irrigated Agriculture, Crop Budget for SUGAR CANE
EXISTING
TECHNOLOGY
Year 145
NEW TEC
Year!
Year?
hnology y ear 4
elements
Units
PRODUCTION
Kg/ha
-
-
•
9.500
9,500
9,50
"t. 0—
INPUTS QUANTITIES
Seeds
Fertilizer!
Insecticides
Pesticides
Draught
LABOUR
Permanent Labour Cane Cuting Labour Harvesting Labour
Kg/ha
Kg/ha
Kg/ha
Kg/ha
till/ha
martfdeys man/diys man/days
-
•
-
-
4
580
1
10
2
220
111
111
4
580
1
10
2
220
111
111
4
580
1
10
2
220
111
111
PER HECTAR
REVENUE
Birtfha
25.472
25.472
25.477
211
INPUT COSTS
Seeds
Fertilizer!
Insecticides
Pesticides
Field Loading Sub-total input costs
Permanent Labour Cane Cutting labour Harvesting Labor
TOTAL COSTS
Blrrfha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
Birrfha
Birrfha
Birr/ha
BinTha
Birr/ha
Birr/ha
154
1,305
150
576
104 2 "IRfi
154
1,305
150
675
104
2.388
154
1.305
150
875
104
--------- 2J88
•I
■^5
•
-
-
880
133
45
•
-
-
3,446
880
133
45 3>«n
----------- 880 133
45
-- ------j44«
4
C
Notes
corresponding to 92.5 Tonnes cane(10.3%)
2 Average yitW ove* a 7 year cycle
3 Revenue is tasec co import parity pnce @ Fetrua-y 1996g irrig
a ted Agriculture, Crop Budget for GreenFODDER
1 EXISTING
technology
MEW TECHNOLOGY
Year 1-35
Year 1
Year 2 I Year 3
Year 4 I Yw 5
Y«rW5
II £
I T
-
3.500
3
t------- “ELEVEN75
CTIOiN
•tf UTS QUANTITIES
Suds
Firtlld»n
IrwKticidM
ftrttjcidrt
Oaughi
Fondly Labour
Units
Kg/ha
Kgrtis
Kg/ha
Kg/ha
Kg/ha
till/ha
T»arvdays ,
-
-
-
-
-
-
•
-
*
■
*
•
250
-
-
-
3
•
-1
1,500
250
*
•
■
3
30
2.500
250
-
*
-
3
30
4 500
250
*
-
-
3
30 |
'jsui labour
man/days
^ENUE
Birr/ha
-
3,735 ( 6.225
a,ris
1t,205 |
WUT COSTS
Swds
'■Wticides
Draught
^flniMcwts
Ml UbOiJr
.^’Ual Libor
-ifiCOSTs
1
BimTha Brmha
Birr/ha Bfrr/Tin Birr/ha
-
-
-
633
630
638
638
191
191
191
191
-
029
829
829
829
0J rr/hi
Birr/ha
*
•
•
225
226 |
227
228
Binr/ha
-
-
1,054
1.055 J
1.066
1,057APPENDIX 6
irrigated agriculture crop production models
Appendix 6-1 Irrigated Agriculture Crop Production Model for Project 1
Appendix 6-2 Irrigated Agriculture Crop Production Model for Project 2
Appendix 6-3 Irrigated Agriculture Crop Production Model for Project 3APPENDIX 6.1
IRRIAGATED AGRICULTURE CROP PRODUCTION MODELS FOR
PROJECT 1 (Alwero-Abobo - 14,000ha)
Table 11rrigated Agriculture Crop Production Model Project 1 - Maize
Table 2 Irrigated Agriculture Crop Production Model Project 1 * Sorghum Table 3 Irrigated Agriculture Crop Production Model Project 1 - Soyabeans Table 4 Irrigated Agriculture Crop Production Model Project 1 - Oilseeds Table 5 Irrigated Agriculture Crop Production Model Project 1 - Vegetables Table 6 Irrigated Agriculture Crop Production Model Project 1 - Cotton
Table 7 Irrigated Agriculture Crop Production Model Project 1 - Green FodderiMtvi NUf
INPUT COSTS
Saade
FartMlrera
lllMCUtidtl
F’aaUcidaa
Draught AnUnals
Sub total ktpul coala
Family Labour
Causal I atiovr
7OTAL COSTS
rt>rTm»
>,034 0
-
74
130
0
0
151
434
4,311
74
225
120
O
151
410
t '04
74
270
240
0
101
7/5
4. BUS
4,441
4.444
0.
c aaa
4.441
DirviTia
Blrr/ha
B»'r*ha
SUrdta
Blrv/ha
nu-rffia
Dlrr/ha
Dlrr/ha
02
270
2-»0
<>
101
743
42
270
240
□
101
70)
42
>70
240
0
101
743
42
270
240
0
131
743
42
270
240
0
151
743
42
275
240
0
101
703
4J
270
740
0
101
743
4.445
n
27C
240
0
101
743
----~
--- ~
—H
250
M4
210
•40
250
1.025
2 50
1.013
250
1.013
250
1,013
200
1.013
250
1.013
MS
1,013
2M
ijl3
210
1,013
EQUIVALENT ha MLVENUt
(tea acreago)
1.144
2.2M 3.432
4.5FI
5.720
5 720
3.770
1.720
5 720
5.720
MX>
0■Tabfc f trrtffMed A/pit^iitunK Crop ProtfiMtor> Htid«f for p>q|c<| t MaiJ£
V4J1JH J ul 1
REVENUE
&/T*ha
fl.Hit
a aas
f.Ml
4 101
« HM
4,*i*
AHI
6,BOS
AIM
AMJ
4 Ik'
HJPUT COSTS
&o«d*
Fvtiiijflii
iHBDEldcldia
FoikJ4«a
[kruiO*K Artlmolt
1
5-ut Input l»»H
ramlly Laboui
Cauatil | plioor
ror al costs
Hnlha
niriNki
Hlrrflu
tllrrftiB
*4
*70
34U
•
1*1
«J
170
J4D
D
101
S2
370
340
U
1*1
u
170
|M
a
101
iJ
1T0
24*
0
101
74)
Tt)
70)
Hi
TOJ
01
170
140
0
111
fn
•1
jro
240
0
101
703
02
770
2411
a
101
TO)
01
270
240
0
10!
m
03
7TD
KO
1D
141
TH!
GJ 3TD 740
8
1*1 roj
IS
170
1-W
O
HI
T«
HGrvJlu
QiriiYk*
BkrJha
IM
IM
3M
H0
2W
IM
7,413
>JU
1,81 J
1,013
*M
mi 3
HO
1.01)
».QI I
HQ
1,013
2W
1 111
2*0
1 01)
JM
1.01)
1,013
EUillVAI ENT ha
|ifb arrcagn)
*JH
MIO
1,720
l,7M
O./JO
1.7)0
S.7N
IJM
MN
A7»
5,710
MH
REVENUE
lalai Iblrr
J0J7Q.il ? fl
2I.1T0 0H
3*2?<I,*H
M.2ro,076
30 HO 0H
3IJ7QJH
3> Hu.OFO
It.lXAOTl
31 3Fo.aU
io m.ori
)*JF*.OT1
aojm.t'M
l*R*UT COSTS
5«td«
r<iutkj«r«
IniBcHc W#»
PlBllEldlB
fraught AjM*M*
Sut> total Iii|>u4 C9»l«
FantUy Latour
Causal Lubow
TOTAL COSTS
Total Birr 1o4ri Ubr Ictal Birr Trial UIk Trial fr*
Tot- Birr
mmm
1,044,44*
i.jt> lien
q
1 Of J, Its
4J04.«1J
1,37 3JSO
V
1,0*3.**)
iMjai
1J7I.IW
0
1,**7.0*3
344,(41
1,444,401
1,313 MO
0
IjMJ.ODi
2*4,Cit
1 044,400
I.3T1.0M
0
4J44.4O
o. >04 m
154.441
1.H4.4M
1.XFZIK
D
1jM7.il)
4 bM I U
JD4 Ml
1.144,411
1J7I.0W
a
1 Q*1 111
4J44.G1J
3*4, HI
1,044.41 'J
1.371.0M
*
1,0*7 113
4,344,01j
4.M4 01a
1*4,041
1,044,4*1
i.m.iw
3
1,U*JOOJ
4.1*4,01)
4.144,011
354,001
1.H4.4JU
mow
0.
1 002,141
AH4.0U
*14, ICT
1,444,4
1,113,04*
1
1,0*7 503
4.M4.H1)
1S4J0I
1.M4.4M.
i.sra,*M
0
4J44.HU
r Dial Birr Trial Birr Tala BOr
1,470 0*3
a
1,43M»)
0
MMlOU
0
1.41B.M4
0
1,4W.ua J
0
MU.tai
M 30,013
0
M«4M4
D,704,40*
1,704.014
1.4M.C4J
0
0,304. GOD
1,4X04)
1
MH.om
1 TM.ODS
1,430,003
0
i,7H,n»i
1,4*0.043
3
(jhw
-i
5 >M GH
1.4KMJ
0
5,704 no
5.T1AM0
WCONf. w r ER LACOUR Toil! Bl. i
l),4H,JT0 JJ,4TM?»
1X01,3?*
1X<T*1T» 3a,«Tt,lM
xj4Fj,m
noa.ui 3i,*Ti,jii ttJH.iri n.-mart"*1 ,rr^’«d Agrlcullun) Ciop Prod^cHon Medel for Project 1 MAIZE
1
3031 | 7D21
TOM 2MB Soli
JoF
JOZfl
JOJI
Ll£M£nts
:om
2021
pMULllJCIIOM
rnpursquANTmia
HvBiita
I UnMs
IkqiIlb
Nfl-'hj
I.WO
4,0lM
t.BW
i.*oa
I.OMI
1,000
B/KC
luOu
ft ,QQO
t-aoi)
FBrtUlnra K[)i'iin
llrtX
Kq-I'S
F'«i Hcliina Kgrtui OnlUpM AnFmaii HWN*
ixnoup
TaimAly Labour nunMajFt
CiwiW Libow
^jtfVdayl '
ZB
170
3
3
0
100
34l
• 20
3
3
0
100
u
120
3
3
0
100
13,
1K
J
3
C
100
21
170
1
□
100
2k
IM
3
i
0
too
M
■ 79
3
1
0
100
IB
1JO
3
3
a
100
2ft
120
3
1
t
10C
3ft
IN
3
3
0 IM
1
J<f VfNUC
Dinffia
4.44B
• •11
ft. M
tMJ
ft, 9*5
Liu
• •OB
l,MS
1.0*1
SMI
IMPUT COSTS
1 R*a<i»
F«pillMn
tniscBcidu
PotNclOoft
OradyJkl Animal*
Suh **pul coil*
Family Labour
Chui al Labour
TOTAL COSTS
1
01 nr, ha
Bafriita
Burma
Blniha
Ittrrihi
Birrfln
Blrrflift
BkfflLft
U
ITS
MO
0
111
•2
270
MO
0
Hl
r«3
12
m
MO
o
HI
■2
170
240
0
101
«
no
240
0
191
41
270
MS
0
101
si
MS
MO
0
111
743
745
743
741
•I
>ra
MO
0
111
7>J
41
270
MO
0
in
743
703
143
41
ITO
240
s
111
JC3
JOO
MO
MO
250
MB
2M
MS
7M
250
250
1,013
1,013
1.013
1 013
ton
1.013
T.OIJ
1.013
1.01 J
1.013
EQUIVALENT lift
(*•* Bcrasgo|
4.120
•,?20
1.710
B./20
S,?10
1,720
4,720
5,720
5,720
S.7N
InfVLHUE
[TdWBmt
»,2?O,O7$
M.270.076
35.270 075
M.Z70.07S
39,270.075
M,270.074
», 270.075] 37.270,075) 39,770,07 5 j 39.170,075/
INPUT CQ5T3
SstOi
pew Biff
1B4.M1
1,544,449
354.M1
1MMI1
354,441
FfiWixm
llol«l 0J*<
1. $44, XW
Wi*ocllcV<U«
llaWDUr
1,372,110
a
1J72.4M
0
ij?zaw|
I.J77UM
PMiiCldOB
HoW DUt
DraugM Anlmh*
hoW Bln
1 0B7M1
1.MJ 8B1
°
f.W,W
(input e.qb.1*
fl crib Tlkrr
4 HA,E13
41*4.*13
ai&4,tn
<.1*4,1» J,
J, J4J «U
1,434.<1BI
1,4M,DiB3
MX.CM7
I
a
8 7MIIM
■ *■* *■'*HWifl TV101
O/S’SS^'I.
oLCjaa't
B*C‘JBOj
loiCXW’a
r»i oioc ffo'kz
0HXWj_
|r*ifliojL _
trtK/
OH'ZOH
innioc
JICW?
fHOKt
iw'tirv
qiu us
rWrei
llOll
Mi HI
[itBIW 91
wkee
WBCE2
XOC>IO
Mi I FL
hfrn'aHTH
| MO'oa
Wllil
•tfiif
ururi
FW9FC
arc mf vbl air
XJFH*
XLI'LSC
tHMf
KF«E
•U>H caicaz
mu
Woe
WlWx
m£“2
»noflvn MJUv amw*
S1SOJ 1V1O1 jnaqrv 1 irinF3 MMiqn X||UIMJ
• twj pdui pw-ci'if
•iiwmv
■WPIiatrf
ttpp|i->MU|
•jDtmMPi
apaaft
cxspjirwwi
anw ja?w| umvAinoi
»lo‘c FLOC
tio'r
■ g | ♦IOC
natu
xoc'fii om'ih
Cl I- ■>17 ni
iiot
aiat
o»r>ci'<»
(itr
OLM'L DUEL
CH
(rtVoMV art)
HI
aw
BIS
Mt
M*____
HZ
i«4___ _____
□sz
OH
MZ
■«
Mf
CW
HE
LU
OU
lai
OH
—T------
BH
ill
1.
nr
ozi
£F
•H
Hi
OH
orx
IPX
Ln
L»r
*
111
-
•ar
wr
XF
LIL
OFF
ur
!•■
.
OFZ
WZ
£F
tM
L«
»r
Oft
XF
IM
IIL
OFZ
Oil
it
hl
ow
ail
XI
III
•Fl
«Z
XF
LIL
an
cti
XF
lbi
.
CLI
IF
-
*
-
■4f"W>
•MU>|||
■nnno
•WW
•HPIO
■UiOlO
■MMB
BI.903 TVAO1
jm>qi i jawrrn j
liwirl X||UMJ
>1503 inilui p|B|•<F’i
■Idu^Tuy niOrw»cj
«gppil«od
«d«f3a|.30t(i|
«JBZ|WPFJ
•poos
mcDirwNi
_________
DCCS | NC'f
«c»
o<r •
Wt B
otc?v
Mt'fl
1£12
HL‘F 1 HF t
•
•
•
mmiti
iPMlASd
jftoqt I laaiwo I /noqrl 4pu«J I
unouvil
awiDWV >yOnwio I
uppjjaiv/ I uwflum /
■p»»s I snittwno wwl
Wil ZWWOfcw/
sivmi ?j
i ho v «*vwd
FMrtHTJwna i
•«i/ivi^ ^a-j •wwnaii/ny
r afrr^i
1
1
i£Tilbl® 2 Irrigated Aprlcifttuiw Crop Production Model fo Project 1 SORGHUM
r
P&ye 2 ol 3
nh
3O10
1011
2012
Wil
;uu
3 ft 14
2010
20 IT
30i|
3011
»1O
LLEMFM15
PnOD^GTiCM
IMPWIS QUAN THIES
. Soadi
I •rllllUFl
Insrcttc^te?
Pat tic Mbs
L*'*t>0iit Animals
LAB OU II
funnily LaCjciiar
€uw»n l abour
Until
Kp4M
■q<Tn
«»**»•
*D*m
Kn-Tii
uir/ikii
nianrlilijrjrl.
4.000
4,404
4,000
4.0M
4,000
4 KMi
4,OW
4,0011
4.000
4,000
-
-
20
uc
1
4
too
»
120
3
5
-i
IM
24
•20
1
3
H
114
3
1
14
120
3
3
24
120
3
3
23
134
3
3
IB
120
1
1
3i
uo
1
J
23
"TO
3
3
JI
Hl
3
1
1
34
IN
3
3
.
100
100
r
104
«
100
1G»D
1EHJ
too
-
IM
-
too
100
|
WEVEWIjF
PlrrOkD
4.320
4.37O
5,320
1,320
5,120
1,320
I1K
1.320
3.120
5,370
M20
1,320
input costs
•wM
Firtihiifw
iHMClIdte t
Pwiltetoai
OraufH AnNnMi
Sufa-ielil Inpul couli
Fflrttlty Libiwr
Cauiil 1ukiCHM
TOTAL COSTS
flru/h*
tNrk/hn
Hh+rfu
ttkriha
ninr/hi
LJJrrrm
dirrtii
Hirrflu
41
110
240
111
47
270
340
141
41
270
740
141
47
170
144
111
41
270
240
111
47
270
240
111
47
2?a
740
191
41
310
240
til
41
270
2 40
111
47
270
240
101
47
170
240
_ ___________ 111
41
17Q
240
111
141
141
744
Nil
144
748
741
744
740
141
741
140
250
no
250
210
2E0
250
2K
250
290
2M
230
2W
MB
OM
IM
Ml
IM
Ml
IM
HI
Ml
Mi
MB
111 ,
EQUIVALENT 11*
hl.VTHUE
IWUTCOV5
Furtfniwt
VwaeVetdOb
Pt Mid tea
Orwuj^iii Anftmatfl
Suta 1-o4«A 1i*i|p«j«. c<rti»
) WH»Ut LnbWf
(■on Mftbgu)
1,0)1
1,011
5.011
3.010
3.016
w* we
Mio
3.010
j,ou
1,015
14,044,041
U Mfl.Oil
IB C44.D49
1fi.MI.04l
ui.no
114,30
ni.Bii
oil CJW
uwen
m qm
XU1U.M1
141.1*0 014.341 T 21.0*2
070,040
2 IbO.QM
3,01*
1t.04C.D4l
141.710
414,341
m.Mi
B7&4M
14,044, Ml 1 14,044, (MO 1
141*700
• 14.317
723,002
174. MB 1
2254.081 |
141.740
014.317 I
723,M2
tn.iMi 1
141.780 I
IM.M7 1
723.4121
375 001 /
141,710
414,317 i 7JJLM2 J
__«II om
• i——- n
141,740
114,747
72),M2
IM,MO
7.HMM
141,110
•14.547 U5.M2
875 011 X334,D»
141,TW
•14,34? 723.M3
570.011 3,358 OH
2.2WI Ml J J.JCC.0N /
Z2M,0W j
4
- 7HM4
-I 1
/
.■um.il,
ji
■t in iMjtovifc
■sirj-TiMuT **',u J
cro# /"rwhjcltan Mu<MI f.H Propel 1 MNrnHUM
F A'.y. 4 (A J
REVENUE
IhPuT COSTS
SaiMJa
F*rfU4r»'i
Iuitnllcl4t«
P*5tiCid*B
Draughl Anrm^i
■juta-kofcii tapuk coiki
Blrrflu
BlnAi*
Dln/b*
Bln Ait
BteiflM
niii/iiB
------------------rnr
4T
T7D
240
til
6.370
*2
270
2+0
til
mIF
47
170
243
1*1
1 IM
47
270
24Q
111
1320
47
aro
244
1B1
HIT
47
770
240
111
5,310
47
37*
140
161
4.330
47
27Q
240
ktl
MM
47
170
240
101
MM
47
170
140
101
740
MB
74*
744
74*
741
740
740
74*
F44
i.ijo
47
230
240
_________ 1*1
>44
Family LatoouF
C«umI Ltlaour
BlnJtit
BUriFha
zflo
263
250
2*0
2*0
100
1W
140
264
250
TOTALCOil5
UlnJha
nvd
oi«
UH
IN
WH
DM
■id
HO
MR
IM
EQUIVALENT hi
<bd® MH W* MH
3,014
Ml*
3,01*
Mil
2,611 1,014
3.01*
1,011
PE
hF V(
Blir
ll M4.04*
r
14,040.049
t6.U4l.OM
10,046 040
fl.044.04S
11,04* 041
10,044,048
14,041 Ml
It D4B.44I
H. 046,041
16,044,049
isPUrCQBTS
3* Bill
FtrtillHii
knatCli^Mdt
PcukldM
tlriughl Arilwiala
5U> 1*4*1 Input c«»i»
Family Labour
CmihI lithairt
To4*i BRt Tfldal OkT TMil Bln Tolad EUn To4*l Din Trial UHr
Tolad Dlrf lakal EJvt
141.7*0
114,XT
723.112 IT* 00*
141.7*0
014.3*7
711.062
174, DOB
141.700
114,307
rum
676.000
141,7*0
01M47
713,1*2
ItO.Wl
141,7*0
014, MJ
723,011
&ri Oil
141.7H
*14.307 1
713,142
*H,0M
141,7*0
114,347
723,1*1
A”.®*1
141,74*
•14. MT
727,881
141,740
•M.XT 723,181 170,081
141,740
•11.147 rnui
_iwh
14l.?«« 414,3*7
mm _JMW
2,214 CM
L7M 0*1
1,256.000
i.iitj.on
2.256 0*U
2,261 JQ0
J
2 ill wi
i.iw.Mi
3 IH.DM
1.154 ut*
l.iflt.ati
714,044 TM.044
704,044
744,044 1 fl tQ 147
7*4,044 ~~ icfo 14T
7*4.04*
Fo 1 <1.142
7|4,044
1,010 J4f
7*4,044
3,019 141
754,044
3.010,142
7*4.044
3,010141
THC44
2610,141
total costs
'NCOME AM Efl LABOUR
T*IM Bin TOTAL BIRR
X01D.141
0, 0*7.310
3 010,142 r lio
" *,007,110
I.Qir.310
"MW 310"
u.off.jra'
too uio
•jMTJlfi
i.MMio
Fwt.iiq
J 0»7~110J 
«ilHwM r.
U C,opp,oducttonModttrofP(o0e|13OVABEAh(s
1 <»r 3
jAE*TWF
•
1,42 F
2.1*0 , l.CW
4,721
4,774
4,Tia
4725
4,?Z&
MM
4 724
4.724
nwijt costs
Sflodi
Inaocllcldhf
PWlkJdM
DraiiQhl AtilmtU
Sub tola! Input co»li
F «mlly Labour
Cauur labour
TOTAL COSTS
Hlnffli
IHrnhi*
Blrr/Na
Burma
Dter ‘h a
liurrtii
Blir/M
Dlrr/ha
-
■
-
-
4
.
-
-
,
-
ITO
140
255
170
IK
,
HI
no
225
.
Ml
170
111
2«
170
m
145
irn
225
-
2S4
170
221
-
255
ITO
211
Ml
•W
-
IM
170
IK
155
405
111
■84
150
170
225
.
251
HO
■84
ISO
no
th
*
Ml
410
■40
444
-
-
-
roo
m
200
TOO
no
KO
2W
100
200
2CH
J 204
-
.
.
TH
IDS
ITS
IW
410
HO
l»
■SO 050
•SO
•SO
LQUIVAl FNT h.
!■•■ wMgi)
411
•31 1.241
1,4U
2.410
2 010
2 MO
2,410
2.000
2,040
2,010Table 3 Irrigated AgrlcuHuce Crop Product Ion Modal For Project 1 SOYABEANS
Pagu
2021 nn 2024
2024 2024 202?
2024 2024 20 X)
20)1
(it min is
PRODUCTION
INPUT1 QUAN TIT If •
5o»<lB
FartiHzora
kiAMlMhta*
PaatrcMae
Draught Aa***h
5, MO
a. ooo
4,000
4.000
COCO
fl OOO
4 POO
4,000
4 000
a ooo
II anoun
fatnttj Lib+Uf
Cauaal Lafcuwr
ixwtv
KqAu
K(J/>I4
Ag/ha
Kj^hn
Wlttia
rmrUdapa 1 naiUdaya
AO
100
4
00
rn
100
4
•0
-
00
100
4
00
•
40
100
4
ao
00
100
4
•0
•
00
100
4
00
-
00
too
4
•0
•0
100
4
40
40
100
4
•0
40
too
4
•0
•
RfVENUE
fhrrOia
< FJS
--------- T77
F 4.225
4725
4.F2S
4.225
4 725
4724
INPUT COSTS
Soods
Fartlllrara
InaacUddaa
PooikMoi
Draught Antenata Sub-lo4al Input rnata
Labour
CiumI Labour
TOTAL COSTS
Blrr/ha
B»rrrt»a
B*rVha
nirrAta
Birr Am
Mrrflia
nifrAia
DlriiHa
ITO
224
Ml
ITO
22S
211
120
nt
251
120
220
m
120
225
285
1T0
225
255
ITO
228
•
255
120
220
255
170
274
744
120
229
•
255
OM
OSO
554
050
050
OSO
440
5 SO
ISO
060
200
204
200
200
TOO
200
200
200
200
200
•54
110
• 50
550
MO
MO
•50
•60
850
AM
EQUIVALENT ha
|440 acraaga]
2.040
3,000
2.010
2.000
2.000
2,000
2.000
2.000
2.000
2,040/*
**^*9 *
fi fnfnte
Cmji frnr^t
rl/orv Morfol tar Fro/tcl I OIL5CED3
Htowenou
INPUTS QUANTITIES
5mi1«
F arfMLrars InaactrcWaa PaafJelcfeB Draught Animals
MEVFWUE
Urrr'ha
-
-
I»W
Jill
6 Oil
1.011
1.011
0.035
------------------- RK
5,011
5.030
5 011
INPUT COSTS Saad* FarlttUara InawcUcNtea PasUcldee Draught Anlmuli
BhrOia
CNrrA»a
Obr/br
BtrrfSia
BlrrAia
170
TO
fl
Sub total l«M»ut coat a
Family Labour
Causal Labour
170
101
Itl
402
170
101
M0
101
022
170
1O1
240
101
702
i ro
101
■40
101 702
170
101
240
___________101 703
170
101
244
101
703
170
101
340
101
703
1T©
101
240
101
703
170
1O1
340
101
702
170
101
340
111
701
Dlrrflia
OtrrfVia
270
220
001"
220
■47
220
wT
230
02?
221
02/
224
02 7
224
~027
2M
HF
331
027
J3«
lit
TOTAL COSTS
CQUrVAI ENT ha
(<<• acraaga)
-
-
>12
<24
IN
4 0434 70
1.244
■,204.044
t.oio
T.S5S 90S
1.000
7.041 OSS
1,040
------------- rurm
1.140
r.osi.ost
1 5«0
-------------7 iTToiq
• ISO
7 nss oil
1,040
------------ y.gn.o>i
HtVENUE.
INPUT COSTS
Saads
FarttfU***
LnsaclKIds*
PaalMUcM*
Total Birr
Total 0Mf
Total Birr
Total Birr
Total IMn
•
IJ.MJ
24.440
jish
190.010
03.020
110.101
100,120
04.041
140.700
170.700
212.171
mon
2117 037
23 A 202
300.211
117,M0
374.422
M7.1/7 1 001 ID)
340JI»
107, IM
374.423
207.977
1.0S6.111
300.310
107 140
374.422
207,077
1911.101
744.211
18 7. M0
3/4.432
207177
1.0s4.1«l
3O0.21O
157,MS
374.422
2O7.OTL
i aos 113
110,310
117 lit
174.423
207,077
f.OM 10>
187.S4S
374.423
007,037
1,000.103
Draught Animats Sub total Input coats
Irmly Labour Causal Labour
Total Birr
7 of at £»r<
Total Bl/r Total Bur
137 2S0
70 204
•
2*0 300
140.400
~42t77l3
J10.012
~70T0»
>00.010
iJM.oir
301,020
1 444 204
301.020 ~ ~1 LM 204
331.020 ~ ~ 1M41Q4
151 020
1444 304
311,020
~ 1~441 SSF
J51A3O
’ 441,304
111.030
Tali 304
TOTAL COSTS__________________ INCOME AFTER LABOUR
rOTAL BIRR
—
----------
—
>30.200
~ 1,070,000
~ >l'z7,0ii~
a, to tTirr
ojoi.osi
~ ~ 4,400.901
9,401 HOI
• 40M**r *W* 4 Irrigated Agriculture Crop Production Model for Project 1 OILSEEDS
Pago 2 ol 3
2010
4811
3011
2014
7015
XiU
3017 1018
1010
3021
Ell MINIS
PROOUCTKW
INPUT* QUAN71TW$
Sood*
Pvrillizara
lr»«»clKfrdes
Peitoc?daa
Until
*Dd*i
KOrtifl
K»‘l»a
Mjpia
4 *40
4.500
4, *00
1013
4,800
4 100
4 500
4 500
4.500
4,408
4 tlXJ
joia
4 500
4.500
Dr«uo*i< AtHlVMli 1 IlVIia
LABOUR
Fiwnlly I hImmn I'narvOayi Cavial Labour ]i»ia«yd*£i
100
41
3
1
n
100
4B
3
3
•0
100
45
1
3
1X1
4*
>
1
SO
100
45
3
3
DO
1Q0
41
3
3
90
100
41
3
3
M
100
45
3
3
*0
100
4*
3
3
•0
100
4*
3
3
00
100
4*
3
3
•0
100
41
3
3
10
____________
HI Vi Nul
BWrma
1,014
l,0J»
Loi*
4,031
BOM
4,039
1,03*
9.01*
1.03*
1.031
5.03*
I.0H
INPUT COSTS
Saadi
fartlM/ari
IniKOrldat
Pairiclitoi
Draught Anhnali Sub total Inpul casta
Famllf labour
Causal Labour
TOTAL COSTS
Bitrate
IIIrrTtie
nirrOia
IJUr.lia
Blrvma
Btrr/ha
OlrVha
Blrr/ha
170
101
140
111
702
170
101
240
111
702
170
101
140
111
170
101
240
101
170
101
140
1*1
170
101
240
101
170
101
140
1*1
170
101
140
1*1
170
101
240
1*1
170
101
240
1*1
170
101
240
111
702
170
101
240
1*1
702
702
702
702
702
701
702
702
702
22*
*27
22*
m
22*
027
211
•2T
725
027
22*
22*
22*
127
•27
•27
22*
027
22*
•27
22*
22*
•27
027
EQUIVALENT ha
REVENUt
INPUT COSTS
Sflfidl
(soo aervags)
1.H4
7*55,011
1,540
7,I*I,O*5
245.211
1,5*0 7,III.OH
241,211
1*40
1,144
1.5*0 7,I»MI
2*5.21*
1,8*4
7,055,055
215,215
1,540
1,140
1,**0
1,5*0
1.5*0
MMos*
2*5,215
r mw
2*4,211
FrrUUzors
117,HI
1*7,141
374.412
i*7,*n
274.422
117. Mt
1*7. Ml
1*7,100
InSMtUWo*
374*421
374.422
374,422
374.422
PasUddes
Draught Mlmal*
117 177
117 177
107, >77
tub lol A Inpul coMt
1 015 113
1,015.113
1.0M.1W
3*1.020
1UI W4
1 411 lit
3*1.021
3*1.011 1 4«SJO4
r
1II8J0
1,441, ItM |
341.840
1 441, JO4 ]
1 «aa,m
i.ieOK
8.idotisi~Fri/j/ir *
iuT
47-'l*P FrocfwcttD** MoriPf frM Frage i i I U|* .»£ r.iO3
V nun * rrt A
-rrtwATT
(pnoDcK: riDW
/iMPU TS QUANTITIES
I $»«■
J FnriflifSi'l
I
I Pullcldm
I DujkugFlI AfiPirbHi
kADOUfl
Ftmrir LMKHlf | CiiiEid Ljbairf
HMM
puarvjjyi
1.015
RFVrNUE
INPUl COSTS
firoda
raairtlizrs
1n»»€ll<Jd«B
rUauqjhL Animals, Snb-lclal H’put ccrtll
FBmll|'lrJ|bnidl
1' guriiWl LbEhChjt
Qlmlha
OifFi’hi
BliuMta
WrftiJ
nirrnu
nirrtlu
fljrnhxi
FSlrrllll
5.0JI
ITO
T01
744
111
FoiS
170
141
MO
111
1031
V®
111
240
Ml
toil
mii
no
in
340
___IM 701
no
101
>40
__ 111 702
1.035
ITO
101
>40
131
702
ibis
170
101
2*0
111
743
no
141
24 D
101
702
i.in
174
101
244
111
702
1,034
170
141
24D
101
T0I
7&I
124
703
221
31B
•37
214
031
211
037
77*
Th'
2H
"mT
711
BJT
>H
127 '
22*
•If
total COSTS
UUrrifiB
EQUIVALENT Im
HEvENUE
INPUT COS 15
KcbU*
T Mi-Arira
l«¥B»El|£lel4C PHlfek1dls4 OnUdlll Anl'MlB
Sulrlaftad knflUl
Fafflily L mIhmN
c*>til Lb&ujf TOTAL <"OST5 WCOMF AfURLAnDUH
[all acroa^]
Tflial Ihn
T.Mi oil
1,100 T,«fr$c>n
1JM T 154,015
1,5*0 t KB Oti
JW.21I
1*7,140
>M,«2
i.aeu
7 iaw
a,MO
1,144
Mi! an
7,151011
TJlfi.M*
TIM.0M
1.111,441
MO,111 1IF.5B0
3TM3I
211,177
M!,21l
117,401
174,421
?11.»37
201,21*
117.Ml
JI4.IH
2*7 orT
109,710
1*7.161
>7*411
207.077
Ml,31*
117JM
37**32
1»MZL
TO I AL »I«R
>tT. in
l,W,m
jSI.QW
MM,M*
fl,A0MM
210.210 107.0*0 H4 42J
y»7>rr loiiu j
101,020 1 >« >g« MMHI
284,711 107,0*1 374,421
217,177 till, ns
3b 10M
i*7,»n 3*7,077____________
,___
i.mm i,m,w
311 OKI
i.oii hi
1 C10,1«>
1.0U4 1D3
i,»o.1l3
1 QBS, 11I
IS 1,020
341,020
301.434
151030
1S1.UW
— UM XT
1 4-40 2D4
1,441 Z$4
1,44*204
t**i
* 404 JH11 rlgatad AgrlcuHur* Ciop Production Modal lor Project 1 VEGETABLES
Paqa 5 <>! 3
'HE
BA
1W
- _ d-EHLMlB
PROOUCTtON
INPUTS QUANTIFIES
SnudU
r ariniiara
iHlwUcldfri
Paiircldo®
fraught Aulr*i*l«
LABOUR
EMWlTr Labw
Cau«fi Labour
M
'»■
14*4
2000
24X11
1002
i»i
JOM
xos
20 N
“-------- ----------------- 1
Unit!
Kofri*
K-yHa
N-pMia
Kgmi
KgiTia
nHfli.t
man tea ^b uian/ri*|r*
■
*
i.JOO
4 noo
r
e,»M
TJOO
T.1M
T.2M
T.JOO
r,lBa
I 1QQ I
■»
.
-
-
*i
l.MM
114
-
«
4
2N
d
1.1«
119
r
1
4
IUD
6
1JO0
111
-
4
4
JW
E
111
4
4
300
a
1.W4
116
-
6
4
300
6
1,900
116
-
4
4
XO
4
<.500
116
-
6
4
Ml
6
1,400
119
■
4
4
300
4
1.MJ0
114
9
4
300
•
i,m 1
Hi
I
4
1,500 I
"3
-
6I
«
300 I 3CT
6
IJ
HLVLWbfc
IJIn/ha
-
-
-
9,103
6 .349
5 910
4,931
5 8 JJ
*.033
L«J
I.91J
5.133
I.IU
1.112
ihrUTCCSia
Sriocli
FflUWren
hiiacUcldvi
Patikitoi
AoInmiIb
Sub-laid hkpiii toils
Family LlboUr
Cui III Lib Out
TOTAL COSTS
EMrdhn
Dlrrrti*
Rin fli a
rorritMi
eici/lm
RhTrtia
BlrrJha
Bknfea
-
T
-
-
",
«
-
1,440 |
2M
337
3B4
2,Ml
1,W
261
_
317
156
i.iw
214
.
337
255
1,6M
359
11?
2f5
1.4W
214
r
mt
IM
lmb
759
337
261
1,460
214
337
345
1.M0
794
337
MB
1.660
244
-
MI
266
1,950
761
.
337
261
1.430
399
-
MT
7 SI
-
7.W1
3301
3,501
1,601
2*561
2,601
2.601
2.401
7,001
2.MH
.
■
-
725
21
T24
a
m
a
725
a
J2S
a
726
23
716
a
721
22
-
-
■
3.226
125
a
3,224
ni
a
3,229
726
23
3,224
3.214
5.224
>,2H
3.221
3 236
J J 26
1,726 |
EQUIVALENT ha
41
13
124
144
JOB
2M
26 fl
208
7™
IN
«■
170,501
274.176
4J.1M
$4,580
93,434
l,?i.im
343420
63.176
1,313,126
342.220
63,97!
70,100
»,W
Ml, If I
130,334
12A44I
i Ml. 101
mil
aao.ait
<1*1
■ /B Mill |
” T!***-
"L2«•• !tu r.ujvrt 1 VrfiFTAHl ta
<<£ VENUE
n<rritia
Borrtia Birr Am UJrv/fea Birr Aw BUvAm
DlrrAva e-r»A»a BlrrAia
•.032
5,032
5 *32
•.032
---------------------OOJ2
• 0)3
4.032
FaiT
a.ais
1,032
4,432
£.032
1,000
MO
237
£<•
1.0*0
200
>37
z»s
1.050
200
337
zoo
1.400
300
337
zoo
1.450
2M
>37
3M
1,040
240
337
144
1,M0
2S»
337
2*0
1.440
1U
337
200
1.050
20*
337
214
1.040 210
337
3*1
l.fiM
201
>37
405
~ 2. Ml
2 001
3 Ml
3 Ml
2,001
2.101
2 KH
2.M1
2 Ml
7.041
2 Ml
Tamil* tatoowr Cauo»> Labav* TOTAL COST!
EQUIVALENT Na
r L vENU*
INPUT COOTS Saad* partMrjara Inaacttcldoo
Ptihrkk* £N»^0N<
S«.t> total
721
M
3 110
720
23
------ 3 220
730
23
3.224
721
23
3.320
730
»
1.224
720
S3
2,224
724
23
3.120
724
23
3.224
724
n
3.21*
324
23
3.224
721
22
1.220
724
23
■3,220
Tolal Bl<«~
1,213 12*
343,220 03.070
70,100
02.043 >20.230
1,213.120
243.220 03.070 70, IDO
•3 043
030 220
1 JU1N
143.7 JO
0X074
<«»•••
343,220
• 3.070
70,100
•3,043
OJO.2J4
TM.aoo 4.704
343,210
•3043
• 20,234 140,000
1.213.12*
345,31°
43.474
70.100
03 043
*20,230
-------------1.113-U0
343.210
43,070
70.150
03^043
320.331
1 213,13*
34X330
03.070
7X100 13 043
1.2H.I2*
343,210
03.070
70.10«
•3.041
030*220
1,211.12*
34X220
*X*70
70.100
*> 043
ojazio
120 23*
1.213 13*
>43 220
03.07*
70. IK
0-1.041
(ja.134
1*0 000 4 704
071031
1M.4OO
< 704
140.000 4,7M
100,00*
4734
1M.OO4
070 011
IW1O2
4,704
470.*31
1M.M0
44
art 431
47J.031
474,111 |
H s!Tiibfo 5 IfftrjAlnd AD'IcLkflurt Crop Producikm Mode] lor Prefect 1 VEGETABLES
Pago 3 of 3
7022 2031 707* 70 2 B :o» 2037
)0t® 2011 1 70)0 Mil
1IIMEW13
mi-'Uwt. TIUW
iNpuis ciJANnTiri
5r*d*
FtWfltzm
bastcilf l|>»
PMllclLiM
AlMrrMld
L Aoouf
Una«
K(f/I»n
Kgrtli
Npthn
KgiTl4
I'WM
1 200
TJ&a
T 2M
T JOO
•Fwnlljr l*|a»jr
C*uinF I BfciJUr 1
ttiiVilayi
1,1100
IIS
-
1
4
IM
•
7.JIJ4
T.iM
lit
•
5
4
IN
4
,
1,44»
no
-
i
4
Ml
5
MOD
116
-
5
4
Wfl
0
i.noo
til
*
a
4
ISO
4
1.MI
115
•
4
*
Mt
1
14 DO
A
4
300
5
MM
in
■
4
4
5W
4
1,400
110
5
*
3tt0 1B
1.800
114
*
5
<
300
5
FEWEN<j£
BOrOn
----------------- MU’
mH
1432
s.bij
8.132
1,431
S.tW
Mia
jm
5,132
INPUT CCSTt
aniMh
toltttclfa
P«alkkfvi
Dimfllil Anlmd*
Sub intal Input fwlt
FamHy Lvbour
Capita LatxMrr
TOTAL COSTS
BWrflta
Durflia
nvrfli*
nutibi
BlrriM
lllnftu
tllrntii
QwrOii
i.«fl
no
317
»s
1,450
?54
,
137
2M
MW
TH
„
137
7*5
1,400
IM
,
337
»5
1,410
>M
137
its
i.«0
2*0
.
317
115
MIO
2 St
.
331
214
1,490
»»
-
337
25S
1.450
250
-
137
2H
Jioi
2,541
2 KI
MSO
35»
.
in
25*
2.101
I,M1
2.101
2.W1
2,50 i
2J01
J.tOT
nt
»
724
23
T25
23
721
23
nt
23
72$
Z3
72®
n
72*
23
725
73
725
23
3,121
122*
MM
3.ZH
J,2M .
3.7«
3,21$
l^M
),22S
1 224
EQUIVALENT In
REVENUE
IHPUT COSTS
Sm-iU
PHtilktHB
IrttacUcl'ta*
PaiMcldai
«r««fcp*J
MB
I Total Bw< MU*
Mt
1J13.13*
UJ.220
13,IT*
TO. 140
S) .Ml
tiQii* f ijo.m
act 1,113,1 at
2-fit
2W
Ml
Mi 201
IM
JOB
i 12.120
1,211.126 j MH.IM
1.211,121
343, m
43,171
243.220 $3,175
DrMiqhk fcrtimiK
Imqmi town
I- WTTul | V tljrjui
<-M|4kJ LMXXir
TOItt Wrtkl-ft
IA«i.r.MT h.1 iffit M«<3U*k
wja.ni
53,175
jojon
53.04) 1MJ0V
*.JM
PI», till L) la ill
343.720 43DFI
TOJOfl ll.Mi
SM.Ml 156 IM
30.220 53,871
7D,roo 53.043
U&rZJfl
341,220
53.175
70,100
SJ.043
MUM
51.171 i
70J 00 I
S3, MJ
514 2J«1 5 70,714 J
»nj.ut
143,220 5JJ75
70,100 *J.O43
520 JIS
r
11* til
11Q,Mi
__ 4 F14_
ID0.H*
Mm
Wait
rsa.kap
__ 5Z*»
4ZJ *11
i
IQtJU.<
llr/a lrrl
.
........................ .....................,„r^.rl , curTCW
|UEVEhjJE
|INPUT COSTS’
1rector
i»ndj
Ffl/lJIiian
fattclldd**
PftllkldM
Prjuflhi Anlnwi Sub toini InpU <«■!»
FainMjf Labour C aUlal Labouf TOTAL COSTS
FQU4VA1ENT h|
fWnha
Blir/ha
Bta/M
Dbrtiift
Oirr Up
Birii-hi
Wrrlha
□Inrba
Blrifria
4 1H
• 11
1«
4B0
1,200
1.H0
111
* cuo
4,412
lit
102
410
<2<w
UH
JIB
■1.U4G
JJ4 JFB
4 411
4.7BI
111
101
450
UM
UM
311
4MO
375
UH
9,024
*11
■I
M2
1,JW
1,3541
□ ID
4,131
371
4,413
1.IM
11.M0
• I*
84
Ml
*,M0
1,110
310
4,131
111
<410
11,210
•It
14
Ml
I HO
1.150
)i>
4134
373
4,510
1,311
ii,2bu
•II
II
M2
1,300
UM
311
4 134
11.2KI
•II
II
Hl
I,MM
1.JH
111
<131
37B 371
4 410
4,410
<1 no
11,210
6f|
9$
fill
1,100
1.350
110
<131
3/1
4,1110
4,1 no
HjW
ill
M
Hl
1.W
1.3H
111
<im ;
11.IM
■10
44
MJ
MN
1.1W
314
1l2in
■ ii
15
M2
1 200
UI0
in
4 135
4,111
3Tft
AF1
371
4.510
4.510
4.4W-
Mb-a Knagal 111
4,140
4.140
4.1 M
REVENUE
taui birr
•
-.
fi.il 1,102
lUU.DM
niHiii
IT 442 014
41427 513
4«,»Ull
n.djFAia
KHJbl
44 W7 fill
INHJT COB Tt
S*ada
FprllMian
1ni*cL1cW&i
Faallcidui
Diwufllil Animals
Total EUtt Tt,l*J Birr Teilti Wifi TolaJBIrr Tolnl &ifr
•
04.141
37<4J2
7M.4M 1,123,304
709 423
141,444
034JJ2
1.4HJI4
J M4J30
3JO.047
311,173
1,402,4)1 3.141,173
),34t,?M
744.170
»1,BM
1,170,444
i,ib),I)1
4,43),DM
1.M1.M)
317,120
PMJOH
4,002.28? 1,114.324
1,327,117
343,420
>,))(«!
MU.UI
Mll.UI
<117,117
lU.U-O
Xlli.Mt
Utl.lM
4.01 UH 1,327,111
JM, *70
1.11LQ&5
■uu.jn
M7I.3JI 1 J1T.1V
152,421
AllO.OM
4.111343
4411,134 1 117 t »T
*U0K>
l.JM.M!
LH3, J 40
1411,315 1.ut iit
Sub4o4al MpUt COIlB
IcrfalUlrr
-
2.4M 437
5 450,001
M70.M4
11,701,011
14,42 Ult
14,4)7,407
14,42? 407
UA2U0F
14417.40?
I4 427.H7
Family L«Mwr
Cluaal Labour
Tatil Ehrr
r<j4a. Bin
-
311,011
•14,034
DM.H4
1.WMTJ
1.5H4B0
i.wa.oM
1.4OI.6M
L,4W,M0
1 MO.068
1,140, >K
TOFAL CD5T5
Toial O*i
-
-
3.14I.4H
• 474 »M
0.712 07
1>J*I IDA
10 II1.4M
14,147 4M
11,147.430
11,1*7,418
|l 147.415
ii.uuii
INCOME A F-r ER LABOUR TDlolEWrr
1,471,BIT B, 441107 11444 112 MAB2 01I JOlTjiqW
Xi,740 020 30,740,020 30,7*00
30,740 020P«g« 2 of 3
iAFVFNOf
l»lrrti»
-------- msr
1 1.740
11 140
-------------------11.740
11.740
11 200
11,240
---------------------11.290
11.200
11.240
11.240
11 200
p4ru»r<5j,TS
TnM-Mir
Made
r
InMcNcId**
PaeUclOca
DraupM AaInmIb
Sub trial mpv* eoala
family labour
(-•Mia* labour
TOTAL COSTS
1
BUr/ba
t»rv«*n
RlrvAia
r rr» •
Barv/ha
omma
Wr/ha
Snr/ba
fWt/ha
414
■4
Ml
1J00
1.140
Sit
419
44
Ml
1.100
1.340
Sit
019
M
M2
1.200
1.340
310
4 lit
019 44 M2
1.200 13M 319
419
94
M2
1.200
1.340
319
419
04
442
1.200
1,340
319
4.114
•to
44
442
1,200
1,340
319
919
44
542
1,100
1.350
310
• 19
as
442
1.2OO
1.350
310
4.114
510
95
442
1.200
1.350
319
410
04
442
1.200
1.350
319
4.134
4.134
414
45
542
1.200
1,350
314
4.134
4 135
4.134
4.119
4.134
4.135
374
<410
374
4 310
ITS
37*
374
374
374
375
375
374
379
375
4 410
—
4,510
4.510
4.510
4.410
4.410
4.410
LCXMVKl ENT ha
1*40 »£(•*•«]
<1M
4.1M 4.140
4.150
4,140
4.140———n—,„^,cr , corroN
iJ
lAAOotjc new
/-wra ouAJfnriLs
I Sreda
J ftrilkifif
I 1 IhwcrAcMn
I PfltiidiiM
I DrBUChtAntaulfl
I T'WltM
[labour
I Eflltf/y t ahwi' L CiUBd Laivom
“lar.idBye
[REVINUE
fiftl'lJT COSTS
T'MEDf
"
Unit
tllrrttu
BifWhfl
FvwiMljaro
PBMkldc*
UlnAia
OMTJhfl
BirrJha
OfftUQM Aulra^i
4ul> !oti4 hipul caaii,
HKtJIib
Hh-'l n
EH nJ ha
EQUIVALLWT h«
HtVCWUE
INPUT CO»Tfi
S»tH
Fwflljm
IhwlIIiIJb*
PhACMOT
**■“0*1 Aflhuali fruto-Mil Input costa
Lobowr Cwnil LkOour
TOTAL COSTS
Taifcl BIm
44.tlf.51fl 44.WJ.flB
41 WT.414
j*JJ7 I'fl
**■*>*,ill
j.wjij
1JMM 1.6M NO
t
Jj.WT.eoy
«.l| Mil
Ml.flM
JJKQM
4,H],Mfe
Lju in
« 477,wr
<■ tjr.An 44.1 JJ Bl 1.1
M3,«n
l.MQ.OM
4,warzn
fi.H4.Ui
Mi,ua
4.H2,2M
JJ1TJ1 ?
i4.fu.4PT
1-MO.DW
H it) 4!Hi
W.IM
UJI.M4
4in,iBt
■,*ia,i2i
1,317,117
jj.W7.M7
1.H0M
JAJ.42D
2.1M.U1
4.«P1^ib
Mlfi.lll
1,337,117
14.I17.4PT'
l.lto.fto
i*i mm
IHCOM£ Af IER LABOUR Tom Bl«,
14 I2J.4QT
IlK.flM 1.HO.OW 14,1 IT IM K,W,4M~ M,T4a,aro
MMU | ZJJfl.oil 4J*2,2B« fi.fi UJH
____ IjU 117
I4.W7.4OF
JJ3flON
Mifi.Mi 1,UT 11T
14.1 ITAM
IB 1BT m
jQ.f4Q.03D MJ4O,DJP
MM.OM
XU4P.WC ~‘~M T4a wf
l(
ja 740,039 X.T4O.02Q JO 74C c?0 >o,f4«,ojgpAfyu 1 Ul 3
Tabfo 7 Irrigjifcd Aprkul|»r« Crop Production Modal for Propel 1 WEEN FODDEH
1IM
1 1MT
JASf
JOGJ
JWM
JtlQtt
20*4
1 riiiHENfs preGCJMCTHJN
INPUTS QUANTITIES Swtii
rulUlxarH h|««Cllc|d*B
LMJil
ifW •HO i,Kir>
2M
*
•
J
MOD
l.UDO MV
■
•
1 SO
M«1
J, IM 210 *
30
4 | hD lie
O
210
2S0
■
-
1
1AHdlJR
C*MMl 1 •ihUUJ
Kgfh* HpA.i
* gi'L« KglhB
, lillflia
1
mam .May a
so
1
30
J
30
------- mo--------
iijaoo '
IM
*
>
1
30
12-200
210
-
3
30
HD
13.200
2*0
•
*
3
30
1J.2OO
IMS
-
•
3
10
aooo
12,700
2W
*1
3'
id
pU-VtNUT
[INPUT COSTS
1 £«ii»
FortWlivii
J ktMcllddli
/MbdcMn
Urainflht
9 ub-lo 1*1 inf u 1: c nt 11
FxtffMiy Labour Cmuial Labor
TOTAL COSTS
EQUIVALENT ha
.I
------------rrnn
•M
■
4
f
H
C
| l« Krtop
Jlrr/M
Bln* in Unflia ' IMffM iferftiB
•
-
.I
•
-
-
-
3.711 1 IM
-
-
IM
121
■M
- IM
■H
.
Ill
13*
•31
■W
- 111
in
1 1 JQfc
■3*
- HI
179
i* zos
431
-
-
* 111
■2D
li. JOS
• >•
■
111
821
fra* IF
G3D
■
•
- 111
■21
11,7*0
*
■ 1S1
•29
11,7*1
•31
■
- 111
121
11,704
13*
111
IZS
llrrihi Mrrth»
.
ni
n«
127
321
ni
230
231
232
133
214
235
_
104
»•
1,0M
111
1.1W
411
1,191 I2D
1,011
520
1.0*0
520
1,0*1
no
•20
520
1,0*4
*207
AftritruHurv Cmp ZVrirftwflnJt M.k/*w fat* f*taa/«»< r 1 <mrr»< f rionmTa hie 7 | rr jgato d A^ric ullur«
Crop Production Modal for Project 1 GREEN FODDER
POD* 3 pf 3
2422
ElfMLNli
FR0OUCIION
rnrursQuA^riHEs
Saade
F«rt»N«n
Inane iJeidat
MasUeldaa
1 AIIQUR
FarUlJy l»tou/
’
7071
7074
MJ*
aoH
----- *77----
3074
UWIi
Kfldia
<0*4
K0h»
<pr>ia
Kg/bn
uir/im manAlaya ]
2020
*»0
2011
ii.joo
13-2*3
11 ;m
15,700
11 5M
17.700
iz.m
1Z.2M
12.300 1
12.700
710
JM
J ID
350
IM
250
M0
150
HO
M0
3
M
3
30
3
34
31
3
30
3
10
3
34
3
10
3
20
Cnual 1 abotar mm^riar’
EJtrrdi n 1 1 MOI
11.701
*1,205
il.JM
• 1,20* 11,201
11 JOB
11.501
11,20*
11,201
WFUTCasta
9**d*
T •fltlrers
Iriiaclkfdrt
PaallcMna
Draught
Sirh totd irpui casta
Family Labour
Caiuat Labor
TOTAL COSTS
0K*4WI
lllnfha
fiirrfta
Blrr/ha
llkrflba
Blrrlha
BinJha
01«
431
«>■
.
Ill
Ill
,
111
•M
,
_
.
m
<131
_
111
Ml
,
_
111
*33
t]R
1SI
r
Ml
•J*
■
.
m
<1J4
+
111
111
■n
»»
•31
121
B2S
B»
IH
in
Mt
244
1,077
3<4
1.0TI I
2K
351
312
78 J
254
IM
Ml
257
1.479
1.0W
l,M1
KW2
1,451
1,444
1.MS
lH
7T-J
A J. I J*
« JkJ jH
J.Af/MM ■#*« ' J*APPENDIX 6.2
irrigated agriculture crop production
MODEL FOR PROJECT2
(ALWERO-DUMBONG, 15,000 ha)
Table 1 Irrigated Agriculture Crop Production Model 2 - RicekMKti. l
WffitE fl+'
•00 1/l‘M
Mtftlll'Dl
wfltt'c
□Kitt ill
□w'orr'ox
DMtJkH
OM-ttl'm
QOO'tltl
at* rc'iii
hVou'm
WO'lli'K _____ om'mi'el
wVfirT
•afizcVn ODD CCI Oi
•M U I Vi _ MD (M3| Ok
•mucc
MHU 111 dw'ke'dx moVll h mi'miIiT
oMik'F
CtttECUL
ws«t w
r
ow'iiiVt
W» 00« Ok
OtlWc
DDOttc'llb DMOrc'Di
MOa'H
CQCMIH
hFvie‘c
mm tn
WOCC'Cl
DK'UI n OOO'ODl'OL IlVUll
QiXi'flCT'ax MC'llkVl
bm'ooTm
WO'IH'E _
1 win'in
BM'luta
Will H
QMfijQt’oi
DM'lxrt
1 Mi'En’in coD'iri'Dt
0M‘IliIll
OQO'OOOI
m'nrT
oPoatnH QM'OEl'ft
o»fl am
dooWl om'oh’e
------ . . —
om vvaii Macur'ik ,
i M4'0MJZ
Njo'iirr
mp'ih'l
Kfl IMII
OOHt/V It OrM’OOLU
ooVn*U
OM'MQT
OSOK*L
dm i«d ii
Doom'll
□W'Mt’PF Mo'oor't
flDC'|1Lk
OM'HOVt
wt'axiiL
Kotvcrr
ooo'oar t
•M'MV*
dn'ki'i
DDDIlOOS
rn'iui II
mookVe
DPO'OOt'i.
ooo'moT
ooa'Kt k
•Mlinti
QM'OXIII
KO'dDtM
UM'me'z
aao'otaV
mVkiT__
DK>M'lt
UU&'OJIBl COT'aOflX
Hfl'Mt1/
anm'r
ogVti« i
DOGI90H
BQo'lLfi'lk
om'wfVc
Mv’wl'l
OM'OM'k OMVci'i
940110*11
___ _________ OQO'OXt II
■mWm
qoa'Mt 'i
mVoib¥
ogg'iE* !
WIWtf_
____r „______ wen ik
mVmc'it
WWi
oon'oTa'r
•od'ici'l
WEIlll
•ao'sirVk
odVobi'oe
OM^aoirt
ooViEtV
Nttl* k
ooa'oit'lx
0OOMN71 oaaoozfi
om'oo***
oaVm7
eoo^Dfli’f
II3D1 jjlOFMl
uta in*i
______ —
-Uffl 1*4** J UHl |IM>1
uflj |«w
jj|d i«®i
"IB I’m
Meqrl irtJV pwcaui alcQjindM iwol
ITkflb
jnnq* 1 ibtimuii
irwiiiv | ItHltJ SiMnXit^r
■Utr? p3l>Hi|0t *11 jwffitn
•ifPFMiui
•IPIIII1MJ
r
1
------- ■ WMf
ow'in'M
ooc m‘v»t
Mn lltHC
duo 119 t*z
WE
oao Wm
DOO'ItB ME
MOVH W
MO'BflllrE
aoatn mi
ODi70»»Dt
00a •£( HL
11 so a mart
•flNlA34l
OM'fb
DM'H
ODD II
OOA'fk
Mi'll
MOfll
OMll ____
KO'll
wru
Mfll
O0171 _____
ODOOL _____
?n
OU
•«
IM
■'
VM
er<
vrr
fW
■
Oti
5«
•M
OEj
ICE
trt
- SEJ
VC
•H
BW
nt
IM
MX
VIE
—
IM
DEI
in
----------—
m
•
Ml
nr
IM
flU
irr
an
fee
IM
OU
III
|*D«aj3* »4t
■14114Ifl
"•fMS
■kU"lU
__
t»4 ri
Ki i
an* I
w*
wr
•Xk
•Uli
•01 ci
MX c<
«t*k
•tn
MB
tit
Ml'tl
■u'l
or ■'<
OlP OLE
«i
txu'ft
•tn
Dll'k
CO
w<
lEk
MX XL
«i'i
00
Mt
in
OOL'El
mcH-
•El11
Ml
ut
in
Mi'n
ten
Wt'i
Dtt
•IE
hi
oom
■rFi
mVi
DI*
DIE
Ilk
MX Ik
•Ct'l
DtVl
DM
DIZ
in
Wifi
•tt'l
■n'l
Mt
Nt
Hl
•tn
am
M*
DIZ
tn
HI
iu'i
«|T
an
air
•El
■uru Hi
■Ml"Kl *W"1U
iquilQ
■M 1N31V Ainba BAOtVT mi IV
J
Jr*Dq«| 1*1 f 1 t -
jwiunn llF^r J
iiwbj |*nj
----------- ------ 1
Kvsoa F*1“11*1°> 0"^
twptir]
tyiH &IWNMM
_wpnW’ d
a
•■pt^aivi
turilipaj
• P«*6
iiEaaifiriM
itTu
K*’tl
icri 1
«*‘n
Kl'tk
«*'ll
«ni
JtVll
Mk'tk
Kk'lk
■ijjJJlfl
inOTMii
L
or.
01k
on
on
Dlk Ml
01k
Ml
OIL
Dll
Ml
Ml
Ml
ML
Ml
□Il
Dll
01k
Ilk
•li
an
Ml
Ml
tlfOlUfUl
iXlp'u-k-w
•ifpjMUtlJ
jmoqll
jfiflqfi |»mrj I
.iHoawi XnwJtj
aooBunl
I
1*1
l«
‘l 4
1 Wl
\ tt
1
«
1
'Kl-
1
«
«
•
IE
H
1
H
H
15
I DEI
«■
tc
K
1
Kk
as
K
«
•
Oil
04
—
K
M
»
Dll
01
>r
M
H
K
I Oil lOtk
I
-
tc
VE
1
Ml
OS
1
«J’~
at
1
•
Ilk 1 at h
I
«
*
\—h-tJ. i L---- mt -1—— Ln1: !UH J UAl 1 - HOE
A
-4-------------
Wl j
"i —1r
■Uiflx/
mw /
tippM-f J
■•PPWiarf r
MH3HMFUT I
winv#j /
