houstho1^'
Bonga
Gambcla
16
Birbir
' —I?
84
73
liana
Sor
711
28
Chiru
Geba
Gilo 2
65
Gumero 2
7
65
56
Baro
H
Sako Gouda
45
Beko
Sounz: T.
Kashu
®thcr survey work by Selkrxjzpromexport and ARlX"1 *n>Akobo River Basin integrated Developincn*
4-100
Mailer P1*”ENVIRONMENT
aN^4
The reservoirs will occupy land that is probably used for other purposes At this o information about alternative land uses for foe reservoirs that did not survive
tve have no
intcdf1scre« ^ J
nn
cultural, or aesthetic features These components were not assessed for
jflis
J^ons discussco
j~.n Chapter 2, but will have to be addressed during feasibility- investigations
habitat Most reservoirs will affect one or another of the protected areas needs to be examined during feasibility investigation Irrigation
Their P -
r
neecj to equipped with wildlife crossings at a frequency of about one
C onvey'^eskm cosr uss io.OOO each)
every 1 *'
jnn uf aquahc weeds Weeds will be most serious for reservoirs that develop broad
f/tiJiffiL— j-
a ound
their perimeter These can be assessed from the reservoir area
^Sy Curves when these are developed
Deterioration ofwater quality The water of most reservoirs will be warm during the low flow contributing to low dissolved oxygen concentration and thermal stability within its
, nfile Wind turbulence will agitate the surface and contribute to mixing of surficial water lavers Even so. anaerobic conditions will prevail along the former thalweg and along foe maximum cross section We estimate the cost of clearing at USS 600/ha W’ere clearance not :o occur, most reservoirs will recover in 4-7 years In order to avoid the discharge of totally anaerobic waters, mitigation will likely require the installation of 1-2 additional outlets At USS 10,000 per outlet, their total cost comes to USS 10,000-20,000.
Reservoir sedimentation Assessment of Dumhong Dam applies.
Inlei delta formation .Assessment of Dumbong Dam applies.
Riverbed scouring We have no information about the riverbeds and can only surmise from geological information obtained from maps Much of the rock of the area is composed of weathered gneiss or weathered basalt Both rock forms become soft and crumbly when bunt'd under layers of alluvium and colluvium for much of the year W’arm temperatures accelerate
withering, so that the material that forms the river floor may be soft yet cohesive, moderately ressuuit but not tremendously resistant to the tractive shear of flowing water Where the rock s unweathered, basalt will resist scouring, gneiss will be easily worn
mav'a^0'11'^ 'Ower b
as n
’ dams, water overflowing through the spillway and stilling basin
^tiHahc,7030? nver at an l^at er°des foe opposing bank In turn, it may set up 5«ttinst'i°nS 1 ,esta^sh harmonic flow lines that oscillate back and forth across the channel,
Liat repfi10 moT’c'n 111 adjustment of meanders that could carry far downstream. It is a subject stinhgj 'W es foriJughout the lower basin projects and demands attention during feasibility
”
,Ciervo’ir
The assessment ofltang Dam applies
The Master Plan requires that all biodegradable material from the r emoved If this is done, then fishnets will not be snagged
Baro-AJcobo River Basin Integrated Development Master Plan
4- 101ANNEX 4
recurrent
cent „( mem >»
The assessments of Gumero, Itang, Dumbong,
rf a diagnostic health centre al USS20.000
, r„ wa1er provisional minimal releases from the reserved , pre-feasibility level we do not know if this n 'K
mmtaaq“aw***t
in the down5tream reaches. It is a subject fot k
, toKf preS«re The w of population support capaaty shows lht M
a subsequent section
Tto
Un,i'r
SmallWder
aSnCU""Ie
“ dfa'“’>
f
!
6.11 Electric Power Transmission Systems
6.11.1 General
Figure J-l in Annex 11 Hydropower and Multipurpose Projects, gives the present status ■ power transmission systems in the Master Plan area It shows two transmission lines oa between Dembidolo and Gambela and the other betw een Gambela and Metu. A third lire between Metu and Bedele is currently under study A 230kV line to the proposed Gilgci-Gibe project is already in place and represents the closest 230kV connection to the Baro-Ak& basin The nearest IBikV connection is scheduled to reach Nekempte and Ghimbi near the northern edge of the basin in 1999. In year 2001, construction will begin of a 132kV lirefon: Jimma to Bonga and Mizan The Master Plan assumes, for initial screening purposes, dial its hydroelectric generators will connect to the 220kV Gilgel Gibe line Table 26 gives ce estimated lengths of transmissions.
Table 26 Transmission lines
H*
s
Project
Length
(km)
Gumero
280
Gcba
190
Bare
235
p 41,
switchyards, substations ^ems include the transmission line, its transmissionlineinciude tj,*,- acccss or maintenance roads. The principal structures
We the Ime. conductors, towers, and supports guy wires and
be
fhe voltage and capacity of th
*
•
Af Or ,, ra”smission line affects the size of its structures
a single wood po]c
' °F SIEa11 V0M?e transmission lines uP to 46 kV,
15
TAMS-lXG Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrals) Develop®® ^ M®
4-102ENVIRONMENT
sed for lines between 69 and 231 kV (World Bank. 1991). and are a type
_
^/^VE,h,opia
■ astructure. the environmental impacts of transmission systems occur within the ^ pear 10 the nght-ot-way Negative impacts result from construction, operation, and
vicinity 1 f
1 1C
| |jnc Clearing and controlling vegetation is a major impact In uniform
lines can have the positive effect of introducing edge effect to an otherwise
^’2 Mt''"
climate, and population of the different transmission routes are roughly identical Tl>c 'frra^$ reason. this pre-feasibility assessment addresses them as a group rather than and- ^bv project The costs of environmental mitigations are computed from inadequate site project d pUreiy provisional the entire subject requires examination during feasibility investigations.
SJJJ fboto* environmental impacts
ch trtcalpower The obvious benefit of hydroelectricity is electric power, which can support economic development and improve the quality of life in and beyond the Master Plan area Its most important benefit is the provision of energy from a source other than fuelwood
f-uebvood Clearing of the rights-of-way will make available large amounts of fiielwood. A subsequent assessment computes the amount of land to be cleared as 2,900 ha Theriault (1095) computed its dry woody biomass as between 30 and 70 Lha Assuming half the transmission corridor has not already been cleared for agriculture, the total mass of fuelwood
.ies between 43,500 and 101,500 tonnes. Its gross commercial value (not including the cost of cutting and marketing) is between 10.9 million and 25.3 million Birr (USS 1.7-4.0 million) estimated at 5 Bin per 20 kg bundle
Hsb!lSLfdge_gffecj Habitat edge effect is to be discounted due to the extensive clearing that has already taken place throughout the project area.
Potentia/ negative impacts
habitat loss along the right-of-way The rights-of-way traverse the study^d areas Sele Mesengo, Saylem Wangus, and possibly Sigmo Geba The background
'\ Y^CO-GEOSERV provides no quantitative information about the vegetation and between 30 areas SurveV by Theriault (1995) estimates dry woody biomass to provide
4
Ma$t'U
totaI biomass about 150 t/ha along the estimated route of travel.
maPs of Cf an maP of land use shows the area to contain mixed forest and agriculture; the expand :0 in orll0n d W ^ow current populations of 15-65 persons per km, which will
en s
by year 2015 and exceed 90 by year 2035.