J
fauiiwffl? KlfliwJ
HU t
no r
iia'r
oio'r 1 WD E i ••o'r J
~7
\—-—■------------------------------------------------------------- j
*------------ — — —j--------------------------------------------- 1----------------------- :_____________ i______________
i i:
1
1
—r—
1—
--1
..JT.l»« 1 Irrlgatad Agrkull^. Crop Rrod^Oon Mo.,.!. aI wbo Dun,bong - nica
Page 1 o' >
>-.APPENDIX 6.3
IRRIGATED agriculture crop production MODEL 3
APPENDIX 6.3.5 - Baro Itang Model (a) APPENDIX 6.3.2 - Baro Itang Model (b) APPENDIX 6.3.3 - Baro Itang Model (c) APPENDIX 6.3.4 - Baro Itang Model (d)APPENDIX 6.3.1
BARO ITANG MODEL 3(a)
Table 1 Irrigated Crop Production Model for Maize
Table 2 Irrigated Crop Production Model for Sorghum Table 3 Irrigated Crop Production Model for Ground Nuts Table 4 Irrigated Crop Production Model for Wheat
Table 5 Irrigated Crop Production Model for Green FodderTabla 1 Iprigatcd
—
ru| m.r> IC.C.
ratju I 05 J
■
1
------ ------------ _-------------------------- ' ---------------------- --------- -
r FrMf -j i •» "------
TDf B
RJkS€ —
|
1MI
' Mt
J-JQO
30 ft 1
jodj
iWi
.
——j-’ iij----------------
Kflt
tUQ?
Kwl
LiJii
'PROUUCBiJN
SPLITS QUAN hlIfc5
SlNltfa
EiflUUtfi
■m Ik idq a
Ky^
.
-
1.
J. a in
3,140
4.9TP
a.ciou
•,C no
A.IMQ
*
*,OW
I.MO
i wa,
■Kyrtw
K^flu
_
L
7
7
-
-
-
-
31
123
15
1
_
.
■
-
1
Ji
m
3
no
3
PeMICltftfe
DlftvgM AJitrtMf i
i nnotiR
Faefil^ Latbour
<?*!#■ ■! 1 DlJCiuf
KgrtM
Hpftia
IlWha
m
mirMdav*
,
-
-
7
-
-
__
, 1
-
*
.
,
-
-
J
_______
0
Hfl
3
0
ISO
14
IM
J
- _______
>
1
IM
_
3
-
.
0
too
MA HECTAR
“ --------- ■
_
*
-
-
ML^LhuE
(tkrt hi
.
.
-
1
• lii
A,MB
«m
-
| INPUT CQ5T?
5«0*
F«lJNfttr
IfiiQcltddvi
PatKlcrd-if
□faugh! Ar*imal|
Hlnflia
-
-
-
*3
BirrOu
.
*
_.
-
A3
3ln
_
*a iro
!*0
a
101
376
5 nd-lu lai Input CtHtl
-
74.3
743
7«
r*j
Fxnibp Labour
Gamal Labour
TOTAL COSTS
Bln ih»
flrn’ha
DJu/ha
ifllil fh*
Blnlhf
■
-
-
-
■
-
240
a
W1
•a
JTO 240
0
lit
240
0
1t1
-
r
-f |
3*0
25J
jja
240
.
.
.
,
ftlriAn
-
-
-
1,011
1.0IJ
1.013
1.011
-
-
EQUIVALENT hi
-
. 1
!.F50 1700
4.62a <V74
7
. |
■
IltWi-NlJE
INPUT COSTS
Scudii
FurWILion
lnucGtlc|«i
PastLcLdrM,
PER IRRIGATION BGHEHE. >1
Jeu- 3Ji r
.ToL-L Bmt
Rntil Qbrr
ll-yi.il D'n
lloliA Bin
_______ —1
1
75IMO
1H70C
J-T, J JP JZ44.9JB
> r. ~ r i. zap
PftaJf)!k1 AhlfTOtl
n«LiflBi*r
If J 141
Hl MJ
Sutalittil liipurt. ctUi
IW Uh*
J'.gJI.TM
J,53M*J
T mYlj Libo*ur
Ckuwil Llld'-nU
totm. cjosis
Wv.twr m k * u.w> m
Oj few/
-F tail*
J" kW.i
r.iJJ.vw I.
J/ jJ-t Jj/
/I
t
FJTOrAUG NOW
tkruTSaUAHTIYItS Sewfs
1nsrer»e^rftf» P*ibcfc/«i
firjujhl Anfrnu/i
i AfiOUR_______ Fiwnity Labour
CidtaH about
MVMfi
—
| RtVfNuF
Ifijmtia
ft,MS
D,HS
i.Hfl
fl.MO
• HI
IUI
iHl
■,■*31
I.M9
fiKI
INPUT COSTS
T»r IblrarB
JnieClkl4lO< ____________ F*ilLcldDV
Birribfl 0*174*14 nirrflt* tUrfftM
17
270
12
270
11
jro 140
62
Df4UQbt Anlmafi Sub lotai input cnaii
ramKjr Labour
TOTAL COSTS
4.
74 J
7W
________ 0
0 111
IT#
J 44
0 111
12
370
240
~~\ft 111
•2
j re
240
i6
HI
TH
Birt/M ____________
flight
Uirirh*
7«
zso
Ml
JSD
1,013
1,011
i.a«
1.013 1.01-3
1,013
ti
UO
J 40
fl
111
7*3
JAfl
1,013
•Z
770
ft
111
741
JW
1.013
•7
ITO
244
_4
1*1
~7*3
2M
1.012,
•Z
370
~ 240
____________ ■ _______ I|1
rw
J«0
1,013
•1
370
240
«
TO)
20
n
JT3
2«
a
7*3
2fl0
743
2B0
F*3
_______2JT
1,011
1,4 • J
4*7«
Ji.TTI.3jT
4,424
L'QUIVALIiHr ha
flFb'FNUE IMFLJ1 COSTS
Gm40
F<rtll1rarB foiMcllcidaB Pu*i|cJd«»
4.B1H
jfjTI 220
2*4,011 ijAijoo
1.110,7 JO 0
Ml fl-tl
_ *■
__ _ _ «.____ 1_ ________ ___ _____
4.414
t.ia 1 4.020
4*21
._ 3
ipyrai
Urtuplrf Anbnil4_ ____________ 5<ib loial tapjl col • •
JM.BM M4tM4
7.HOJ2O _a
«iim
> Ml,104
11.771 720 n.»i no
JM,tt4
i,2o,m
i,nu»
9
111 us
Ji 131,1*4
ii.TTTJR]
Yl.TF1.nj]
_»■■ >30
1,144,040
1.110JZD
_■WJMJ
i ijyo4
liht.jjo
flfl.OM 1,341.11* 1,11C LN
MM,1*4
1.117,004
I.1IF.0W
FarrUly L^saur CbubiI Lalinua TOTAL COSTS
TnuHiiT
leM flirt loW flirt
Total flirt ratal flirt Talal &H To 1*1 Ilin
rut>j birr To*al B*r Total flirr
1,147,000 S
0*4 1 H
4.m,iM
77.013,OB*
1.Hf.6lW
I
4.HI H4
IF OB LOH
0
1,1*7.640
0
4MIJM
I
J J MJ 0*4
jf m.M*
2T.M1.0Mr 4.
1.1IT.XIC ____ 4
4 4M .1*4 ~JFJIl.Mil
I INCOME AFTfeH IACOUH ’TOTAL
J7.WJ OMELEMENTS
P *O(M>C1K>N
*N*UrS QUAN Tl Tip c
Saad a
JF*rHhf «fs
*n—ciicl0oo
Pfrollekfoo
Daao04H Anlmaio
^^ L'rng.t^c.op PTOdue0on
— ~— -------------------------------------------- TER ME C TAW
’“I
. ____ _____________
_____
______
RE vl NUE
birr Ata
AMS
fist
• Ofti
o.aei
• lai
i 80 1 Tmb
8.685
• ax
INI’UT COS 18 ________
Saade
Ferl'Miera
IneacticJdao
PaeOchXe_______
Draught Animale_______ Sut>-1o<«l Input code
Family Labour
Causal Labour_______
tlunlia
Blrrfha
SlrrAia
DWrrtiii
BlrrAia
DU r The
0'rr/ha
48
270
240
0
141
42
>74
240
0
141
82
270
240
•
___________ 101
83
2 70
24C
0
___________ 1ST
82 270 240
0
101
42 270 240
0
181
62
270 I
1 *J
370
240 240 00
181
HI
763
62
770
240
0
181 763
ai
270
240
0
181
763
2K
280
,
2 50 1 013
190 1.013
250
1.013
180 ~F6iJ
280
~toii
2M
1?0l3
"350
1.01)
380
1013
—
4638
_______________________________ FEW IRRIGATION 4CHE REVENUE____________________________]1olal birr_________________]
31.771,220l
31.771.220
4,424
31.771,220
4.828|
__ *•***
31,771.220
4,828'
EQUIVALENT ha
—
(•04 acreage)
4.8J8 4.824
_________________ 1
4,824 j
31,771.220|
4.836*
31,771.220]
31.770201 ji.ni.aol
4,8211
31.771.220/
INPUT COSTS
Saads _
FertHLrore
Uliactkidil
FOSlicidaa ________ ____ Draught AnlmaU ________
Sub-UAal Input CPlU _
I 1 trial BWr
It<hm Bin
llolil Mar
I Total Wit
iTcUl Birr
\Tola1 Wo
288,831] 1.240.M0I
i,iio.?2ol °
443,084] 1,H<1U|
MJHI
[ 3.831 144
288.834 1.248.880
1.110,730 __ 0
3,831,184
3,131.1*4
£249,540 1,110,720
— ®l a, 63 >.1*4]
1,248X0 1,118.7 201
Of 883,748/
J 411.1*4/
288.834 1,24»,$60 1 110.220
I.MT.OOQ
IIM t<4
1.187000
~4>88.1<4
1,167,000
<M*JB4
——-J
— /~ ~
>T,eeve*4l— fT»T»«JgMo 2 If rig mo Crop Protkictlrm Mod«l for
-
—
--------------------- ■ -r -------------------------- 1
-- ---------
,
2W*
JOO*
2014
2*11
1014
Ml*
Ml*
LltMLSTS
Mt*
HH
2012
2013
201 F
4.M10
,
« *w
4,000
4.000
4 000
4 000
4,000
4.000
4,000
4 *00
4*00
4,000
INPUTS QUANTITIES
P«HIN2*n
JriMCkici[jF>
Pfrtkkidra
Draught Animaf*
L.ADOUfi
r*fw#y 10OWT
Cauul Labour
ES
M
3
14
IM
3
M
1M
21
2*
Kjpi*
W|^h»
lira
>
i
1»
3
3
3
25
IM
3
1
21
TM>
3
3
23
120
I
120
3
___ 3
»
IM
3
3
*
IM
23
IZD
3
1JS '
3
3
3
3
3
>
31
iwVdayi
tnirtMiv*
3
.
ioa
-
-
100
IDO
100
IDO
100
IW
-
IDO
10*
•
100
-
100
1-----
tUvOSJE---------------------------------------
Blrrtha
U2J
------------------ ns"
1.3M
1.330
----------- Rm
5ThT
tw-ur coati
Irtd*
Birr ill a
42
ITO
240
-
in
42
JTO
42
Fortlilnri
i HM Elbe Id
Pa iMeJilua
D mug hl Anlntil-t
nirr*i4
IkrrHia
Blrrrtna
Birrfli*
340
270
240
in
-
m
47
220
244
101
47
ITO
140
•
1*1
4?
37*
ZMJ
-
101
$ubloli4 Input costa
741
74*
74*
24*
240
741 |
Family Labour
MO
3M
2W
nd
MO
JM
CmjioI Labour
TOTAL costs
Blnftui
Uln/hi
filnih*
HI
*W
m
M*
Ml
ni
EQUIVALENT ha
(la* acranga)
______________
4.340
4.341
4.14*
4.MI
4.3X1
4.141
___ A>“
REVENUE
Z3.131.3W
aJdM.HO
23,131. MQ
. 1 1 ii !u.:i
23,131 JIO
73,131,5*0
21,131,3m
njjf.MO
ihPUT COfilB
d 
J1
----------- 1
]
11
firrtU*_______________
FotlMiiora
344.311
204,15*
1,123.190
W,3M
1,1TJ,*W
1,043,120
2fi<3tn
WH
204.351
J
1,17 3,9*0
i.in.tno
I.TW.I Of
1 174H0i
r
tOHJM t
1J7J M0
r
I
hmacHddou
i.MS.IM
1,0*3.110
I.MIW
l WJ, BJO |
r
t.CMJJ 1 J
r.MJjMi
PaibitUib*
Draught An knali
130 4*8
IW,4H
110 4 6*
130,4*1
I JO 401 I
*T0.4|*
*30,4*1
IM, 4*0
3v4>-tWll Input c-mTw
1.H1W
1 2flZ,lQ4
3.21 t.MM
>J»,304
J «J. 30<
3 ; 1.2 304 I
*10,4«*
3.J52.W
5/252. J44
J.251. J4M
1 antkf Lktoe^n
|
1,047 .OWl
1,017.000 I
i,on,oao
1.047,000
f. 11*2,1
r.pa/.pw?
r.iW.RW
Lafow
I
■i
• L
Wlfca-COM*
I
4131.304|
4,131,104 |
■1 33* M4
4.-M* J CM
4JJ1JM
ia, aua rajfi J
acUWFJTJES
Fori I Mr fra Jn**circkTu> Ftoticidu
OrAnMlalt
I ABCMJff
Family labour Cauaal Labour
J
1
HFHBECTAR
11
1
[HfcVi;ML>E
Wrrrha
ruo
1 >30
i.iw
K.liD
1 3M
I,3M>
4 3M
MID
4 330
1,320
4330
5 3JD
fMPUT COETfl
Satdo
FertlHraia
[Urriha 47 47
Oinflia 770 270
IT
270
47
370
Ina ecCIt Idtl
PoMKHlca
Drau^rf ArwMU
5ul> -Iola! Input CMH
Family 1 TOTAL COSTS
Hindu 240
24fl
INrribi
Dbriha iipvn*
.
101
•
141
47
370
ZW
■
1f1
340
-
in
47
270
__ >*>
101
47
27D
340
in
~4T~
770
240
_____________ -
til
47
170
240
-
111
47
370
J40
-
Ill
47
370
240
111
47
270
140
iei
240
101
744
740
744
741
74R
744
>44
744
741
741
741
744
360
3W
360
2W
1«
ni^rha
iM
»M
OM
DOR
DOI
2W
•11
HO
350
JiO
210
Ulii/I*o
IH
MO
OH
OBI
250
tie
MB
I- —------------------------- — — — I------------- —L ---------------
EQLUVALFKTha ^a#*
_____ ___ ______________ I __________ _
4,341
4,341 4,341 ♦ 3«
<340 4,344 4 MB
r
<2«
4 314 1-------------------------
- ---------- ---------
4,341
___ L.__________
-------- ------------------
— --------------------------
4, Ml
run i* RJOADOh fiCHE
Fol*! Ill*i
D.DtNO
J 04.31*
i.i7a.net>
1,041 520
1,»3 304
<MT,000
4, DO, 104
iAj>i.3*a
JI,111 3«C
3*4,)M ___ 1.1T3.VM
Dll 1.344
n juhO
'jMiT.wi'
m.HO
n f ji.MO
’HtVFHiit
iwput costs ____ _
&aod>
FartlllJTl _________ kuBKLloM**
Uriwpht Anrtmoit
Bub-BolRl ihpul cdiik
FuiBlyA italic
Cau»«i Litaiwf
TOTAL COSTS IWCOME AFTH LABOUn
030,414
JJ *2.304
11*3,504
1,043,OM
4,3 34 M4
■ Id 444 *4
J),131 HQ
3O4,3M 1,173,»M 1,043,130
4 W,4DB 2 1U.M4
J 1.131. NO
204,3 M 1,173,MO 1,04l,tifr
IM.4U
1 212 M4
IMT.VW
304,344 tin wo
1 M3,1 JO
_ l>O*4l 3 75JJO4
<3)0,304
O>rw£
<»i,W
4,j Ji 34*
1Q,IK1.1Q4
< no,j<m
II.Wt.HM 11, DM,104'
le.aos.Ki*
11.001 >M 14 W4, IM
<p8,w
1B.4OA.4O4
TOTAL UIA«
23 UI.MO
344, IBB 1,17 J. MO
1 043^
lM,4H 1,261 W4
i,M7,m
4,131 X4
iAioi,io4
ajQ4ifl
4 1JI.X4
il.MI.J04rrfOfxtcnOM
/ Causal Lsbawf
fmaiiMar* | 1
—
_ — _
__ w
«D
__ 00
_ 04 00
1»
1------ ------- 1 ~
------
r- - — - , - - -
|R7 VFewiJE
rnr
-------------------- ro>r
—
------------------- mr
------------------- rnr
"1 651
------------------ rnr
------------------ rnr
------------- rnr
mr
—--------------- rnr
—rnr
l.oi!
pNPVT COSTS
1 Fa*t«lt*»a
1 Faauciaot
OiiufM Anlmd»
| Sub leaw inrue «o«h
|» amlhr Latonvr
Icaural Labour
| TOTAL COSTS
Darrel**
DI rr*«a
IMmtfha
ThrWIta
□irrrtia
OrrAia
—
170
1ST
744
101
701
- ------------------------
ITS
1ST
MO
1*1
701
• ra
101
440
101
701
170
ioi
MS
111
701
170
101
140
1*1
rol
170
101
140
lit
701
170
101
1*0
1O1
701
170
*01
140
iat
TO!
170
*•1
140
101
701
1/0
101
140
.01
s
— 170
101
1*3
101
701
<70
~IO1
74*
101
701
~_»a
----------------927
_7_~m
•17
- --
"TIT
IM
olF
170
wf
110
•7J
JU
~»17
~j»o
Ojr~
1 __________ J
_
,
UO
MF
I
-’-’•1
L~ , »>d U<
ni
OH
a aSa 1
CULMVALENf h* M vi tiuf
iMi rm
rrnrrn
hmm
n htfi
rrFTTTFT
410, 100
•04 (WO
rrnrrn
rrmn
irnrw
rrm fm
4l*i IW JMlD ooo.ooo
401J70 irtMk
•44 U«
rrrrrm
r>laTTC7
mmn
4]a,2M TM.tti
•6*.O00
JS* 411
~t,yy> >»o soi-iia
401.170 OiflM
4*1,J r» ijniu
•M.m
Mi.iM
4BJ 27£
t
i >f> <M
■•0,110
7 >40 *71
_iM,ui
i »at>4ta
407.170 *,//7>»o
±*M£i
t Mo.trl
ua,i.»
aoo/ua
!• ari.Poo
MC^IM
t^o/i
■e.irj rdO i "
TOTAL OOlft
I11 rw aNOOMt) mj ppaij
.j,,, a pH ufl|iJr (T*jiAA* -J
Lf.ift
A n, -j
mJOKFJCW
W/’UTS QUiWTirH 5 Saedi
rrrllHi*r»
f*l > •■'. 1 I l ''J'.1 ? FcxElcictu Drawofil Antails
LABOUR_______
FinUi|r Lifiour
iKg^ia
iKpria
|K^
I
<-
IMfllTM nw.ii ■
1
11
REVENUE
*
*
-
-
-
•
-
M?r
i.in
OFF
NPUT COSTS
5 cuds
-|
-i
-
FuilIVran
tatecik ido
PrvhGhlo*
tkaughr A'liiHal*
■
-
1
1 irrflni
9*rrjlii
ilivAu
liir/lia
diui^mi
•
■
•
-
-
-
-_
■
-
*
-
*
-
•
■
■
__ •
-
-
*
-
-
MT
134
NO
210
-
•
•
MB,
MT
■>)•
111
DQ
311
MT
111
Ml
JFO
111
Sub -I alii Input cb«4*
-
-
-
1.2S4
1.2*4
I.W
147
331
40
DO
110
1,144
—
iiii'ii*
—-----------
------------- -----
——
*
------------ —T“ -------- ------------
JIS
371
ciuuj lahoui
IQIAL CUSH
-
Dlirflw
•
-
•
-
-
•
•
1 ft»
i.ws
I4M
EQUIVALENT M
------------ 1
l'«l* 14 !»*«•?
-♦
•■-
■
101
-------------
1,010 1.241
—
1 ,JM
MtVCttUC
Total fiirr
-
•
■
-
■
*
•
-
-
i.nijyo
2,4**714
MM.774
input cos la
iwk
F«rtiU9«r»
Jnwell<M««
ll*«si|lcJdn‘4
Or*ikglii AnlniAiM Sub lot.il Input cii-fck*
,1 trial Hlrr *
ToUi Ulrr ■
-
T.
----------------- r_
114,111
170,400
Tulil Qbi
Total iDIrr
—J—
------- -—
■r
.
--------- "—
-------- . ..
•
-
-
------ '. ’ —z
-
■
------------- ;
■
•
—J—
' ~ 7
Toll! L»n ■ Thill Ohl ■
Total Birr
-
Birr *
ratal Ulrr
-
-
__________ ’ _
■
-
-
•
•
*
IM.3M
1ST 0»l
•13.lfo
240,410
Mt, JOO
172,TOO
3X2,1 IQ
1, .’ft 4,140
_
111,714 _________<*,*•!
340740
401 IM
111,714
414,111
100,1*0
J 40.740
•a: its
1.MJ 14«
1 SHJ Ml
Family LAtiouF
-
-
-
•
•
-
•
________ -
•
•
-
-
■
470140
472
C«u«*l LbImmj*
101 AL CDS IS
*
•
•
*
-
*
1M.17*
•22 145
371,7m
1,441 JUO
y oii 7H
1 054 JOO
-------------- -----------
<*4CDMr AfTFR I ABOLR ItoTal ehi«
*
*
1
-
•
1 >41 144
4.100.110 4 3«0 ill
t, jin,«r<4 Inlguled Crop Production Model lor WHEATTubln 5 Urigjitod Crop Production ror GREEN FODDER
Piyo 1 of J
'
HAS?
—
•m
ELEMENTS
im
IBM
iaw
—
2DQI
IMJ
2MJ
3W
XM
2M4
W7
Itoi
PRODUCTION
tMrui 5 QUAHTinf s
$4«4*
FiMilljwrt
In *»LtiE Idr*
Po^orlnMa
[■'raufllil
I A BOLIN
FArtillJy Lnliour
C««u*l Iflbpu*
—__
-
-
.
-
-
12,204
tlltth
I J. 200 |
-
-
-
-
-
•
-
•
-
240
•
-
-
-
-
-
I
*
-
«
-
■
•
JW
-
*
IM
-
■
-
T
•
•
•
J
rilArPJBya
-
-
•
-
-
•
-
JO
1
30
-
3
30
1
.
■
-
.
-
_
■-
I
-
■
llOLMUt
rtiiMia
■
■
-
•
•
-
•
-
ti,35i
11,20*
ipw
INPUT COSTS
Starii
FmIHHIV
inwcircidM
PntlddM
-
*
•m
■
...
-
-
1
.
-
-
-
-
Di h Light
Blrrdia
Olrrftia
niir'hl
FUrrJTia
Blirfha
Dlrrilifl
Ulrr/ln
tltaT/ha
-
-
-
*
*
-
.
,
•
*
Gil
-
-
on
-1
•
-
•
-
*
■
•
-
-
-
*
-
1tt
101
-
Ill
5i»b lerf*l Input co<La
-
-
-
■29
IM
lit
Fairly Labour
C«iuM LaAi<jr
■
-
>
-
.
-
213 ,
234
TOTAL COSTS
■
•
-
-
-
1.061
i.wi
1,043 I
ECMMVALENT In
I-------------------------
||taiEmg ■
I -----
r—*
1
»
Ml
LP20
L«2 I
1
L
-
------------- r
I
1
l'i| ; i hue
IWPUT COSTS
I Sw4t
i rtrtlMEara
IVmaI Birr
Tow Birr
IioMHwt
t ' i.’. i
JJITW
VmictcbtkM
ITbLiI Blit
PhMtelaM
It trial BM
. Traltfi
VUrfIMn
\ Sul> loW Input will
RlW
iToUiBtar
fcfFSl*£?
1 iWliOJ
' •mUy V rti»wu
it fcui-al < atUMji
\irrTK1 C<J1T1
rQLBHh,
ll MM VUn
* mi
'X2^ » h’-- Crop pro<lucuon Mode) ,or QREEN foooeh
P»«e 3 of 3
•'Kooucno^
1J.XW
12 MO
Kfpha
K®i»>a
tlS/Tia
MLVlNtir
INPUT COSTS
fllrrfha
Saedi
FartllUara
ln*ac*UMcs
Poatlcidaa
Draught
Sub total Input cost*
Family Labour
Casual Labor
TOTAL COSTS
nirv/tia
Burma
Blrr/tia
omma
Bln/tia
Birr/ha
Hirrfha
Blrrma
EQUVALEMI ha
UFVFHUf
1.T02
Total OUf
14.140,710
■05 IM
14.140,710
14140,710
■1■■
14,140,71
•OS ISC
14,14O no
•os. is*
« r-K. Ill 214,7»J
rZSTTW
i u.i
111,114 an
— i,4ai,ara ta-gyi.ddL
>f a>4
y?a,4
------ 4APPENDIX 6.3.2
BARO ITANG MODEL 3(b)
Table 1 Irrigated Crop Production Model for Sugar CaneTnbls 1 Irflgiud Crop FfOflucUon Mod»l lor Suqju c«iw
P«o »1 ol 3’ fltli0 1
Cr<3P Production Modal (or SugirCjn*
fTTGlTR
’’FIOD4JCDOM
INPUTS W4NTITIE1
$n*4i
FertHlmi
Tris« Detail
"PllllcWtl
I4ici&wy
LAftOUft
PrTtnMiwiH LllJftW Carta CiriHng____
Cars ilBritoaiilnti
IN
1
10
2
111
2»
in
m
H0
1
10
1
IM
’1
minima ya
mwflajra
lit
MO
111
111
IQ
2
111
J»
111
111
REVENUE
Him hi
10,64*
: aMS
iH4F
20,641
-------------- IqT»T
BF.au
-------------- HFmT
-------------------- 20 644
-------------------- rrnr
—i~
20.MA
-------------------- TO
INPUT COSTS
■i«di
IniKlkltffi
i PttlleJdei
Hatiitoary^M
Loidfrig
Sub-lntil input f Mia
FlHlGCHt
pBnnriHErt Latour
CM* Culling
1 HorvsilBn*
(equivalent hi
114
»rM*
!M
•7«
114
114
IM
ij w
b
IM
*71
1J4
IM
ITI
114
fifrr/tiB
JUrrtaa
FllrriTu
Dim*.
140
171
IO> Hi
SM
OTE
1*3
Hl
1*4
11*1
•fl
101
IBS
IpMI HO *71
W
Oil
103
955
_____________ 1*4
110
•71
101
MB
IM
M4
144
1,341
1«0
•ri
103
• M
103
955
IM
1M
•71
IM
Ml
3.143
3.343
1.M2
1 142
1*4
1|3W
IM
■Fl
103
i jii~
3.342
3, M2
3J<2
1 W2
3,143
3.343
BkTihB
DlrrMt
eiw.'hi
Dlrrtm
•M
133
44
BIO
133
44
IN
133
44
IK
111
44
|l ICB aatlflB]
t, 100
II*
134
44
• WO
HO
131
44
Moo
IM
133
44
IIOO
*,CM
MO
133
44
i,M0
IM
133
44
e.sco
1,4430
___________ l.iM
HO
133
44
R.MO
IK
iii
44
1.100
rTTRUF
lolal Dlr*
hmnDi/i
iWBn
ToiiKMrT
IM,MJ toft
1,3M,«*
11,011500
itt.Hi.Wo
IT9.JI2.M0
i,ae» aw
474.W0 *,117.100
S7< Ml>
(
■ ne< AM
ihstik numum
1.MPQ0D
11,012-SM
rro.iij wo
1.301,000
11.0M.I0*
fzojilso
11 WJ.iW
CTMWO
until
Wrr
I.STKltro
1J74.0M
1,737.500
T.27S.0N
1.275,000 I
Haul
Din
1,737 WO
1.737 OW I
1.737,MP J
■71.1M I _ ,r!.fi£C |______________________
K.4CT.0Q0
21,407,000
2MM.00C
i.iir.'wo/
J*40<MB£
i.itF.wg
Jf.4CF.~iH0,
B75.4W
■J 17,400 2t,W7,OT0
lurmirt Libaw
C*nw_Cwt1hn|
MWMlllWWl
SlA, 4Mrt Utaftui
KrtkUWRH <W4
MIDjMO VUO^tt 1F4JW0
l,W.4b6
7.4W.0W 1 7,440,0m I
r iM».Kw| __________ LtMSOOJ
1
1.M.W /
I
mxyeu* 1
BLM<,4W f 4 JT^Uj i9W,Wf~
•mj£M*piw
f
t ST
jnrnrRr
I
tttJM1.IIW
rij nai
137 BB I. MM
1 u, pa r, JDfl 'APPENDIX 6.3.3
BARO ITANG MODEL 3(c)
Table 1 Irrigated Crop Production Model for Sugar Cane• I hr. aia|< rop Production Model for SUGAR CAW
K
j!Li»ENTr
INPUT!QVANTlTiet
Sttda
FartiMw
Wiaarttekia*
PrutHidai
Mifchlniwy
Kgflw
Iracltwfli
LAUOltR
H'lrwitp,
Cm# CuUImq
Cana Haiitflln-g
moiiNIny
m>n>dap
fltVCNUE
INPUT COSTS
Saadi
Fnrlill^ara
JpMlkMM
_ Machhn«y-fl#|<f
L tatting
Sub total Input coiti
Fm«i CmIi
fUrr.'hn
«,64t
DlrrAit
llln/ha
Dinflna
B-rriM
P««m«fWl4 Labour
Blntta
Cum Cutting
Hv^atttng
iii'Tiba
ItirrlHa
CQ LI SV AL (XT ha
RNPMU!
input com
Btarta
FntMiara
inuclkka*
PaUkWti
WachVnpty 41* tn
Loafing
SUbAoUH lnp>A sr»h
r»’Tn<mw'1 Lrt*oii*
C.ars> Cutting
HanaMing
■ftlifto V«V*«1
ICVtlU wOolAjl CQST%
•3* 153, Wd
jrt.4H.0OO ?4O.T(5,CO0
I
IE5J2D0
4U7.W0
510.CW
1JM K0 I
3«I.JDD f
1,047,200 B.flF<O0O I T.OiO.OM j
59*0,0001 HMM /
1,4*4, (XX) /
liUMYf*
UM. 400 / Mt Jtftf I
T.ttf.Aoo I
H iJTUJ f-----------
I u.QMOTq
AlW.flKJ
IJIZ4M
W>14,W
Ik'iiiJtfiO
—
L«3C«»
4H.M0
rr j«o «Pd
Zl 11,000
jjjlj, 0M
Xhaok
Pf.JH.W
J<JU!Al¥ttNL£ &e d<#3
fwh/IJWB
M«BcMcld»> PaaricMra MiCftfaary
LoMfort
LAflOUA__ Parvnananr Latima
C«v* Cutting
liMi tor/1
riMriij I_____
iwirl/fUy
111
22t
111
! 1201
1 111
m Hl i
220
1t1
in
-
_____
r
I
REVEflut
BirtJlij
20. MS
20,M4
70 646
70,O4S
20045
20,045
20,046
20,045
20,045
70,64 i
20,644
20,M4
IHPLITCOSIS
ta*4»
farllM/rra
Iflitdlk k>»1
PoiticLdos
1 atHlinu
Sub total Irtpui tail*
r u*i Co»ki
Paawwianl Labour
Cana Cutting
ManrBfcilng
irouWALCNiT Ki
.— . —--------------- -
r
Hiirfaa tliniha Binau
□krini
Din/Im ftrrJha
tilfritM Hifi 'Via FUrt/lM Ukrdia
|WMt<
IM
1,301
IM
■7<
103
•46
3.M2
114
1,3M
110
111
io
Hi
164
1,101
IM
<71
103
Mi
3 MJ
114
1.1M
OF
on
105
OH
1,143
144 .
1.3U0
•71
10S
•If
J, Ma
144
1,30-5
IN
476
165
HI
3,343
3.341
194
I3M
110
476
163
15S
1,147
164
1,305
ISO"
671
103
BtS
3,343
154
1,306
i«9
575
1»
Ml
3,341
154
1,306
150
576
103
Ml
X34J
114
1.364
160
674
103
MS
1,343
1H
I.3M
140
•76
IM
665
1,142
MO
133
44
17.MD
490
133
44
17,t(N
•ID
131
44
l7".0M
440
133
44
IfW
160 133
44 11MO
BW
133
44
17,060
HO
433
44
TT. 000
DM
133
44
17,Ma
MO
133
44
17.0M
■ BO
lii
44
_ 17,060
noa
131
44
‘iXOftl
flfl®
113
41
17.006
rEvI 'J’-'f
M4.Fit.C00
34D7M.M4
340.761,000
MOJBI-MO
J*J.T4 TJjl.uj
3441, >44 OOU
34o.iii.doo
IMjli.OM
MO. 746.566 3W 764 dOfr
544.741,mid
340.741,606
--------------- Total OUT Tai al Olf Total Uli Total i>u Total All Total Btr
Total Bk Total DJr Tout Dlr
1
►NPUTCcHTB
•aada
f-sriliiiBra
*tim><H£]0u _____
Mi<nte>ary'4bBkt
Lt- ■dlr-y
iv^ ldUl Input cpBla
ParmanMt Lnhnwr
Ctrtl CuMlHQ
Harvauitm
iidi twill Iptowr
rJiALTHPbT'EtisTi
“ i,»ib>m
n, 191,00®
MM.ecn
II.Oli.OM
I.TSI.MO
M4I4.9M
1,010.0m
li.1VI.0M
3,460,00« 11,476,Mb"
1,7 61, Mb
illJifi'ODO
114,006
-MiAOtt
2X114, MO a,,M0. Mb
11,471,1MB 1,711, Mi
ii,iM,60o 10, kt 4, ON
X«14,400
3L14I.M0
3.MD.M4
1l>71,MA
l.lti.OM
14131.600 64,414, 600
3,«IB,MD
23,1 M.M0 3,410,MA |
11,4T4.WI
i;n 1.000
14,4 i <000
2.11 B^M 12,1 M, MO
li 4n.»M
r
I,il1 ,MW
14.1N. KM 64,414-MN
11,11*, MO-
l.ill.MO
33.144,004
7.4M.4M
11,476 MQ
ijki.ow
l6,3J4.tMJU 34 114,000
2.611,6M
22,t6B,M4
3,4*6,00®
11,475.000
1,711.000 1B.2J9.CM
SO 011 000
1,6 IB,040 71,144 000
1,66a, DM 11,471,990
VthtiOD
14,135.000 H 114,000
-1414,600 23,116,000 ,
LMOOGtl 11,479,000
I.Fl 1 .ooo" 16,235. DM Si'ilM.OW
_ 2.414,600
32,144,000
l,450,M«
11,471,000 1.7 41, WO 14.735 OW
W,6l*,0Q0
14. IM ,000
iSsIoirt
1TJM ,»o
14. HO, 00$ 3,111,M0
741000
17 HD.ClUO
14,mo,66o
LN 1,006
7 44 M0
I7.Mb.Q46
14. MO.005
1,141,000
TM.000
l>,M4M6
ii.Ho.oao
LN 1,000
740,000
iJmioM
{4,616,60a _1.N1.11M
746,000
iLHtMti
14 Htl'ttH
' sjii.mo
746,BM
17.6H.M0
14,440,MO
LH1JW
741 MO
|T,W».«OD
liTblO.Cdc
1241,600
746 OOD 1T.44BOOQ
KKfr btt
ll 341.000
7M,AM
17,611,044'
rliifi.oao
3, JU. MO
740 000
lT,M6,O»0
Kliiioo
»,N VOW |
744,004
17,145000
irMWHOAfiat Labour
74.14S.0QO T4,r>3,000 J4.7I1.W T 4, Til,MO 1M.MS.ODO T HlUt 1,000 Ni,H£ffi0 U4.N2 00D
74,J6l,0W
Ni.tiLDtt
T4.T43OM
Hi,H2.QM
74.711,600
74,113.600
r4T63,O04 - t<M?doo
I
i
i
— jiS.ltlMO “ns.ni.ok N< IlZMO [ 2M.NLC66 f NXtiTOM 1 Nl aia.oflb"
1
*
J- ■*!
£ 5 5 Sjzfc 2 Him' I l>rilt,i<l
lCr pP
O t<><J-e,i.|1
Modri for SUGAR CANK
r«Kr J of J
FlFMFNTs
hMooucnOw
INPUTS QUANTITIES __ Baade
Ml/Tta
Kg/ha
F a Hill rat a
Kg/ha
•n»tx l»cl«l*e
KyiK.
Paatlcldaa
H^iNa
Mac Hl nary
liaclorfl*
Lnadara
Kfjrtia
Rl Vr HUE
tWTUT COBTS
__ iaodo
fn«fV<1ay tnan day
Blir )>>
(Brrflva
Fartlllrara
f>.-.
— 
1.305
Ill
InucMcldva
Mnltta
HO
1.305
190
PaaUcldoa
Blrritia
«7f
•75
M n c li In n ry 1.<l1-J
Uiri>1«a
103
'. <> »<JI '-J__
Hirtflia
Ml'
Bub-total input costa
j n:
iMn/No
Blrr/ha
Blrrftia
EilrrAia
EQUIVALENT ha HLvtuuE
17.000 745.000
Total Dlrr
I Total D*0
22.101,000
7 550 000
15.aJB.000
55.014.000
—U U4 M f 3.541.004
rau.aM f>.54» oio
---- 7.1 Til '
K‘
1
JAPPENDIX 6.3.4
BARO ITANG MODEL 3(d)
Table 1 Irrigated Crop Production Model for Cotton
Table 2 Irrigated Crop Production Model for Maize
Table 3 Irrigated Crop Production Model for Wheat
Table 4 Irrigated Crop Production Model for Green FodderInble I (rr^Hictl Crop Proilurltan Multi for SUGAH CAML
T*Jt< J i»f J
--------- ;-------- t—■—r---------------- -
2W
£OJt
—
3020
JU ID ] MH
---------- otghth
■TOT"
LflrflW
—
----------------
IMiMJCIlOM INPUTB CHJANTlTlfi
M
•,W0
4
1*0
1
15
V
IM
0,400
■,wo
------ "rar
______
■“4 IM
1
10
1
111 220 111 111
______
—
—
Lp’hi
lA’hi
ijflM
r«c tor/l i Sgrtia
4 «B«
4 5M
infeivericld** pMlkhtaa
MkNiwv
1
10 3
4 eld
1 id
» in
LA4QUR
P*rmanwtf LMmr
C-bhdGuK*M
Can* HmmUfiii
TMAlrlay
nanJriay
rnanUday
GO
111 Hi
111 W
111 111
320
111
111
11 10
J 111 120 111 111
4
140
1
id
i1
in |
220
ill
111 .
WvENur ~
Hlnmji
£0,041
ZD,044 id 045 Jfl, 041
ld.04S 1
INPUT CQSTQ
ktMta
Oulu 144
114 114 114 lU
Fthiiiw _
PwWldn
M feCbibfHqf -4b[*d
LawMni
Auto-Wri Input coiia
“i«4
flhriliB
B|niHa OlnftM
BIhi/Im
IWiflu
iWTJNa tJkrftM
□Ittftu Ulmin
|[«<i acre
1.W IM
473 103
IM
I.W*
105
471
101
Ml
1,304
150
471
101
ISO
1.305
1M
■71
103
055
ijtt
ISO
«ri
101
MS
1.305 HO
■ 75 101
tst
1342
1.M2 1,142
1M2 114?
1342
i
II val CoMt,
1 PtnmMnkLjiUior
I Can* CuiDng
I kar*Q5liii^
|FQUlVALEMf6r
EtUNUE
IlIMPUfCOlIT"----------------------------
1 s“di
I l-*nllli4ri
I«D BOO
~0M
131
_ OH M0
133
133
IM
133
44
1~
44
<4 M
44
MO
133
44
IT. DOO
17,000
340.714,050
3M.7M.DM
n,«w
345.7W.OM
lilt,MO
M.1M.W0
1.M0.0M
11.471,000
1.711. W0
H,2»,WQ
54,114,000
17,000
■-
340,764.000
340 rw.Mo
17,000 j 340,755,DC ;
|t«W oi
f
I
itliUi
1 P*thc.|4«B
I UKHnvryJReU
1 timing
t tauoui iftjwFciwu-
1 C'wnwNanq Litaijr
l<"-«IVh_ewmnfl
1| Hv^mJIIh^
\ feA'MP Lau*M>
brjTM. INPUT Uiftir"
llaUI Bl
|T<mi oi
I lb tri Ell ll^*' ®!
|t«h h Urtri
v•*«l 1 M
1
I “' Mii.tto
21,143,006 rl l.tM.MO
• | ii.4To.ooe d 1741,000
I 1fi.iaS.DDC
~ J.siMw
n,i os,odd
10M.MD
11,471,000
1,711. OM
15,114,M0
SO.iflWb]
2.411,0M _ 22.lfS.DOO
IMo.mo
11.4U.OKI usiOM i
Tf^lii.floo iSlllMC f
7,010,VW | 27,111,000 1
J.SM.QGO | 11.471.000 1
l,7fi1.0£w |
_ ’«2
it ffa MO 1
550<m|
1__ ajOibM
74 i.oai
1 1*4*1,&61
14.MO.OtW
74MB U.i»,«W
i4.UA.Wd
J.Ml.MQ
___ 74B.4O0
1T.BO.MO
~ —LU rTj-j
J,Jit S«D
74t,MO I
ioira* J
----- "N FF> H.ISrf
’Hh <uj tun -
i4.*e<},6wjf UjiidJM/ _____I
?44.d«] /
>ltea 1, a*._Mr
— ~i~
t Fm-.-»' IM.kilw
~F4 jfJ OBij
M&M3.BW
T4 I’M £hlp J M Ivj.aTp f
|1'1' 3? p — fPittlp* ?livs=r =i
st 8 gif'sAPPENDIX 6.3.4 BARO ITANG MODEL 3(d)
Table 1 Irrigated Crop Production Model for Cotton
Table 2 irrigated Crop Production Model for Maize
Table 3 Irrigated Crop Production Model for Wheat
Table 4 Irrigated Crop Production Model for Green FodderT >»>lo J C.op Produclion Mod«l lo.WHPAT
nights
—
UM
r------
-----------------
LIJ 1MT
Iill
1H4
[--------------- tm
-
>M1
JOO J
--- -----
jooz
-------- Sm------------
MM
------- 1010—
»11
Unlli
—
——
PROiMJCTkMM
•
•
-
-
-
•
•
-
-
-
a mh
J ww
J.BOO
awe
! WQ
),l«
J, toe
jwm quantities
Sh<H
FBirmwi
fcHMKtfcAto
r»illcl4oi
D«a jgM A
L4I3OQR
FwnllV I about
CihbI Labour
NgflMi
Ktphi
K^tU
K gill a
BlLIki
-
.
•
-
*
«
*
r
•
*
.
r|
.
.
.
-
-
>
IM
•
.
«i
.
•
-
>
-
-
*
.
-
.
-
>
-
-
>
-
•
•
10?
IM
1
4
I
104
100
1
4
•
100
1W
1
4
1
■oo
____KO
1
4
•
110
1
4
1
1W
IM
1
4
I
------------
IW
IM
1
4
•
»n«rwd»y»
NtaiVdapt
■
•
*
-
-
•
-
•
.
.
-
■
•
■
H
M
■»
05
M
M
■
-
REVENUE
fihfjtia
mH
MT7
S.1T7
A ITT
A.tTi
5,077
4,177
INPUT COST?
9»4*
F«HI4l»r»
Maae. He Ml*
PMtKMll
Draught Animal■
gult-iDtal inpul enti
OhiOia MrRha flirrrtra
0**1
Ulnd’a
■
.
-
-
-
-
.
.
•
-
MS
141
311
10
770
310
247
334
UO
J70
310
247
■«
-
.
.
.
330
+
•
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
*
-
-
14T
331
IQ
ZTB
00
370
•
-
lit
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
1,354
247
331
09
270
Jit
1.K4
247
330
M
2?0
310
1.2*4
247
JU
10
270
310
17*1
1,254
1 254
f,7M
Family L*tw
fiuuha Qifrffia BurrHna
•
•
a
-
,
.
371
.
371
-
375
-
375
-
375
375
375
Catwal labour
TOTAL COSTS
-
-
•
1,021
1 >20
t.tti
un i
i.m
UM
1.i»
-
1 EQUIVALENT hl
■
-
.
-
—
-
■ i «> 1.010
j
-
11
i
1 212
_1
1,ISt | 1.202 . 1.M2 1 i 2«
r
1
_____________ 1
RtUEMut
INPUT CM11
3«rdn
L*rtlHlOT_________
biaacMtlOw
VMiddaa
Ur irughl AnteMlt iub taUA Ifipul mt la
4rrt*y L*6iM
hi Labour
Tdtm. C.O111
?.w m
114,73J
1TD,«Q
4C.40Q
131,350
5,533,770
245.470
341,300
M,MQ
171,700
U!t7M
rar dm 337,100
340, 740
ioj.mo
tJJ.jTa
II5.3M
12J446 j 1 MS J»
I.25C, 540
j/tjsv
irww
4/J/M
Mi A
JlT.714 4J0J50
JM.SOQ 340,740 f
4<L2,jri LM7.UI
J/JL/fP
[ zaa ftBXirWfwi reftfcWM
Aminuhi
-ABDUft
FiffiJIy Lihaur
1
---------------------------- ,
|
■
. .-------------------
I
i
1 ------------- 1
wcvtwje
HlTT/hP
-
■
•
•
•
-
— .
------------------- -
2 146
1
IhfUT COSTS
3<i*ds
FerdLrari
JfiBOClkld^i
FanUcjdofc
Draught Animal*.
Birr**
BIrdhi
Qlrrifii
furrflu
EMrrJIia
iSinrHi
Blrirtia
(IIii/Ki
-
■
_-
-
■
4
-
-.
•
_____ -
________ -
•
■
*
________ -
__________-
•
------------------------
*
-
-
rr
IM
140
T
• i
-
-
*
-
•
-
-
*
if
*
*
-
-
2AS
i«a
♦40
Ml
lub-taHal Inou! coils
-
-
•
•
■
*'
-
i.ott
1.011
r «nlly Labour
Ctuaai Labour
TOTAL COSTS
-
*
-
-
-
-
•__
•
•
_______
•
-
•
•
-
-
iff
17S
.
•
-
-
*
-
-
-
•
•
I.41B
1.411
EQUIVALENT lu
|M1 Krtaga)
■1
|
4—- ,
•
«_
4
■
I
+ «•
|------------------
J JH
fttVlMUE---------------------------------------
Yd<*i nii*
-
■
-
•
-
•
-
•
•
177*755
“ * dirsri
.
iPiFLii 1 GO3 T 5-
Saids
—
------------- ------------
—
-- -----
4
■-- ~
-------------------- .—
— _ -
7-
FvrllRiDF*
______ 4 ------------- 7"
•
■
-
■
—
*
—
—
—
ToU Wif Tiiiak Dlrr ToIbJ Dhrr Tolll Ulf* T»IU Bl.'l TpCiI tH"
Twai Birr Total Otar Total lllrr
. — , _
-
»
•
•
—
*
■
-
•
•
-
■
----------- ----------- .—
-
Lnia-C llcl.|a«
I iiiUcMos
Paawyhl AMmvia
fetto-Wlai input c<i*l*
■_■ ________________
— - -----------------------------
■'
-
_______
1L74J
iM.rt*
>12,440
-
■>
__________________ ■ _
•
-
•
•
•
r
•
*
-
“ir:»
441,113
i,nF,Mi
10-11 Ji
-1
-
fc
■
•
-
«■
-
-
I.MlMi
).»i,«r [
Family LhIiouf
Caw*a< Lsf>4M*
TOTAL COST!
r
■
«
-
•
-
-
«■
-
-
•
-
*
•
-
•
•
-
MT, Ml
*
■
•
•
-
1 jSlJM
---------------------------- d
i
"immh
---------------- -----------------------
|
fhCOMF Af lC« 1 ADtKW TOTAL WtR
— ---------------
■
■~
l—
_ —- ..
r—• —
"-----------------------------------
-------------- -
_______
L------------
f
[
■ J-1
1
1
1 IJ1G1J 1 »M <44rog*lot1 Crop Prcducltan COTTOMJAcjw
jtM'vrs auAunnii
F4rw.rr>r>
PciMe^drt Ordugfii ArUrnda
'LABOUR
Labour
im.
ClTOIJf E nbciiur
JmarUtflja J 
]
—
1 J..
1 I
—
WfcllMJF
flrrnlia
MM
MOI
7 MO
2.010
7 000
MM
i oia
7.W
J. 000
MOI
INPUT COSTS
SMd»
FortUiiwi
IhabeUeIUbi
I’nilltldni
DMwfihl Anlniala
5ut] I0L1I Input co*lt Fttinuy l*bmii
BlTTOll
DlirJha
Blrv-tia
RJrrfha
hlrritiia
17
lit
*40
*
ail
17
111
M0
-
20*
17
1D9
MO
-
7*4
17
1W
044
Hk
17
100
*40
111
17
100
• 40
-
2 IS
17
109
«4O
3&G
17
109
*4D
,
206
17
111
040
215
17
101
040
in
1,M1
1 Ml
1.MI
t.OBI
1.001
1*01
1.001
1.001
I.OOt
1,001
llirrlim
EUrrflta
011 115*1
370
■
145*
3 7*
•|
370
-
IT*
370
-
1 450
370
-
1,450
no
370
37S
LBUld Ldauur
total COSTS
I
1,4M
1.418
1,400
1.410
1.4*0
1,401
375
i
1,4*4
— - 1 H
!— 1—
LQklLVALfcNT hi
f*eaaci»*(|«|
■.2S7
----------------------------- ------------------------------
_y*7 ».267 8,107
v,a*T 8.2*7
•s"
il8 7
•.ill
------------------------------------------------------ ]■-------------- —
—
111 ---------- n-> 'U J lln 1
REVENUE
INPUT CO* TB
Tpi-i niTT
H7.M*
1*7. *•*
1,0*4,02*
1.004,411
i,w,m
0.IM4IO
inikMikchJi*
PMiicitf—__________
8,114,4*9
0.014.4M
>3*0,131
$ 0 008,817
imam
Dr autyhl Anin rd* Sub-tolal Iftpui £»*!•
in dOS
10,0*0,017
2,471,37*
3,411,170
MIhF!
____
1,471.375
>,471.17*
>,*71 370
J,4f I,1H
I aHnli7 Libfriir
To<d Qkf
MTU”
abciuf___
TOTAL CDSTtt
Told &h*
Total OlfF
ii.ifijai
li/ffiMM
114?U*f
Ilin t»?
114M 'll!
—~
i3.ha,gj* [ u Ji
* 0/4
11 IM 034
Hl** 038Tab‘°
,
a c op
Mortol po< MAIZEHi
3
1 » 3 ” t
iii i
" rf rT
Si i s 
* *F i
H
i
: h•t
ih =
rfrf -*■
- O Bi-f-
‘ E*
■ * *1
- *’
■*
•
i
sH.’zi J=§ •:!
4 n «■ »
J s *
:
IB
—
»-
s
m-Bi Hj s)
rf vi
vn
1—
r
•
—
S
s!3 *]:
n n iHi ■
—
3
fS
*Z
S|
S’
V B C O tte. »
MM f, -
?-L
i■
l» T
*-
■
■-
s’
o
£11*15 Hi «i«
8*E
IE
M ■-*
ae
s
a
a
HI'S: i;1
ma
ii
•»
S.
X23°-= Hi H
aa
►- «i
I*
*
A
■'-■
•*• o & a w-
X 8 « — S
| s s s e
* •. * ~-J—.
a -o —
■■ «
ii
*i 4
»
a
0
Hiin
huh
Hi
k- 1— h- k- ta- H
Hl
1— ta. h-
z>
E
-J
.■
-d
4
. if
- --S5-SI 5 i • “£3- 1-
Hi
flf
& U r-Table 2 Irrigated Crop Production Model For MAIZE
PaQeiof 3
w?3-------
---------- 2011----------
2012
1014
---------- 2011----------
2010
-------- ion--------
201 a
-------- FoT»------
hi MINIS
P AOfHH? T»O*
inputs quan rims
Seeds
Fvriiauen
Inaec Hcldaa
PaaHrMaa
Df aught Animate
I ADOUR
Family Labour
Cowtat Labour
2020
Mil
Mglha
Kg/lia
My**
KgOia
KO*ha
IMUHa
marVdaya inaniday a
8 000
1,000
1,000
-------- MU--------
5.000
aooo
a.ooo
0.000
1,000
i.eoo
• OOO
• 000
• >30
25
120
□
3
0
100
»
120
3
3
0
100
25
120
3
3
0
100
25
110
3
3
0
100
25
120
3
3
0
100
21
1M
3
3
0
100
21
120
3
3
0
100
29
170
3
2
0
100
25
120
3
2
0
100
IS
120
1
3
0
100
IS
120
3
2
0
100
25
120
)
3
----------------------
REVENUE
lUrrlha
5,551
---------nn
6.845
6.K5
4,041
--------------- Tin
4.061
5 54
0,541
0,045
4 541
4.041
IMPUT COSTS
Saad*
T •rtUlrar*
Insecticides
PralKMaa
Draught Animate
Blrriha
OlrTlha
Mrrfha
BlrtRia
Blir/ha
52
STS
240
0
tsi
52
270
240
0
101
M
270
240
0
1S1
c?
2?0
240
0
101
62
270
240
0
101
52
275
240
0
101
52
276
246
0
HI
0
27
244
15
2 52 270
240
0
151
02
270
240
0
101
5] 7ft 244 101
62
270
240
0
101
Suh'lalil Input coaH
753
Til
753
753
753
753
753
70
703
753
F5J
7«
i amity Labour
Causal Labour
Olrr/lil
Birdha
IM
250
290
250
250
250
250
2M
250
250
25C
MG
TOTAL COSTS
Olrriha
1,013
1.013
1.013
1.013
1.013
1.013
1.013
1.013
1,012
1.013
1.013
1 013
EQUtVALFHT ha
flat acreage}
4.370
4.375
4,375
4,370
4.375
7 M3
10.210
13.127
14,157
14.557
14,507
14.M7
iREVENUt
llolal tMn
30.041.240
30.041,240
30 041,240
io.041 240
30 041.240
50 048.445
b 051.850
50 115.055
100.U0.7MJ
100,120,755/
100.130.755j
1OQ139J55]
Input costs
1 Sta4«
1 Fmtlliiaia
\ UlMOtUlSO
1 PaiHcldei
\ Dtauglil Anlrrult
houl Bin
Hotel Bln Hole* Birr Hotel Bur HtAaL thn
271,312
1,111,620 1 1,050.246
1
1 536,51
271,312
1,101.620
1.OU. 140
0
5)5.511
271.312
1.151,520
1,060.240
0
5)9 515
271.312
1.101,520
1,DM, 240
0
0)5,515
271,312
1,151,520
1,050,240
0
535 515
452,164
1,050,110
1,710.320
0
1,352.04)
4)1 020
1754.700
2450,400,
1.550,110]
813.874
3,M4.2»ol
3,190 4501
2.507.2571
7 
804,304/
3,038,4M|
3,M0.«8d|
H
2 755 1171
004 384
3,030.400/
3.SM.5M
'1
2.7041117/
004.3841
1034,40*/
J.MOIlo/
0
7.794.1171
804 3 041
3,034.4 X)/
j.ioo.iuj/
./
2.ZM 117/
\ Suta lots! Input c<m*s
V trial Din
I s.ua.se
• S.iM.eat
UM.MI
3,335,885
3 338 884
1 554.550
7 reo 7 30 J
10.015 ion
It. 1280*11
rt.i2e.00 r/
11.12f.50l/
ii.ih.Mil
U kntOy IMmhm
y. «i*«m LafeMMM
\local B*r
\lcAU Din
1 1,oe4.<
xao i,o»«,m 0
0 1.0M.OM Q
1.084,000
0
1 004
0
1,471.340
0
2.442.190
3.701,79 o/
A<4« Hal
i,Uriel
al
AML 700/
0/
\1O1H.CM1k
\r*tu utrr
\ *413 1
a* *45)
kfe «,*».*•
4.«12.Ut
4,417
l.iir bob
io. Ml. ria)
tijif.iiil
ujrtuil
nrn,vil
r</ra.«jr/
A*M.
V*«r-<
Cawaf
Tl >4
»
M*ura OUANrjnfJ
SoorfB_________ Faritfanrv
MirriTfldn
Drjanupji-J
i-AD04JR
Latour
rill.ll
. ! Ik 
CauMl 13 l>M/f
rritititf
iva
PER NECTAR
1
J_ _
1_
|____
_1
n
]
I --------- 1
REVENUE
BrcrrtM
5,477
1,177
1.4/7
• ■7^
1477
1,477
1,477
OH
5.877
5,077
5.477
kin
I.IT7
5877
INPUT COSTS
S«e-da
FhHIIxqh
irsacBr Idoi
Biif/Ni
247
JM
Pt»U<444«
□raujhi jMvJrih*l> , Bii|j4uI»7 Input ca«4«
f-ajnily Litiour
Ctuaai Laticwif
TOTAL COSTS
B'rritu 1Ulrrtii DlrrJha iiirrrhp
M
170
147
51V
40
170
319
247
1JV
40
170
147
331
141
134
40
2TD
SIB
247
131
40
270
314
1 244
247
IM
40
170
31V
1.114
JIB
147
334
80
27V
310
1 254
80
270
JIB
1.1M
311
1,144
247
3M
80
270
319
1.244
247
114
40
170
314
W"
MB
BQ
270
119
1 244
■-------
34/
134
10
no
310
247
331
•0
270
114
1.1H
1 754
1 IM
1.384
1,344
1 244
HI
334
10
270
314
1,114
BhtTib
ehrlhl I
IM
374
-
1 ON
373
378
375
•
374
1*J9
374
375
374
374
-
1.W
374
•
1,820
314
374
373
HlnTu
1,434
1.429
1.429
1 479
1.414
1.429
•
1.814
1,424
1,420
1419
—
EQUIVALENT hB
1,111 1,243
pm jhiuqatioh bcheme «
1,211
’ .Ml
1 1*1
1,142 1.144
1,141
LN2
1.102
1,2*2
1.341
1,M2 1,141
REVENUE INPUT COSTS
Tout Gift
414 .'F4
111714
J.
311,114
414.444
100.444
240 140
401.171
r 8t4?
7.414 J
.414.:
1,4*
To4*l ! ‘I I r T<H«I Mrr
fotal birr
IMIHI
414,210 1,084,784
41JJW 413,no
<73,2U
2,011,748
413,710
2,684,748
’ MJ 444
4111*0 3 014. IM
413 2*0 J.pU.TH
413 J8« 1041,184
1,843, M4
471,2*0 1,681 ?M
471,780 2.915 748
311 714 424, • H 1Qd,M$ MO 740 402,174
1 Ur Hi
411 IM LtiLIll
Mil TH
111,714 4J4.IM ’00,140 244, MO <02 IN
IM 2,144
•*f J, 214
2 044.744
111,174
424 111
’M 111
144,741
401 111 1,442~i4i
4T1JW 2 044,7*4
!
[INCOME MltA L 4 DOUR i IPrAL
1 >01,010
8,MOO7*' 1110 878
8,34*878
X
1
T9ON
111.114 424.M4 100, Ma 340,7 40
401.114 I MJ;Ml
411, JI9 J, ML, TH LM4IF4T^lo J Irrigated Cftp Pw|uttlw
P.fl. 3 o< 3
2O3T
3u2i
7071
1430
J.HK
J031
RTktf-MS
Until
_______ PHQOUCTHDN
rtgrtia
J 5Cfl
j.ij-no
INPUTS QUABrrTTKB
Saad*
Hgiha
IOS
IQS
IM
1«
IK
FarllHrm
kiiha
IBB
110
1B«
ISO
■ 10
hn war II cl da a
Klpl'i
1
1
1
1
1
Pailtahfaa
K^li*
4
4
4
4
4
LhnutjiM AnlHM'i
minifl
B
4
s
1
1
L4BCUR
Family Labour
HkBHndMpr tiumid^a
l SB
M
IS
SI
tl
Cauiil Labour
1
REVFJhiUf
rbirrfTio
1*77
t.W
Hn
5,«7
S.fTT
INPUT COSTS
So.rfa
BWha
MT
MT
m
347
MT
rarlHIxar*
ftnflil
331
IM
3M
3Ji
JJl
biaoctlciilaa
ninflit
M
IC
M
SO
is
PMUtldm Oraiaght Anlmali
Sub-tolai 1r»pi/t coala
01 hi1 li a Birflia
fbnfaa BHrrf3*>a Birr Am
ITO
111
1J54
270
311
l.«4
37*
*
1 .G±S
J7Q
31S
1 2*4
r
|FiwrHiy labour
»•
3»
Cwtai Labour
*
TOTAL COSTS
1 III
P
M2*
17&
311
1,284
374
-
1.421
27*
31*
1.1M
371
1*29
—
EQUIVALENT ha
1.MI
1 2&1
1.2*2 1.J4J 1,112
heveMUF
J Dial tlli r
T.jia.nt
7.41M74
7,41ljh
INPUT COSTS
| 5fK1
Fartaliw*
Inaacllcldaa
PaMlcldat
Draught Animal*
Sub total topol coala
lr nr* I1,! Labtwr
L.awtai Laiiouri
ITCH AJ COSTS
ToUi Birr
Total Birr
t trial Ulrr
Total Sin
Total Bin
Total Bln
311.T14 42i,5i-D
WHIM IttJU
401,171
f.art.m
311,714
43*,*U
100,140
M0.740
*03. STI
l.tlJ.M*
7,411,77*
■111,711
421, Hi
bM.HD
311,714
436 !«
IOO.SM
371.214 |
414,454
ISO. M0 |
1.512JW
M0 7«
tCU.tJj
Mu.sii I
471,3*0
2,055. TOP
jw,t« 34 * J 44 I 407,471 4M.57B 1
f,M2.f44 J 1,113.141 |
r
StXth 1
____ J1
Talsl nirr
|TciI«1 fSIrr
BUT
aJi-W 2G55.7UJ
4T1IE0 >
aTiaso I
1 fl5i 7M
A0M.71I / zmni J
1
A -J i. JB«-M '
P. >■«.■"■ 1 a7jai»rw J
- J .. ._. ’__I
VHCOME AFTTH I AMOUR TOTAL Bl ■ ins »ra i.iuitUrtVFuTJ otM^nnw
_ Jaoda
/*rrWr#n
JntKifcftM
PtaiieAdts
Draught
ISfiOUN
ramibfLatiour
mwwdiyi
CuaraH abflur
Iftlih'i
ft L VENUt
nr- '1.1
INPUT COSTS
BMtii
H-rrrtiJi
FtrUlUara
LkiiJli*
IihicHcMh
FaUle Ida*
H|nrti»
B4n/lM
tJriuyhl
Bkrrtu
sub-uui input c*ili
I AirOif Latour
aiitrti*
CamuU L tk*«r
Utrrflka
TOTAL CUM 71
EQUIVALENT lia
Alvehue
|T..i«i UdJV
IM*UT COSTS
Saad*
ITviar Umi
F«rt£t| .wa
TO4*i Hlilf
in«acilctilnv_
T&Ld Mln
FaaUcldi*
Total Din
| Tfaciere
lolai Bn
Tirfarf Uin
Ifnmll> Lab&ur
TM4l fllMr
TOTAL GDlTi
Told B4rr
-■
INCOMiLAr itH LAACHJW TOTAL WfUl
4 314.MOTable 4 Irrigated Crop
ELEMENTS
•’HOCHJCTKM
INPUTS QUANTITIES
Bo*d« _
Fa«1ttuara
biaaullcldaa
Pva lieidea
(NaugNI
:-------------- i--------- ill!
I
;
-----------
----------------------------- -----------------------------
2000
12 20(1
2M)
*
s
2010 ---------- HH------------- ---------- Hu------------- 2013 2014 2<5Ta 2014
201? 2010 3010 2020
12.200
12.200
12,200
13 200
11200
12.200
12.200
—
17 200
12,200
________________ ________________
JIO 200 280 250 200 200
12.200
JU
-
___ !
»
r2
12 200
MO
-
2M 200 210
•__
•
__ • _________ r
~~ ~' y
•
-.*
-------- ------------ I—
3
•
3
3
2
- ------------ — ------------------—:— --------------------
T32
. .♦____ _
i
manrd*y% 30
■MMtrt
|
>0 20 30 20 20 30 30 30 30 30 20
_
'1
I
_____________ 1 . _________________
1
Ht-vtNUE
|il«i/ha
11,205
11205
b ki
---------------- 11,201
11.100
11.205
11.205
11,200
11.101
11.104
11 205
11200
INPUT COSTS
«--------
D*rPl»«
nirv^i*
Bbr/ha
Din^a
OM
________
sm
OM
030
F«r1IUc»r*
IniDCttckloa
P*«lkld**
Dtm»gM
Sub *o<al Inpul coal*
020
*
101
•M
•
in
•10
>
101
-
•
101
434
•
101
•30
-
•
•
111
.
IM
•
101
_____ •
•
-
•
101
101
101
m
020
•20
B2*
•20
• 10
•
•
Hl
020
920
020
•20
Fa rrdly Labour
BirTfta
Birr/h*
BWt.Vi*
230
130
237
220
240
241
242
243
244
240
240
Cmu*I labor
TOTAL COSTS
1,004
1 001
1 MO
230
i,M7
1,004
1,000
1,070
1,071
1,071
1.073
1.074
1.070
EQUIVALENT ha
.. 1
*cr**a
1.202
1 202
1,202
1.202
1,202
1 212
2.104 2.M5 I 3.707
4.200
[-----------------------------
4 204 1 4 200
1
-----------------------------L --------------------------- 1-----------------------------1---------------------- I
REVENUE
NPUT COSTS
Sr•11
OMtmiar*
lnaactbcide*
r«*tici4«4
TratUm___________
Sub total Input CO4U
14 140,710
Ml. 100
•it-n
001,110
14,140710
1< 140,710
23.&75.J20
1.342,352
32.000720
orooio
42,433.3)5
2.410 100
47,150 MO
Z0M.7W/
47 1!Q 543
2.004,704
141.043
241.041
241,042
401,OM
1,744,214
MJ, 710
3,440 4J.
Ml 720
J, 400,432
iv7,m
241,M2
1.040.100
300,314
1,344 554
713.317
J, 13*.42 J
WO.J41
<*>*4My
f.OJO MO f.AM. IM
< Ui >4*
11 151.541
141042
1M4.1**
too.om
1,545.7*2
ii lH <111
241 Ml
1 044 1M
301,010
1,347,*14
-------------- i
n W OM 4
2 441 403
712 4*0
' on
>* *4<*x7"
1.024 742
<414, fM
11.1*4.454 1
107MP
t 141,07a
tf.MI.0tf I
<*f* 1*2
4,5/J *M
JO
f 4X4J5 «4 'rrcw
iwrurt OtAflAiFj
Frtg/iM______ JkiMriic-MM POfrttTW**
FjjnWI, Lib Out dw4J L aOovr
1
i
HfcVtNUE
flUrr.Yi*
11,204
11,201
11.10*
11.201
it, 704
ii.iM
11,104
11,305
ium
H.Jdf I --------------- lijoH
G03T3
Scrda
FwHUfm
Jrt**eUelcta«
L’rfcjflht
5wb-talil Input <0414
fllrrJTi*
BBtAw*
lilnflh*
iui i ti*
Dw<At4
118
IM
431
■
-
-
1*1
in
IM
-
OH
• i
IM
-
•
■
111
IM
-
Ill
Ml
in
-
-
11!
“T
•34
IM
-
•
-
111
B»
-
-
•
-
ill
-
in
■■
in
■34
-
__ _________ >41 UB
t
-
ill
•31
_
—
_
111 111
120
on
171
m
CmmjI LMtor
TrtTAL COST*
Birrfti*
347
1 014
.
I" — —
SU
><•
iW
ill
1 071
no
1J7>
111 1,040
_
.
Mi
1 0D1
1ft] 1 001
___ _______ J-. ”
1
_______________ 244
■197
-m
._______
----------------- . .
4. >t>4
A laa
A 104
____________
4 liM ,_____ _________
__________
L___ ____________
_____ _ IjiH
1
-----------------
|-------- ----------
__ _______ A *.
1 l>B«
J.104
I
HLVlHUl
'NftJTCMIl
[T^TB
C F * *7 < -1 •'
Z.M4JV4
itUWa
1.M4.7M
47.140.*40
17. ill 440
•■Vll4
FifllliufB
ltkl4C.lkid44
PwDCldH
Tracton
Ivkri Dlrr fotaJ Du r t«m«I ®uf Tsi*il Biff Tulnk DMT Total FVirr
47.14$ *40
14MJM
4 F. *40.4441
},M4,T<M
TTIHW
J.4M,rO4
•01 Yin
__ 1.144.TQ4 JO J, 711__________ KJ.IM
7 «4.70-I
l
4 7.740,444*
>.i«4 TM
Sufa.lc.14l input EMI*
3.4M43J
____ 403,7*4 3,444 4 JJ
X4BB 443
441734 1JAB4M
FbjivU^ Ltiwur
C»U*4l LfttHlui
Toul Blir lol■* Hu.
TOTAL COST!
Tmw OH i"
0<l3 TM
>,4UI 411’
IjftOW
4, >31,014
4 3 410 014
1,047.ru 4 474.324
^,4H jlf
1. M2.000 LOM.ZDO
<4417,431
j J,4111,704 4 3. WDM
■i;®w3k
U,4P1,TI3
4 51X014
4? 487 144
1,41441
_1.BU.oii
-4,w,m
Mii.m
4.141 iei>
4>14>,lWT~ uud im
42 4M
4. Mi ll
I
T 4J,MoJB1APPENDIX 7
IRRIGATED AGRICULTURE, ECONOMIC APPRAISAL
APPENDIX 7.1 - IRRIGATION PROJECT NUMBER 1 (Alwero-Abobo) APPENDIX 7.2 - IRRIGATION PROJECT NUMBER 2 (Alwero - Dumbong) APPENDIX 7.3 - IRRIGATION PROJECT NUMBER 3 (Baror - Itang)APPENDIX 7.1
irrigated agriculture, economic appraisal
MODEL 1 (Alwaero - Abobo)
Table 1 - Irrigation Model 1L.
Table 1 Irrigation Model 1
ELEMENTS
Unit*
froouctiom
INPUTS QUANTITIES
Saadi
Familiar*
k-wc tic Ido*
PoaUetdea
D» awgM Animal*
labour
Family Labour
Causal Labour
KgHta
«0*a
Kp’ha
Kp**
lilMia
man/day* maiVdaya
PER H4CTAR
WtVLNl/E
imputcoh!
Saada
Fartllirara
lnaactiddat
PaaUddas
0»au»M ArUmala S ,h leial Input CO**
Bht/ha
O*tt*a
Bln**
Bin/lii
1022*
t
Family Labour
t.auaal labour
TOTAL COSTS
EQUIVALENT Im
Birr**
12 MH
1X112
FVALUEI
INPUT COSTS
Saad*
Fartilli^ra
Inaactklda*
PaUeMaa
Drauihl Animal*
1 Sub-tot* 1 Wi«mi coat*
V uMj labour
\c*>m>A Labour
\tOl AL COSTS
741,447
•44,411 1.117.215
m Ju A124.372
•00.347 141OJ77 I27LMC 2 274.no 1 H1110 4 154 144
i.uun 1.414
4,414 474
1 24X151
1711.112
<121,122
3.411,451
2 147.423 0,742 4M
2.MX0M
1171
3,514.443
3__1_2_7
2.072.144
• 047.444
7.1 MOM
1444.424
yii.oso
2i.77J.4OF
4.4H.141
4.714
X14X171
S.J71.243
7413.472
5.544.429
2 174.544
>4 44C 724
<74X117
4»4
24.432 70“ 40
..mu’ umm’
2.141.471
4.374.20 J
7.443.472
MM.42S
3,174 5M
24 444.72*
<742.717
4 714
24 414 224
0
<713,747
24 435 241
JF344 777 21 271 7f4
14-327 444____________ _
XJ51.5M
4.7M
2X434-444
I21.M7 J
2.143.471
1.374,3*3
7.413.472
5 IM 425
J174.IM
24.444 724
<712.237
4 714
21 434/45
T------------------ •
2t.M7.JJO
2 14X071
9,374.343
7.44X472
5. MM2 5 J. 171 IM
24.444.724 <744.27/
4 714
«
«4® umm
1.14X171
<37X313
7.44X472
S.M6.421 X»7f <14
24 444.724 <244.71/
47*
■»1 4 J< A7J
/
»,
4 T>a r
, >l
VHLOMU M-t€« LMKMJM
nwiiM.
r.u<aMMMI
(••* aertAfl
Tola I l»ri
iTotai Bar 1
|Tolb BtfT |
llotalBhr |
(Total Btn 1
If Dial Qin 1
1 Total Bln 1
Haul Bin
HoUAWn
Void #W
nui
t 044,144 ~" 0 0
awM. 444
Mv.aoa.aM
............ ,
ayjivvrr—K3g,S»*e-.-.-*-*-a--r-.-a--a-a--.-iM-----------------------------------------M--*-V--/-r-1-a--a--*-*------- ffi'VfuJiiJMI.’fXlV
M,4M \
4^ .40* \
41M4 \
4\ 4Wl\
wn?Tf QUA* WES
WijJl.l
7.Wo\
l.«4\
7
AviiriAcAlr*
1W \
rw \
tw\
750 \
FrvRh'tfvv
11 I
VI
11 \
17 \
CrjujiM Arvlnwi
111
21 I
M\
111
MI
21 1
Ml
11 1
tAQOUff
Labour
11!
111
111
111
Ciuia* Labour
REVENUE
I NPUTcoais
flawfe
FtfriNkrtn
Uli
fll*
taiacUt U|««
Cnr
rTii
Pei1kkl«i
Blrr
flu
totUBhl Aninuli
Blrr
Hii
Sub lotDl li%puf c«U
10,321
Uml>r L«4iom«
LiBomi
1101
10.321
totai COO 10
IX10!
jj-W7 12,Ml
12.MI
12 w
EQUIVALENT hi
fii.Vr hue
IM*UT EMITS
OMlto
iniieifcJiUi OoifllMM
Di iimqM AfllmMt flvb-talMl Uipul „
it.ho
uuM q.iw
17. *11 17,Wi
Jnlal Dlrr
121.M7.iaB
■voiuri
_o u* M? Ho
17,214
0
Tio-ii7 jsT
17.211
0
7m, h I. i io
I MM
iN.hKilo 12*. Hl. J 34 ~ih.tir.jifl Tg.ooT.iki
t Lt
FiiKry LiOHKtr
■ hu^ll Lifciiiw
TOTAL Cd'S IB
i^CDMt AFTFA | AncUH
GAM 1 AL
RCCCCUr<WEHT
BTftFAM
l*Ttn»fAL RATe br 1LE.TURH
7.143,111 4J7A143
7,40 MT1 1,014,U&
3,174 Ml <4.714
i.14Wt 4.174, IM 7,443,471 1.1M411 WBM
*4,Ml, Mi
2,143,070
I.W.Ml
7,403.471
MM.4H
>^,001
7.141,170
M71.ll>
7,40X471
■.•M,4||
__ MM.IH
24.tM.7H
UQIZI
UN.3U
T,*M4T1
■•000,411
1,171141
1.143,070 »J7«,M1 >.40X472
___ i»■Z0«0*1M,410
4711 U7 4 T«4
_
H«fmi
■JIWF 4 7(4
_
H.434 ]r«
2, llj,*7*
1JTI.MJ
7.403,412
0.011,4)1
7-1.444 TH
■JIM IT
__ <JH
_ M 41fl.4>r
A 10,171 0.371J11
r.MM'l
MM,<21
Wl Ml
J4.Ml.Ti4 J-i-Ml. r J4
0
iltooy.AM"
2,14), in
1.374,31}
7.401,471
i.tixm
34 4417J4~
4.71I.41F
4,714
» <30.04*
WW 47IMJ7
ilH.HT
___ MM
IQ.Mt Mi
a
lij w.w
2,14X17<
1.371,101
7.441,4*1
I.4M.424
JjlIlliM
H.044 *14
LWh
4J14
4.711.0J1 <TH
TalH IW ll.tlife*
1,14X170
■ niMi 7.4U.471 M4M11
___ 3,171111 24.040,7 J<~
VI MM 4,704
>0,441,001'
3T4X1M
M7M»J
7.44J.4M
IJMOt
X*7<0H
24*14,7)4
W,1M
4714
r
0
4*04
• I Ml 740
•J
JIIUUT Mil-ion
miw
ru, |W Tl_ '
- M, 44X^67Table 1 Irrigation Model 1
Pago 3 of 3
2020 502? 2024 7021 2«5c 24)1
fltVlHTi
PROOUCDON
INPUTS OUAN TIDES
Saads
F aril Hears
intacilcldaa
PratieMaa
Draught Anbrah
labour
Family Labour
Causal Labour
Unlit
Kpiha
Kf/tui
KgAM
ttgtu
Kghi
lift***
man'day a manMaya
41 400
41 400
41 400
41 440
41 400
41,400
:
2M
704
17
M
>1
11
coo
201
•
2001
710
17
H
21
13
-
4M
20S
•
20M
7M
17
2B
74
12
-
AI0
201
2.001
700
M
24
24
11
•SO
201
•
2,00 B
700
17
IS
20
12
•M
201
2.004
7M
17
21
20
12
410
>05
PER ME
EQUIVALENT ha
|aaa acraag 17.245
0
17.245
0
17 245
0
17,214
0
17.205
0
17.M5
0
REVENUE
Total Birr
120,907.330
124,047,330
lit 047.130
124 90* JM
124 H 7.334
US M7.JM
INPUT COSTS
Saad*
Familiar*
Inarctlclda*
Patttcldaa
fraught Animal*
Stlbdol*! Input coata
Family Labour
Cauaal Labour
TOTAL COSTS
Total Bln
Total Bn
Total Birr
Total Bln
Tata! BI<t
Total Bin
I Hal Oht
Total Birr
THal a In
-
2.141,070
1,174,343
7.443,472
0,IM.425 3.075 MS
•
3.141,470 6,370.343 2,443,472
I.4M.425 3 070.540
•
2.141,070
5,174.343
7.443.472
OOM,420 3.074.544
•
2.141,474 5,374. M3 7.403,472 1444.421 1074.544
2.141.474
5,174.303 7.401472
1.444.429 3.170. MS
24.144 724
24,044 724
24,044.724
24444 724
24444.724 ]
3.143,470 4.170 301 7,403,472 5U0.42S
1074,500 24 044774
4,703 114
4 704
2* 444 *11
4.70)434
< 7*4
24.441. <44
<,704,144
4744
20,444,044
4.704.471
4744
20.440 144
4.7M.IM 1 4,795,714 4.704 / 4.704
29,444 704 J 29.447.224
0
__________ o
0
4
0
0
0
•___________ a ___________ •
ao
iHCOMt *nin labcum
r.Arirai MCCCIAHIHT
>) U-i ii7 aa,Mi>*y nn>ot> iimjm? »>Wjr
T.KI.lXr T.UI IM r,l41,aar / «4I, >X>_____________________________________ f. »4<,»O 7.f4i.J7O
-Ml...
44.411.747 M~4Jinr rtnilt)APPENDIX 7.2
|rR(GATED AGRICULTURE, economic appraisal
MODEL 2 (Alwero - Dumbong)
Table 1 - Irrigation Model 2Table 1 Irrigated Agriculture
1“
Crop Production Production Model -Alwero Dumbong Rice
1 O/ 4
ELEMENT!
•nfutb quantities
T
Uidla
Bee do
FertSUere
inaoctic Idea
Pwellc>,>«■
xg/ha
KgTia
Kp'ha
Machinery
Loader*_____
t AHOUN
I •only LtlMMM
Casual Labour Permanent Labour
HLVt-NUe
INPUT COSTS
Saadt
FortlMzora
__ tneocUcldca
man/daye
rnarv'day •
nkrd.a
HlrrOte
il n ha
BiivHaa
Poetic Idea
Machinery n»4d
Loading
Bl»riT»a tllrrdia Bln/ha
Sub-ttMal Input costa
fitrvma
Birr IM
Blrt/ho
RlnHie
INCOME AFTER LABOUA F □.jiVALENT ha REVENUE_________
INPUT COSTS
Soadt
Fertilizers
Vnaectkcklea
PeailcMea
Machinery (laid
Looking SuOlatal Input coata
Family Latnnr
Casual LaAaov*
eo a-ieage)
Total Star
Hotel m»»
TN
in* Li
Sub Kota* lahoui
ioioLiMrut comTable 1 Irrigated Agricultu re Crop Production Production Model -Alwero Duinbong Rico
3 Of 4
L^—
**4PVT5 ouan tints
9«*da
F acttlUara
tataaclie idee
Pa ell cider
Mac binary
I PlKfrrt
leu
------------nn----------------
yjn
----------- nn—
rm
M
M
M|>iha
MgO»a
KgAui
rraciortha
HgTia
in
•
>a
170
1
34
----------- TTHI------------ 60
120
1
24
----------- pm---------------
M
IX
•
34
! 5H
ie
in
4
14
24
34
M
M
IB
0
24
24
24
24
M
120
•
24
34
50
120
0
74
>4
B
IB
24
74
I AHOUR
7 arvtNy Labour _____ Casual labour
Permanent L abour
manMaya
tiMUdaya
*«anMoya
IM
IM
ISO
IM
•00
IM
IM
too
no
IM
1M
100
180
1M
1M
1M
180
1M
REVEMUf
Bvntvj
18,432
ie,4j7
11.437
18.437
18,437
10.437
18,437
14,427
14,437
INPUT COSTS
Sards
FarttUrira
Bbrrtia
Urrftva
llrrdia
Urr ih a
TlrrRta
Mrrftta
m
13t
in
m
in
m
128
m
jn
270
Inardktdas
in
480
in
4M
in
410
Pesikides
Machinery-field
Loading
Sub lolal input costa
1.420
1.331
1.820
1,820
410
1820
no
400
1.820
IM
278
4M
MW
1».
1 218
480
1,820
1.338
4 no 1,820 1.238
1,238
in
270
no
1.820
1,238
1218
1.2J1
12.TM
13.700
12,700
12.700
13,700
12,700
12.700
13.700
12.780
Fuel Costa
Family Labour
Blniha
Blrv/ha
RUi/ha
33S
TM
231
720
225
Casual Labour
Permanent Yfodtfi
Sub-Total labour cosit INCOME AF TER LABOUR EQUIVALENT ha
226
710
720
226
720
r
228
720
225
710
-
231
710
221
728
DlnAta
.
.
•
•
•48
MS
MS
048
MS
845
MS
MB
MS
<sao acraaga)
16.000
18,000
18.000
15,000
11,000
16,000
n.ooo
11,OM
11 000
IREVENUE
244.ISS.000
248.SSS.000
244 588.000
248^54,000
248.655.000
248.565,000
246.555,OX
244,886.000
245,555,000 |
Input costs
I Beads
I FadMItorw
1 loeeclkldas
1 Pesticides
1 Machinery Aatd
1 Loading
\ Sub total Input cost* 1 f errU-y Labour
Total Birr
Tola! Itav
ItoHI Bln ITcIM Birr
1 Total Bkr 1 Total Birr
Kotd Birr
1,018 000
4.0M.M0
7 200,000
14,100.000
1l.fTV.000
64.066,000
1 918000
4 050,000
7.200.000
24,100,000
15.670,000
1,835,000
4,084.000
7,200.000
24,100 000
1l.Bn.000
1.016000 __ 4.080 ON
7JOOODC
24,100.000
18,47 0.000
1.835,000
4,050,000
7,200.000
24 100.000 1
18 170,000
1,835000
4.050,000
7,200,000
24.100 000 1
18.670,000
1 118,000
4,080,000
7. no, ooo
24,300,000
1M70.000
1115 000
4,050 000 1
1 20C 000 1
24.300 000 /
18.170 000 /
1.835.000 1
4,050,000 /
7.100.000 /
24 100,000 /
10,470,000 /
I
64.011.000
84,061,000
54,045 000
64.045,000 J 64,055.000 J
— -
l.JTS.OOO I X J 75. OOO 1 J. J 75 000/ XJ7A0M/
54,055.000
+
58.054000 / M.055 000/
iCasurt Labour VctakBUr \ Pai manamt Labour llotal Wti
3.179,1m
10,too DM
X1T5.DOT
10.000 000
1.375,000
10 BOO OOO
3.175 000
10 MO M0
J. JT5 OOO
to aooooo
to,MO MO I
to sm aoa /
\ Hut. total ba*our
|
ia.175.OW
14 175,000
14.175,000
14,175.000
14,175 000
14,174000 I n,t/40Ofl /
IA VMPO0 /
Kf/MOO /
latrnfMl
1<17A0O8/
UaiALWtPUT CQ»T*
TO >10 00
0 TO 230 000
n.2>0 DOO
70 2 JO DM
re ijo.ooo
ID J»0 MO |
70.JM.0M /
ru JM.DM / 7O.XM.0M/
IhtLWM AKm LMOOtM
ITS J21 000
175.125 QOO 175.325. 0:<>
124.321 OM 1M135.M0
174375 000
124X24 800
174 3/5,000,
»7<XMM0/APPENDIX 7.3
IRRIGATED AGRICULTURE, ECONOMIC APPRAISAL
MODEL 3 (Baro R Itang)
Table 1 - Irrigation Model 3SjrrfL# 1 irrtiraffnn
tj£Arf^rj
J Snrnmarv
i/rvti J
V* 5 ut <
f
/
f
If Si
/ 13» ! 1 MJ
41—
T Err l 1.0TB
zjiw I 7.001
[ 7 002
1
2 003 lj "wr—\ l.Wi
/ /tAT’JML
I ToWCipfta! CcoM
/ FctftfJfln EKthamflf
I Tcttf CAjdtal Coati
J Ateurntai Ccsit
[ Recurrent Caiu
[TOTAL CAPITALCOOTS
l
f
I
---------- 1
7
1 OW.CMW
3J23.0W
11,JOT JOO
-
1
I__
1
.M?L __________
r
.1—
a
MOD,WO
«,2tfl €0D
r
1
7.110. CM
6,2 44,001)
3.310.000
3,130,000
31.W.700
•
I
3.B1Q.OO3
3.170,000 ’
»J07.T00
7,110,000
1,241.000 1
1.no.000 L
0.341MK
1T.lflQ.0M
U240.MW •
Hl AW 0
\
L
10.410,Dflc\
lA.no.woi
1-
60. 2^.000 S0.JMfl.7M
( M ,340,100 1 Ml ,340700
ttss
i&*AR
hirr
____
o
D
•i
_J
l31.Wfl.0Q0 i W 111,700 \
M OOD \
.1
.1
20.207700
♦
M,2« 000
I
-1
I
I
“ ’l
1
WJH0 I
M.Uflroa
71, ID J JOO 1 23.7OT.70fl 1 M.M0.7M | M MO.TOO 131.001,000 i
1M.0MAW [
J
— 
•
j
[Not RmhNH Sclwuw (a)
•
J
"*T " 1
'Not Dtntfliv Scharno (b| I Hol otnoffta Sehina (cj
Nil BmflU Schrnw (d J 1
TpUJ BgrufttB Schama 3
TOTAL BENEFITS
IRA
1
CflOF CVSTRrOUUCff IrriaaUon Bchaino 3 -tab
*
-
•
•
-
•
_*
■
‘1
•
_
■
-
-
-
-
-
— -
■
1
J
’i
-
—T
*
~“I
T
--------------------------- -
-
-
-1
■
-J
-
■ (JOJOT.fW)
rlD,Mfi,qaoj
t.m
110,340.700) [10,207,7001
IM.107.7M)
.■
IM.340.700) [B0,340,700)
< 132.000 000| (134 030.410)
12.MX
T
....
1.MI
1,HT
1.1M
7,000
| j<W1
| 2.0oi
[ i^oT-
|----------2.0M "
2,001
1
L_----------- _ 1
!
—
1
1 Ground Kuib
1 Main
SOQrhUcn
a i+on fodd»r
Whail
10%
33%
31%
0%
•X
1MX
i
1
-
■1
-
*
-
-
L
1
1
.
-
*
-
-
__ Z,
•
•
•
-
-
-
-
-
*
■
-
•
L
-
-2
.
•
,
-
■
—■
-
-
-
-
■
-
U fipBlkWi Sells mo 3-[d)
1'
|----------------- --------
I
I
1
Colton
Malta
|Qt+»h Feddw
i
..
33%
01%
im
I
I__ _
-
r
-
•
*
•
-
_
■
-
•
•
•
-
-
♦
■
■
-
•
-
-
■
-
I - -- ‘
•
■,
«
•
•
|
Liifi(j*ilon ecimjuhb J ^e) r
J.I-------- ----- ----------- rI—"
L_.
1
1
1---------------------------- umipilton ttebam* 1 (b>
4uQ«r Ci<W | TOfrX
■
*
■
■"
-
--J
j
-
-
------
1m
1
Ibuu>f Cun*
•
*
*■
♦
I
■
•!
-
JT»bln 1 l,r|0 llon Schomo # S|(minary
,
ELEMENTS
' APIVAL
Total Capital Coal* ForoIgnEachangu
_ c_apltal Coats Hocurront Coats Recurrtnl Costa
TOTAL CAPITAL COSTS
Pago 2 of 4
2.008
2.00 T
2.008
I 2,009 |
— -I
2,610
j
2.011 |
i?.i90.ooo'| "
14.312.000
2,013
2.814
22.420 000
17.838.000
117.477.400
1.160 .C00
8.590.500
25,340,000
21.072.000
191 759.800 133.839.300
1.411.000
10,640,170
1.727,000
12.300.990
148.538 >00 *
2012 [~
---- ---------------- 1
21,710.000
17.432.000 1
182.771.300
1,081.000 14.872.770 i
177.844,070T
2C15
17,420.000 17.934,600
187.477.40a 2A77.OO4
21.117.nw
272.34a.73O
273,000 5 BO
173.968.130
171.087^00— 20? 2*9.970
Not Done Uta Schome
(■)
54,887.300
Net BerkotUa Schome
(b)
74.11 *771
74.61B 511
74.517,254
74,814.730
74.H2 xa
Not Doneftta Sclwmc
(c)
Not Bonvflta Scheme (d)
1023.740
Total Benefit* Schama 3
26.270,140
M.697.3OQ
285,645.928
328,225.14)
TOTAL BENEFITS
(211.3D3.2aQ)
6.113 344
119 108.939
il - B3o' J
238.755 101
CROP O/S TRIBO TION Irrigation Scheme 3 -(a)
2.575
Ground Nuta Ma lx a Sogrbum Green Fodder Wheal
^.740 505
SOS a.« to
4,348
2.526
4.82a
4,3451
1.282
1.282'
14 025
2 525
4,821
4.348
1.282
1.282
14 02S
_1.252 1 742
M.025 |
2.777 4.378 1.21 1418
4.375 '
1 282
UHgatlon Schema migahun Scheme 3 IM '
[
----- Sugar Cano
sugar CaneTabla 11rrigation Scftorno 3 Summary
Pigg 4 of 4
ELEMENTS
Uni La
>0M | Toii— 1 ?.„» 2.026 I 2.030
f— —
2 0H
CAPITAL
Tpl«| Capital Cotla Foreign Ej t hunga
_ Total Capital Cotta Recurrent Cotti
Recurrent Cost? total capital costs
NatHonaM* |n| Me! Bvmrflit 9chome (h|i Nel 01 rm■ IIt» Bchanw (e:i Hot Bane Hit Schama (d|
U9I
UW
HIM«
USJ
BIRR
BIRR
-
■
•
-
-
-
-
4.433,000 4.4 3 3,MO
33,114.510
33114.110
33.114,610
-
4,433,600 4,433,000 4.433.000
>3.114.610 33,114.510 33.114,610
-i
4,433,000
33,114.610
33,114.610 33.114.510 33,114.510 33,114,610
33,114.510
—
744*1324
ijj.w.om 2B6.MI.OOO
141,220.040
74,467,M2
132,661.000
266.062,000
141,216.732
74,466,600
137,981,000
265.667.000
141,212,524
74,464.631
132,661.000
MB, 662.000
141,206,316
74.445.276 74 402,014
13 7.661. DOO
132'WI.OOCI
Total Oonallti Srhomo 3 TOTAL BfNtFITS
IRR
414.IB2.3B4
514,664,764
414,691,324 614.675,954
265.662.000 706 602,000 141.704, IM HI.HB.tOD 614J70.3B4 614.6M.614
Ml, 0/7,764 Ml.672.3B4
961,566.4 14 M1,M1 344 641,011,874 661 550.404
12.M*
7.026
2,027
2.025
2.026
2.030 2.031
CROP DISTRIBUTION
Irrigation Schema 3 ]i|
GitMind Nutt
MolKi
tofifhum
2.625
4.626
4,346
2.626
4,421
4.341
1.262
1.262
2,929
2,525
3.676
2.626
4,626 4,626
4,120 4 623
4,341
4.348 4,346
4,346
Green Fodder
When
1.262
’ 1,762
1,242 1.262
1,262
1,262
1,262 1,262
1,262 1762
’«.«»
14.025 14,026
14,025
14.025
14,026
I Irrigation Scheme
1
1
.Cotton
[Main
Grain Foddet
6,267
14,586
6.267
14.M5
9.257
14 .MS
1.257 6,767
14.585 I4.M6
4.701 4 206
4.206
4.201
4,206
_
5,267
14,583
4,206
1
1
TZ
26,050
21,050
2B.O5O
76,014
76,058
IB.090
1
1 irrigation Schema 3-ic|
1
1---
1
' Sugar Cana
—i------------------------ —t--------------------
17.600
17.000
17.000 17.0M 17,000 | 17, WO
\
j
\lrrtgMkin Scheme 3
4-1-------
k
—
i5ug*rC.*no
_
6 M0 i 6,«>0
I_______________ i
a, mid H .500 I
B.5M
4.9MAPPENDIX 8
WATER SUPPLY
APPENDIX 8.1
AND VILLAGES
WATER SUPPLY FORMEDIUM & SMALL TOWNS
p PENDIX 8.2 CITIES’ WATER SUPPLYTnblo 1 Irrigation Schomo 3 Summary
elements
Unlit
1.026
2.077
2.029 ] 2 029
—
2.030 7.031
CAPITAL
TolAl Capital Coat* USS
Foreign Exchange USI
Total Capital Coala BIRR | Recurrent Cotta USS
——
-
-
4.433.000
.I
-
•
4,433,000 4433.000 4.433,000 4.433.000
-
4.433.000
Recurrent Coats BIRR TOTAL CAPITAL COSTS ' BIRR
Nat Benefits Sebomo (a)
Nil Banafita Schema (t>| |
Nat Bannflts Schama (c)
Hal GanatHi Schama (d)
Total Barwfita Schama 3
TOTAL BENEFITS
IRR
J
33,114.510 33,114,510 ' 33.114110 33.114110
33 114,610 33.114.610
33.114.610 33,114.910 | 33.114.110
33,114,810
33,114.610
33 114.510
74,499.324 74,497.092 74.496.900
132,991.000 . 132,991,000 132,991,000
266 991,000 295 962.000 265,112.000
141,220,040 141.219.732 141,212,924
74,494.938 132,991,900 299,992.000
141,209,310
74,493,276
132,991,000
269.992,000
141.204,100
74,492.014
132,991.000
296.962,000
141.199,900
.■j
12 MX
l
414.M2.2M 614,680.794
614,891^24
914,975.054 814,670.384 914,994.914
Mi,*njs4 I 511572.294
591.566,114
551,561,344 M1.S65.S7r 991.650.404
2.029
2,027
2.028
2,029
2.030 2.031
CROP DiSTRIBUItOH
Irrigation Schema 3 -{a) |
Ground Nuts
1 Moira
Sogrhum
Groan Foddoc
Wheat
—
2.626
4,929
43M
1.292
1.212
2,929
4,929
4.349
1.262
1 262
2.528 2.629
4.628 4.929
4,348 4.349
1.262 1,262
2.821
4,628
2,525
4,629
4.349 4,349
1.292
1,262
1 262
1 262
1262 1.262
14.029 14.025 14.026
14,025
14 026 14,026
lirrigahon Scheme 3^d)
1
Ivonon
Malzo
; Green Fodder
9 257 5 257
14 MO
14,595
14 585
14 686
14,565
4.209 4 209
4,208 4.208
4,208
9,267 14,MS
4.209
I I 1 1-------- f—
28.050 29.060 28.050
L
28.050 28J35O
________
irrigation Scheme 3 lei
I
Sugar Cana 17.000“[ 17,000
17,000
17.000
I
11 |
17.000
_____ _________4
28,050
________
17.000
________
1—
llrrtaatlon Schama 3 <01
Mugar Cane
a too t VK ’ 9.MO
i aoo
t.soo .
_____
8,500APPENDIX 8
WATER SUPPLY
APPENDIX 8.1 WATER SUPPLY FORMEDIUM & SMALL TOWNS WD VILLAGES
^PENDIX 8.2 CITIES’ WATER SUPPLY1
II
IAPPENDIX 8.1
WATER SUPPLY FOR MEDIUM & SMALL TOWNS AND VILLAGES
IBI£1 -50 Small, Medium Towns & Villages Water Supply (SUMMARY)
•3LE2-15 Medium Towns Water Supply
£LE 3 - 28 Small Towns Water Supply
BLE4 7 Villages Water Supply
L 3LE5 Economic Analysis of Medium, Small Towns & VillagesTabla s Economic Analysis of Medium,Small Towns Villages
Page 1 ol 4
Medium & Small Towns & Vilteges
CONSUMPTION
274,516 321.948 309,360 416011
464,243 403,690 467,057 512.023 666.190 629,366 674,523
RATEIal (5 00)
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5OT
6.00
500
RATE 2nd|O)
8.00
6 00
6.00
6.00
GOD
6 00
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
6.00
BENEFITS 1st
1.372,500
13MJ59
TW5F
■2,084,05$
"1311.216
2.0(8,450
2,284,28?
2,560,116
TJ'ICTM
3,101,751
3,372.614
BENEFITS 2M
M47,0M
1,931,687
2.216,177
“1^00,668
2,705 458
5,4 22 140
1J47.139
3 072,139
3,397,136
J.722,137
<047.137
CAPITAL
(60,052,535)
O&M
STREAM 1st
STREAM 2nd
IRR 1st
W Ind
NPM 1st
HN 2nd
■
-
-
4 (593, MG) (593,305) 159 3.305) (593,306) {593,305} (593,305) (6»,305)
1.372,560 1.609,759 1,846,8SF" a;oww~ [55,334.6251 1,425,145 1,695,978 1,966,011
2,237,644 2,508,476 2,778,309
W'tM "Wlr 2:215.277
2,5oa,fih 57,170.352 1.328,836 2183.85 5
-ZtfJ.SST
2,803,833
3,45jJ32
<i
629%
7 28%
(24^98,9001
qo,Me,725|
inIflblo 2 13 Medium Towns Water SupplyMBLC 4.7 Vllliga W.twr Supply
1 o» I
WATER krPLTfmOUIRMHtfTB f-.tri n«l average wMar
Ei iiif.g wfr
Utfah
Hrt Daly HaqUrmarU |
Hf»txy
•' ' '
Lr^ A Adm 00% |'
TatlC—Unf___
COST OREAKDOWW • US |0»M]
A*»i XX
CM 1BM
WAT 15%
Fip»t WX
Er.j AAdmAltWi
! 01 ACCOST USIim
LOCAL
LOCAL
LOCAL
LOCAL
■a
LOCAL
**K 70% A KS CM XJX A TOU MAI WHAHA
IpU 20XIIDM
_
Erg A Adm rtXMtiX________
TOTAL COST TOO* Uli (mt)
'.'I' KJ
ftnii • Qm—n
J5VX«h
1O1AL O AU COS1 UM” O LWtOtlTable 5 Economic Analysis of Modium,Small Towns Villages
Page 2 ol A
2.007 |
2,008
2,009 [
2,010 [
2,011 |
2.012 |
2.013^ 2,014
2.015 1 2,015
2,017 |
Modium & Sniafl
CONSUMPTION
RATE 1st (S CO)
RATE 2nd(6.C)
BENEFITS 1st
BENEFITS 2nd
CAPITAL
728,689 782,856 537,022 891,189 956,490 1,021,791 1,087,093 1,152,394 1,217.695 1.284,351 1,351.007
SOO 5.00
8.00
-------—
4.172,135
BOO
’T.m.mr-
8.00 6.00
~47T55.(545~
5.00 5,00 5 00 5.00 5.00 500 500 5 00 5.00
6 00
"“4752^1
6 OO__
6.00 6.00
"5761^69
6.00
—O0IT47B-
6.00
---- ff7?T7M
6.00
rtIV
5,622,1«’ S.JZTH4 5,734,941 MS3T46 6. 52i,556 1.SU.TOJ -------7.304,1*4 'TjoSJot' ' Bjoe.Md
(58,323.800) (3.736,736)
O&M
STREAM 1st
STREAM 2nd
IRR 1st
IRR 2nd
NPV 1st
NPV 2nd
(593,306) 1593,305) (593.305) (621.033)
(821,033) (021,032) (621,033) (621.033) (1,171.931) (1,171,931) (1.171,931)
3.050,142 3,320.975 3.591,(TOT TJJ3OT2
4.103.B3T 4.428JD0 4,720.101
4,161,418 4,487.024 t.iujm 57H0.55C [51,407,250) i.Brr.Ho esaifw-
ksrIw * 4,001.522 Ss&Wir.—GOTlWWi—~mr<raT=- <L53'J.11STable 5 Economic Analysis of Medium,Small Towns Villages
Pago 3 of 4
2.020 |
2,025 |
Medium & Small
CONSUMPTION
RATE 1st (5.00)
RATE 2nd(6.0)
BENEFITS 1st
BENEFITS 2nd
CAPITAL
OSM
STREAM 1st
STREAM 2nd
IRR 1st
IRR 2nd
NPV 1st
NPV 2nd
1.417.664 1.464.320
1,560.976 1.632.649 1.714.722 1,796,596 1,878,469
1,960,342
2,059,514
2.158.687
5.00 5.00
5.00 6.00 5.00 5.00 SOO 5 00
5.00
5.00
6.00 6.00
—7108.318 7.421.559-----
h.505.962 8.9d&,9l9
(1.171.531) (1.171.931)
6.00 6.00 6 00 6.00 8.00 6.00 600 6.00
~7,754.890 8.10F246 —8.573.512 “ 8,982.570 $192,347“ 9,801,710 10.297.572 10,793,434
4,305,856 9.797.09& 10,286.334 1d.779.df4 11.270.813 11,762,052 12,367,086 12.952.121 (778.645) (776,945) (776.846) (776,845) (778.846) (1,263,705) (1.253.705) (1,253,705)
5,916,357 6,249,660 ------ 7,334.051 ?,733,9B1 —
6.976,035
—y me — ---- 7 704 7E7---
7.3U5.4Q i
,
fl 5487005 ------ 9,043.867 ---- 5159.729
I.M7.BU 9018 .«i 9.509.490 10.000,725 JBJS1.9BB 10.lOT.M7Tatote 5 Economic Analysis of Modlum SmaH Towns Villages
t
Page 4 cfl
2.030
2.031 |
2,032 |
2,033 |
2,Q34~Y
Medium & Small
CONSUMPTION
2.287.8SH
2.357.032
2,455.204
2.601.724
2,747.244
2.882.704
3.038.254
3.183.504
RATE 1st (500}
6.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5,00
RATE 2nd{0.0|
5.00
5 00
0 00
6.00
500
6.00
6.00
BENEFITS 1b|
11,269.208
~ 11,705.166
12,231,020
59,332,450
6.00
<5738,220
600
iWWlT
1$,101,420
<T,5e8,&4
B0.Bl0.828
BENEFITS 2nd
14,142.100
~14.737.H4
(50,323,000}
IS, 410,344
16,483.454
10.229.704
CAPITAL
93,014.832
O&M
(1,640.376)
STREAM 1ftl
STREAM 2i>d
IRR 1st
IRR 2nd
NPVfrt
NPV 2nd
1^5id™ "liSrin -------------------------
rAPPENDIX 8.2
CITIES' WATER SUPPLY
TABLE 1 - Water Supply of all the Cities
TABLE 2 - Water Supply for the City of Asosa ABLE 3 - Water Supply for the City of Dem bi Dolo TABLE 4 - Water Supply for the City of Gambela TABLE 5 - Water Supply for the City of Metu TABLE 6 - Water Supply for the City of Tepi TABLE 7 - Water Supply for the City of Mizan
'ABLE 8 - Water Supply for the City of Bengi TABLE 9 - Water Supply for the City of Gore TABLE 10 Water Supply for the City of Maha TABLE 11 Economic Analysis for all CitiesWater Supply of mii« CIt!»•
Paga 1 of 1
rvAiuri
r*1si•
I fRr (MW OOl. OOP
1IJ»OCOO
1853 481
4MIM
2, rBJ •<!
>208 07
1 in*
4 7M W
2JM ao
3. IK 10
1 7M 10
3 077 40
] 232 20
J 73180
4’$ Al)
m ?51 DP.
■ 120 00 40,l”»(rt)
231, no 00
• MC OC M414CO *4 1/800
344 *23 00
11741400
2M 172 30
440.448 X
7 727 X
>48 ioc n1
:J« Ml iT
8734 OO iei.^ooI
4te 131 JQl
77? 813OOJ
41A1KQQ '
;ki imqo
o ri
j rnb imxI
1,1*7 .‘70 »l
1T0
0 ?4
C
587'
1 JO* ’13 04
___ jL
> 77? 543 (*.
0 30
18 MT 14
jj M« «;
14 17100
__ US MS 04
177 f 93 J*
40/234 (W.
0 '1
JMI*
M 408 II
»t4/n u
J»MJ| J
• 40? «
14 1>I 88
170 1W 'll
.• r*J ao
mm
IfcMCUI
ai
r Matra ti
OM
an
0J\T-Abf* £ -
SiJjrfrry
r»f A(Q«
\ uil
kW StM^Pt v M gUWW-MJS
f Phu1 rMf
auppry
lEriMfrwnti frdterfcuEwlT ewe-rff
IrnJw [ 4?
IfJafipis 
Invltf
jFeah D*' p Rw^mrirwrti 1.1 54 iJmJAT
wl d
—r
| CCMlLlmCBdil Vrjf
1 HMttlmBJk! 1'sar
2WC joiB-acao
Atldktcfl*( Nffl Supplj
IffLW
' laid AtMMLhbla S-fply
UU»t COLl
USS4H30
Ei!ir JM Cflil fcx AvBfn&ki lupfFj
L'5 3
USS
I5D0ULI
CanlingwxMi i |20%J
r -a A Adm [»o%?
Ttild Funding
1
US i 1»3
—
COST BREAKDOWN - US
Wolll 10% *0%
IOTO 2C<XJ 1W0-2OTQ
1
1
1,3QC
_£WD{CC
390 OW
195 OOC
2 535 000
2)4 UGO
QW 3U% I ?0%
US 1
US I
1 'WW JWOOl
" 1U50UJ 7 61$, DOO
2) 4 iM 702.0 I
ULF 35% 4 20%
26% L K>%
USS
USI
1
: r -j A Mm
US1
TOTAL COST U5$ 1IM
I LiB U JU ifl.coo
1W.W0
J W QIJP
COST IIMI AKDOWW TM» USI
csimii sow < hm_
M A L JO% iOO%
I Pipes 20% A riQV._
I Fhq A Adm »% L Jfrfc _________________ [total, CDBT 1QOOUM LIMA)
local {formonI local [forogm| local fdreiqw]
LOCAL
__________________
4b«CT
JIBM
1.63 M
1A7 2g
4tfV 40
0.55 201
14G 25
a do
in so
>CWU|Gh| LDCAL
T
i IBF ?Q
LOCAL |fpRflG*| LOCAL’
rone win
25 W
JJDW
__ aim «a
2BBQ
101 <ID
fiSS 20
«&
5W.9S
t >4fl Lrf>
_ 3,3«cq
3.006 Cfi
J Mg W
3 ij-zj IM
—
Plf** 0 7%
WalM CixuiijTyUiyi
JJJ_U ’'■'
IQ1, WOO
______ a lb
jq grig rjQ
0 (51
i ..XX? -X
005
0 DO
n v?
4 «-“= i GO
—
i- ?ju«I
» JJU DU.
JWX
910 ru
Q to
j); ton w
00
<1 DQ
OM j;.' rxKi [>j
_ d <0
jflQW M
a ua
(;hw>fan
TOlAL_0 A M <o*T 0411 : jr.T ■ um i IM1
.■5flS3 uo 1 IBfl.QO
411 ISA <J<J _ C) *iD
nj ItHJU r)fi ooi
17,TOC L«
ODO
aw
4 5,1041 <c
1
— —Hi
* 6HU nc
7,;-L.uuif
to
J.&M DU 51A iMU r«i
_ a to
i n i <hki no
o in
11,1 I n? a
<1 OP
0 K,
ia.TiW
u in
(
4 MO 130
f 74K A)
50.2JO w
2 Sfifl uf
J3I.OP5 Xl
D 10
22 J r*xi oc
□ IQ
22iXk?(io
U DO
Qftj.
aoj
0 DO
ru j mi tij
0 IQT»blo J . Water Supply for the City of Oembl Dolo
Ptrtfrfir tr ■ VKiifrr
for /7xr <2iry of Tapi
M ’Hirn \ uli 1
OT
■MflHStmv *£OUWWENFS
foW
pater it^plf
fc.Mi.nnj| CW water eagjcJf
fcun L'j i-j1 Frfcyjiffrlftntn fghyayg.i1 1 3i 1 JmJ/lf
pnQPUStOPFCffiAM
raFiUurfcm TMf
1057 1.-
2001-2M.
2014-2016
Inwifrniiini rey ______
19BM99!
1999-2’jr'.
2014-2015
014 2^*4
Atfaiignil Nil Snippy
rnM
200
Total AyilTOlw
nJ.1-!
300
_2M0
4,000
Unit CMf ____________ -
uSS/mio
T3W
1,600
1
_f ■Qnijlo Dfrti Ihi AvaHtHn lutyry
i.SJ
26OCQC
3200.01X1
3 jOO.MO
CeflnnpunctoF (20 W J
___
US J
i^pixi
WQ.DJC
040MKJ
A Mm |1Q%)
TdUJ FwMfiflp
__________
vSS
USS UM
2ADOO
JMOOU
32DX0 4 160000
21C-0U0
5£iCa»
IV1 oul
JXlfJuO
4. VAMO
______ 25DOO 125 000
COST 0ACAXDOWN > 0l $pM6)
1O<V- t ’ '■ ■
Civil 30% I 20%
MA€ J5% & 20%
i>i 2W A TOW
Fhj A Adm
IQ TAL COST USS 1MI
11200
IOEOTXI
rigoo
zsoqq
i.iflndd
HID ODO
JS.frJO )» ODO
W*ni zow ATO%
C.HM VrX. A 7DU
M A I; XW. 1 Btrw,
_P i'll 20^ i
’l-nfl. iMm 25WAT5W total co«T wonu6i~(itwj
OIMCfrtTi tOUl 1^
LDCALjFORClGM
d.UD 0 i»
LOCAL iFQItriQh
403 20
a?D 40
Wl M
2*4 «* 1 O7B 2D
~I4oon
i?2i w
i.ora Jtt ?4D Da
a i> i»
7 naitx f MjSOU
n-nXwll til i
14 Pen IM 41 ••■ l iC
« .Xf
HliS tk)
MAI 10*
1w
Pifimiii cjtuTiiiij
5l2W
J.W600
a 301 Ob
7 lUad-
on.PDfi jo
1.TO
JA ifab DO
__ -aococ
sw 1S4WO0I]
'. H
- t« M
LJ4 4______
__ M <mw in ixiog
i a i AL OP* <fo*T
iwf uiHCfigy
JJUilj (H> MLiJHTuq
0^
oi* —
y.Maau iia.Mftdu
I. LU
• iL1 aaS IX)
___OW JO 4H'k>
D-34
TTifr
20*13 oa /ifo.'i an'
11
MfrAfrl 'X' a-.*
QM 171 ba
hi a? j uj| U III
* IQ
i C«J
1.4*1.39075 _ <’*’■
■ ®4 -ij i .j ^"6 CM
JJ TM 3a To fdi Jrf
ft'Wl1abK 7 Wator Supply for lb* City of Mlxan Telsri
J
F' V* I ql
• t aA
ftAlEH bWPk t FUCL *MEHT0
PRESLSI
nsl t . ii»jj|f
, Lt i,<
r.li.lrj Ml wfcr t.jppl, caynfr_______________ I'.lr. |
■Horostu mwham
'T-qiuVuctewi YjMT
■dm ___ w?
IWIM-. »'l idc» nh
ibmtM ra-7-:w«
*jupptr
irtl
200 000
3JMKDK ____ THJ.oro
__
4440 &M
COST BRtAMXMN - UlUIlM]
A OH____
CmI JOHltt*
| BAIL 2JWAJ0U
f l r». icm.
lA*r 1$>
|T QTAL CQtT US$ 1W
COST MtAKDWW . 1040 W10m» j
W Mti
LOCAL ]EQR6|(*»r LOCAL TIMKIN] LOCAL J>QftlWN
’«OTC 7Dl££
7MCCC LOCAL
EUfl * ARm JSUJl TJH total cost iowuu jmi
a u com ttsuipj-^
FQREm*i 10MAQ
ioxr
yu <51 J 2C<» M 30 <M| ~ JT3M
i ids sol ssmk
? TO* M
fp—<
on
I DE
r,SM DO
1
wsnoo
H '^4N1
__ J>a v=i»j______
t Oi
w rratK
1 DO
rre’-s-ix
PCT
D4M.
■iiv.wT imop m '
■JJJ
*L IHOJ J.H" BO
»T TT5C0 iW
WfHOO oao
__ 1 DO ow.wg&i
Oct
PW
ISaMQQj______
■wdMflai 7-------------- ■
i ml
C«WM Ctt|
| JiSMt’i,
10114.. 04* COR I
21
0 7>la Mjv CH? af U^tfi
Teaa
I
~~l
-I -- r
armr-
I
Joao
i
inwi
h»
jut;
r
jiTT
3
1—
i
Hill
«r
Hl
1
-
MHlI
JOW
I
t,MC
117 Xfi
___iirool
«3.o<k|
50 790
J 32 100
IH.4M)
uo rw’
71 MC
Ml 003;
KM ]iFQKfWN 10 Ml 4Q~M
1W 4l 33.41 141 w 25 >»' ID I 40
11 K |____ M « mu' 44B BU
jfijd1
!Qil M2D |j
TO]
i,»o]
____ ip.wp
MS,COO
__xolawl ijwl
I VW I MO W MIO 401 iiy,oa>|
!« QQO
I
FOUtWW
1L»
•iWl 47 hi un
FO^tlliM
Mbu
j« 1*1
411.1
____ n
Ma_sli« <n
1* w
i»L>
r.ir.yja vr
a “■an
i tj i oa _ ||>B4t_W
Jtorw ii rrtO ■<■
■J ID
* 171 «
??tJW
i; tJi «j
__ 4l UD
u w'
■□ J£
u at
n ,u
r
O1B
I ^Jrx,
4 ,-al W
_ ♦«
■D'*-
ji
_ J_._tU1l ■'oJOj ’2L,j4O1.Cm7Aj.hLoiaf
rijiw‘OuIwK-
<i ra
n oo
1 I'd
____ UM
t <■»Q_iiu
W,11'fg|_______________
. ir o tijr L
□’111»
Ei 4
I tool
mmoo
i
at „o ao
144730 00