^he 22QkV r
estimated^ ConnectinSt0 l^e Gilgel-Gibe trunk will probably be H-frame pole structures Siting are c°nibined rights-of-way will require 20 metres either side of the centre line The Pan°f con^ 1S (4° 01 x 725 km) 2,900 ha The cost of its clearing is given in Annex 1J as
‘istniction
Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Master Plan
4 -103me »w« °f
“fc™""”' abou' he Me. it i a-
Xmotul .np.c of right-of-^y eleanns Agneulture appcars
s
t t0o
.^mission corridor Indeed, the land occupied by rhe transmission hne,
that being occupied by forms
Environmental damage can be reduced by constructing the transmission
sEeadv occupied by agriculture Where this is imposs,ble. then cleans *'?,•««, ••
and tower veneration intact Mechanical clearing is preferable Ov« rh'"'•foil,
Roadwavs should be to a low standard and recovered following construction <
should be replanted Estimate the cost of roadway sediment control at US$ sn ,,
replanting at USS lOOper linear km.
Increased access to wildlands The nghts-of-way will penetrate parts of Sele v
Gcba, and Saylem Wangus protected areas Roadways cut through these
discontinuous and constructed to a low standard Prior to making the rout^ h:
wildlife habitat areas need to be identified tn order to exclude them from the rieht T"* * standard of protection of these areas needs to improve (see the wildlife annex) °
Runo ff and sediment from access roads and lower pads The rights-of-way should b
to avoid impacts to water bodies, floodplains, and wetlands Sediment traps and filter * ~ similar to those described for dams and reservoirs, may be required Roadways and dra->-
*“ (•, ln °r Con^y
should minimise the use of fill in their construction. Culverts should follow the same <> icJe"
as those proposed for dams and reservoirs See the initial assessment for an estimate of cos
Loss of land and population relocation Given the present low population densitv- oftht rights-of-way. we do not expect this to be problematic Rather, populated areas should Ik avoided rather than the people be moved.
Chemical contamination. Chemicals should not be used to maintain the rights-of-way Rair. low vegetation should be preserved Vegetation control should be mechanical.
■dvron hazards The protected areas and, indeed, much of Ethiopia contain important habitats and flight routes. Feasibility' planning will need to identify1 these areas so as to r>n them.
^ra&jKcards_from transmission lines and towers The towers proposed for this pr^ wil! be below or at tree line for most of the rights-of-way, reducing the risk of 1 aircraft. Lines in proximity to flight paths will require markers
Induced effects from electromagnetic fields The scientific debate continues of electromagnetic fields upon humans The current proposed for these lines i believed to cause problems to human health
Cuitjtral or aesth^tjejn^gets. The potential impact of the project uP
on CU
r !^ be
resources was not assessed for reasons cited in Chapter 2 of this repoH It s to by the feasibility assessment
TAMS-LLC Haro-a koboRiver Basin Integrated Developrnco!ENVIRONMENT
^rierat
b'
The
assessment of dams and reservoirs refers lo four irrigation projects (Table 28). ‘ g lhe subject of a pre-fiMsibility screening by this Master Plan, the other,
T'nree Dl theS^eSjgned by Selkhozpromexpon during the 1980’s, which also conducted an ^bobo. w3S . impact assessment of the project (J 088). Tie preceding assessment also environnie^^^ceS paragraphs that follow examine solely the irrigated agriculture of
Table 27 Irrigation command areas
1 Scheme
Iiang
| Abobo Dumbo ng
1 Gilo 2
Area (ha)
50,000
10,000
15.000
46,900
The Master Plan envisages inputs to irrigation that include seeds, fertiliser, insecticides, and pesticides. Tillage will be by draught animals. About 640 person days of family labour and 205
person days of casual labour will be required per hectare Extension will be at the ratio of 1
agent per 2.000 farm households Tw o harvests comprising a potential mix of about 12 crops will occur annually
Conveyance networks grade through 5 and 6 categories of canal. Field delivery is by gravity :low and terminates in drains Waste water will reduce the quality of water to downstream users and may be a factor in increasing the frequency' of disease.
ca^h project occupies a portion of Gambela National Park greatly affecting wildlife habitat migratory corridors Table 28 gives the approximate reductions required of each area if
iff lnte^-’
National Park is to be preserved In turn, each project will be greatly
Ciuted by wildlife, particularly species that raid crops, migrate through farmed areas or
■JWnit disease
Project encroachment into Gam beta National Park
Project
Encroachment (per cent)
Ltang
Abobo
Dumbong
Gilo-2
25
100
90
75
1
AMS-UlG Etaro-Aknb a River Basin Integrated Development Master PlanSocial development will be a major constraint to the success of the pro'
lower basin are pastoralists, some of whom also practice river bank r Th«Pen Some of the pastoral groups regard the use of animal traction as den ^’^al a *'l area were not welcomed dunng the Derg government, and confllcts b'grator> SeJX.' were reported Most settlers have since left Will their irrigation 'the*^
fate’
6.12.2 luuig irrigation command area
Description
Itang irrigated area commences at the right abutment of Itang Dam
S0rs'»'ett>SS
%
the area between the road to Jikawo and the Baro River to the nonhw ”S fiek* otn about 15 kms towards the northwest, the irrigated area expands north "'d After
area on the northern side of Jikawo road The land between Jikawo R- ?aassesrae"1 °fdams and reservoirs recommended lhf'‘^nKV'' ' M“M diseases required the construction of lined canals Sekh^
____________________________________________ —; TAMS-VLG Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Develop"*4
—--------- ----- - --- -------- —
ENVIRONMENT
-- ""
reported the presence of constituents in the water that attacked concrete
v5
, .□gg and d’J^ g will be required if canals are to resist scouring
I “f!:' '
yhe upstream reservoirs will accumulate most coarse sediments Fine
vel as far as the dam face will be evacuated through the low-level outlet and ^|ifneflts ^at "enter the canal inlet The terrain is flat, so overland and dehris flows are
iinLikeh' 10 canals from upland terrain The risk of canal sediments, therefore, is Sftdy«en"r
iD^rto^
Soil
leaching
will
result
from
over-watering
The
same
lack
of
sophistication
<2/
farmers to deg
rade t
heir lands will have similar manifestations, albeit through
that leads up
e? n a
]j jy tion , in l
owlan
d irrigated areas. The Master Plan proposes extension
leching
jgp
3 ent er
2 to00
farm households A higher frequency of contact will be
a£ctlt* dduring ^rst ye413 °f dngation development if soil degradation is to be controlled
Master Plan foresees fertiliser applications at the rate of 425 kg/year for 2 crops ' ph ’his will compensate for leaching, excess fertiliser will enter the soil to eventually
its way into rivers No background measurements of nitrogen or phosphorus ion ^ncentrations have been made of lower basin rivers ARC 0-GEO SER V data from springs in 'Te upper basin show nitrate concentrations in excess of recommended limits at about a third
•if rhe sites measured This is an issue that will have to be addressed during feasibility study
,4/pj/ blooms and weed proliferation Algal blooms and weed proliferation is a response to the release of nutrients from fields We recommend a range of fertiliser trials be run on different soil types in the command area .Among its objectives will be to define the rate and timing of fertiliser applications so that financial and environmental objectives are mutually achievable
LOTtof weds The assessment on dams and reservoirs requires than canals be lined Although this is done to address the risk of Schistosomiasis, it will fulfil the multiple objective of controlling weeds.