184 375 00
[XB.MOOO*
OOP
a v,
0 08
ooa
□ nc'
• bw on
9.804 CO
•.in ooj
1 <,09900
V JP5JU'
004
004
0041
t nrm
i.a^on 48,529 00
0 44
9,198 01' WWI 00
o»
•71,40 CO I
OMl
O 41]crj»y *>r
1* hex* ’I nJ *1
TEA*
T PflFgEN? f
I
jnnj
2c v 1
J J2j’
ftVAFf ff F ffrEftjWWFWTS_____ ' upt/wtf HyW^n^ar
t
I
1
jmltf
____ _ __
ffert D*J> ftegjrnwniU
fpWQPy»S£L»l^RAU
iLi.i.fcrij rt«4 wiar ti-y'&y oM~di.ii/
'DurioJi
[wya TmA/fl
1 I.S/f/mKi
4
4 Mil __ G|
MM
JUJ'ti
L _1
Mil ___ tl
sn
T.b
xi'.-
7S«W
___ 1
’11 11US
al
4W»|
■Kdl
—-i
•m
I
■ .iil-uCKn Yojk
2000
I~
201'jl
rriv0»iJii«^ >«frr
1KM-200CI
■JDua>0l3
20^1
Mown a I uh Sup-j^
paji7325
I?OM-2o5s
3x|
IpWS ; ply
inl'J
mlAl
300|
6M|
Urul Catt
i.!4ftnld
1.300
’1
f iIhmjId CtnJ farAvalaMa mppfy US J
300 DOO,
390 OOP
' '' I
■■-u
CfrAngcririoi i_2CHbj
Vsi
U5I
117 000|
j.ijjSbu
Eng < AdfTI [1Q% | 11
71000
rrtx»
IS 7.0001
/a Cidj
Tai it Funding_____________
| IK4
'45O»
.’TCUOl
585 OX
sib ujc
SK^OCl
COST BREAKDOWN - U 8 lp»Hj
Wells 1Q% BOH
US f
50.700
Sa /ool
z I
CM 30% & 20V.
US 1
Bl WO
’.syjcol
irSf
♦7y.4M|
U51
12*7501
7><XKi
128, JMT
usi
_ Tuocol
505.000
TOTAL €051 un im
■ - ml ICihT] LOCAL
TOMIiQmI'local
40 Ml
r QiicinN local
»OMiQH
JO 14
_4b Sd
FOREia*<r LOCAL [FOHLIwJl LOCAL
wh| 4<Hib
I
FOHEioM LUCAL JORIriJiS
WJG
45100J14
35 40
Ifrft4'
141 tr.
4FIA1
3542
'1 -41 41
4:. 113
35 4»i
I
1 r •*.'■
LOCAL
*41 (Ml
25 34
f5M
II J VJ
14l_IHt
jOIAO
__ J 5 t.'"
KII 40
DB 1
i»»
M5i>
1x111
1’iAH
444 419
13d 11
4 4J1 no
thfjirt A Kflt ______________________
l_l<E)rb-. M4 ACdOmA,IM25WH li>J»-VjH}«
[101 AL COST iOOOUMl 0IMf
t=
1 duof_t _ I L11 rm
?UU IW
1 QHUu
td/ uO
> 5;I 00
2 2MI 1X1
tf I DO
1J2JJP
iri n 141 r . j
rfi urn to
253 OP
Ip .<14 3 0Q
7aoaa
" fikj iw
LDCAL
____ Hnr no
asr.cj
1>* 1 III ■ '
2 J J.jf !ki up
J7-I OODIX]
100 Toil OU
0 Xi
Ilw
0 3u
0 34
ji iiT~
w j iti ixT______
44 i«J aci
$4,440 cw
8117 do
■IMON '
IPIfllu Jd
____ c ia
fOMtaNl LOCAI
n 1c
d ip
U ID
“ I (Ml
JH|
st
WWl-M.triJ
|E#fiwiyr_____’
£rS lAwhr
~ uyiifmSMl iw t “ _
1 ;nn«.u
nwj
_ DC
1 8.224 r
—E1
UPC 000
rt ‘Jtaoo |>1J
“Tlit&ii ________ M’ __
A.M *e h*n-
017
0,4*4 iki 0 0.' 000
■ 713 a:
EW o'i»
(Jud, J
1 •» xl
111
O 17
rj
_________! tf <Q
toWi nb _
□ off ~—ate — 17 row co
n if
rr ',rLTable'll Economic Analyst for All ClUes
Page 1 of 4
All Cities
CONSUMPTION
RATE 1M
RATE 2nd
BENEFITS 1st
BENEFITS 2nd
CAPITAL
MM
STREAM 1st
STREAM 2nd
IRR 1st
IRR 2nd
NPV 1»t
NPV 2nd
568.341 698.464 826.580 958,709 1.088.631 1.223.655 1.358.478 1.493,302 1,626.126 1,762.950 1.897,773 5.00 6.00 5.00 500 5 00 5.00 5.00 5.00 5.00 500 5.00 8.00 6.00 600 600 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
— 2,841,705 3,492,316 4,142,930 4.735143——5,444.1KB— 5315,274' 8,792,355 7,466,511 8,140.629 8.814,748 9.486,866
3.410,04A 4.190.781 4,971,516 5,752.251 6,532,986 7,341.928 8,150,876 8,959,813 9,768,755 10,577,697 11.346.639
- 39,620,880
•
- 154,890.450
- 2.913.300
- 36.775.175 ' 3.492,318
• 1.351.667 - 1,351,667 ■ 1.351,667 - 1,351,667 - 1,351.667 . 610.792 - 610,792 4,793,543 - “T50.797.fl62 4,766,6 S7 5,440,725 ’ 6,114,844 6.788,952 6,290.655 8,878,074
- w.sto.iw 4,190,781 “WK 5,752.251 - U9.7M.UI 5,990,262 6.7W.204 7,608,146 8,417.088 7,053,605 10,775,847
4.31%
598%
(80,097,294)
(66,956,467)TabteH Economic Analysis for Alt CUtes
Paijft 1 cl 4
2/007 ~ 2,00a 2,009 |
2.010 |
2.011 |
2.612
1,013 \ 2.01* t 2,015 \ 2.016 I 2,017 \
AH Cities
CONSUMPTION
RATE 1 ftl
2,032.597 2,167,421 2.302,244 2,437,066 2.73B.4B2 3.039.097
3.341,311 3,642,726 3,674.492 3.914.673 4 154 654
,.
5.00 6 00 5.00 5,00 500 5.00 500 5 00
5.00 5.00
5.00
RATE 2nd 600
6.00 6.00 5.00 6.00 6 00 6,00 6 00 600
6.00 6(00
BENEFITS 1*1
BENEFITS 2nd
CAPITAL
O&M
STREAM Ul
STREAM 2nd
IRR 1st
LRR 2nd
NPV 1»l
NPV 2nd
12.196.4H 13,004,5^1 13.013.466 <4,622.408
“ 10,163.955 10,037,103 11,511^22 12,166,340 “13^97,411" 19,199,483 " 16,706^54 ""dfl.TTS.m 10737276 CF“
d 9,5737364
TVT47268
13,109.850
23.406,037
24,9^9,122
92,740.050
610.792 ’ 610.792 - 010,792 - 2.076.621 . 2.076,521 - 2B75.621 . 2,078.621 - 2.076,621 -
4.690(400 -
4.690,400 -
■ <4,53331*9 ■20,047,86^ iW.JSi—
lI^F‘ar 533 TO, S3 (TW3P vs.535.070
7WBWS <«,707?i47 JtTTTOjf7“
4,690.460
ft.652.d02-------1B.726.3dd
"“irmjBB 11.363,tis
TO.W0.429 ■
TOJ)3J7BaTable11 Economic Analysis for All Cities
Pago 3 of 4
All Cities
CONSUMPTION
4,305.034 4,635,215 4.875.396 5,216.149 6,666,902 5,897,655 6,238,408 5,579,161 7.073.253 7.567.406
RATE lot
6 00
6.00
5 00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5 00
5.00
500
RATE 2nd
6.00
6.00
6 00
6.00
6.00
6.00
6 00
6.00
8 00
5.00
BENEFITS lot
21,976,172
“23.176.076
24,376,980
28,080:748
27,784,518
29.486,275
21,192,048—
;32.695,805
35,366,417
37,537,029
BENEFITS 2nd
26,370,205
iW.igi
29l5i.J74 84.485,700
H.SW
33,341,412
5S.385,930
37,430.448
39.474.M6 107.792,100
42,439,700
45.404 435
CAPITAL
O&M
- 4.690.480 -
4,690.480 ♦
6.580,306 •
6.580,306 -
6,560,308 -
6.580.306 •
6.580.308 -
9.244.147 -
9,244,147 -
9.244.147
STREAM tot
STREAM 2nd
IRR lot
IRR 2nd
HPV 1st
NPV 2nd
17,284,692 18.4BKJM -
19,500,437 TnO4.W2~ 22.K7.9«7“ 24.607732 - 84,140,442 26,122,270 28,592,582
h’wjjm”' 23,120,811 - 5T.0lS.532 24,718.588 28,76^,1^ 28.SJ? 622 55,850.148 '
33,195,553 38,160,287TiibMI Economic Analysis for Ait Cities
*Q'x
2,023 |
2J29 [ ~
2,030 |
2,031 |
2,012 |
2,033 |
2,014 |
2.035 1
All Cities
CONSUMPTION
3.081,523
8.655.65*1
9.049,773
9,133,556
10,043,779
10.903,972
11.764.164
12,624,357
RATE 1st
5.00
500
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
500
RATE 2nd
000
6 00
6 00
6,00
6.00
6-00
6.00
6.00
BENEFITS 1*1
~4O.JO7.041
42.771,255
45,243.665
45 917 536
50.2nnJ54
SWBW
5B78RMJJ1
24T3D3.054
BENEFITS 2nd
40,360,160
61.55S.W4
54,296,83!
5S.ld1.t-l6
60,252.673
JUH.AH----
------ 78.4*4,9«-
-------
CAPITAL
-
10,662,100
25T.927.JH 16.450.900
O&M
0.244J47 -
9.244,147 -
11.743,057 -
11,743.057 - 11.
743,067
- 11.743.057 - 11,74
3,067
.
14.207.536
SI REAM tat STREAM 2nd
IRR 1st
IRR 2nd
NPV 1st
NPV 2nd
3CTOn 4i.nas.T86 u:irr.m
aymjSB mzxroir
34,174,173
4i.Sii 45U ^0.519.ci 0
332.ttb.wh
4
47.0777$$ —anrooir
— 1 21J.1M.BW"APPENDIX 9
DAMS
TABLE 1 - Detailed Ranking of Dams
TABLE 2 - Detailed Financial and Economic Analysis of Damsr
WA1UMM0);
r* .
.-■U-A-ji BSKEFlTB
”~i bfl a* trth
twUlJkTONDWUMWM^ffl^l RXMKJMn'
r**—
mah
tourcz | Daw rppa
FfmiRiik
S3 nr
[b^i Call c— CM
IHM 1
<-
FhfMCM f Hf 1 A*4i 1 Trial L«l 1 flhn.il I
cmm* cm
— l
nflMCvM |
1 — I-w>vt| dpMfl.tal.1 Arn IlMI
O-WV |
Mb al ti
hkMri l*h
FhlAL T *O* iFGFUt ATIQM |WCiaftrEEi MM A | Of NVr e[MFLAili: Mr.hT
(AM1 JAM****!-
blM
IK-MiM
“Turin
14
1 4J.W4
i J fl4b
I M»
*
* fl rii
i li.Mi
b • iiF
i tus?
b IM
1 IM*
Mi
JI
r?
I UM
1 fl -Ml
111
mo
<M 1
mii i
WMM
>
MnUm
U
1 11 iu
1 MM
1
» 1* Ml
1 felTI
l t.m
1 ilni
1 1U
-
* Mil
feu
41
m»
i flori
I a.an
-
Uk
Mll.tt
4MM.il
iHJMi niJ
1
H
1 ilM4
» r.rfj
1
1
I JfljM
1 *M
1 J Ml
■ n,m
1 *M
1 Ml*
111
T1
ife.fl
i atid
1 ft Mi#
*91
M«
tt'lll
artuTj
UUMBMU
i
nOCMfH.1
-
t IflMI
a nail
» J.Mfl
i
1 Ifl-lfl’
1 f.lflfl
1 fl IM
1 *1.1*1
1 ♦«
1 4.Mfl
ID11
fl
IM
1 o “*
1 »M*
19 4
MB
■KM
in
inxxnk
$ nm
I ci*»
4 1**Bfl
*
| U IM
1 1BMI
1 fc*M
i fa.CD
1 TM
1 1 Ki,
1«i i
111
Mfe
k 4«M
t OJril
Mt
II B
IflU tj
Mi ar rr
H4JIU
A
4IICQ
iMtN
*r
i r»«i
I ***’
k 11
l m ft*
| III IM
1 J* J-M
1 mH i
1 Ikl.iBk
1 1 *M>
1 ilflll
wrfl
M li
4a a
4cw
1 .un
■« ■
U1
114a r
r«rr* u*
l.l Alt l OMtN M M|v
MJ It
miro
FUREII
■am
4Mm
ll>HW
liiMQi
IM
iMllflfl
1*1*4 M
imUw
1l«l W*
multi m
JT'.JN
■* 11
um
14
IM
11 M
flli'M
«M>m
ik*ri 14
KIRI
ucaiR
EUMIII
rjw
J14M «
inn w
Ir k~
IIMI IM
1BJII Mi
1hH» ™
itrHMM
1*M K1
|LM *■
1*1 “
r*. ra
■ III
UUk
I.SJflfli
HIM
Hi. ■*
n IWfll
uiinlriiu
lira
bqMlFUl
11*11 *■
IHMfla
IM
LUdl Mi
IMHM*
MU M
w4 W
1Jflll M
m«
•■M
WM
But
■ DI
M fli
Mil
IfllflBI
BKH>jr I
•AM nJ
MKHTlLl
HU
V114IM
MtUM
IMMH
tM
■MUM
1*111 M
rJrtM
nniN
imm
IlMflM
j“ »■
H.H
MM
■M
IM
U Ju
fllflfl
■MM*
faMl.rr
IMH
1 'St
RIICWIIL
nm
MUM
hWM
iwuri.w
jBiwru
IM11W
JJIUM
MU M
muH
*ii H
M 4«
MM
■ 11
tvr
klliM
IM
ITU*
MM| M
HU*,
r«
MCCi
|-MI1II
UOI
MIUM
»***! m
MIJI M
1*11 Jw
1 HU 1 M
IJMI Ml
I IkMQ fe*
MM1FM
irifli*
IflliflM
AM**
Hi M
IBM
Bfl
PM
MM
riflt
fell 1*
1IHKM-HI5
1
i
- 3 33
2H1H
i
-t 3 -3
3 jr
::
2
/
!1
-I
3
a !!! HUM
1
f
a
M
? 8! j 3 " 1 !J
I
•? 3
■■ « -«
t
?
Hf
1n
I
f
I
f
HI«I
h;
= I H s3 H MJ 1
!I
31
B
f
r
f I H H I >1
ns
In
ii
-'I
a
3 If
t ■ «!
3
-*3
3
—
5
I H J1 HIM
i
I
i
*
H
'I
l|
!!
Mi
i
a
J!
S! 1
3U5
r
}«}}}}!}
I !! I
J
EI
IS
*!
I H a M ! i|
5
3
3
f
a
r
?
} 5} J 5} J M I
aI
3 1 }}
i
U
II
II
3f
JI
M
11
H
>
3 3? s
a
■■
*1 MH
IS
-S
3
i
e
*
?
it
:s
H1E*S1I
*
j
—
3
=
1 *I I !| 0 I H f
?
5 !5 ! I! j !| }
! ’! Ml 5 ’! } ”
■
I
i
1
?
s
?! i 3! 1 3! ! J
u I H U HH >H 3 i
»
IM
I I!
3
IH
3H
3
I
1 i!■R 3
5 31 1 !|
■1
a
■2T
? M H H I H IH
J
1
1 3 H MS Ml
3 *5
aj
JI
I H ? hi mm h31
3! i }} I « ’}}}}}«
!
HI HI Ml ■
*
7
i
I H MH H
1
1
U
"i t
j
3 UM 35 Ml
3
a
tf
IH UH M UH
!
Ml HI Ml 5
1
S HH U Ml Ml
i Ml Ml Ml
19
*3
i
I
i
5}!!)
Ill
5! 5 S5
aSMJ3
tf
IH } 'I UM 3I
—
i H! I i!! !|
2 I 41II 15} ? HI MI Ml
UM 13 Ml
I I]
a
i
r UH M Ml US
? >i
}}}
I=!|
5 3I
s =3i
3 =U MM M UM ii MS 5
I
3
i
3 =si
5
3■ 2
I i h Minn
3 1C 2 5
s *3 e a
3 II
J
c.
■s
h
II
’i
a
5
11
V!
H
=f
"-
’5
!
?
i
-?
• hi >
? st
i I H J »’
Ml Ml MM
! !? s is a
sJii1
i S’
3 <J
Mj
I
3
= <h<? -’ii sJ h’:1 U ii
5 1 IS J I< 1 I
3i!!!;
h i I? s i; 3 h Ms 1 b 1
I
11
~if
ii
_ iiM j i
J
» i i ; ;i
I!
«I
H
«I
I!
«I
I!
*2
I!
iiiI
?
li 1 12
f r - «B r
B
Si i S ,
5
81
II
’I
t
?
11 2 28
Hi
5
i
H
i
i
i
i
i
• 1 II
i SitI li
ft
1
1 !1
!
r
!| i U
r’
•
B
■
%- Si 1
2 s2a
1H | ii
i SiIt 35 I J| I 51 I 51 I II
B 3i
i
:
a
z
a
»
-
a
t
-.
Ji
I
92
s
J Hi
1
1
li
i
i iSiI
t Si i ii I SI i S| i
1H|
«
1
1
2
Hi
Ii
2j
B
i S| ? !| I §I3
H
!1
9 SiI 22
i Si
I S’, i S3
1
*
2
•*
Si ! !!
!
i
I
t
■
a
!i
!|
IS
*2
I 22
-2 Mil
i
<2 2
51
"HI 1
1 H Hi 1 51B H
3
3
I
-
!
*
s
I
£
25 1HI
H
H
H
•I
21
li
H
31
-5
Hii
ii
i I <2
i ii i Si
Si IH
i 55 i
’5 i i t M
IHi
!1
B ’4 1 H >ft
KrMV|jW*ff«Pa
rww
♦r t •*"-!
I
i
I
Il
•I
It
<1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
1
1
I
1
I •I I
II U
•!
I il ! II !
IH
8
H3
II
»» IIII ii | Si
11 l
H
ll
<1
ll
•1
li
•!
11
ft
1
!
II
I
n
I!I
’III
11
'i
!
I! I
’! I
1 I!
11
11
u
!
I
il
11
r
!
'• n i
Stii
1 I!
1
«l
I
I
t
•I
IS
«!
III II i ||
Hl
I
!
51 It
E It
1U
I 111
U Hl
f
O!
B II
ll
<1 I
I!
<r
I
■I UI H I1 II t- II i
I!
i III
I
n
M
n
Hi 1
2 I!
1 <1
E I!
Hi
1
i
y*
il
11
■I
ll
!
I!
<1
I!
u in jS
t
I
•
<1
III 1
11
-1
? 'i
u 1S3
M HiII H
■I m IR <1
!1 11
IH
I! i si
B!M
k-
u1
S3
l il | ll
8H
IIIIIIIII III II
11I II I li IIII H
II H
t
3 II I U I H I li
I
H
*1
Ill
B
t
:
3
III »! ! l| I ll
ift
I
1
1
I
1
I!
IIII II I H 1 H I II HI I
Ill
IH11|
*
1
1!
*1
IS IIII
II IIIIII
I II HH *3 Hi Hi
12
I ’i
il I II I II I II I IS I
!| IIIIII11! III
i II I II I II I II I II I II
B I'. Hl ®i I ll I !■
: I!
i <1
3
I II I II I II I 1} I II 2II
1
9
3
9
:
3
IH
I h I ll HI HI I H I II B ll
i
f
3 HI
f
ia
’!
is
«!
IHI H
IIII i>
III IHIIIIHI H} H H H! II I llI ii
9
-
BAPPENDIX 10 FORESTRY INTERVENTION
Table 1 - Gum Tree PlantationSSS
252
-y *•
F* .
IIS
«si
88
H>
IH
599
sss
333
>S? S.JS S.8F 3P.C5S IIS SSS sss shh
its gsi psi smkm
sss sss sss shh
HI st."
HI IH
•
Hi
111 III
ip
a
I
•
*
i? 1 x?x 2 = 8 mSspm
sss sss sss SHH
hi
I
HI III
m
•
M
St: s 2 - 2 2s “ s t: s
sss sss SSS SHH
ill
IH HI
H?
.
a
1
f* -
£.= ? gHi*
sss sss sss shh
|b£ tZi 155 z52is I
iil Hi ii! IH
.I
a
... HS SSS SSS shh
*• —
IO n? sp*»
.11 ill sss sss ssssi
Hi 3«? UJi« SIS SH SSI Hill
|h *H ill -‘-Hl ____ SIS Hi III lllll
isi Hi . 5 1 mm a
its sh HI HI
HHilHHil 1
.«
a
.1
iii »|
Hl III
.1
11 rixvatry Sactkm Gum Ti
Plankton Financial and Economic Anteyal.
veajf
Mir
CHjrrtji
I
Uunt»n«K« A Opwaaona
EaLabt thing
Malnl ananc*
HanraaUng 10X
1 < ar* «t Ung 20%
Harvatung XT*
Gvardt
Op**alkng Cotla 10%
70.000
•04.000
1 000,000
1,*12.000
77.700
JTl.tOO
Operating Costs 70% Operating Costs 70%
TOTAL COOT AT 10%
TOTAL COST AT 20%
TOTAL COST AT 70%
GROSS MARGIN AT10%
GROSS MARGWATTOX
gross' MARGIN atso%_
NE T OREALNT VAUM
NFV10X
InFV 20%
1.17% 100
ft! MO
i.orisoo
i s moo
4.441 MO
S 004. MO
1| MO MO
—
I4JI7WO HOT ASM !M4t,S00 iaooamoAPPENDIX 11 LIVESTOCK INTERVENTION
TABLE 1 Tests© FlyTABLE 1 Financial and Economic Analysis ofToslso Fly
Pago 1 of 3
I
1996
OUTPUTS
1 1. Savings on tryanlccal drugs
I 2. Roducod Mortality
GROSS INPUTS
317
•
317
1997 1996
317 317 360 360
1999
317
360
|
-
2000 2001 2002 2003 7GC4 7006 2006
317 317 317 317 317 317 317 360 360 360 360 360 360 360
1
1
I
677
677 677
677 677 677 677 677 677 <77
I
I
INPUTS
Capital Costs
Survey
Conical Traps (50x50)
11
25
•
-
•
•
•
-
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
-
•
••
••
Total Capital
36
- • ----------------
-
-
-
•
•-
Operations & Maintenance
Labour supervision
Labour D/A
37
37
534
534
Trap repairs and replacement Materials and Suppllos
73 73 534 534
• | 6
50 50
37 37 37 37 37 37 37 534 534 534 534 534 534 534
66 50 50
66
66669
657 r 663 J 627 627j 627 6277 627 627 | 627? 627 627
50 50 50 50 50 50 50
I
total 0 & M
TOTAL COSTS 6937 663 | 627 627 | 627 j" 627 I 627 f 627 627 627 627 ]
I
J
\gross margin
14 t 60 60 60 50 50 50 50 /
/
(375)T
50 |
so r
1T /
\_______________
URR
\—_____
r
12%
/ // / /
/
I7
L ---- 1 '
7/
/
__r—
/
/ 2007
317
360
"7 7T-- T“ j —___ j_________
1 / 1 - -- I
1 2008 / 2009 2010 2011 2012 1I
■
--- 1
317 317 1 317 317 317
360 360 360 360 360
1
1 “V r----------- ’—
” I 11 I
I
\
2013 2014
317 317 360 j 360
2015 2016 2017 2016 2019 2020 1 2021 \
J _ ].
I
317 317 | 317 j 317 | 317 i 317 317 |
I
360 360 360 360 360 360
----------—1
360 i
677 6771
677 | 677
677 | 677
677 677~J 677
677
677
677
677
677 677
i
—--- _
■1
w
a
•
-
-
-
•
*
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
•
-
-
•
-
•
•
«
♦
•-
-I
*
*1
*-
-
-
-*
37 37
37
634
6
60
!
w
534
6
1
37
534
6
60
37 37 634 534
6i 60 60
37 37
37
634 634 534 666
I— . _6_0 50 60
37
534
6
60
37
53-1
6
60
37
634
6
37
37
534
e
60
534
534 534
•
•
50 50 60
1
627 627 627 627
627 627 627 627 627 627 627 627 627 627 627
1-------
“H
627 627 ! 627 627 627 627 627 627 627 627 627 427 427 utT 627 1
-
50 60 50 50 60 60 50 50 50 50 50 60 50 SOT - KO
<-
—
1
1:
-- --------------
I-
1 r--------------
i
I1
LL
iTABLE 1 Financial .nd Economic An.ly,I. ol To.Lo Fly
I- -
3 of 3
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
$317
$350
$317
$360
$317
$360
$G77
$677
627 627 r 627
627 627 627 627 627 627 627 627 627 627 627
------------------- -------------------- --------------------
II
627 |
627 T 627
627T 627 627 627 627 627 627 627 627 627 [ 627
50 \ so r 50 T 50 60T 50
I
II
I
'If
60 50 | 50
50 50 50 50 OUJUSTIFICATION
Industrial Projects Service (IPS), etc) estimate the annual per capita consumption is follow?
-ot milled cereals to range between 1 12 to I 86 quintals (an average of I 5 cutrials ts assumed here),
-of milled and split pulses to be about 65 kg and
of milled red pepper to be between 2 to 4 kg.
The milling requirement to preside for 444,000 households is estimated at 3.330.000 quintals of cereals The quantities are estimated to increase at 2 8% per annum
National production capacity of milled grain is estimated at about 300, 000 tonnes Actual production reaches some 250.000 tonnes Imports do not show a consistent trend It has for various reasons varied from year to year and the major share of the imports 3re a result of donated goods Nevertheless, current total supply (domestic plus imports) vary between 350,000 to 400,000 tonnes per annum, providing a peT capita consumption of only 20 g on the basis of total population, which is a rather alarmingly low figure Thus the need for grain mills in the country is easily justified when the amount of 20 g of grain per capita per day is compared to the actual need of 1 5 quintals per capita per year (410 g per day per capita requirement)
tnk6 l^e tOwns *n project area do not have gram mills (Wacha, Girabo. Beta Gent:.
PROCESS
diesel driven depending on the availability of electric power
TAMS-ULG Baro-Aknbo River Baiin LntcsTJir4 Dt'etopoeal Miiu* Plus Annex JH - Appendix 12SOCIO-ECONOMIC annex-je ECONOMIC AND FINANCIai J. PRODUCTION CAPACITY AND PROGRAM
l^LVSls
It » rcwr.mendcd that for wall wale milling a machine with a throughput of
n<
7
tonnes pc hour >» appropriate Thu throughput is based on maize with a moisture cn I* : % The output decrease for maize with higher moisture content This 
.tar. tm»« f<v other corals .Assuming that the recommended millino .-J gUrc *ou!d
Qf
At a pct capita consumption figure of I 5 quimals per year, the supply requircme protect area :» estimated al 330.000 tonnes of flour This would require about 1 io ° *** scale nulling plants including the existing flour mills in the project area This study " Smai!' that 50*. of the flour requirement is met by the existing small grain mills The pro*5^17545
will then require an addition of about 55 small-scale flour mills 
4. PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
4.1 Building
P Ject 2752
Required covered area, including storage, production and office area, is estimated at 200 nr
4J Production Equipment
Milling machine, with all its parts and accessories
A quotation from Bental Simplex Industries Ltd of England provides the following technical specification and costs
- Bentll Unimali assy cJw cyclone & ducting in kit form, base drive, guard and 15 kW 3 phase motor and star delta starter, including 1 5mm. 3 0mm, and" 5 0mm screens Including 2 sets of spare hammers. 2 sets of screens, 2 sets of drive belts, and 2 sets of drive belts and 2 sets of bearings
- FOB UK port pnee for the machine including spares is estimated at
- Sea freight Assab port for one "UNAMILL'’ assembly complete
USS 6.300
USS 1.000
- Other items (including weighing scales, office equipment and furniture)
The complete milling machine is assumed to be imported while the other items 
are assumed
to be locally available
5. PRODUCTION INPUTS
The annual requirement of raw materials and inputs for one cereal milling unit of capacity 0.75 -1 5 tonne per hour operating in one shift of 10 hours for 300 working days in a) ear i> as provided below
5.1 Raw and Auxiliary Materials
Wheat or maize and sacks are the major raw materials required. However the plant is not required to purchase these raw materials as it is assumed (as is norma J 
ca ^
with other existing milling units in the country) that the unit is providing JP
a
31 " sOrr.e
service where the raw materials are provided by the customers themselves "°'S^atcti3l provision is made in case the mill owner wishes to produce flour from his own raw - Wheat or maize, assume 10% of annual output is based on owners input ?
TAMS-ULC Biro-Ako bo River Basin Integrated Development Master Plan Annex 3H - Appendix 12^^ECOXOMIC
AVEX-H ECONOMY avD n> w HL
. rtw wheau'maizc. assume possible reuse
jacks f°r *w
Utilities
f> lOfcw X 16 hours/day X 300 days per year ’ ?JWe; ^titrated al 0 10 rn' per tonne of product
piece-.
306^
;J Manpnwer
___
-—
i.^ istijtjon Clerk---------------—
^^02erat^semiskilkd)
^4^ct;onj3bou£ force ------------------
--------------- -------------------
rotiJ^—------------------------------------
t COST AND REVENUE ESTIMATES
I No I No
I 2 No ’ 6 No
, 2 No 12 No.
Ccst and revenue estimates are worked out on the basis of one shift opcraton in a JOO da) ..ear to provide milling service for 3,000 tonnes of flour mill is provided below
Investment (in Birr)
Local
Foreign
Total
filed assets;
Building (low cost)
200,000
200,000
Equipment
25,000 75.000 100,600
Total filed assets
225.000 75.000 300.000
Working capital
5.000
5.000
JjMal investment cost
230.000
75.000 |
305.000
forking capital is calculated on the basis of half month's material supply and other inputs. as plant is only providing a milling service requiring little or no working capital
Annual Production Cost
cost ot inputs such is electricity and labour are the major production costs Cos of raw serial is small as the mill is established to provide a milling service where customers bring eir own raw materials
TAIMS’ULG Birch Aknbo River Bisin laicgruted Development Maa ter PUn Anne* JU — Appendix I-SOCIO-ECONOMIC
annex-je economic and financial
Foreign (Birr)
Cotf Item
Murna
I tilitin
Eicctnr.t)
Uatct
Others
Consumable*
erhead
Total Production Cott
4
30.000 1.500
28.000 bOOO
14,800
92300
Overhead costj include depreciation (5% for building, 10% for equipment) 11*t of fixed investment) and insurance. (0 4% on fixed investment)} majntenar.ce
63 Revenue
The revenue is calculated on the basis of grain milling charges in Addis Ababa 1 different weredas in Addis Ababa revealed the following milling charges 
In
Crop
Tcff
Nkizc
Wheat
Pepper, chilli
Pulses
Milling charge (Birr per tonne)
601
100
70
500
150
7.C0MMERCIAL PROFITABILITY
Profitability is calculated on the basis of cost and revenue estimates in a 300-day year working in one shift and providing milling service for about 3,000 tonnes of cereals The rate of return is calculated assuming 50% loan and 50% equity Bank interest rate is assumed at
11%
Total (Birr)
Revenue (assuminc maize millinc)
300.000
Production cost
95,300
Profit before tax
204,700
Profit tax (35%)
71.645
Profit after tax
133,500
ROR (rate of return (simple)), %
40.0
The project is financially viable with a return on investment of about 40%
TAMS-ULG Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated De*elopmen’^'lcr P*
Annex 3H - Appendix 12AXXLX.JE ECONOMIC AND FINANCUL ANALYSIS
APPENDIX 13 PROJECT PROFILE - OILSEEDS MILLING
JUSTIFICATION
t ftdibie oil 15 an e55cnt*^ nutrient as well as an industrial raw matenjJ Etna* a a ojbstitute for0,1 onl> t0 a certain extent, particularly during the fasting davi fix the folowen ’• the Coptic Christian Church Butter is nearly twice as expensive as oii
Annua1 consumption of industrially processed oil in the country has varied yearly depenfeg Qfi the level of production and imports It is estimated that the annual per capita consumer ion o f oil in Ethiopia is of the order of I 2 kg or 1 2 litres considered to be one of the in ’he world. Thus with this per capita consumption figure, the annual requirement ofcti m the ?ro ject area (2.2 million people) is of the order of 2,640 tonnes A recent survey in the project area has revealed that there are only three small-scale oil mills, one is located r Gimbi and the other two at Assosa Thus the need for additional oil processing units has been demonstrated
Even assuming the consumption level of the project area to be half of the national per capita consumption, i.e. taking 0.6 kg per capita consumption, the present need for oil for a papulation of 2.2 million in the project area could be roughly estimated to be 1.320 tonnes per annum Thus there exists sufficient demand for the establishment of at least 20 oilseed milling units, each with an hourly output of 15 litres, working IQ hours u day for 300 days id a year
2. PROCESS
Recovering oil from oilseeds can be done by mechanical presses, solvent extraction or a mix of the two Solvent extraction is for large capacity ventures. In view of the small production scale under consideration, the mechanical press with a small capacity screw press and capable
operation without ancillary equipment to prepare the oilseed for pressing is recommended This method involves continuous pressing of cleaned seeds followed by filtering of primary pressed crude oil k has to be suitable for village scale operations and driven either
electrically, or by a suitable diesel engine for areas that are without three phase electric 
supply.
S«d is gravity fed to the press from an integrated feed hopper fitted with a manually 
operated shuL or slide. The thickness of the press cake produced by the machine can be varied ' adjusting the axial position of the wormshaft agamst a stationary choke ring
PRO RUCTION C A PACTTY AND PROGRAMME
^ ulPmem recommended is De Smet Rosedowns * Mins 40 screw press The Mtri 40 ;s 
cfl ^
e
ped rncet demand for a relatively simple, small capacity screw press to be
Atfr operation either electrically, or by a suitable diesel engine for areas that are
three phase electric supply As a general rule the Mini 40 is capable of processing
the •
Per hour producing press cake containing about 12-14% ci! trorn
contenl of 45-48%. With a lew oil content seed containing only 2CS ml.
yield would be much less and it would be of the order of 3 - 4 kg of cd per hour Mo\v-^Crent caPaci^cs the Mini Press f° dUterent types of oii seeds is ptreded
r
TAMS’ULG BartkAkobo Rhtr Basin Initiated DcAtioptncnr Muter PUa
Aiidci. JII - Appendix 13■TO
SOCIOECONOMIC ANNEXE ECONOMIC ANO FINANCIAL anai
___
■ ■ —---------- ''Ms
&apc*ccc • approximately
C«Mc:n
Rewdual oil tn cake Approximate «l weld Percentage of scbdi tn oil Waler vvrtcr.! of ex! Power consumption
4M2‘» oil content in wed
40-45 kg pc: hour 15-16%
32% of «*d input 6 to 9% by volume Lew than 0 2% 16 kW
• Sunflower wed approximately 40-42% oil content
Capacity
35 to 40 kg per hour
Residual oil in cake
12-15%
Approximate oil yield
32 5% of seed input
Percentage solids tn oil
4 to 8% by volume
Water content of oil
less than 0.2%
Power consumed
2 0 kW
- Soya Bean approximately 21% oil content
Capacity
Residua! oil in cake
Approximate oil yield
30 to 35 kg per hour 11 to 13%
9% on seed
Percentage solids tn oil
8 to 10% by volume
Waler content of oil
less that 0 2%
Power consumed
1 8 kW
• Cotton Seed approximately 21% oil content
Capacity
35 to 40 kg per hour
Residual oil in cake
10 to 12%
Approximate oil yield
9.2% on seed
Percentage of solids in oil
4 to 6% by volume
Water content of oil
less than 0.2%
Power consumed
2.1 kW
°f study, it is assumed that seeds with relatively high oil content will b* used The .Mini plant is capable of processing 40 kg of seed per hour, or 4 quintals p« 1°
OP<TOn or I’200 tluintals in 300 operation days in a year With see*
roaming about 40% oil, the mill can produce about 15 kg of oil per hour or about 45.0C0
litres per annum
4. PLANT AND EQUIPMENT 4.1 Building
5K
finished
Required covered area is estimated at 150 m2, including raw material an g^vanis stores, production area and sales area. It is assumed that the store (50 m') "
iron sheet walled with a view of minimising the cost
TAMS-ULG Baro-Aknbo River Basin Integrated Development M-*sl Annex 3H - Appendix 13^o-EC^wnc
Equipment
One heavy duty weighing scale
Oil drums, 25 No
5. PRODUCTION INPUTS
5.1 Raw and Auxiliary Materials
Sbieriai and quantity required for a yearly output of 4$ 0Q0 oilseed with about 40% oil content in the seed
r
0,1 frOta 1200
of
Groundnuts Nueg
Total
600 quintals 600 quintals
1200 quintals
51 Utilities
j. 11 Electric Pmver
The total annual electric power requirement of the mini plant, based on a consumption rate of 5kW per 10 hours working day for 300 days per year is 15,000 kWh The rate assumed is Bit 0 4397 per kWh, which rate EELPA normally charges when supplying from diesel generators
>■22 Water
The plant does not require much water One cubic metre per day is allowed tor human consumption and general cleaning including small gardening making the total annua! consumption about 300 cubic metre
Manpower
The mini plant will provide job opportunities for 8 people The man power requirement “-token down to skilled an unskilled category is as described below
Owner manager ' ^echanic (skilled)
' ^bou
r
Ie s
(unskilled)
--
^ards (unskilled) Total
I I 4
2
8
TAMS-ULG Ban>-AXobo Ri'er Basin Integrated Dodopfflcnt Vtawer PUa Annex 3H - Appendix 13SOCIO-ECONOMIC aNN'EX-JF ECONOMIC ANI) FINANCIAL / 6. COST AND REVENUE ESTIMATES
KI
Im ntmrnl
Filed lomtmrnt
Building
I quipmcol
One Mim 40 screw press ______ Extras for the Mini 40 screw press Che 4 k\V poic motor
Che \ce rope dnve
One set of \rare*
One \ ibratcrv feeder
Working capital*__________
foul Imotment Cost (Birr)
50.000 3.500
86.000
69200
55J00
•Working capital is assumed lo include about one month s suppi/^
materials, inputs and labour cost ANNUAL OPERATING COST
-j rau
Cost Item Local (Birr)
Foreign (Birr)
Total (Birr)]
N (atonal
360.000
360,000
Utilities
Electric power
7,500
7,500
Water
600
600
Manpower
12,500
12.500
Spares and
consumable
2,000
8,000
10,000
Overhead*
12.000
3300
15.300
Total Annual
Production Cost
394,600
11300
405,900
• The overhead cost item includes depreciation 5% for building. IO°o_ >or equipment), maintenance ( 1% of fixed investment), insurance ( 0 4% on investment plus cost of raw materials), and miscellaneous ( 1% of production co excluding overhead)
8. REVENUE
Al 12 Bin per litre of oil (current price in Addis Ababa) and 30 Birr per quintal o. the anticipated revenue from sales of 45.000 litre of oil and 720 quintals of oil caK to 561,600 Birr.
TAMS-ULG Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Master Plun Annex 3H - Appendix 13commercial PROFrrABnm
Revenue
(Production cast)
Mt before
Less profittax (35%)
Profit after tax gOR (rate of return (simple)). %
561.0% ‘♦05.900 155,100
54 JOO
I GO. SOO 641)
project is lucrative with a 64% rate of Qn ■ rorther reduction or the price of oil in the projecr arei
pTOV:f!r5 rooct faSOCIO-ECONOMIC KNNFXJ! FCONOMK’ ViD FINANC|
A SNai
|
\m:xdi\ i4 project profile - mini sugar n VXT
i. jisnncviiox
l.l
1x
pc* o
f Sugar
There
are
two
main
centrifu
gal
are
of two
tvpo of sugar. the centrifugal and the non-ccntrifucal
tvpcs the raw sugar produced as an input to refiner'
-"V
purification and direct consumption sugar produced for direct consumption 0T
sugar The
final
includes geWcn brown. brown. yellow. washed grev standard white, and planta
'i ’he current graac o> '
hrte sugar is J*
i—.«^ion white
. n( «iear that is produced in the sugar factories in
The latter *-
Plantation w!
'
* ‘-
Ethiopia
The nocxmtnfugal sugars include gur. jaggery, pancla and desi These groups produced tn cottage industries for local consumption and. in the case of jagged manufacture of alcoholic bes erages by fermentation It is in Asia Africa and South a that non-centnfugal sugars arc made for direct consumption Gur in India desi in D Ir'enca
pancla tn South America and jaggery in Africa are the names given for non
1.2 Physical Features of Ideal Sagar Cane Area
The most salient physical characteristics of an ideal area for sugar plantation arc 7.2/ Land Form
,,un-centnfugai
ideally, the land should have long, regular smooth slopes of l°- 3°. the higher value being more acceptable with heavier soils Completely flat land is less suitable
1.2.2 Soils
Sugar cane is grown on soils which vary in texture from light sands io heavy clays, but in all cases they must have optimum access to the main elements of nutrition nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium and also to many trace elements The best soil for sugar cane is provided bv more than one metre of siable well-structured loam to clay loam soil The optimum pH for sugar cane is about 6 5, i e very slightly acidic However, cane can grow over pH range of 4 8 - 8 5
1.2.3 Cli male
Temperature, altitude, rainfall, sunshine hours, wind speed and other factors have a marked effect on the growth of sugar cane The ideal climate for sugar cane plantation is as prov. eu below:
Altitude
Annual mean maximum temperature Annual mean minimum temperature Annual average mean temperature Sunshine hours
Mean annual rainfall
800-1,500 masl
29 - 39 °C
15 - 17°C
22 - 24 °C
8-87 hrs/day 600- 1,000 mm
TA.MS-ULG BaroAkobo River Buin Integrated Development Muster PI’
Annex 3H - Appendix 14^,0.KCONOMIC
AfflEX-JE ECONOMIC AND HXW1AL v<K
„„o Akobo area has narny h«ur« of land wlh ph^oi r<scu,„ ,im umlK
t» rcd ideal parameters This is also supported by the extsterw rf mwy 
^^anasjcd by smallholders
r. b-^-
SEED for small MINI SUGAR PLANTS.
i are only three sugar factories in Ethiopia a combined output of ottfy JD.OCC tenths ^^Ltiation white sugar per annum Currently, the per capita per year ccnsumpxr <jf x$ar
*
whole country' is just slightly over 3 kilograms This figure compares very tearflv ever,
the le<3s! developed countries of Africa As the country's population mcrasev it i -w
V'j. per annum, unless the capacity is increased or the deficit is made up with tntporj, -.*e
^capita consumption will further decline If made available, there wifi be a UtttEndcus 
for non-centrifugal sugar It is recommended that mini sugar crushers of capacay 
■ij quintals per day be established by smallholders to alleviate the sugar requtfetnent af the
saion
t PROCESS
Susar cane crushers designed to work on 5 HP are quite economical to the farmers having imall acreage of sugar cane The recommended crushers are ho riron.aI ty pe ,th three rollers held between two heavy cast iron plates and mounted on a heavy- cast iron frame The
.Tosher can be driven by either electric motor or diesel engine
The process is simple The raw cane is fed into the crusher manually and the svrup is {dirtied in containers as it leaves the machine The syrup is crystallised by heating in locally made pans over ar open fire to produce 3 crude sugar The 'empty cane' or bagasse on be utilised as animal feed, but being woody and hard can also be used for fuel in the Reduction of crude sugar or domestically
A PRODUCTION CAPACITY AND PROGRAM
small scale cane crushers are available with from 1 ton to 5 ton per hour The I [on per hour opacity crusher is recommended The technical specification is provided below
Silt of pulley 
rollers
gashing rollers fraction roller
Qr » power required Peed of driving pulley 
Opacity fraction
30" xd 5'"
9‘diax 12"
9” diax 12”
6 1/2” did x 8 1/2"
5 HP
360 rpm
900 - 1.000 kg cane hr 60 to 65%
an extraction rate of 60 to 65%. the maximum amount of sugar that can be extracted by , ot crusher is of the order of 7% of cane, i e 700 kg of sugar could he recovered per eff1* cane crushed .Assuming that the crusher operates 8 hours per day, and with an
1 i'r\Cncy 
,uo tonnes
<md for 200 working davs per year, the total annual sugar output is about
TAMS-ULG Baru-Akcbo Rner Basin Integra ted Lk-i elop men i Matter PLut Annei JH - Appctidh 14SOCIO-ECONOMIC ANNEX-3E ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANai Vs|S
S. PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
5.1 BuiWmr
Required cv^vred arwu including rtorapc. production and office area, is estimated ax ]<r
of uhjch SO tuJ is oofc budding
5.2 Production Equipment
. One Mck itmon cane crusher for small farm or co-operative use
• Two pans for boiling sugar
• Others including weighing scales, office equipment and furniture
*
The complete cane crusher set is assumed to be imported The other pieces of equipmen.
assumed to be locally made
6. PRODUCTION INPUTS
The requirement of inputs is calculated for crusher capacity of 1 tonne per hour worldnc « hours per day and with an efficiency of 70% and for 200 days per year The yield of su~ from sugar cane is taken as 7% of the cane crushed
6.1 Raw and Auxiliary Material
1 are
~
Sugar cane
Sacks for bagging sugar*
1,120 tons
200 pieces
The sack requirement of the plant is calculated on the basis of two month’s output, which is of the order of 200 quintals
6.2 Utilities
Power Based on a power requirement of 6 kW, working 8 hours per day for 200 days
per year and allowing 20 % extra power for other uses, the total annual electnc power requirement of the plant is 12,000 kWh At unit power cost of 0 4397 Bin per kWh. the total annual cost of electric power is 5,300 Bin-
Water Water for human consumption and cleaning is estimated at 2 m3 per day. and
3
about 600 m per year
Fire wood Fire wood is required to supplement the bagasse used as fuel for the concentration of the syrup to form sugar crystals. It is estimated that about 0 5m of fire wood is required per day, and about 100m per year
6.3 Manpower
The mini sugar crushing operation would provide job opportunities for at least 11 persons The manpower requirement classified into skilled, semi-skilled and unskilled is shown below
3
3
Owner-manager
] No.
Machine operator (stalled)
2 No.
Assistant machine operator (semi-skilled)
2 No.
Production labour (unskilled)
4 No.
Guard (unskilled)
2 No.
11 No
TA.MS-LLG Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development .Master Pla
Annex 3H - Appendix 14^tcoffoMic
ANNEX-JE ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL ANALYSIS
COST AND REVENUE ESTIMATE
' and revenue are estimated Tor the annual output at' 30 tonnes of sugar produced from a operation in a 200 day per annum
[nvestmen£ 
-.1
Local (Birr) Foreign ("Birr)
Total (Birr
TgL^neyj.—-- -----
rgj fixed _______
forking capital_
T0L>f[n vestment^
7j Annual Production Cost
[
75.000
20.500
95.500
75 000
102.500
102.500
20.000
-
120 000
122.500 -u
Cos: item
Local (Birr)
Foreign (Birr)
Total (Birr)
Material
225.000
225.000
Utilities
6,500
6.500 •
Manpower
26.700
— -------------------------
26700
Consumable
10.000
10.000
Overhead
20.200
20.200 :
| Total Production Cost
288.400
238.400
73 Revenue
Al 450 Birr sales price per quintal of sugar, the anticipated annual revenue :s 352,800 Birr
7.4 Commercial Profitability
Profitability is calculated on the basis of cost and revenue estimates for the proposed sugar cine crushing unit of capacity 1 tonne per hour working 8 hours per day in a 200 day per year
__
Total i Birr t
.Revenue
352,800
■Xigdugtion cost
238.400
before tax
64.400
2rofitUx (35%)
22.540
JjPnt after tax
41.860
(return on investment (simple)), %
211
prpject is attractive with a rate of return on investment of over 20%,
TAMS4JLG BuroAkobo River Buin Integrated Doriopmcol Master Ptin
Aancz 3H - Appendix 14ANNEX H. INSTrnTIONU M PPORT
ANNEX 3F
INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT
fAMfi-VLG Biro-Ak&bo Rh«r Buin laie^MteJ Dortofracnt Master Plan^ClO-ECONOM'CS
ANNEX Jf, INSTITUTIONAL st PPORT
CONTENTS
****—************----------.*—**—----------- -—............ ......... ......... ix.................
PRESENT INSTITUTIONAL SITUATION , General Institutional Framework
.... I
I.
II
U
1 1 ‘ ll2 112
III 1.12
13
HI 1.3 2 133
!■» 1 5
S^rwg of the Project
legal Situation
Federal Institutions and Inferretanonskips
Water Resources Management
Ministry of Water Resources (AfWT?/
Coon/jrtctofNJ Xrrowgemenfj i**rr/r orAf f .Iftffm’trc Regional institutions
Local administrations in Bam-Akoho basin
Project related structures in regions sones and * credos
NGOs in Project area ............. >.... Private Sector Activities
International Funding . ..
1.
2I > ■? *■ =
MANAGEMENT ASPECTS OF PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION. Proposed Project Interventions and Possible Timescale
General Institutional Issues
22/ 222 2 23 22 J 22 J 22 d
23
231
23 2
23 3
23 4
/flrtrHanonu/ /mpiications
Water Legislation .............
Cfl5r Bt'ccjvrn 
Rede of rhe Private Sector
Co-ordi nan on X r raflgemcjw Sfnrc/lirr for Financing
Immediate Issues
«"■■■■« I
Gambela Region .... 
Xiabo £tam and X/wern Irrigation scheme
Catchment management, rain fed agricultural developments in the upper basin.
Awareness and consultation................................ ..........................
1 INSTITUTIONAL arrangements for project IMPLEMENTATION.-.
3I 32 33
J 3
Project Implementation at Federal and Regional Level
Role for Basin Co-ordmating/Management Unit - Short and medium term Proposed Institutional Arrangements
< Xj-rum/jflortj,...................... ...... , .......................
33 2 
3.4
33 3.6
3.6 1 3 62
Organisation Structures
Institutional Options .............................. .....—-....................... Institutional Structure and Project Financing Implementation at Basin. Regional and Field Level
Implementation of Principal Project Interventions Community Participation
4.
4.1 42
<2/
<22
INST1TLTION.AL support....... ............... ......... ........ . Support at National, Basin, Regional and Local Level. Estimate of Possible Costs
Prapojt-d 
Co-ardf/ianpig (. ‘mt (PCU)
BarcwAknho Basin Water Management Authority-
<1 2
3
9
7
tj ti
;■ u 13
15
13
— 16
16
17 ;*
1? JT?
/J /? 20
20
20 2/ 2/ 2/
— 23
23
23
25
jh
?< 26
26
2d 29 
._3O SO so 
JO 32
APf,E.NDJCESSOCIO-ECONOMICS___________________ ANNEX 3F. INSTITUTIONAL SUpp0R
TABLES
Table 1 Administrative units (Region, zone, wereda) in the Baro-Akobo basin
Table 2 Estimated Institutional Support Costs for Proposed Project Co-ordination Unit jg acronyms
BWMA Basin Water Management Authority
CAA Civil Aviation Authority
USA Central Statistics Authority
DFD Deutschen Entwicklunsdiens
EELPA Ethiopian Electric, Light and Power Authority
ELA Environment Impact .Assessment
EPA Environment Protection Authority
ERA Ethiopian Roads Authority
ETC Ethiopian Tourist Commission
E\T>SAEthiopian Valleys Development Studies Authority
EWCO Ethiopian Wildlife Conservation Organisation
GIS Geographic Information System
MNRDEPMinistry of Natural Resources Development and Environmental Protection
MOA.................. Ministry of Agriculture
MWR Ministry of Water Resources
NGO Non-Govemmental Organisation NNWMSRACNational MeNtaetoioronlaolgWicaalteSreRrvi ecesouArceges ncyCommission
NRB.AP
PCUProgramme Co-ordinating Unit
Nile River Basin Action Plan
SNNPRG Southern Nanons and Nationalities Peoples Regional Government
TECCONILE Technical Co-operative Committee for the promotion of the Development
and Environmental Protection of the Nile Basin
UNHCR
WRDA
WSSD
United Nations High Commission for Refugees 
Water Resources Development .Authority 
Water Supply and Sewerage Department
TAMS-ULG Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Mas'
3F-ii]5TR0DUCTI0N
The objective of this report is to describe -he
Baro-Mobo Master Plan project, t0 id^. ^
CBI Uiaitulioo
. *l framework rc)arpH L
organisational arrangements for projw possible areas for institutional support
BaroAkobo Ri^r Butn 1^^ Dc.c^nT^^-----------------------------------'
JF-1SOCIO-ECONOMICS
ANNEX 3F. INSTITUTIONAL
1. PRESENT INSTITUTIONAL SITUATION
1.1 General Institutional Framework
1.1.1 Setting of the Project
The Baro-Akobo river basin is one of eleven river valley basins in Ethiopia Master piar. studies have already been completed for two basins - the Awash basin in the eastern central part (December 1989) and the Omo - Gibe basin in the south west, adjacent to Baro-Akobo m April 1996 The present study will, when completed, be the third basin master plan Two other studies have also been commissioned one for the Tekeze basin in the nonh and the other f -
c
Abbay in the west centre adjacent to Baro-Akobo The remaining basins are the Rift \’alle\ lakes, Genale - Dawa, Wabi Shebele (in the south) and Ogaden, Afar and Aysha (in the east)
Among the five basins for which studies have been completed or are under way, three are of panicular international significance as sources of the Nile river system The Baro-Akobo waters flow into Sudan and join the White Nile, the Tekese waters join the Nile after
Khartoum and the Abbay waters flow into Sudan as the Blue Nile
Moreover, as described more fully in section 1.13, the Baro-Akobo river basin contains within its watershed the whole or parts of four of the 10 new autonomous administrative regions (nine regions plus Addis Ababa) which make up the federation of Ethiopia These factors differentiate the Baro-Akobo basin study to a significant degree in institutional terms from the two studies so far completed. In undertaking the present institutional study the consultant has taken account of the organisation and management proposals made for the Awash and Omo Gibe studies and comments later in the report on the cases where a different approach is thought necessary for the Baro-Akobo basin.
1.1.2 Legal Situation
Water Resource Development
The main rivers of the Baro-Akobo basin are international waters (also referred to in Ethiopia as trans-boundarv rivers”) crossing the Ethiopian boundary' and flowing into the Nile system in Sudan As described in the Interim Report Master Plan Development (refer to section 2 J International H 'aters of Ethiopia), Ethiopia has the status in international law of an _ P^ ' riparian in the Nile system the Baro Alwero/Giio rivers are “consecutive" waters wit and the Akobo nver (sharing a common boundary with Sudan) is “contiguous” water
Some bilateral understandings about water resource utilisation in the Nile nver system « general terms For example Egypt and Sudan made bilateral agreements or mentor
un erstan ings about water use and catchment management in 1952 and 199*. Egypt have a framework agreement on general heads of co-operation (1993) m wtuc articles relate to the Nile basin It is understood however that up to the present noJP^
B^in Integrated Development Muter P'»n
3F-2
U^o^conomics
AWEX3f ronnmoim.sOTTOCT
wment ,’b0UJ T“15'ind rMour“ ai,tral™ l««een the three count™ (uud
^er ripaf,ans^1S in
Ethiopia participates in the Technical Co-operation Committee for the Promotion of the Development and Environments) Protection of the Nile Basin (TECCOMLE) Ethiopia - with 0otvndi, Entrea and Kenya - has observer status in TECCOMLE. whose members are Egypt. Rwanda- Sudan, Tanzania Uganda and Zaire After joint conferences and workshops? ±e Council of Ministers of TECCOMLE approved a Nile River Basin Action Plan (NRBAP or Action Plan) in February 1995
Ih€ Action Plan programme proposes 22 projects covering integrated water resource planning and management, capacity building, training, regional co-operation, and environmental protection which are intended to promote a comprehensive and international co-operation ^amework for water management in the Nile Basin Ethiopia has agreed to participate and commit resources to one of the regional co-operation projects (03 - Nile Basin Co-operative Framework) The aims of this project are in the short term to attain a regional co-operative framework acceptable to all Basin countries and in the long term to determine equitable entitlements for each riparian country for the use of the Nile waters
Water Resources Utilisation Proclamation (No 92/1994)
Ai present the main enacted legislation concerning development of water resources in Ethiopia is contained in this proclamation of the transitional government in March 1994 Its purpose is lo ensure that Ethiopians abundant water resources are allocated equitably and utilised properly Definitions are given for water resources (surface or ground water), regional water resources, trans-boundary rivers and water works (construction or related works for purposes of water resource development) The lawr requires appropriate authorities (Ministry of Water Resources or Regional Governments) to issue permits to use water resources for defined purposes These purposes include irrigated agriculture, commercial animal rearing commercial fishery development industry and agro*industry, mining, municipal and urban water supply, hydro-electric generation, recreation and tounsm, water transport, any use requiring construction of water works Permits are not required for use of water by peasants, artisanal miners, traditional fishermen and providers of traditional water transport services
applications for permits need to give the volume of water required monthly and annually. Acceptance by the authorities for a determined period will be granted in due time provided the ^plication is not detrimental to the interests of other water users or is not environmentally lannfol or polluting Permits can be amended or transferred and the appropriate authority may 
■evoke or suspend them for failures to observe the terms on which the permit was granted
rov Uion is made for fees to be paid for water permits and for waier charges to be paid
dually tQ appropriate authority. The authorities are responsible for avoiding excessive
e pletion of resources, ensuring sustainable and beneficial use, maintaining a register of water Qs ®’ assigning supervisors to monitor use of water according to the permit conditions.
Utilisation of trans-boundajyr rivers shall be administered according to the provisions oi the Proclamation and international treaties to which Ethiopia is a party The appropriate authority 
consult with the concerned central government organs before issuing water use permits elating to trans-boundary rivers.
TAMS-ULG Biro-Akobo River Baiin Uilegraied Development Master PlusSOCIO-ECONOMICS
ANNEX 3F. INS 111UTIONAL SVPPqRt
The full definition of “trans boundary river" means a river which crosses the Ethiopia boundary and flows into another country “Regional water resources are defined as any Wat - resources existing within a region and includes tributaries of water that flows across or ji^ between more than one National/Regional Self Government Appropriate authority’’ mear|S
(i) the Ministry of Water Resources as regards trans-boundary rivers and water that flo across or lies betw een more than one National/Regional Self Government and (ii) the region^ Bureau of Water, Mines and Energy as regards regional water resources 
Federal and Regional Responsibilities
na]
Under Ethiopia’s new Federal Constitution extensive powers are decentralised from th central (federal) Ministries and Authorities to the Regional (Self) Governments
The legal powers of the Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia under the Constitution defined as
• issuance and enforcement of overall national, economic, social and development policies, strategies and plans
• establishment and enforcement of nation-wide standards, yardsticks and basic criteria for health, education, culture, historical legacies, science and technology'
• enactment of laws for the utilisation and protection of land and natural resources
• construction and upkeep of roads linking two or more states
• development, administration and regulation of postal and telecommunication services
• determination and administration of the utilisation of (i) lake waters existing between the boundaries of two or more states and (ii) trans-state rivers crossing the boundaries of two or more states
• administration and expansion of federally funded institutions and programmes that serve two or more states
The Regional Governments have responsibility for and authority over
• enactment and enforcement of the state’s constitution and other laws,
• establishment of the state's administration and structure,
• formulation and execution of the state’s economic, social and development policies, strategies and plans,
• administration of land and natural resources * in line with applicable federal laws.
• determination and collection of state taxes,
• preparation and administration of state budget,
• enactment of laws governing conditions and emplovmcnt of state’s civil servants.
• maintenance of public order and peace
Note * As stated in the Water Resource Utilisation Proclamation, these natural resources ais include “regional water resources" as defined above.
Participation of communities in development and decentralisation ofadministr Other clauses in the Federal Constitution proside
TAMS-ULG Buro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Master P|aD
3F-4. ?rfO-«COWQMtCS
ANNEX JF. LNSTITtTIONAL SUPPORT
. Citizens have the right to participate in national development and, m panu^ to voice opinions m respect to policies and projects affecting their community [aaic!c 43.2)
. The states shall accord the lowest unit of government such powers as will enable the people to participate directly in their self-administration (article 50 4)
Federal institutions and Interrelationships
proclamation 41/1993 of the Transitional Government defined the powers and duties of the -entral (federal) and regional executive organs Some further reallocation of federal ministry responsibilities took place in the latter half of 1995
The general institutional and administrative framework of the federal ministries and authorities «nd of the regional governments and their local administrations are illustrated diagrammatically by means of the structure shown in Appendix I A 1.
The federal ministries and national authorities, like the regional government administrations, report to the Prime Minister Each Ministry. Authority and Regional Government is autonomous in the sense that it controls its own budget as agreed with the Federal Government Ministers, heads of federal Authorities and the Presidents of Regional Governments, are members of the Council of Ministers meeting regularly under the chairmanship of the Prime Minister, with his deputy Prime Ministers
Ministries
A large number of federal Ministries are involved in policy making for or in monitoring implementation of the developments proposed in the Baro-Akobo Master Plan. The structure and duties of the Ministry of Water Resources are described fully in the next section, some of the other federal agencies closely involved in developments in the basin are described briefly below.
Ministry of Mines and Energy: Formulates policies and strategies for national mining and energy development and. after approval, follows up and supervises implementation Regulates ^d issues licences for prospecting and mining operations. Undertakes studies for the development and use of energy and promotes the growth of the country’s electric energy
Ministry of Agriculture: Formulates national agricultural and land use policies and strategies ^d follows up and supervises implementation. Encourages and assists provision of agricultural extension services to peasant farmers and encourages the provision of agricultural m Puts, agricultural mechanisation and credit services to them Establishes and directs research ^d training establishments to assist agricultural development, provides technical assistance ^d advice to Regional Governments relating to research and dissemination of research * plates the production and distribution of improved seeds and controls seed quality 
Courages the development of agricultural co-operatives and farmer associations In co- °Peration with appropriate organs? encourages agricultural investments, issues agricultural 'Vestment licences and supervises foreign investors engaged in agricultural activities
TAMS-LLG Baro-Akobo River Basin Intetritcd Dnelopnient Master Plan
SF-5SOCIO-ECONOMICS
annex 3F. institutional sup
P0Rt
The Ministry of Agriculture,
-
like the Ministry of Water Resources for water resource,
assumed some of the responsibilities of the Ministry of Natural Resources Development^ Environmental Protection when this latter Ministry was abolished and the new Minister Water Resources (MWR) established. The Ministry of Agriculture assumed the tasks 
issuing ar.d monitoring directives related to protection and administration of the country'' forest and wild life resources, of demarcating and registering national parks, game reserv S and protective forests (in co-operation with Regional Goyemments), of administering natio parks and of providing assistance for forest development
.At present the Ministry of Agriculture (MOA) is organised into six main technical departments These departments cover .Agricultural Development and Crop Protect! Animals and Fisheries, Extension and Co-operative Promotion, Forestry and Wild Lf^ Conservation & Development, Watershed Development and Land Use, Land Use Studies and Rural Technology Development A new structure for the Ministry is currently under consideration and may be introduced in the next fiscal year.
r-ai
As far as irrigated agriculture is concerned MOA deals yvtth small scale schemes while MWR deals with large scale irrigated developments
Ministry of Public Works and Urban Development: Formulates the national construction,
urban development and housing policies and strategies and follows up their implementation
Prepares building codes and construction standards Prepares designs and contract documents 
and supervises and executes government construction financed by central government
Registers and issues letters of competence to engineers and architects and licenses local
contractors and consultants Studies urbanisation patterns, and (at the request of Regional
Governments» has master plans drawn up for urban centres and provides technical assistance
for implementation
Ministry of Health: Formulates the country's public health policies and strategies and supervises implementation Establishes and administers referral hospitals and research centres, determines standards to be maintained by health services, issues licences to non governmental hospitals and clinics and determines qualifications of professional staff
Ministry of Education: Formulates national education policies, facilitates ways and means of expanding education, determines and supervises educational standards, determines the educational curriculum and teaching qualifications Prepares national higher educatior. examinations and establishes higher education institutions, licenses private higher education, establishments and schools established by foreign investors. Provides technical assistance to regions to promote their educational activities.
TaMS-1 LG Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Master Pin0
3F-6^economics
ANKEX3F. INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT
. frv of Economic Development and Co-operation- Thk
Sons of rhe fenrier Mms:™ of Pta™, Ind Ecommi; * oric Cc-ore™ It initiates pohq, proposs]s „ fc
P 7“7 " “ « 
J
e
d
Priorities it
prefarK Jrd Mows
™
of development plans based on national development strategy- and executed bv -entral government It prepares annual consolidated development programmes and supporunz 
ap
ital budget proposal from central government organs for consolation bv the Ministry <
finance into the annual central government budget It evaluates the execution of development ,'ans prepared by bureaux of planning m the Regional Governments It formulates strategies nd takes measures for increasing foreign development aid and loans from international ^ancial and development agencies, countries and non governmental aid organisations It -esotiates and signs foreign aid and loan agreements
Ministry- of Finance. Has powers to prepare and follow up implementation policies and laws ind strategies to be followed by organs of government of central and regional governments Prepares and submits to the Council of Ministers a consolidated annual budget after analysing recurrent budget proposals received from central government organs, capital budget proposals received from the Ministry of (Economic Development and Co-operation) and requests from Regional Governments for budgetary subsidies Administers the approved budget Reports periodically to the Council of Ministers on the central government s financial operation and situation Ensures proper collection of central government revenues as well as common revenues of central and regional governments
Federal Authorities or other National Organisations
A number of Federal Authorities (or other national organisations like Commissions, Organisations or Corporations) will also have responsibilities for setting policy for. planning, jointly implementing or monitoring some aspects of the proposed Baro-Akobo basin developments The more significant of these in terms of project related activities are
Ethiopian Electric Light and Power Authority (EELPA): EELPA is responsible for generating and distributing electrical power nationally Under the new investment code, generation and distribution of electrical energy above an installed capacity of 25 MW is reserved for the state: production and distnbution of electricity below 25 MW installed capacity is now open to domestic investors. EELPA operates the interconnected power distribution network and also operates the major hydropower generating stations installed in pasting dams. The main FFT,PA local headquarters serving the Baro-Akobo basin are at Waliega, Sor and Bonga
E’hiopian Roads Authority (ERA). The authority has primary responsibility for all roads in he country it establishes road standards, plans and designs road improvements and constructs 
maintains roads in the country except in major urban areas For trunk roads and major link r^ads ERA exercises its responsibility direct using consultants and contractors as appropriate
nder the new federal constitution the Regional Governments are now- able to undertake Planning, construction and maintenance of regional road systems themselves within the extent
their own resources without reference to ERA, although ERA would expect to retain some COr,trol over national road standards Ln some Regional Governments a regional agency has
TAMS-ULG Baro-Akobo River Birin Iniegrated Devdopmeiil Master PlanSOCIO-ECONOMICS
ANNEX IF. INSTITUTIONAL SlfP0R
been established to deal with rural roads in the region At present the EKA roads in the R
.Akobo basin are managed and maintained from EKA’s district headquarters at Jimma ° 3r°'
Environment Protection Authority (EPA): This new authority was established in ]at
to assume some of the environmental responsibilities delegated to the former Mini*
Natural Resources Development and Environmental Protection before its dissolution^ authority is now setting up its new structure with a present staffing of some 30 profess^? Z***
federal level The two main operating departments cover environmental protection p |
0
S 31
legislation (policy analysis, legislation analysis and monitoring) and environmental
studies and control (environmental pollution and hazardous wastes manaclniPaC'
environmental impact assessment and monitoring, drought and desertification
ecosystem study) EPA also maintains a co-ordination office of regional environmental aft'
as the regional environmental units of the former MNRDEP no longer exist
Civil Aviation Authority (CAA): administers the air transport sector and plans and supervises construction of airpons in the country. Commercial flight operations at the airnon are presently controlled by Ethiopian .Airlines
Ethiopian Tourist Commission (ETC), is responsible for the overall national tourism policy 
While it does not have a direct connection with the tourism units in the regional
administrations good working relationships are maintained with the regional Industry, Trade
and Tourism bureaux
Ethiopian Wildlife Conservation Organisation (EWCO) This organisation has had a chequered institutional history Originally established in the Ministry of Agriculture it later became part of the Forestry and Wildlife Conservation and Development Authority This was disbanded and the environmental conservation activities were transferred to a main department in the Ministry of .Agriculture Later, with the establishment of the Ministry of Natural Resources Development and Environmental Protection wildlife interests were transferred there ViTien MNRDEP was abolished responsibility for wildlife and forest conservation was returned to the Ministry of Agriculture EWCO is. we understand in the process of being restructured and of revising the draft wildlife policy document and proposals for protected areas with a view to legislation Under the new Federal Regional Government arrangements, regions will be responsible for developing their own wildlife policy
Ethiopian Mineral Resources Development Corporation: This is an autonomous organisation, independent of the government budget, responsible for minerals (including g and tantallerite) exploitation. Investments in the prospecting, exploration and development minerals resources are excluded from the present Investment Code and policies are eve by the Ministry of Mines and Energy for implementation by the corporation.
Federal Institutions and Regional Governments
The overall interrelationships between federal institutions and the regional gc administrations are illustrated in .Appendix I A l The Ministries, Authorities an bu(J?e-
Governments all report to the Prime Minister’s office and have control ovcr tlJ*L
ut o
j nS thus 
once this is agreed by the Council of Ministers and Parhament The federal >ns^e detaile- have no direct control over the operations of the Regional Governments *
IAMS-ULG Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Master
3F-8ANNEX 3F. INSTITmONAl. SUPPORT
of the Regional Government administrative structure is set out in section 1 3
; ; 1 Ministry of Water Resources (MWR)
Organisation of the Ministry
. new Ministry was established in October 1995 to take over the water resource elopment responsibilities of the former Ministry of Natural Resources Development and
Environmental Protection (MNRDEP) MNRDEP itself had absorbed the water resource planning and development functions formerly earned out by the Ethiopian Valleys Development Studies Authority (EVDSA), the National Water Resources Commission (NWRC) and the Water Resources Development Authority fWRDA).
MWR's organisation structure is illustrated in Appendix 1 A.2 Central departments (e g. administration & finance, general services, planning and projects, women's affairs) and services (eg audit, legal, organisation and management training, public relations) report directly to the Minister The principal technical departments (the tasks of which are described
in a following section) report to the Deputy Minister, to whom also report the central technical services (library, laboratory, computer and G1S) and the National Meteorological Service Agency (NMSA).
Responsibility of the Ministry
In the same way as other Ministries listed above, MWR is responsible for formulating national policies and strategies for. and following up implementation of, the country’s water resources development According to its January 1996 letter of sector policy, MWR has powers and duties to determine the conditions and methods required for optimum allocation of and utilisation of water that flows across or lies between more than one regional self-government imong various users and regions including trans boundary water. It initiates the preparation of master plans for development of valleys including undertaking studies relating to water tariffs
^ collection of bulk charges for large scale water supply schemes, dams etc. Its powers and utles also extend to controlling the impact of use of natural resources on the environment and
Preventing water, soil and air pollution
'(irtments
the principal operating departments of MWR are
Or j- -R-MS-Projectj Department It prepares the national water resource policy and co- Policy16] re'evanl government offices and MWR departments to prepare the "Federal Water
imp|eni P pares short, medium and long term plans for the water sector, follows up
re
^etaik ?
e
at 'on’ eva^La’es projects and prepares water tariff studies It prepares and provides 
0 projects covered by Master Plan studies.SOCIO-ECONOMICS
ANNEX 3F. institutional SI pport
ensures that master plan studies take full account of national water and natural resources and socio-economic factors
Trans-Boundarv Rivers Study Department Conducts studies on trans-boundary rivers and ensures that the benefit from such rivers is secured in line with international water use principles, national integrity and advantage
Design. Department Does surveys and designs of water works to be undertaken by federal government and follow's up/supervises work by foreign consultants Monitors environmental impact of designed works Prosides technical support to Regions