ijgHgsireqgj quality. The assessment of dams and reservoirs describes how minimal pleases equal to S percent of mean annuai flow will help maintain downstream discharge q^S h°w reservoir clearing will prevent anaerobic conditions from developing,
onstream of the irrigation command area, however, waler quality will deteriorate if ispan^f ^ human wastes find their way into the Bare River Improved water management k-mers^ answer> but will demand a higher level of sophistication than many of Ethiopia's
1
1
Wt con°d haVC
deveIopnient, through training before the completion of the project,
Methods1151 Cr ’SSues that include rural sanitation and health as wpell as advanced fanning
the Project °£Watcr quality downstream of the command area is essential to the well being of
Preece pro * co"ect^on background constituent concentrations and sediment needs to
^Jihasa ^
n eij’ C0?StrLICt'10n
also needs to include data on fish catch and human
111 ICat’On of the environmental condition of the stream
pCr of ~~The design of the project requires the compulsory release of 8
•can annual flows to the river channel Minimal releases take priority over ’S-H.g Baro-Akobo Rher Basin Integrated Development Mister Plan
4-107ANNEX 4
discharge to the command area, so that in case of drought, irrigation fish in the river
5**s'
frcroachj^^
command area Cllvroa k
StioS Park Rather than further endanger the park, this asseSsrTlen, °ach« into r border of the project area be relocated to north of Jikawo road the
between Jikawo road and the Baro River needs to remain intact and*'0" of rh % reduces the size of the command area by about 25 per cent
The section on sector setting described the types and densities f
“ 0Uld her enCr°ach«intor
Undeve|opec v'<
o
Selkhozpromexport in the project area dunng the 1980s We do not know T °bs^ k of wildlife, particularly as the park has been disturbed by the construction of Abobo Dam Baboons and other monkeys prefer areas with water and will ’ SU,e far* t- ofimzauon To avoid conflict, the project will want to keep at least 50
between its canals and the forest. Monkeys will take up residence in the fa** °f ’**•* they will raid irrigated fields. Groups of up to 200 baboons have been known?*' raids near Abobo (Selkhozpromexport, 1988). Elephants will raid fields C°ngre8 «:
Rat
£
8 al
migrations, possibly even taking up permanent residence near a virtually ? CUnng
supply Trees with ladders should be left standing in the fields as a possible™? "' •°
elephant attack
At least 9 species of rodents reside in the lower basin Irrigation will cause their nu~b mcrease, resulting in a concomitant increase of human disease Grass mice are hosts to i-Xi and dermal Leishmaniasis, but Selkhozpromexport (1988) was unable to identify examples -f the mosquito earner
re ®e
Birds will invade the irrigated area Finches and sparrows will be especially apt at raiding Ih: fields from the forest, where they will take up refuge and construct their nests Gurfc against raids will increase the labour requirement of irrigation
Impediment to wildlife movements The maintenance of migratory corridors was addressee the assessment of dams and reservoirs Bv maintaining the southern half of the command ra in its natural state and providing wildlife crossings, migrations along the right bank of the Sar- River will still be possible
impediment to livestock and human movements Wildlife crossings as assessment on dams and reservoirs will be suitable for use by livestock. Jikawo re crosses project canals at several locations, will provide safe crossings for humans [hreai to historic cultural or aesthetic features The threat of the project
t
aesthetic features was not assessed for reasons expressed in Section 2 of this rep
■^I^^QLjQssjdJlppdplain vegetation. The command area, if constrS*
its present design, will disturb about 70 km of the right bank of the Bare cornrturJ1 assessment, we required the design be adjusted so tha*t this is not done: that should not penetrate into Gambela National Park and damage its flood plain
□ uccoriir-
TAMS-ULG Biro^Akobo River Basin Integrated Developm**1
4-10SENVIRONMENT
.
.
'
the assessni
, iLj/n’nK_arid communities. The dislocation of populations was addressed
of dams and reservoirs. The project requires the relocation of 711
111 %olds
h
m Ajine'f 1H
The corned area bc
™ h are reported tbe costs of whjch „
^rfegglSS Assessment of ltang irrigation pr0Jecl app|ies Assessment of Itang imgation projcc( $
^L^nn Assessment of.
£
Itang
rotate®. Araesa™, ofItan? iniga[ oo projKt^
.
^gjweeds. Assessment of Itang imgation project apples
retun water quahry The assessment for Itang imgation project applies
/7cjh reductions The assessment of Itang irrigation project applies
Encroachment on ecologically sensitive areas About 80 per cent of the command area lies within Gambeia National Park, the remaining 20 per cent lies within Abobo Gog protected area. As mentioned earlier, much of this area has already been cleared to make way for a state farm A feasibility' study of Dumbong should begin with a study of the state farm and a review of policy towards the continued existence of Gambela State Park. It would seem likely that the reasons for declining production at the state farm would carry- over into the irrigation project, fringing into dispute any favourable arguments expressed in support of Dumbong. For the purposes of this assessment, we require the command area be reduced by 80 per cent and that its encroachment into the National Park be excluded from further consideration by this Master Plan
to wldlife movements. Three potential
an impediment
GHo-2 , converge within a short distance of ^^^X^ are to be
emigratory wildlife As with Itang. they need to become
avoided a preservationist attitude would argue the lrngatJ P J that Gambela National Park should be preserved
not
i o 1^^ human movements Wildlife crossings as described m the as scs5ment on dams and reservoirs will be suitable for use by livestock.
^Id^historic. cultural or aesthetic features. The threat of the projecil tc) histone or thetic features was not assessed for reasons expressed In Chapter - □ tms .
of flood nlatn veretaVon The command area lies adjacent to about 25 km
;'
^cx 1H proposes the topog^y -tarn
0Qd1^ • e., the right bank is not flood plair. Given the uniqueness of nvenne v egetanon
^MS-ULG Baru-Akobo River Balin Integrated Development Master Plan
4-111annex 4
tfiica and its .are of disappearance. J ”
1 5 “sessraml requires [h|,
•.
leave . tafc strip of at least 100 m along the nght bank of lhe aj
eide of the Ney and Chnu Rivers, which pass through it. This win de *v«r *1 percent
Disinrniton of pointlatiotis and communities. Descriptive information an
there are no people living in the area of rhe project, although farming Out lhc sil(
w,
lt& si Zp l tirifc
by %;
area The project map in Annex 1H shows the command area encap
SU a
| f P'Cs J?
Abobo. Ultimately, the number of people affected by the project needs to
feasibility investigation.
Water-related disease Assessment of bang irrigation project applies Ad
rriivevetrs s ttoo rreefflleect ct tthhoosese iinn DDuummbboonngg cocommmmaanndd aarreeaa.
Borer supply inequalities. Assessment of I tang irrigation project app|jes
Rgconwended Actions
In the event of this project proceeding, the following specific actions to mitigate adverse environmental impacts.
• Carry out full El A and take note of its recommendations
^e?-
e reso]vetj ‘ JUst the
are likely to be
• Ensure construction contracts contain clauses to control noise, dust, soil erosion the discharge of effluents into river channels and the impact of temporary' construction war
• Ensure effective soil management practices are in place to minimise soil degradation
• If there are any, resettle families in accordance with World Bank guidelines
• Carty out mitigation measures to minimise increased risks to health of water-borne
diseases
• Assess wildlife habitats and ensure that measures are taken to minimise disruption to movement of animals
6.12.5 Gilo-2 Irrigation Project
Description
The primary canal leaves Gilo-2 Dam to continue about 30 km along the right bank oi ahej-^
River to where it abruptly expands northerly and westerly to form a fan-shaped tom..
area The total length of its primary canal is 61 km; the size of its command area is
Canals feeding the project are lined due to the area's sandy soil texture.
northern edges of the irrigated area are bordered by dykes to exclude flooding >
other rivers
within
About 75 per cent of the northeastern portion of the command area lies
National Park About half of its southern edge passes on both sides of the Pug
ioad Tata l_ake, which is the subject of a pumped irrigation scheme P ^
rc
e jee IMf-?
authorities, is 75 per cent surrounded by the command area along its nort e j^gated*-" left-bank outlet to be installed at Gilo-2 Dam, an additional 25,900 ha could D -
of the National Park.
TAMS. T'LG Biru-Akobo River Basin Integrated DeteloproentENVIRONMENT
7 . A cessment of hang irrigation project applies
;
Assessment of (tang irrigation project applies Assessment of Rang irrigation project applies
Assessment of Rang irrigation project applies.
■ -^Isedime/Jh Assessment of Hang irrigation project applies.