Contract Administration Department Prepares estimates, specifications, contracts and tenders for major federal water work construction and monitors construction and installation Develops water works studies and design standards
Waver Rights Administration and Water Utilisation Department Plans rational distribution of water between regions and monitors implementation Issues permits for irrigation and other water use on rivers crossing regional boundanes Monitors water charges, controls bulk water use. controls and monitors safety of dam and irrigation structures Joint research studies into improved water use methods
Water Supply and Sewerage Department (WSSD1 Plans expansion of national water supply and sewerage Recommends water quality standards and sewerage safety standards and monitors installations Develops sanitation and sewage disposal policies Plans implementation of works and provides technical support to regional water supply and sewerage administrations.
1.2.2 Co-ordination Arrangements with other Ministries
The main means of co-ordinating the activities of individual Ministries is through the central executive (the Prime Minister, his deputy Pnme Ministers and the Prime Minister's office) and through the forum of the Council of Ministers The activities of the Ministries and the Regional Governments (reporting to the Prime Minister through the Ministry of Regional Affairs attached to the Prime Minister’s office) are co-ordinated in the same way
In MWR’s Letter of Sector Policy (January 1996) it is recognised that co-ordination among the sector partners in waier resource development has been weak in the past For the future it is intended to improve linkages and co-ordination To this end it is envisaged that MWR will chair and act as secretary for annual consultative forums for governmental sector partners (ether Ministries and organisations) These co-ordination meetings are envisaged as starting next year (1996/1997) and will also provide a mechanism by which appropriate projects can be identified for development and possible support by donors
TAMS-ULG Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Master Plan
3F-10^noJ£ONOMlcs
; Regional institutions
j3 j Local administrations in Baro-Akobo basin
VN>EX 3F
- INSTm;'noNAL support
The boundaries of the Baro-Akobo river basin cover parts of three Regional Government areas (Oromiyi SNNPRG, Benshangul & Gumuz) and the whole of the Gambela Regional Government in all tour regions The new (1996) administrative boundaries have been juperimposed on a GIS map showing the major recommended Master Plan developments idam sites, irrigation schemes and existing roads) This map to a scale of I 1.750,000 forms part of the GIS map album as Irrigation ana Dam Projects - Administrative units of 1996" (Volume -f} An A4 size reproduction of this map appears as Appendix LA 4 in this institutional report
The Baro-Akobo basin encompasses eight zonal administrations of the four resorts these zones cover 48 wereda administrations located in the basin The distribution of the administrative units in the Baro-Akobo watershed are shown in Table 1 on the following page The table is based on the latest available (1996) demarcations and names or zonal and wereda id ministrations
Li.2 Project related structures in regions, zona and weredas
Proclamation 41 1993 defined the powers and duties of the Regional Governments as well as defining those of the Federal Ministries. It also recommended a general structure for the establishment of administrative bureaux in the Regional Government: Regional Governments were given discretion to decide on the actual establishment thought appropriate in local conditions Bureau heads were accountable to the Executive Committee of the Regional Government T he outline structure of a typical Regional Government administration is illustrated in the diagram shown in Appendix I A3
The regional bureaux would normally be grouped under the executive ccmminee into an economic" sector and a “social’’ sector The economic sector might include the agriculture
bureau, the water, mines & energy bureau, the public works and urban planning bureau, the ln dustry, trade and tourism bureau, the transport and communications bureau, the finance bureau, the planning and economic development bureau and the invesiment office The social sector might include the education bureau, the health bureau, the social and labour affairs bureau, culture and information bureau, and the women s affairs bureau
some regions a new "sustainable agricultural resources commission" (or similar title) is being established to plan and supervise implementation of small-scale rural developments deluding such aspects as small irrigation schemes, catchment management projects and ’^proved rural technology In one of the Baro-Akobo regions the small scale irrigation section °f the regional water bureau is being transferred to work within this new organisation with Units from the agricultural bureau
TAMS-ULG Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Master Pl in
3F 11SOCIO-ECONOMICS
ANNEX 3F. TNSTITI TIONAL SUPPqr f
Table 1 Administrative units (Region, zone, wereda) in the Baro-Akobo basin
Region
Zone
Wereda ------
Benshangul & Gumuz
Benshangul & Gumuz
Kurmuk, Komesha", Asosa, Bambasi*^
Begi (B&G)
Oromia
W.Welega
1
Illubabor
Jimma
Begi (O)*, Jtma Chdami. Anfilo,
Hawa Welel, Gawo Dale*, Dale Lalo
Ayra Guliso*. Boji*. Lalo Asabi, Yubdo
Gimbi*, Haru*, Nole Kaba
(14)
Danmu, Supena Sodo. Dcga*, Bure
Metu, Yayu, Chora, Nono, Ale
(9)
Setema*, Sigmo, Gera*
(3)
Gambela Zone 1
Zone 2
Jikawo, hang, Gambela, Abobo
Akobo, Jor, Gog, Godere
.
(4)
(4)
SNNPRG
Keficho & Shekicho
Bench & Maji
1
Masha Anderacha. Gesha, Yeki.Chena* Sheco, Bench. Meinit. Dizi*, Tirmatid
I
(4)
(5)1
Note * denotes wereda with less than 50% of area in Baro-.-ikobo basin.
The duties common to all regional administrative bureaux are to
• prepare and when approved implement plans and budgets,
• ensure implementation of laws, regulations and directives,
• undertake studies and research, collect and compile statistical data, transmit this to the
appropriate central executive organ.
• enter into contracts in accordance with the law
Below the regional administration similar organisational structures exist at t e eve .j
administrative units (zones and weredas) These largely follow the pattern o bureau structures on a smaller scale The powers and duties of executive units ^ ^
at
o arna io
.n
zonal and wereda administration level is determined (generally in line wit p were<ja
41/1993) by the Regional Government The typical outline structure of zon
administrations is also illustrated in Appendix I A 3
Other local government administrative units operate below the tier of v'ere^^a^ ;
Kebele administrations (“wards” in urban areas and formed out of t e^
nS on
( peasant
j serv>cC
Associations in rural areas) administer sections of a wereda. The agricultural ex
is organised with subject matter specialists deployed down to wereda agncu tu ^^gioptnert Below wereda level generalist agricultural extension agents are deploye a ^jed f’r°n'1 centres serving formal farmer groups organised on a kebele basis, or o
I A. IS ULG Baro-Akobo River Bavin Integrated Development Master Pl-i*1
3F-12^cro-ECQNOMtes_______________________ annex jf. k.stiti ho.nal support
iU(VMng sen-ice or producer co-opera^ as „e)| „ infonral w
acific purposes wa the enactment of the new Agricultural Co-operate sX»
.1 well be m future be possmle for eoluntan- fanner groupines to emerge f“
of combined input purchasing or produce marketing
! f 3 yGOs in Project area
Several non Governmental agencies (XGOs) are operating in the Baro-.Akobo basin in the field
o f rural development and humanitarian relief .Among those identified by the study team are
’ ACORD Rural development in Garabela area savings schemes and tools/inputs for
credit
• DED in the Asosa area
• UN High Commission for Refugees Humanitarian relief in the Gambela region
• Sasakawa- GLOBAL 2000 Agricultural extension and inputs for credit in the Oromiya
and Gambela areas
• Menschen fur Menschen Small rural infrastructure in Mctu area
■ Mekane Yesus (Lutheran World Federation) Protected springs and fisheries
Organisational responsibility within the regional administration structure for liaising with NGOs lies with the Disaster Preparedness Office.
1.4 Private Sector Activities
The stated policy of the government is to reduce involvement of the public sector in economic development generally and to encourage a greater role for the private sector in terms of investment and operational economic activities
Ln the large scale agricultural production sector some of the former State Farms which were responsible for major estates producing agricultural crops (particularly coffee, cotton and sugar) are scheduled for privatisation. Some state farms (eg sugar estates) will be retained in government control because of their strategic importance. Some progress has been made: for example the new coffee authority claimed recently that nearly half of last year s coffee expons tad come from private coffee exporters In the agricultural input service sector too some Progress has been made Major donor supported projects are in progress for fertilisers and s eeds? under which the commercialisation of the principal state operating enterprises ("National fertiliser Industry Agency and Ethiopian Seeds Enterprise) is being assisted and under which Le involvement of private distribution companies on equal terms with state organisations is being encouraged At present however the private sector plays a small role in agricultural and *ater resource development in the Baro-Akobo basin
1<s International Funding
•Jtore thar. two thirds of the developing world’s money comes from official development ] nance sources - ihe international financial institutions. Some of this money goes lOwarcs 
lengthening weak economies and financing imports, but the majority is destined or projwvt W °rk in recipient countries. The sources of finance for developing countries have been
TAMS-LTG Baro-Akobo River Basin In Iterated Development Master PlanSOCIO-ECONOMICS
ANNEX 3F. INSTITUTIONAL SLPpqrt
steadily shrinking during the past 10 years which has resulted in the traditional mainstays of development finance playing a more prominent role The multilateral and bilateral institutions that supplied only one third of the developing world s total money at the beginning of the 1980s now provide more than two thirds
The development financiers have arisen from a variety of motivations The most basic are the bilateral aid agencies which administer aid that is funded directly from donor government budgets The UN family of agencies grew from the same sentiments as the bilaterals, but extended the grant concept into specialised agencies with multilateral objectives The concept of the multilateral development banks (MDB) grew from the need to mobilise larger capita] flows than could be generated solely from donor sources The World Bank and the regional MDBs leverage donor contributions with commercial capital borrowed on world markets to use both the credit rating and the seed capital of sovereign members to build the larger capital resources needed for major development programmes
The development funds grew out of the need to recycle capital generated from the oil boom of
the 1970s. the Japanese resurgence of the 1980s and other political pressures International
funds provide loans on concessional terms often with a various conditions attached The
multilateral development agencies have consolidated in recent years to absorb one quarter of
total aid from the industrialised donors This multilateral market is only half the size of the
bilateral consultancy market, the bilateral programmes operated by the OECD donor countries 
devoting approximately 25% of their expenditure to technical assistance activities
.Aid comes from various sources - the multilateral development banks such as the World Bank,
the .African Development Bank, the Asian Development Bank to name some of the major
institutions, from multilateral aid programmes such as the EC funds, the Commonwealth funds 
etc Each of these Banks and agencies has different rules governing the terms of loans, credits,
grants etc
The World Bank, for example, has two institutions that provide both financial and technical assistance to developing countries to stimulate economic development, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) and the International Development .Association (IDA) The IBRD lends funds most of which are raised through the sale of AAA-rated bonds in international capital markets, to creditworthy countries or their agencies, generally for specific development projects Financing provided by the IBRD is at variable interest rates set at half a percentage point above its average cost of borrowing, and amortisation is over usually twenty years or less, including a grace period IBRD loans must be made to, or guaranteed by, the government of the borrowing country IDA credits are made to countries that are not sufficiently creditworthy for IBRD financing or to those that cannot afford to obtain al! the requirements on IBRD financing terms IDA credits, made only to governments, are for fifty years at no interest but which applv some small service charges. There is also the International Finance Corporation (IFC) which is part of the World Bank The IFC le^s directly to private or mixed enterprises for projects that assist local industries Unlike
and IDA, the IFC provides loans without government guarantee and it can only take positions in private companies Projects'receiving IBRD loans or IDA credits must technically and financially sound, produce acceptable rates of return and contribute to
country’s economic growth and development
TAMS-ULG Baro-.Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Master ’lan
3F -14
fa ul
-
,Project Loan - discrete investments aimed at creating specific productive assets or increasing
]de ntifiable outputs
Unes Of Credit - funds channelled through national or sub-regional development institutions ainwd at financing a number of specific projects, most frequently small and medrum sized
enterprises
Secior Investment and Rehabilitation Loans - investments aimed at stremzlheninc or rehabilitating sector specific planning, production or marketing capabilities: often used to finance imports of equipment or inputs for the sector
Sector Adjustment Loans - credit aimed at supporting policy changes or institutional reforms ir. a specific sector
Structural Adjustment Loans - credit aimed a; overcoming specific macro-economic policy problems and structural imbalances.
Technical Assistance Operations - loans or giants that provide expertise aimed at increasing
capabilities of regional or national institutions or that finance studies needed for project
preparation.
The terms of AfDB eroup for "soft" and “hard" loans are varied and may change in the future, for hard loans interest rates are variable, repayment period is normally 20 years including a ^a<ce period of 5 years maximum and the commitment charge on the undrsbursed balance is 1%. However, for the African Development Fund, the terms for the soft loans are slightly different. There is no interest charged, buL there is a service charge of 0.75% and the "payment period is normally 50 years including a 10 year grace period For TAA loans, studies carry a 50 years repayment period including a 10 year grace period which can be '^tended to 45 years if the siudv does not lead to a bankable project Lines of credit give a -0 1 'car ^payable period including a 5 year grace period
TAMS-ULG Baro-Akobo River Basic Lilesrared Dcidopmcni Mister Plan
3F-15SOCIO-ECONOMICS
annex 3F. institutional supp
Ort
2. MANAGEMENT ASPECTS OF PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION
2.1 Proposed Project Interventions and Possible Timescale
Implementation of the interventions proposed in the Baro-Akobo River Basin Master Pl study involves a large number of individual projects spread over a wide ranne of econ sectors and over a 40 year planning horizon For institutional development and management purposes the recommended development scenario (Scenario V in chapter 4 of Volume Ilh has been taken as a model
The main areas of proposed intervention are
- Dams for Hydropower and associated transmission lines - Geba Al & A2
-Baro A2 & Al - Gumero
- Catchment Management and Reforestation (including forest inventory and forestry)
'
- Dams and Large-scale Irrigation schemes
- Alwero/Abobo
- Alwero L & R bank
- Rainfed Agriculture Support
- Coffee Improvement
- Water Supply
- Towns Water
- Rural Water
- Major and minor Road Works
These interventions include the phased development over the whole planning period of major capital works (such as dams, hydropower plant and lines, large-scale irrigation schemes, towns' water supply schemes and roadworks in the basin) Most of these require further pre feasibility and/or feasibility study before implementation The large-scale investments are likely to need significant elements of external financing The second category of interventions includes projects of a less capital-intensive rural development nature, which can be started more immediately and which will be mainly implemented by local institutions These include catchment management and reforestation, rainfed agricultural improvement, coffee improvement and (possibly) rural water supply In addition to these two categories of project the Master Plan Study (which was mainly based on old data derived from the two previous 
soils and
surveys)
t ie 5
basin consulting studies) has identified a number of areas (c g topographical survey, water quality, forest inventory’, other socio-economic or environmental baseline
where detailed basin wide studies need to be completed in the short term
The management of implementation of the proposed basin developments proposed in * therefore needs to take account both of the two different categories of projects to implemented and of the different timescale for implementation of the two va^ego project
TAMS-ULG Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Master Pl a®
3F-16^ECONOMICS
ANNEX 3F. INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT
General Institutional Issues
iJ-
1ir plementatitJn of the Baro-Akobo Basin Master Plan developments will raise a number of Scy issues which are applicable not only to this one basin but are also relevant to other or ah £ ver Basin developments Some of these general policy issues are considered below
, ? / International Implications
Thrcc of the Ethiopian River Basins (Abbay, Tekeze and Baro-Akobo) form part of the River \"jc water system and thus have particularly sensitive international implications for Ethiopia's relations with downstream riparians. On the one hand Ethiopia has a duty in international law , 0 inform downstream riparians of proposed developments and possible water utilisation affecting the outflow of water beyond the Ethiopian borders It will, assuming that ar. improved regional co-operative framework begins to take shape, wish to ensure that adequate Ethiopian basin water management arrangements are in place to ensure effective control and monitoring of water flows, water quality and environmental impact On the other hand the international nature of the Baro-Akobo and other “trans-boundary” waters means that the special provisions of the Water Resources Utilisation Proclamation concerning the relative responsibilities of the federal and regional Governments will have to be observed in any project implementation institutional proposals made
12.2 Water Legislation
Proclamation 92/1994 is slightly ambiguous about the distinction between "regional water resources”, which are within the authority of the Regional Government if lying within a region or are tributaries of water flowing across regional boundaries, and ‘ trans-boundary- waters or water flowing across more than one regional boundary, which is under the authority of the Federal Government There may be a need io clarify these definitions, although for purposes of the overall Baro-Akobo basin waler resources developments the legislation appears to indicate that the river basin water system is ‘trans boundary’’ (or international) waters and that the main rivers cross more than one regional boundary On this reading the implementation of the Baro-Akobo river basin system is a matter under Federal authority'
Other clauses in the Proclamation relating to the issue of permits to use water, to the Principles of paying charges for water used and for the control of potential polluting discharges appear to provide a sound basis for management of the water resources in the basin
Cost Recovery
ri general consensus appears to be emerging that water is a valuable commodity and that ^ atcr users should progressively be expected to pay part (or all) of the costs of its use This principle appears to be reflected in the acceptance within Ethiopia of the need for tariffs to he bylined and recommended nationally both for pouble water users and for large scale
cultural, agro-industrial or industrial users
the case of major water resource development works the issues of effective supervision of instruction and specialised operation and maintenance of the major structures (dams or main lst ribution canals) after construction is of particular importance The growing trend is for the
TAMS-ITLG Baro-Akobo River Busin Integrated Development Mailer Plnn
if - rSOCIO-ECONOMICS
ANNEX 3F. INSTITUTIONAL SUPP R
ot
construction of such works to be supervised and subsequent operation and maintenance of h
finished works to be assured by an organisation which can recover charges from water users 
and retain sufficient sums from this recovery to pay for professional operation and
maintenance of the water system The same principle would extend to water users within
irrigation scheme The costs of operating and maintaining the local field distribution system
w'orks might be assured by a water users association who would recover the reasonable
of doing so from the individual irrigated plot holders
2.2.4 Role of the Private Sector
VkTule private sector activities are at present quite limited in the basin, a number of future opportunities cart if continued governmental policy support for private enterprise development is forthcoming, be envisaged
Investment Opportunities
In terms of attracting domestic, joint venture or foreign private investment in larec scale developments the possibilities are
• commercial estate farming on large irrigated schemes in the lower basin Under former policies such large-scale developments were exploited by state farms With some exceptions these are now being commercialised and, when convened into joint stock (shareholding) companies it may be possible to attract new investment from private investors and. if profitable, from government funds In the longer term it may be possible to envisage private investors entering into commercial ventures on new irrigated land.
estate farming (coffee, tea other crops) on rainfed land in the upper basin Similar comments apply to this category although the investment may be smaller and the time scale for private participation.
construction, operation and maintenance of major water resource development works It is likely for some time yet that the investment in major water works (e g dams, hydro-power plant and lines, mam distribution canals) will have to be made by the state with financing assistance from international development agencies In circumstances where there is scope for rapid financial returns, private investment has been attracted into the construction of works such as hydro-power dams or toll road bridges on condition that the investment can be repaid out of profits to be made from the subsequent operation and maintenance contract It is unlikely that these conditions would be met in the Baro-Akobo basin Two possible options could be considered in
the long term Firstly it might be that EELPA, if in future organised to operate as a self-supporting power utility independent of government subsidy, would be prepared to
justify an investment against its own resources in electro-mechanical plant and distribution lines on the basis of an economic cost of electricity generation into its national or local power system Secondly, it might be possible to attract private investment by way of working capital from an enterprise willing to take on a management contract for operation and maintenance of the basin water system In t case the state would continue to own the capital works which would be operated on it-' behalf by a private operator under contract
Other areas of opportunity, especially for domestic private investors, will lie in the smaii sca^ agro-industrial processing sector, in agricultural input senices, in rural technology an s
1 AMSTjLG Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Master Plan
3F-18, supp0RT
. machinery and in the storage, processing and marketina rtf ,« ■ i .
>^0.
government has introduced a new investment code (Investment Proclamation 37/1996 of <S June 1996). This replaces the previous investment code enacted under proclamation ; 5.1092 and introduces some improved concessions for domestic investors. The code does not apply to investments in prospecting, exploration and development of minerals and petroleum Jesource5 and continues to reserve certain areas for the government (e.g, large scale production of electrical energy), for domestic investors (e g various trades in agricultural and aiitrial products, saw milling, grain milling) and for joint ventures (e g. engineering industries ind fertilisers) It establishes a new administrative structure for investment Under an Investment Board, the Ethiopian Investment Authority - an autonomous public institution - u-Jl provide one-stop services for promotion, registration and licensing of investments Regional investment organs (investment organs) will be established in the Regional Governments. The responsibility for allocating land for investment activities however rests with the Regional governments, who are required to deliver the required land within 60 days
For purposes of agricultural investment the terms and security on which land is made available is probably more important than the investment exemptions on payment of duties, tax. research and development and remittance of funds which are contained in the code The present basis of offering the use of agricultural land for terms of eight years will be quite unacceptable to any investor who is expected to make a serious investment in land improvements, capital buildings or field irrigation systems. This issue will require careful attention by national policy makers and regional investment offices If commercial investors are to be attracted to the project area for the large scale irrigation schemes a minimum iencession period with assured land and water use of 40 vears would seem to be necessary'. The local investment offices in Regional Government administrations should, at the time of negotiating with potential agricultural sector investors, have authority to offer suitable areas of land on appropriate lengths of lease.
Domestic investment in agricultural services and agro-precessing also will be facilitated by the ^tablishment of the new agricultural service and producer co-operatives operating on a commercialised basis. In these cases, too. it will be important that these organisations can have icce$s to credit or capital against the security of their land or buildings as collateral
*' ’ J Co-ordination Arrangements
Co-ordination of the implementation of the proposed Master Plan developments is particularly implex because of the complications posed by the following factors:
the contrast between implementing many multi-sectoral and rural development p, ejects and implementing a one sectoral major water system development,
the fact that this study refers only to one river basin (Baro-Akobo) while the principles for implementation here should also be applicable io other aver basms,
the basin contains two rivers of international importance and its management the. involves national relationships with other riparian states.
TAMS ULG Baro-Akobo River Basin lnlegr»««> Development Master Plan
3F - 19
haV£ b"" i<l'nt“i'd fOT
feXSi
2SOCIO ECONOMICS
ANNEX 3F. INSTITUTIONAL SUPPort
• the fact that the overall programme may need to be co-ordinated on a federal basis while most of the individual projects will actually be implemented by one or other (or all ) of the four Regional Governments involved
• the need to distinguish between the activities to be carried out and co-ordinated in the short term and the major water works to be constructed in the medium and lonu term
In making proposals for institutional arrangements an attempt has been made to balance these various factors In chapter 3 a process of institutional development is suggested which cou d la) provide for a co-ordination mechanism in the initial phases to integrate both the federal and regional interests and (b) form the basis for establishing an effective water management unit for construction and operation of the major water works
2.2.6 Structure for Financing
The proposed institutional arrangements will also need to provide a firm basis for possible financing by external support agencies (international donors) from whom the Government of Ethiopia may wish to seek assistance both during the initial study and planning phase and for construction of major works
One of the principal concerns of the donors will be to ensure that any loans made by them for the construction of major capital works can be clearly identified with the project involved and that, by means of cost recovery from users, some revenues will be secured to ensure effective maintenance of the assets and a contribution to Government s service of the Ioan Where major dam or irrigation schemes are concerned donors are often sensitive to issues involving resettlement and environmental impact: assurances will usually be sought that adequate attention will be given to the planning of mitigating measures on these aspects Provision for institutional development by strengthening the capacity and human resources of existing organisations and by the progressive build - up of new’ institutions will normally be welcomed So too will be the involvement of private sector investors and enterprises together with the progressive withdrawal of national and regional government agencies from economic operations
The institutional proposals made in chapter 3 seek to provide for an implementation structure that will, as far as possible, meet the likely requirements of external funding agencies.
2.3 Immediate Issues
The issues discussed in section 2 2 above are primarily concerned with longer-term issues national policy There are also specific short-term issues related to implementation ot I c proposed project developments
2.3.1 (lambda Region
AJone of the four new Regional Governments involved with implementation of the
Baro-Akobo master plan developments, the boundaries of Gambela region (and ®
zones of w’hich it is now composed) fall completely within the one river basin The ^8
distant from the main centres its road and general social infrastructure is relative
developed The region has also been the recipient of influxes of people from over the n
IAMS-ULG Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Master Plan
3T - 20^OClO^CONOMieS____________________________ ANNEX 3F. INSTm-TIONAL SUPPORT
W1ir>dan and from other regions of Ethiopia in the recent past: it still accommodates iarSe
U"5 of re??“S ft°m
l &a"’ hela h“ “ >«
the te-oteanisadonZ
(,-staffinS °f l,s r=8>onal. zonal and wereda administrations Under the proposed basin development master p an a number of major projects will be implemented in Gambela Rational Qovernment (l e large-scale irrigation schemes, national parks and wild life conservation possible join: venture tourism projects)
proposals for the strengthening of the administrative capacity in Gambeia’s two zonal administrations are therefore thought necessary and form part of ihe institutional support proposals made later
212
4/wcw Irrigation scheme
Development of the irrigation scheme downstream of the now finally completed Abobo dam in Gambela region is proposed for early implementation under the proposed basin development. The irrigation scheme on 10,400 net hectares was originally designed to be operated in a number of large-scale irrigation blocks by State Farms Current policy does not favour the use of state owned farms for exploitation of such schemes. No alternative operator is immediately available The time scale for attracting private investors, if this is the preferred approach, will be extensive. They will need assurances about security of land tenure, definition of responsibilities for the provision of suitable road and social infrastructure, staff housing and will wish to make their own detailed surveys before making any firm commitment to invest. If small-scale irrigators are to be involved arrangements should be considered soon for possible alterations to field designs and to the establishing appropriate water users groups to operate such schemes.