Assessment of Itang irrigation project applies.
hiwnsand weed proli feration Assessment of Itang irrigation project applies
Canal weeds Assessment of Rang irrigation project applies
Downstream water quality. Assessment of Itang irrigation project applies
Dwnstreum flow reductions. Assessment of Itang irrigation project applies
fyicroachtnent on ecolosacaily sensitive areas About 75 per cent of the command area lies within Gambela National Park For the purposes of this assessment, we require the command trea be reduced by 75 per cent and that its encroachment into the National Park be excluded from further consideration by This Master Plan.
l^edmentjg wildlife movements. Three potential irrigation projects, Abobo. Dumbong, and
j °'2, converge within a short distance of each other Combined, they form an impediment to av^ded™ As ltang, they need to become smaller if wildlife conflicts are to be
tiy, k,°ttrr P senati
r re
'
O nisr attitude woutulduaLrigiuuec wthueuiriro igaratisouneprojects should not exist at all National Park should be preserved
ltan8 assessment applies
■^NjITLenF Qfl Jr
.
---------- ------------- l=? ------------- w. ■WrfW.M. tajvr
UWJVI4UUU UH UJt
^■suietic
and reservoirs will be suitable for use by livestock
or aesthetic features The threat of the project to historic or res was not assessed for reasons expressed in Chanter 2 of this tenon
BarO’Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Master Plan
4-113ANNEX 4
possible to state is
cOmmunrries. The number of people living m
ss^SSs®-”” — ■■-■;
A fishing ^cbo
of iung ^&ation project applies Adjust the D^O"8 con""ind ““
e ofI'a"8W M^P™i“W'«-
, tssBsm M
8
Recommended Actions
In the event of this project proceeding, the following specific actions are lik I
to mitigate adverse environmental impacts
• Carn- out full EIA and take note of its recommendations
• Ensure construction contracts contain clauses to control noise, dust, soil erosion, the
e to be re^j.^
discharge of effluents into river channels and the impact of temporary construction camps
• Ensure effective soil management practices arc in place to minimise soil degradation
• Reseltle families (if any) in accordance with World Bank guidelines
• Carr, out mitigation measures to minimise increased risks to health of waier-bome
diseases
• .Assess wildlife habitats and ensure that measures are taken to minimise disruption to
movement of animals
6.12.6 Other Irrigation Projects
General
The preceding assessments examine projects that survived interim screening. There are other projects, which are listed in Table 4 of .Appendix A The quality and quantity of data about .... remaining projects is much less than that of the projects assessed in detail Nonetheless, t ^ be that one day, these projects will reappear for feasibility investigation The °-oW - assessment is made on a group basis as their data do not support a detailed study
Potentially positive impacts
Fuehvood. Assessment of ltang irrigation project applies
Potentially negative impacts
Soii erosion The command area, will be cleared and levelled, the costs o
those reported in Annex 1H.
Waterlogging Assessment of hang irrigation project applies.
Salinization Assessment of ltang irrigation project applies
■___ _______________________ __________ ____________ ______________ _—” - ^Master PiaCt TAMS-ULG Biro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Develop®6ENVIRONMENT
---------------------------------------- ----- -------------------------------------------------------------
Assessment of 1^5 irrigation project applies ’ ’ Assessment of Itang irrigation project applies
L
a «e ssme nt of It"® ini gat i on project applies
,f
i weednrfL^J?^-^ Assessment of Itang irrigation project applies , A „ ^ment of
e Itang irrigat i on projec l a ppbes
c^ss^- AS’
auatitv Assessment ofltang irrigation project applies
flaw reduction Assessment of hang irrigation project applies.
< >fl ecologically seusane areas Many of these projects encroach upon ^^iTNationai Park The degree of encroachments requires assessment during feasibility study-
•
to wildlife movements In general, Itang assessment applies. The amount of
pediment relates to the number of projects implemented and their relationship to each other Were all projects to be implemented, then the wildlife resource of the lower basin would be effectively destroyed
Impediment to livestock and human movements Wildlife crossings as described in the assessment on dams and reservoirs will be suitable for use by livestock
Threat to histone, cultural or aesthetic features. The threat of the project to historic or aesthetic features was not assessed for reasons expressed in Chapter 2 of this report
Alteration or loss of flood plain vegetation The command area lies in an area of many small steams These will require diversion to larger watercourses that lie outside the boundary imposed by flood protection dykes Flood plain vegetation will be lost, but at this time it is not possible to state its extent. Feasibility surveys will have to explore the issue further.
^^P^tj^u_o^^op i
u a ijons and communities. The number of people living in the area is
ar ge unknown. It is a subject required during feasibility’ investigations
Assessment of Itang irrigation project applies Adjust the names of " ssfl«S ’W of ih« mde, mg
Assessment of Iran g irrigation project applies
L 1S4.LG Baro-Akobn River Baiin Integrated Dcvefopment Master PlanANNEX4
6.13 Flood Protection
6.13.1 General
In the project area, floods result from
• backwater upstream of major confluences on nearly level land
• discharge in excess of channel capacity, ana
• rainfall in excess of soil infiltration capacity on poorly drained lands
Lands above 450m altitude appear to be sufficiently well drained and „
Hood protection Low-lying areas, on the other hand, often experience 2-4
between the months of June and November, usually covering about 3500 k but increasing to 9700 km' during the 50-year flood (Cowx, 1995). Major dam ^AtWell occurs to the town of Gambela and to riverside villages
Flood protection can come in two ways:
• by implementing structural works such as dykes and channel straightening, and
11 (iT rpnir.*
slruCtura|
ma ®e penodicallj
• by performing non-structural activities such as watershed management or zoning to control construction
This Master Plan proposes to control flooding by 2 methods the first, improving iht hydrologic condition of upland basins, is discussed under a range of projects in a later section pan of the second, the construction of dams for hydropower and irrigation, has already t«r. discussed This section of the assessment concentrates on the construction of levees, intended to complement and expand the effectiveness of dams and natural resource improvements In w doing, the Master Plan proposes to build about 2 4 km of 2-3 metre high dykes and 1 4 km o:' diversion canals along the right bank f of the Baro river Several of the irrigated areas, Guo-- and Itang, will also be protected by dykes
Excep! vee construction The World Bank resettlement criteria given in Annex A are to be followed Compensations, where those are appropriate, have been computed in this document as 3-year's gross margin plus USS 500 to cover the cost of assets. Reserve USS 30,000 against the cost
& resettlement, the true amount to be decided during feasibility studies
- eastbility studies will need to do an in-depth study of the socio-economics of recessional -gnculture and grazing The needs and aspirations of these groups need to be taken into
part011111}^ 'he P °i
r
ect The project would first need to know the number of people who take
Lq 1 ese activities (he strength of their economy, and how charge would affect them
The project needs to incorporate a programme of fishery
n i including hatchery and restocking This is discussed under dams and reservoirs
r ''^SQi£tipn M *
^Pediments t Many the comments discussed under Dams and Reservoirs apply.
Panted to be° natura' drainage, uncontrolled runoff, and soil erosion require control Borrow
' e they increase the habitat of mosquitoes
of
^Pply ^Sssiopql sprazing Reservoirs within the lower basin could be operated to
ees
L "’eisifi
e(1 f0|L?nal
during the dry season Compensatory grazing could also be
owing (foe proposals put forth in the livestock section of this Master Plan.
-pL U " " ■—- -
-
______________________________________________________
1 G Ba ro-Ako bo River Basin Integrated Development Master Flan
4 IKannex 4
■*5
dose to Gambeln.
— r--" *"
' sscd
above W ^
s<
v
r x ,Yw!; Th‘S 5UbjeC'15 BddrCSSCd UndCr im8atio'
wildlife »«unUWiy L. . ,, , ,
J
® a’txjv,.
. x,_turai overflow areas absorb and distribute runoff Whtn
,L hv the construction of levees, downstream flooding incr^ C
e
by Selkhozpromexport (1990), feasibility trhitqur s subj edteoicdet wntaisf not t’the wM 'lfedivtktecstosn downst,ream flood regimes
6.14 Mining
6.14.1 General
This part of the Master Plan addresses the large scale extraction of pnmary meals, it r., discuss mining of placer deposits, which are low in concentration and pursued by miners Minina involves 3 phases (I) feasibility assessment, (2) operations, and n, decommissioning. They are presented in that order.
6.14.2 Feasibility assessment
Feasibility assessment is conducted to determine the location and concentration af praim metals It is done by core drilling The benefits that accrue are principally knowledge aboir. site. Some minor employment might be provided to local labour, but this would involve ver. few people Its negative environmental impacts are caused by road construction and driltnj These have already been discussed under Hydropower and will not be repeated here.
6.14.3 Construction and operations
Land clearing would precede actual mining. The period of clearing would be extremely triri perhaps only a week or two Construction would also occur as a simultaneous activity a h
Portakabins’, leach pits, crusher, concentration plant Prefabrication of most oi would limn their installation time and environmental impact. Leach pits are no ng moi sealed basins in which drains have been installed to convey dissolved miner concentration plant The pit is first filled with crushed ore. Low pressure emitters or^ lain over the lop of (he ore distribute chemicals, possibly compounds of cyaro
onto the surface of the mineral, through which it leaches and eventual!) en’^e jor fonhe drains In the concentration plant the concentrate is separated from the eac processing, the leachate then returns to the leaching pit.
Sl
^£
AAt t
■- -
Positive impacts would accrue as income to the concession opcrat
•
tnrs a. anndaaas s fees ’**'
,
“
------------- —————— ww
fcV MJW w»«v—— '
I
ggoovevermnmmeezunt LLoocacall eemmppllooymymeenntt wwoouulldd pprroobbaabblly y bbee eextxtrreemmeelly y llooww dduuee tioo tt c " the operations being carried out.
Potentially negative impacts are significant Dust and noise would affectThc fuel chemicals, and human waste have the potential to enter the groun q|jjpme
e
nI ar
impact of the roads that would be required to transport the mining
_
_
_—-«-j~ j>|rar‘
TAMS-ULG BaroAkobo River Basin Integrated Development ftENVIRONMENT
tild be similar to those described for the dams and reservoirs above, as
j mat cr'a' W^nPact of population displacement Care can eliminate most of these
pos5,blC ' /^rations, but they can recur once Lhe site is decommissioned
> d duriW
pr.*"1’
Decommissioning
□ « standards of decommissioning require the site be returned to it, r
11 aior brf°re minins '°°k phce Tl“ CO"CCp' und“KO'K lhe need io eXe In^ l ^XabiWy of the leaching pits If lhe mine is opemw, and sMow ,
P 1 fallow the excavation of ore by occupying the same pit from w(,; |,
:-----------------
r
mighl
S?X™«io-d would he covered b? a User
, K,ui inffinrlion. overlain by lop®, removed during tend ctaumg Md
[f a the other hand, crashedI materials are removed to , !p0l)s dump, extrTcare «
X apical dump consists of a ddre constructed to the same specificarions as a small dX “h
» romplerely surround the waste It cannot adjoin mountams or Mis as these n-JataLX enter the crushed malenal, gtvtng n a jelly-like eonststency and makrng it dffiX'
ratdle. Furthermore, the ike cannot cross a valley as ir would block exMng dXte possibly even collapsing under the weight of flowing water Once filled wuh
^Id be sealed with an impermeable matenal Given fhe natureX the Jump should be several hundred years
“
’
’
life of
The potential for negative environmental impacts is enormous With care, however, its risk can be reduced to acceptable limits. The concession license requires extreme care from jjevernment to assure that all risks are identified and indemnified against Specialist advice should be sought.
6.15 Conclusions
ilfJ Dams and Reservoirs
His chapter presents a pre-feasibility environmental assessment of 7 dams, reservoirs, and
ippurtenant works and a general assessment of other dams This section takes an overview of
of their environmental impacts and conflicts
ttotnthe view of the environment as an entity an as a p , ^r0IjieXpOIt, in 1988. prepared
ssperience with Abobo Dam in the Master Plan area tt environmental impact assessment which forewarn o' instructing Abobo Dam. the recommendations of the Regarded
oro blems and difficulnes In appear to have been
? Her quality i
051
s an
■
toe reserv -
0 mpOrtant issue. This assessment proposes that all biodegradable material
Xuil r
escrv
O rs
i °lr 3Jeas be removed We also propose that more than one outlet be fitted to
ferial caring or^Cr to limit the discharge of anaerobic water If funds are such that the
0 ihen we recommend the dam not be constructed. The removal of at enal from Abobo was inadequate
t AMS.ulg ^■ru-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Mailer Plm
4-119ANNEX 4
Each dan is a tamer not only to water but also to migratory fish \yc feasibility investigations, that each dam be equipped with a fi^ ]ari?'neiki, jx
programme Abobo Dam has no such programme
Water-related disease will become a major problem We recommend that reservoir be equipped with a diagnostic health centre. These diffcr fo"1
a^er
centres in that they are able to give a firm diagnosis of water-related d °rdin’Jv?cf treatment We do not believe that chemoprophylaxis of malaria is app^n * jC' temporary, non-immune visitors Nor do we accept the role of anti-rnosq"4’6 for °Oe
to their reliance upon hazardous pesticides, many of them banned and each ° ,Carn?li
?n ^’
s
problems. Avoidance, through the use of mosquito nettings treated with Ils°^i5.‘> the risk of the disease tn children by 70 per cent and the nsk of serious attaT?'' (Science et Vie, 1996). Indeed, mosquito nettings are in common use thro h Opt i manv parts of tropical Africa. where they have been effective in redu Ugh°U1 »>•
Treatment, coupled with health education, is another response Schistosomiasis is problem common to irrigation projects. Good intentions st
C 'ng thc
canal design and management can limit the disease But we have seen these 310 pl*
not fulfilled and Schistosomiasis become prevalent in other areas of Ethiopia 8F°°d
or 5 ie^r.
irrigation canals should be lined
Sediment will be a problem at some of the reservoirs From suspended sediment '
hydrologic analyses conclude that sediment accumulation will not reduce dam des
These samples ignore bed load and contain inconsistencies that limit their diagnostic ^ Furthermore, the forecast assumes that watershed hydrologic condition will remain imc Elsewhere, the Master Plan believes it will degrade
The dams most al nsk from sediment are those that are closest to the break in gradient fos central plateau to lowland savannah Dumbong and Gilo-2 The situation of their reserve needs to be examined from the view of lateral deltas that could divide the reservoir into two r. more portions upper and lower
Spillway discharge from dams in the lower reservoir could set up oscillatory Dow lines th destabilise meanders further downstream These, in rum. could threaten irrigation conns: areas, villages, and roads. They require examination during feasibility study
Several irrigation command areas join together at their edge to block existing "
migratory corridors. Rather than introduce major problems with wildlife, it is better
a corridor to permit their passage through developed areas Many of their routes are
less permanent and require a means of traversing canals For this reason 've Pr
crossings constructed at intervals of about 10+1.5 km along the length of each can
• conCTri-'W Recessional grazing is a distinct possibility during the dry season .As reservoir:> if they1,1
may attract thousands of cattle and horses Their numbers will have to be contro not to damage wildlife habitat and fields. Their ultimate risk is starvation.
T.AMS-ULG Biro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Developim*1 *laStcr
4-120environment
,^4
A ^,2
r t[ie cnvtronmenral impact of power transmission through the Master Plan
, assess171®111 ° b -0Or quality information about the habitat resources of the proposed
.< hamp ® '
er
our assessment is forced to be genenc Nonetheless, some genera!