23.3 Cfl/cfrme/tf
rain fed agricultural developments in the upper basin
As part of the proposed master plan developments, early priority was to be given to the improvement of catchment management activities such as reforestation, soil and water conservation approaches in the upper basin. Priority was also attached io the intensification of tain fed agricultural activities in the upper basin For institutional purposes these activities are expected to be implemented primarily under the direction of regional agricultural bureaux by [ he staff in relevant zonal and wereda administrations. Some support would be provided by sniall-scale irrigation departments of the water mines and energy bureaux and departments. In some regions the creation of a special "Sustainable .Agricultural Resources Commission’1 (combining the irrigation and catchment expertise of both sectors) may provide a focal point
co-ordinating the priority actions proposed by the master plan study
^"hile no specific institutional support is proposed for the local implementation agencies, proposals are made for the co-ordination structures to help integrate regional planning and lengthen imps ementation capacity of basin wide improvement projects in this field, The
^°^ ion
s
of necessary inputs for these activities has however been allowed for and costed in
e dividual project and economic appendices.
* • 4waren ess awd consultation
? discussions with the planning bureaux of Regional Governments, interest was expressed in Proposals generated by the Master Plan study Planning officers would welcome access to
TAMS-ULG BaroAkobo River Bzsin Laiegraied Development Master PlanSOCIO-ECONOMICS
ANNEX 3F. INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT
the emerging master plan repo s as 
thev became available for publication and circulation This including basin proposals in their own and
would enable early consideration »* ajsQ assisl in the co-ordination of regional
X'XVrb"institutional proposals ns.de for basin-unde co-ordination in
the next chapter.
. .^nation of local communities in the overall development of basin
The involvement and participat
projects should also be const er
Provision is thus made for financial held b regional administrations with
* peered by major basin des-eiopnrenrs
TAMS-ULG Biro-Ako bo River Basin Integrated Development Master Plan
3F - 22□ClO-ECONOMICS
AWE 3F. KSTTTITIONAL SITPORT
INSTITC1105AL ARRANGEMENTS FOR PROJECT 3j Project Implementation at Federal and Regional Level
IMPLEMENTATION
As discussed in section 22.2 a reading of Proclamation 92/1994 suggests that implementation of the overall Bare Akobo River Basin Master Plan - if regarded primarily as a question of developing the basin water resources and catchment area - should be a manor within the authority of the Federal Government Many of the projects, especially the proposed rural development projects, will actually be implemented and subsequently operated by the four Regional Governments involved. The initial stages of basin development planning and integrated programme initiation should however be co-ordinated under federal authority for the basin as a whole. But at the same time the four Regional Governments should be fully involved in planning and initiating the activities which will be earned out in their individual region We believe therefore that there is role for a basin co-ordinating mechanism during the initial stages of implementation of the Baro-Akobo basin Master Plan This unit could be physically located in the basin area and would report to the Federal Government, with sub units al each Regional Government.
The conclusions reached in the Organisation and Management report of the Omo-Gibe River Basin Development Master Plan Study differed slightly in emphasis from the conclusion above for the Baro-Akobo basin The Omo-Gibe study did propose a Master Plan co-ordinating unit reporting to the federal Council of Ministers, with regional co-ordinating sub-units It did not take account of the international (trans-boundary) nature of the basin water system and concluded (a) that there was no case for any basin wide organisation responsible for implementing the Master Plan and (ii) that implementation and management of all developments should be the responsibility of the individual Regional Governments
The situation in the Baro-Akobo basin is slightly more complex in that its trans boundary river systems form part of the Nile Basin and its basin area falls within four different Regional Governments For this reason there is a need - as in Omo-Gibe - for a basin co-ordination mechanism in the initial stages of planning and initiating the Master Plan developments More importantly the consultants for the Baro-Akobo study believe that there should be a basin 'vater management organisation for the purpose of dedicated planning, financing, construction, deration and maintenance of the major basin water resources development works Because ^his involves an “intemationar’ or trans boundary' river system, because the rivers cross more than one regional boundary and because financing of the major water works construction u ould need to be financed and guaranteed through the national government it is thought right ^hat such a unit should report to the Federal authorities
Role for Basin Co-ordinating/Management Unit - Short and medium term
The timescale for implementation of the proposed Master Plan interventions was described in Se ctfon 2 I Two different phases of activity were identified The first phase of implementation
TAMS-ULG Baro-Akobo River Baiin Integrated Development Muter PlanSOCIO-ECONOMICS
ANNEX 3F. INSTITUTIONAL SUPpqrt
involves the carrying out of detailed basin wide studies to update earlier technical studies and to provide baseline data for monitoring and evaluation purposes. During this first stage too t would be necessary to integrate the basin and regional planning for the initial multi-sectoral development projects and to initiate early implementation by the appropriate regional, zonal and wereda administrations of the projects in their areas
Role for Basin Co-ordinating Unit
The role for a basin co-ordinating unit during the first stage would be
• to provide a central point for integrating the Master Plan basin developments with the plans of the individual regions
• to initiate the necessary basin wide studies, passing these as appropriate to regions for implementation and collating the data received on a basin wide basis,
• to provide a focus for promoting infrastructural development and investment in the basin and for raising finance for basin wide developments
• to channel technical and financing support to the regional implementing agencies so as to build up their capacity to implement future basin and regional developments
• to provide a specialised basin water resources section to commence planning and detailed water resource and pre-construction studies for future basin system water works and at a lateT stage, to develop into the dedicated basin water management body proposed below
The second phase of development would involve (a) the commencement of construction of major water works (e g dams, irrigation and hydropower schemes and main distribution systems) and (b) the continuation of multi-sectoral developments in the regions During this phase the multi-sectoral role of the phase 1 basin co-ordinating unit would reduce and implementation activities could be taken over by the Regional Governments with co-ordination on basin wide issues being maintained by the regional cells of the former basin co-ordinating unit The specialised water resources activities of the basin co-ordinating unit however should continue and be absorbed into a new basin water management organisation
Role of Basin Water Management Body
The role of the basin water management unit during the second phase of implementation would be
• to prepare terms of reference for and commission feasibility and other studies preparatory to construction of major water works
• to supervise on behalf of government construction works for major basin water system works being earned out by contractors
• to prepare plans and budgets for subsequent operation and maintenance by itself ot completed constructions
• to undertake responsibility for overall management of the basin water resources and bulk water distribution system
• to recover (according to tariffs established by government) charges from major users for water consumed
TAMS-ULG Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Master Plan
3F-24gOClO-ECONOMJCS
ANNEX 3F. I5STTTLTIOXAL SI PPORT
j 3 Proposed Institutional
Arrangenients
Following discussions with
Ministry of Water
Resources departments and planning, water and
agriculture bureaux of two Regional Governments, provisional diagrams of possible structures for implementing the mulLi-sectoral and water resource developments proposed in the Baro- AXobo river basin Master Plan have been prepared
jjj Assumptions
Two main assumptions have been made
] RQgional_and_Federa]_Responiibuities Four different Regional Governments will have primary responsibility for implementing the multi-sectoral developments fe g. rain fed agriculture, catchment improvement, urban and rural water supply, roads) in their pan of the basin The major water resource developments (dams for hydropower, large irrigation schemes) involve trans - boundary' nvers (“international waters”) flowing across more than one regional government. Co-ordination of the project is thus treated as a federal responsibility but with the fxill involvement of and support to the regions involved
2. Institutional development in two stages Phase_1 - say the Erst five years - is concerned with co-ordination of plans for the basin, preliminary basin studies and short term implementation both of multi-sectoral rural development projects and of preparation for specific water works developments in the basin A basin level Programme Co-ordinating Unit (PCU) is proposed with sub units in each of the four regional government administrations involved Technical assistance, funds for studies and training would be directed (as required) to the regional governments for implementation and as a means of strengthening local capacity At the same time specific funds for water resource development could be directed to preparation of feasibility studies and preparatory works for later construction.
For Phase 2 - the design, construction and operation of major water resource works - the establishment of an autonomous Baro-Akobo Basin Water Management Authority is proposed This would be responsible for supervising construction of major water works, for operating and for maintaining the basin water system It would operate on a basis of cost recovery by receiving payments for water charges from the major water users It would telain monies to cover its approved costs of operation and maintenance of the capital works and pass the surplus on to government to cover the cost of debt service for the works Regional governments would be represented on its board of management and would also receive taxes, fevenue from permits etc from water using projects'enterprises in their area
J. J. 2 Organisation Structures
Two provisional organisation charts are attached. The first (Appendix I B 1) indicates the structure and relationships of the proposed Project Co-ordinating Unit (PCU) to operate during the first stage of implementation (basin planning co-ordination, initial studies and rural development project implementation).
The second chart (Appendix 1 B2) shows the proposed structure and cost recovery Mechanisms for the proposed Basin Water Management Authority io be fanned far the second
TAMS-ULG Bare-A kobo River Basin integrated Development Master Plan
3F-2SSOCIO-ECONOMICS
ANNEX 3F. INSTITUTIONAL SUppQRT
Stage of implementation (design, construction and operation of major water works in the basin system It is expected that this “Board" would be formed from the staff and expertise developed in the water development section of the original Phase 1 PCU The "Board” would operate on commercialised lines and might, in the long run be considered as an option for privatisation, e g. by way of a management contract
3.4. Institutional Options
A number of organisational options were considered before recommending the preferred institutional structure above Some of the options considered were
(a) Instead of establishing a Board of Management for the proposed Baro-Akobo River Basin PCU and Water Management Board (and presumably - if the same principle is generally applied - another board for each of the other individual river basins) one overall directing board at federal level might be set up for all basins
(b) Instead of adopting a phased approach to the process of Master Plan implementation with a different type of institution in each phase, one dual-purpose co-ordinating and management unit might be established from the start
(c) The presently proposed arrangements assume that the programme will be implemented under Federal control. If it were decided to treat implementation of the basin wide Master Plan developments as a Regional matter the proposed Board of Management (both of the proposed PCU and the Water Management Board) might be constituted from representatives of and financed from the budgets of the four regions concerned
(d) The proposed status and title (e g Board, Commission. Steering Committee) and the proposed membership of the bodies directing the policy and operations of the suggested PCU and W'ater Management Unit are only indicative anc could be reviewed by the government in line with current practice in Ethiopia
The reasons for and assumptions made in recommending the institutional arrangements in section 3.3 above have been given earlier For option (a) above this study is concerned only 
with the Baro-Akobo basin W hen more basin studies are completed
r
it may be appropriate to
consider one overall body to co-ordinate and prioritise all basin and trans boundary river developments The concept of phased project implementation is taken as a basic assumption and so option (b) has not been favoured for that reason Option (c) depends on policy decisions: for purposes of this report it is assumed that the project would be under federal control. The option of changing the status and titles of the proposed units (option d) is also a matter of choice by government but the titles used are meant to indicate the preferred type an status of the different institutional units
3.5 Institutional Structure and Project Financing
The institutional arrangements proposed are thought io offer clear lines of project financing The proposed Programme Co-ordinating Unit would, as suggested, provide a c^*.n^asin which support could be prosided during programme inception for multi-sectoral an
TAMS-ULG Baro-Akobo River Bavin Integrated Development Master Plan
3F-26■ Ot-|Q-ECO?<OM<CS
ANNEX 3F. INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT
wide studies and for Piding technical assistance and training to regional implementing
org
anisan ns for capacity bu.ld.ng purposes. It also p^des 
0
a mecte^’ ]n
pC U‘s proposed XX ater Development Section - for water sector fUnds to be directed from federal sources tor the specific P^ming and initial preparation of foe major basin water system works This would enable MXX R to direct government and possible donor financing for parity basin water resource development to the Basin PCU
When major water works developments are considered for financing by government and donors, it is likely tlial a Prior condition will be made that there should be an effective institution in place to manage the pre-construction activity, to supervise construction and assume responsibility for operating and maintaining the structures. It will also be expected that a system of recovering some part of the costs of construction and operation from water users will be in place. 1 he proposed Baro-Akobo Basin Water Management Authority can provide dedicated professional management of the major works and the overall basin water system. The proposed cost recovery procedures are envisaged as follows:
• The principle is that water users should pay for the use of water consumed and be responsible for preventing pollution or using water inefficiently
• The dedicated basin water management authority acts as the agent of government in supervising construction of major water works system and subsequently ensuring efficient operation and maintenance of the system so as to optimise resource utilisation and assure water quality
• The basin water management authority recovers charges for supplying water under controlled conditions to the major water users who are able to pay a commercial price for its use Special dispensations may apply to peasant users, such as small scale irrigators, artisanal fisheries, small water consumers)
• The basin water management authority budgets for the necessary cost of efficient operation and maintenance activities: once the budget is approved the authority may retain the cost of operation and maintenance The surplus is passed to central government for service of the capital expenditure (government investment or foreign loans) made in the basin system
• Regional governments retain the taxes, income from permits, penalties arising from water use activities in their region
• The basin water management authority' acts as supplier of water at "wholesale * level, i.e up to the point of intake and measurement by the major water user. Water losses and the cost of focal water distribution after that point are home by the user.
^■6 Implementation at Basin. Regional and Field Level
Other than the planning, construction, operation and maintenance of the major water works in l ^e basin which would be the responsibility' °f proposed Basin Water Management Authority, most of the other projects will be implemented by the existing regional, zonal and ^ereda administrations or the regional branches of the appropriate Authority. The agncultural ^tension services will provide the main channel of comniunication with local groups involved lf| the various rural development project activities.
TAMS-ULG Baro-Akobo River Basin lntegriied Development Mauer PlanSOCIO-ECONOMICS
ANNEX 3F. INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT
3 6.1 Implementation of Principal Project Interventions
Referring to the principal basin development interventions proposed in the Baro-Akobo basin Master Plan (sec section 2 1) implementation responsibilities are expected to be as follows
Dams for Hydropower
Initial studies would be commissioned by Water Development Section of the proposed Programme Co-ordinating Unit (PCU) The Basin Water Management Authority (BWMA) would be established to supervise preparation of structural designs and to liaise with EELPa concerning hydro power plant and transmission lines The role of BWMA is to act on behalf of government as owner of the works (e g in the French expression as maitre d'oeuvre) while a retained consulting engineer retained by BWMA (e g maitre douvrage) would supervise the contractors constructing the dam
Major Irrigation schemes
Initial studies would be commissioned by the Water Development Section of the PCU in collaboration, through the Regional PCU cell, with the water and agricultural bureaux concerned. The PCU would co-ordinate the involvement of private commercial investors, on terms agreed by the national and regional Investment Offices, with the regional administration The PCU (later the BWMA) negotiates water supply agreements with large scale user and also liaises with regional bureaux on the creation of water user associations for smallholder irrigated agriculture The PCU Water Section (later the BWMA) supervises preparation of structural designs and supervises construction of major works generally as above
Catchment Management and Reforestation
PCU through regional PCU cells liaises with regional planning bureaux (and - if appropriate - with regional “Sustainable Agricultural Resources Commissions”) in the planning stage for subsequent implementation by regional agriculture and water bureaux
Rainfed Agriculture and Coffee Improvement
PCU through regional PCU cells liaises with regional planning and agriculture bureaux during planning stage: implementation by the regional agriculture bureaux and local agricultural extension services.
Town and Rural Water Supply
PCU liaises with the regional planning and water bureaux in the planning stage. Implementation done by the regional water bureaux and/or local water departments with the use (where appropriate) of private regional contractors operating to national water supply and sewerage construction standards
noam
PCU liaises with the Ethiopian Roads Authority in case of main roads and PCU region with planning bureaux and local regional roads agencies where applicable in regional or local roads during planning stage. Implementation is earned out by regional roads agency with the use (where appropriate) of road contractors operating approved national road construction standards
. . ..
TAMS-ULG Baro-Akobo Riser Basin Integrated Development Master Plan
3F-28^.O-ECOW^
ANNEX IF. INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT
6 2 Community Participation
0 |vement of arid consultation with local communities during initial planning and The in> nt implementation of the proposed basin developments will be the responsibility of subset oriate regional, zonal, wereda and kebcie administrations. Participation of rural tltf aPP . wl;j be facilitated by the local agricultural extension services working in
y)niniun• ’
farmer associations, co-operatives and other groups. It is proposed that
collar0 i|iroUgb jts regional PCU cells, make available some funds to facilitate the holding of the " and workshops for purposes of increasing community participation in the Baro- jXbasinMaster Plan development
Community participation is seen as being especially suitable of the lower capital cost projects ac terracing, reforestation, i urai road maintenance and rural water supply However even
>rtth the more capital intensive schemes active participation may be encouraged by suitable
•ontract packaging and by rhe consideration on the pan of the designers, of alktcmative ^ur-intensive techniques of construction, which might also bong the added benefit of minimising the foreign cost component
TAMS-ULG Bano-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Master Plan
SF-29SOCIO-ECONOMICS
ANNEX 3F. INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT
4. INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT
Institutional support is often prosided for purposes of strengthening the capacity of existing institutions and for the institutional development of new organisations Typically the elements in an institutional support programme are
• Technical assistance to provide - on a temporary basis - specialist technical expertise to supplement the skills available in country
• Training of local staff in new skills and techniques
• Financial assistance for improving the logistical capacity of the existing or new
institutions (e g. office equipment, transport, communications etc )
• Contributions to the cost of necessary studies
4.1 Support at National. Basin, Regional and Local Level
In order to assist existing and proposed new institutions in implementing the Baro-Akobo Master Plan it is proposed to provide institutional support at national or basin level, at Regional Government level and (in selected cases) at zonal level
It is proposed to provide support in the establishment and first five years operation of the Basin Programme Co-ordinating unit (PCU) The central unit would be supported at Basin or, if not actually located within the basin, at national level Support would also be provided to sub-units of the PCU - PCU Regional Cells - to be located within the four Regional Government administrations Special support would be provided in the Gambela Regional Government, where two PCU Zonal Cells would be located in the two zonal administrations Apart from this organisational support, funds are also provided for staff training at all levels (including the training of members of local water users and farmer groups) and for awareness seminars for community' representatives throughout the basin Funds will also be provided for carrying out basin wide technical and baseline studies through the appropriate regional or local administration.
4.2 Estimate of Possible Costs
4.2.1 Proposed Programme Co-ordinating Unit (PCU)
A provisional estimate has been made of the likely costs involved in supporting the establishment of the proposed Programme Co-ordinating Unit (PCU) for an assumed operating life of five years A spreadsheet showing the progressively reducing cost elements over the period is set out as Appendix HI The total cost elements for the five years are set out in Table 2 on the following page
TAMS-ULG Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Master Plan
3F-30§OClO’ECONO\nCS
ANNEX 3E INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT
Table 2 Estimated Institutional Support Costs for Proposed Project Co-ordination Unit
------ L_. _ I
! IJSS *000
«t|innort Costs for PCT Operation
Local Staff 20 Professional level 1200 Birr/month 5 vears
250
"international
Specialists
40 Support Staff (Drivers/secr curies) @ 500 Birr/month
|_for 5 years
estimated 12.5 man years over 5 years @. $200.000/yr
200
2,500
Logistic costs: Capital Vehicles 8 J S25.000 each
200
Office equipment 7 offices @
S50,000 each
350
Recurrent
f Vehicle operations, office
£ consumables and
Travel (international & local)
' estimated $100,000/vr
500
u-1
PCL1 related costs
Capital 550 j
Recurrent 3,450 j
Total 14,000 '
Provision for Basin-wide Technical. Monitoring & Evaluation Studies
J
Technical studies (e.g. soils, water, geology, surveys etc) estimated lump sum 300 ]
Monitoring & Evaluation studies (baseline and follow up)
200 ,
_
.1
Provision for basin stuc
ies
500
1
1
-
H
Training
Overseas Regional Fellowships/ Study tours (15 Jij $20,000)
300 |
In Country Training
Irrigation training
J
Management Training for Professionals
Water & Catchment management etc
Irrigation applications
1
11
Financial & Management Training-Groups) &
association leaders - estimated
500 j
Workshops and Awareness Seminars
200
, Training Provision
1.000
___________ , ____ Provisiona. Total for Support for PCL over 5 vears Capital 550
1
Recurrent 4,950]
Total 5,500 I
Note. Figures expressed as rounded costs in USS 000 (6.3 Birr - SI) over a 5 year period
TAMS-ULG Baro-Akobo River Busin integrated Devdoptnent Master PlanSOCIO-ECONOMICS
ANNEX 3F. INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT
4.2.2 Baro-Akobo Basin Water Management Authority
It is not possible at this stage to anticipate the timing and scale of operations to be managed by the proposed Authority These will depend on the priorities attached by Government to the development of the Baro-Akobo basin water system The intention is that the Authority should be developed as an institution out of the previous Water Development Department of the Baro-Akobo PCU The Basin Water Management Authority should therefore be formed after the work of the multi-sectoral PCU is completed The work of the BWMA would be to prepare for the construction of the major water works since the main recovery of operation costs can only commence after the dams and distribution systems are built interim financing for the Authority would be required during the bridging period The cost of these initial operations of the Authority (prior to operation of the major water works) may be similar to those proposed for the PCU during the later stages of its existence .An annual estimated figure of S700.000 has been provided to cover the costs of the Basin Water Management Authority dunnu the bridging period after run down of the PCU and commencement of cost recovery from operations of the new water works constructions,
Once major water system development works are constructed the cost of operation and maintenance of the basin water system will be recovered by charges to be levied on major water users For economic and appraisal purposes an estimate of operation and maintenance has been included based on a normal percentage of the capital costs of the works
TAMS-ULG Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Master Plan
3F-32S OCIO-ECOXOMICS
ANNEX 3F. INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT
.APPENDICES
APPENDIX I
] A.l Institutional Framework
I A.l Ministry of Water Resources - Organisation (Oct. 1995)
I A.3 Typical Regional Government Administration Structure
I A.4 Regional. Zonal & Wereda Administrative Boundaries, 1996
1 B. 1 Possible Organisation Tor Baro-Akobo Implementation for First Phase
- Detailed Planning and Capacity Building
I B.2 Possible Organisation for Ba ro- A kobo Implementation for Second Phase
- Design, Construction, Operation of Major Water Work System
TAMS-I’LG Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Mister PlanAPPENDIX I .Al
INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK President
Federal
Parliament
Pnme
Minister
pH rH
Federal Ministries
Federal Authonbes
Regional
| Assembly
|___________ X
|
__J______ ,
President Executive Committee
Regional Government
____
Regional Bureaux
1__ 1
Zonal Assembly
Zonal Administration
Administrator
Executive
Committee
Wereda
I Assembly '
_____
Zonal Departments
Wereda Administration
.----------- L___ _
Administrator
Executive
Committee
Wereda DepartmentsAPPENDIX I A 2
MINISTRY OF WATER RESOURCES - ORGANISATION (Ocl 1995)
MINISTER
Atfyiwrs
Ch Engineer Sen Economist
CentTaL£ervl£K
Audit
-Legal
Orgar.lsalujn/Mgt Training Public ReinbonJi/Protocol
DEP. MINISTER
Library &
Technical
Service
__ _
Laboratoiy
Computer
Service
1__________
National
Meteorological
Service Agency
| Womens
Affair*
Dept
Planning
1 A Project
Dept
i
rpfafl into 4 project
FAip Oiv I | Evaln Div (
Admin & 1
Finance
Dept
Supply i
, Equipment
1 ??*_
1
Hydrology Depl
F~
Tran* Boundary
River 6a*ln*
Study Dept
Centrad
Adi limit hat Ion
□ept
[ Walal juyply i . Sewerage Dept I
I I
(Dotign
I
i
Dal fl Cornp<lr>g. Dnta Analysis Fteld Supervision
llh/or Ba»r» I
I Mailer Pion Study, Oopt
Master Plan Study Team
Master Plan MAE Team
Dam A Irngfl Design
Eiedro-Mcth & H/Power
Geo-Tcchnlc
Envti impKt A*SB«JTieiit
1 Survey* A Drafting
'Contract Docs
Preparation
Contract
Tech Seivko 1
1 Quality Control |
Enecubon 1 1
Inspection
______ _
' Water Use Right!
I a* A Operation
Control Dept
l_--------- --- ------------ --
LleeiiM S User
Charge
Hydraulic Structure
Protection
1i
f
f f
I t
J /
i
n
Waa Mm & Energy Dept
PjWc Worn * Urban Devpt
I Industry Trade i | Tourism Dept
I Fierce
D* PUmmg
Dept
| Hearth Dept
<
111-*-- 11
’»* Of M-nci Energy Buroou
PubfacWhrka A Urban ' Development Bureau
industry Trade Tourism Bureau
Transport & CommuhcatkMts
Bureau
| Finance Bureau
Planrung & Economic Development Bureau
'n vestment Once
Labour & Social
AHwt Dept
Disaster
Praperodnass Office
r v i xia\3J4vSOCIO-ECONOMICS
ANNEX 3F. INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT
POSSIBLE ORGANISATION FOR BARO-AKOBO
implementation for first phase
- DETAILED PLANNING AND CAPACITY BUILDING
Baro-Akoho Basin
Programme Co-ordination
Unit (PCL)
Roads
Authority
EELPA Other Authorities
Board of Manage men t-
Composed o f
r-----P---
1
Manager
Chairman: appointed AvAfBT?
Members- ■» regions
Min. of Agriculture
Studie Water M&E
Other Ministries
—v Devpt
I
Zone 2
o Existing Structure
 New l y Proposed Structure
PCIJ Zonal Cell
Dept of
Planning
PCL
Zonal Cell
Dept of
Planning
a
in Addition ra the Existing One
TAMS-CLG Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Master Plan
- OkSOCIO-ECONOMICS
ANNEX 3F. INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT
POSSIBLE ORGANISATION - BARO-AKOBO
IMPLEMENTATION FOR SECOND PHASE
- DESIGN. CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION OF MAJOR
WATER WORKS SYSTEM
Small Scale
s Irrigation
and Artisanal Uses,
etc
TAMS-ULG BaroAkobo River Basin Integrated Development
PlanECONOMICS
ANNEX 3F. INSWTTrONAL SUPPORT
APPENDIX II
Institutional Support for PCli - Estimated Costs
TAMS-ULG Baro-Akcbo RiverAPPENDIX II
Cost Figures in $OOC
INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT FOR PCU • ESTIMATED COSTS
Category
Unit
Unit cost
$'000
yr1
units
yrf^
cost
yr 2
units
yr 2 yr3 | yr 3
cost un/ts] cost
yr 4
units
yr 4
cost
7rT
units
Local Star
Professions'
Support
Technical Assistance
Intematona’ Specialists
man/yr
manfyr
marvyr
25
1
50
40
20
40
50
40
20
40
50
40
20
40
50
40
20
40
200
3
60C
35
700
3
600
2
400
1
Sub total Labour 690
790 690 490
Verities
Capita!
Operating costs
Q5»s
Capital - Fumrture & Fittings. Computers MtollOTQUlGQMt
vehicJe vemcle/yr
25
7
8
8
200
56
8
56
8
56
a
56
8
pe* office per yr
50
44
7
1
350 44
1
44
1
44
1
44
1
Sub Total Equipment
studies
T ectimcal Studies and Mon & Evaln Studies
Training
Overseas T raining In country Tra'nmg
Seminars
per study
per place
lump sum
1/SUrrJyr
50
3
150
5
250
2
IOC
Si
20
125
40
1
40
5
1
1
100
125
40
5
1
1
100
125
40
5
1
1
100
125
40
1
1
125
40
5
2:
Sub Total Materials
190
515
265
265
266 1$t
TOTAL COSTS
1,530
1,405
1,055
855
655 5.5C
^oo I-
■<
I
J
K
i
■
i
(
I
r
■
<
t