\
a
M
"^dpJ5appy
Pn
s should include the identification of important habitat areas along the
...
-^bW of wav The power line comdor should then be adjusted to avoid those kev
should be single-purpose and built to a low standard Following construction Access ro‘TSbe made impassable by motorised traffic Severely damaged areas should be they shoul ..ecoJ]Servation should follow the same general advice as that given under dams r ;piinicd 01 tcniporary' nature of the roadways, if carefully constructed, should reduce
(jj5J Irrigation
sation project penetrates Gambela National Park to a certain extent, Itang
-hine the least Most irrigation projects reviewed by this Master Plan failed interim
^eejuno because of their high costs, A more feasible alternative is the intensification of
Upland agriculture, which docs not encounter the same magnitude of problems of disease,
uildlife, a^d socio-cultural evolution.
The design of the projects invites conflict between wildlife and farmers In particular, Abobo, GOo-2, and Dumbong present an almosL impenetrable barrier co migratory wildlife, many of which are large Farmer's lives are at risk should they come into confrontation with elephants or hippos. Monkeys, birds, and insects will raid and destroy crops virtually at will, given the favourable combination of plentiful water, food, and shelter as amplified by the project in the lower basin.
As with dams and reservoirs, disease among humans will increase. In part ibis is due to the favourable environment the project will provide to disease vectors. In part it is due to the vincentration of humans the project will create - a third of the required labour is casual, in
due to the project’s reliance upon animal traction in a known tsetse area Some of the ^’ectious products of disease will eventually reach open waters and be transmitted
wntri^t3111 ^r3irun® “n health, improved sanitation, and improved treatment will all
siaiple t£ t0 dlsease control in ±e project area. The use of mosquito nets is an example of a
■ cost-effective means of reducing the incidence of malaria
■
'he
rft duce the effectiveness of water management in irrigated areas. Settlers
^genous ^asirt during the previous government were greeted with hostility by the
Veas We
COn^cts cnsued Almost all settlers have since returned to their native O f nOt ^el know’ the ability' of different ethnic groups to collaborate on the
r feh°UrCCS Such as water> seed’ anti fertil’ser irrigation is a complex agricultural
:nd «avou vei
Moralist’ WkthC pCoP,e of the area still rely upon the planting stick Many of the people are
0 v iew animal traction with disdain
t^ULG Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Master Plan
4- 1117.1 Introduction
This chapter of the Environmental Impact Assessment examines the confT generated by development among the different sectors of the Master Plan and^ lnU- among their component projects Chapters 5 and 6 examined sectoral enviro ’ °
the basin developments and the large projects in detail. This chapter t^^1 ls^if overview of each sector and its behaviour when intra-sectoral investments an. rtlOre a-t
dre combined
Table 1 lists the sectors under evaluation An exception from the list is health ’ - which the Master Plan views as a mitigation to water-related disease under hvd irrigation rather than a sectoral investment The capital and recurrent costs me tr° ° section arc for environmental mitigations, and are listed in Appendix D rather ih^ These have to be added to (or subtracted from) the costs and revenues of the pro' sectors before financial and economic decisions can be concluded Not all env- *
P Wer
decisions can be based on purely financial criteria, however An example is death 7^1?'
from project-related disease, which cannot be financially assessed at the Master Planning:^
7.2 Hydropower
Three hydropower projects fulfilled criteria of interim economic screening. Because the process ignored the costs of environmental mitigation, however, the screening was incompieie These costs, which include sediment control, household relocation, reservoir clearing additional outlet installation, and diagnostic health centre construction and operation must bt included in future sectoral analyses
The construction of hydropower will briefly (during 3 or more years of construction) produr; large amounts of sediment Sections 6.2 to 6 9 describe how this and other adverse ntipacj can be controlled; Appendix D lists its costs of mitigation Unless rhe reservoir arei - completely cleared of vegetation, serious declines of waler quality will occur
More important is the problem of water-related disease Among the different
reservoirs, Baco is the most serious. This problem recurs through each ot the -
water resource projects and is difficult to control. The production ol hydroe'eCln° |fSS jt can
bring large numbers of people into intimate contact with vvater and soil but, none^eCl a It#
produce ideal breeding habitat for insect disease vectors. These, in turn. run
area
- flg fDr It# Reservoirs during their dry-season drawdown period will provide recessional "jp^jTjcti011
numbers of livestock Unless livestock numbers are controlled, vegetation starvation may result
-
-------- —
____________ ______ _____ _______ t~crer
TAMS-ITLC BaroAkobo River Basin Integrated Develop®^01
4-122ENVIRONMENT
---------------------------------------------------------------------- ——
sl ruction will undoubtedly disturb wildlife habitat, this is difficult to assess
r e$ert’O’r investigation and its variable quality of baseline information The level of
the scale o* basin is jess that that in the lower It is a subject for further investigation
hvdropower development and the corresponding electrification of the basin
t*
i lCrt»tiveS tOb[J energv and reducing the demand for energy by implementing conservation,
■Jude rsneW,a gional or national growth, and efficiency improvements These latter options
'^ftficti005 an r^|e for Ethiopia at this lime, renewable energy could be an attractive
nd prac1^C3 . _n but could not substitute for hydropower and electrification
^>^!hes
.j urg*-scalf ,rri®9liOn
four lareC'Scale irrigation schemes were recommended by the interim report .Xs A total of ?U,
tr c t
j j \ these ignored the costs of environmental mitigations In addition to with hy health and water quality, the projects seriously detract from wildlife resources
.^es p|an area The costs of mitigations must form part of the final screening for
these projects
" -h imgati°n scheme depends upon a separate reservoir These are shallower than those
mmended for hydropower, and create extensive shoals The insect habitat they provide
c l be ideal for malarial mosquitoes During the dry season Lhey will attract large numbers of
■rf dlite and livestock, and habitat damage and starvation could occur unless animal
populations are controlled
Because the projects bring large numbers of people into intimate contact with moist soil and provide habitats favourable for large populations of disease vectors, human health will be seriously affected Deaths from malaria and other illnesses should be expected While potential mitigations include diagnostic health centres, mosquito nets, and treatment, the effectiveness a: these measures may be low. Non-immune children and adults, the weak, and the infirm will succumb to disease Schistosomiasis presents a serious risk to the area Its control would require the canals be lined
-ns of proposed irrigation sites were the locations of resettlements during the previous liiwnrtie!lt People dislocated by drought came into conflict with the indigenous population
precautions are taken, implementation of the projects risks reintroducing ethnic stress
pj.j,
portions of their reservoirs seriously reduce the area of Gambela National
mammals ’ ,°C*aSe rnigration corridors will force contact between farmers and iarge which win CU?ln® e’eptanis. Dangerous rivalries will develop between farmers and monkeys, rodents ^elds almost at will Irrigated produce will also increase the population of
the and^
‘ ^genou
n
s
^rboui diseases that are dangerous to humans. Tsetse is endemic to
Prove hazardous to animal traction, which is endorsed by the project
? ;^y upon ?COple ot area not sophisticated farmers. Many are pastoralists, others ^ries betw 6 P^ing stick. Both groups will incur problems during project inception
Cen ethnic groups may introduce inequities into the distribution of water: some
L'LG Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Develapweni Master Plan
4-123annex 4
fanners will over-irrigate; others will under-irrigate. Waterlog ’ sodicitv pose problems to the area Leached nutrients present - |F’ users
Partial alternatives to large-scale irrigation include the following
improving (he efficiency of existing irrigation projects and rather than develop new irrigation projects;
intensify upland agriculture;
develop small-scale, individually owned irrigation systems i
X1
s
restore degrade ]
develop systems that rely upon a mix of surface and sround"™?.°fiarse’’i»>
negative impacts of wholly surface svstems
This development of rainfed agriculture is capable of making a ma'o
supply of the region and should be implemented, as pan “of thr^B Wr°Vemem “>thef priority The realisation of one or more of the large irrigation sch
longer to achieve, and must be only put in place after carefol study of?h *
ale 50 as to redUce
Scenar'& ?
inevita^v to
to address the negative impacts identified in this Report
7.4 Flood protection
' C tnJtl8’tion
The Master Plan proposes food protection around several of its irrigated areas and alone th Bara River at Gambela. Relocation of some households in Gambela will be required, but th i ■ minor. More serious is the loss of wetland habitat that will result from this investment - combination with irrigation Dykes acting in concert with altered flow regimes may caust channels to migrate in unpredictable but damaging ways. Feasibility investigations must resin the impact of altered sediment flux and discharge upon channel morphology
Alternatives to flood protection include the following:
• Revise upstream dam operations to mimic, as much as is possible, the natural anr.ua! hydrograph;
• Revise upstream dams to provide partial alleviation of flood risk, or
• Improve the hydrologic condition of upstream catchments
The levee proposed for Gambela should be constructed, but only in unison with flood zc~«e
so that areas at risk do not receive additional households Catchment protect.oc^
essentia] to the long-term control of flood risk at Gambela The behaviour o
downstream of levees will require monitoring, particularly if upstream dams
discharge and sediment concentration of the Bare and other rivers,
7.5 Smallholder agriculture
an imoonant alten^,^ * *:
' Sa*mi||s
Government policy on wildlife is fragmented and weak Gambela National P
over to the region in August 1996 It contains a warden and 11 scouts Jrk Was hi^
uncertain Indeed, the park already includes pan of a state farm and Abobo DanT h^3’' "
The Master Plan proposes several wildlife studies in the Master Plan area Usin
it then proposes to assist government to develop an effective wildlife policy With"^ foundation, there is little that can happen to benefit wildlife in the Master Plan fc°f tk“*“ resource on the wane, vet the national foundations essential to its survival are lack"* national problem
This assessment proposes a moratorium on decisions involving dams, reservoirs, and im • areas in the lower basin until a firm policy on wildlife is evolved
7.10 Tourism
The Master Plan proposes several investments in eco-tourism, including river safans aid • lake development These are small and unlikely to prove interesting to other than a snx minority of tourists Kenya and Tanzania are easier to visit and pose fewer risks to travellers
.Alternatives to tourism in the Master Plan area relate to site There are not many Natiomit investments in sites of historical interest in northern Ethiopia would be more remunerative
7.11 Mineral resources
Mineral resources being prospected in the northern pan of the Master Plan area
describes the mitigations required if active mining is to occur These will require K
the characteristics of the mine and the method of mining are known We th<^c[uRjs
alternatives to mining, there are alternatives in processing. For example, in situ
more hazardous to groundwater than heap or pit leaching At this time there is
information to guide other than a very general set of precautions
.12 Water supply and sanitation
[v with 'J* The Master Plan proposes improvements in water supply and sanitation -hat ? ^-6^ Ministry of Water Resources' Letter of Policy dated January 1996 The
TA.MS-LLG BiroAkobo River Basin Integrated Development ^sSter P
4-1264
ENVIRONMENT
..—-------------------------------------- ------------- ---------- _____ _____________________________
" Sdins » size of community. Piped water supply is
v^es he smallest Similarly, piped sewage disposal with primary tr
h 3r Cst
- ' wcU
^■clV‘I immunity, improved ventilated latrine at the smalls IrcaIrnc™ * available at
the &°e. relate to water supply and sanitation and refer m n r ^ tefTtatlV of collection. disposal and sludge maraecmem m, «
,rM,raent For
^‘^s^different advantages and disadvantages including enytrnfT proposed for the Master Plan area are suitable for a
Each
mpiCtS Tfle
Further study is required « whreb
” ""
?3fl assess^ent have t0 be com™ssioned.
impact as
. fj Solid waste disposal
TneMaster Plan proposes solid waste disposal as an adjunct of sanitat
i™
Ab •
•
Jesting, co-composting with sewage sludge. reuse in a^ctiriu^ TTi?
^thamzation, or incineration. Methanmtion is unlikelv to p effective i
rove
^ tur
e
-
sources available to schemes that are to be self£!
composting ■« probably the most suitable method available to the pi
Or co*
fewibility study before it can be accepted with confidence
'
' an' &U recluires
-.14 Roads
Tit Master Plan borrows ns plans for roads from the government These comprise three Masses of roads constructed in tour phases The major environmental impact from roads is soil erosion and sediment. Chapter 5 describes the mitigations that would be required.
In general, there are no alternatives to roads that provide fast, cheap land transportation The man aliemative lies in the selection of route. Section 5 15 describes the precautions that should be taken.
T AMS-Xjlg Baro-Akuba River Basin Integrated Development Master Plan
4 -127ANNEX 4
8. monitoring requirements and plan
8.1 Introduction
The baseline data preliminary to this Environmental Impact Assess™ to support a Master Plan of the complexity of Baro-Akobo. Their require improvement if feasibility' studies are to be successful Data
bareI.v ad
arib qualifo^’*
continued throughout the duration of the project to gauee its HT° ect’On should th *
ifficulties
'
““'"Wes «
Monitoring the effects of natural resource development proposals is an
of environmental sustainability. However monitoring requires compreh CSSentJal pre'rcquiitc conditions against which to measure environmental changes and to pl'^ data of ba«ir.' actions. Monitoring is expensive .An economy of effort will require that "PKlfic Ini*ifiatiaa and that data collection concentrates only on project areas most likelv lQPr°Jects be keened For large projects such as dams, data collection should precede construction^^V^^'
years
8.2 Environmental standards
aI 6351 seven'
Ethiopia has a basic legal framework for the management of the environment. Environment! related regulations and standards can only be designed by the national and regional authonfe In many cases such regulations and standards might interfere with or impinge on existing laws However in their absence the Ethiopian Authorities could turn to the recommendations of a number of international organisations A number of studies have been conducted over the pa" 10 to 15 years to test the appropriateness of standards and regulations for a large numberc: countries in .Africa, Asia and South America and a large amount of literature is available a: die World Bank, the Food and Agricultural Organisation (FAO) and the LN Environmain- Programme (UNEP). It should be remembered that the level and impact of enviro regulations and standards are dependent on government policy: for example, to what often are the authorities prepared to accept soil erosion.
For the urgently needed forest resources assessments it would be appropriate to
adopt thed^
processing systems deployed bv the FAO and UNEP. Such systems v— ^aice authorities to oversee and control a number of important factors ' ^grazing, environment, including unauthorised logging and clearing, reforestation an
In the case of water quality the criteria recommended by UNEP e J ^
would £
e
e
domestic. industrial livestock, irrigation or fish farming. It is envisaged t onlJ oj
.
Protection Agency (EPA) would be responsible for overall monitoring an
TAMS-ULG Birrv-AkAbo River Basin Iniegraied Develop01* *
0environment
----------------------------------------------------------- —-------------------------- j of relevant published material that may be assist in providing
lect on
folio** t^-cc for the management and protection of resources in the project area in the national standards
iF L’ri °f 1 cntal Source Book * The World Bank. Washington
Envir0"11’® Water Quality Monitoring - United Nations Environmental
'
d
Nairobi
prD?ra r^onral and Planning - Pion Ltd, 207 Brondesbury Park, London NW2 5JN
En viron^eni
Engl^ mentaj Change * Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd. Linacre House, Jordan
, SrtxXd 0X2 8DP England
i nf Environmental Management - Acedemic Press Inc (London) Ltd, 24-28 * road. London NW 1 7DX England
'
j neuradation and Rehabilitation - John Wiley & Soos Ltd, Baffias Lane, West SussexPO19 IUD. England
ronmental Software - Computational Mechanics PUBLICATIONS. Ashurst
* Lodge Ashurst. Southampton, Hampshire, SO4 2AA. England
U Monitoring checklist
i r order to minimise repetition within the report, the following sections open with a general tieckhst of monitoring parameters categorised according to resource. This is followed with a senes of specific monitoring programs dams, irrigation, general construction, wildlife, water supply and sanitation, mineral resources, and upland agriculture.