Summery

Summary of Baro-Akobo River Basin Master Plan

Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Master Plan

Prefeasibility Studies - Volume V

Document Overview

This document presents prefeasibility studies for three major water resources projects in the Baro-Akobo River Basin, Ethiopia:

Geba Hydroelectric Project
Gumero Hydroelectric Project
Itang Irrigation Project

1. Geba Hydroelectric Project

Location: Geba River, 60 km east of Gore

Key Features:

Storage dam with two downstream hydropower diversions
Total potential capacity: ~180 MW (112 MW + 72 MW)
Mean annual flow: 35.7 m³/s
Reservoir area: 66 km² at full pool
Estimated cost: $252.76 million (Jan 1996)
Internal Rate of Return: 16.4%

Key Data Tables

Table 2.6: Geba Hydroelectric Project - Annual Firm Energy
Max Reservoir Level	Diversion 1 (GWh/yr)	Diversion 2 (GWh/yr)
El 2160	386	245
El 2170	588	374

Environmental Considerations: Minimal population displacement (28 households), reservoir clearing required, potential for fisheries development.

2. Gumero Hydroelectric Project

Location: Gumero River, 27 km west of Metu

Key Features:

Cascade of three hydropower plants
Total capacity: 51.6 MW (12.2 MW + 18.4 MW + 21 MW)
Mean annual flow: 8.66 m³/s
Reservoir area: 37 km² at full pool
Estimated cost: $99.78 million (Jan 1996)
Internal Rate of Return: 11.4%

Key Data Tables

Table 3.6: Gumero Hydroelectric Project - Annual Firm Energy
Max Reservoir Level	Diversion 1 (GWh/yr)	Diversion 2 (GWh/yr)	Diversion 3 (GWh/yr)
El 1610	64.3	96.5	109.9

Environmental Considerations: Minimal displacement (7 households), potential for fuelwood harvesting, reservoir fisheries development.

3. Itang Irrigation Project

Location: Right bank of Baro River, 30 km downstream of Gambela

Key Features:

Net irrigable area: 53,147 hectares
Main crops: Sugar cane (21,000 ha) and diversified crops (32,147 ha)
Water requirements: 1.11 l/s/ha (average)
Reservoir active storage: 139.4 million m³
Estimated sediment accumulation: 13.6 million m³/year

Key Data Tables

Table 4.16: Monthly Irrigation Requirements
Month	Requirement (m³/s per 10,000 ha)
December	10.80
July	5.50

Infrastructure: Includes dam, 53 km main canal, 12 secondary canals, and extensive drainage system.

General Observations

All projects face data limitations, particularly in topography and geology
Further feasibility studies recommended with improved data collection
Projects designed to meet Ethiopia's growing energy and agricultural needs
Economic returns appear favorable for all three projects