MI Climate and water resources
• climate (rainfall, wind, temperature, evaporation),
• discharge (above and below dam, above and below irrigated area);
• sediment discharge,
• nutrient discharge (irrigation projects),
water table elevations in project area and downstream (irrigation projects); groundwater quality (irrigation projects),
water quality (salinity. pH, temperature, electrical conductivity, turbidity, dissolved oxygen concentration, suspended solids, phosphates, nitrates, );
t
hyd g
ra en sulphide and methane generation
limnological sampling of microflora, nticrofauna, aquatic weeds and benthic organisms,
. ^.Sherie5 Species, populations, , laims °n prior use;
.);
, ^tability
f distribution;
O water
' uds( l On °f Water distribution (canal sediment and weeds in irrigation projects). ' incide^ ^Va^erS^eC^ condition (extent of agriculture and practices, industrial activity),
• Dm- nCC Ul ^Sease and presence of disease vectors,
of hydrocarbon, (roads)
^^G Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Muter Plan
4-129annex 4
8.3-2
h orders families, phases (especially erosion, depth, stOni
hilitv (irriRation projects).
to»™« (WBrtio* I’vd.ofetnc, agncutaral. forestn, proj
ro “enals 1'an<""’8
S3 J I'egrtflrfon resources
vegetation (cover, species composition, growth rates, biomass, area unit yields (agricultural and irrigation projects);
cropping intensity (agricultural and irrigation projects).
changes in natural vegetation in the project area and on downstream
8.3.4 Wildlife resources
• wildlife (species, distribution, numbers),
• wildlands (species, plant communities),
• poaching records (cases adjudicated, trophies confiscated),
8-3.5 Human resources
• public health and disease vectors,
■ in- and out-migration of people to area,
floodplains,
•
changes in economic and social status of resettled populations and indigenous people,
•
equitability of water distribution,
•
health condition of project populations
8.4 Specific monitoring programmes
The following monitoring programmes are for specific types of projects These imgation, general construction and roads, water supply and sanitation, wi > e, resources, and upland agriculture
A permanent gauging station should be established within 1 Okm upstream surveycd:0'
V™
of the resent
and another within 1km downstream of the dam axis Both gauges permanent benchmark Both should contain staff as well as recording ^
the staff
[eor0 o
| gicai b
being the priman gauge The downstream gauge should include a
re a
| tive hu(IU "
capable of measuring and recording wind travel and direction, temper rainfall. and pan evaporation.
TAMSTLG Baro-Akobo River Bavin lniegraied Dcveioprne111 *la5ter
■1-130ENVIRONMENT
r of operat*on al ‘east 12 rneasurements covering a range of flows should h This will require that a gauging team take measurements during flood
p#‘?r l£}wto wcather. Gauge operators should never measure high (lows alone 2
jtiiv,d
nt
aljon should be measured using depth-!ntegradng samplers for at least 5 stream Samples can be integrated into a single container. Separate bottles
5 files 81X055 thC diment and water quality Dissolved oxygen samples should either be fixed be used mr se or electrical meter should be used
the above, a third permanent gauging station will be required between 5 and ] n jcd4tniction supervision can come about in several ways Construction contractors do not wnnally assign an environmental officer responsible for safeguarding the environment
0
on large projects it is not unusual for governments to retain a consulting engineer to
^erset construction; on smaller projects the task often falls directly to government. Ideally.
res POns^e for supervision has the power to stop on-site activities when a
serious1 da0CCUrs 10 penalise contractors when they commit serious offences Examples
°7*rator a®e ^Uretri r
excess clearing of road right-of-ways, road design by equipment engineer, failure to adequately clear reservoirs of their vegetation, and
10 hallow BMP’s
J
^
rns
- Conc^ssions or licenses to implement activities such as the construction ot
^’^nihental r roads, it is government’s responsibility to make sure it has fully identified ail s and that it is sufficiently indemnified so that damage can be adequately
Baro-Akoho River Basin Integrated Devdopment Master Plan
4-131ANNEX 4
repaired The license should specify the actions to be taken by the liCcnsee environmental damage
Water supply and sanitation
Water treatment plants should operate a stream gauge upstream of their abqt large towns this should be a recording gauge linked to a primary staff
,nOrd'rt0B.^
should utilise a staff gauge that is read daily At large and medium towns d ? Slnal1
samples should be taken upstream of the abstraction point and from witH? k atcr
system. Those at medium-sized towns should be processed at large towns Anal d:shib^o made of nutrient concentration, especially nitrates, turbidity, and of the d Sh°ui^r
coliform and coliform organisms Periodic (bi-weekly) samples should be mad
related to aesthetic water quality and inorganic constituents that have health COnstihienis
U1 Slgnificance
The quantity of overflow from primary sewage lagoons needs to be gauged d • monitored It should involve a flume with recording gauge, its chlorine
measured
Monitoring also needs to record advances in sanitation, particularly the number of latrines installed in private households. Health visits, and disease frequency and careful records to be kept
&4.5 Wildlife
Shou* be
,e ^
Wildlife habitat quality' should be assessed in terms of vegetation density, type, md productivity Baseline samples should be conducted at locations that are then sampled periodically, say once everv 2-3 years Wildlife censuses also need to be taken, possibly as pan of university- research or technical training programmes. Before any change of administrate!: or major incursion into protected areas by roads, dams, or state farms, a census of wildlife and inventory of habitat needs to be conducted.
Poaching needs to be recorded When poachers are brought to trial, a park record needs to br kept of the case and its outcome. The disposition of trophies also needs to be recorded
A 4.6 Mineral resources
Gauging stations similar to those for dams need to be established in the
’ “’^
vc
py j
un
J1
during prospecting, they will need to include piezometer taps into the water underlying aquifers These then need to be maintained until such time asj a jjscontin^* made about mining If mining is not to be pursued, then the gauges could De Otherwise, they should be operated until several years after mine decomrruss related to minerals, especially iron, copper, arsenic, lead. zinc. su^atrorc rnim 8 conductivity require measurement Aquatic life should be censused ® jurin?3C3' periodically thereafter Sampling should occur weekly during prospecting,
mining, and weekly following decommissioning
__ __________ ______ -
—-—■— plan
r
TAMS-ULG Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development M#*
4-132
I
*environment
;
projects currently operate a set of runoff parcels near E>La This should
' *il CDI,SC Lt each of the 5 upland agricultural systems within the project area is
imp** of different land uses should be measured, particularly iea, coffee, and
1 . j| ]C research needs to be expanded to include a plot in permanent bare
*
^lect’011 ^r£Sith standard procedures (see Lai, 19851 Economic monitoring needs to be
5^'v in
1
'fertilise ’ and insecticide use. prices, and farm household revenue
x ■ needs to be undertaken of the effect of coffee cleaning upon water quality At stn ^jervation stations are required upstream and downstream of representative
leiSt s^'cra ^factories, and should involve weekly samples taken over a period of at least one
lJ Ul tcrs sampled should include DO, pH, 5-day BOD, temperature, discharge,
pjffe* P ^ g
Psranl
e j |ifc. during active coffee preparation the frequency should be changed to
d beT]th c
p-bidity- parameters should be measured at coffee factories that have installed the
gjoh“d«nl>ed in Section 5 4
about Lhe frequency of extension visits, the number of participants, their yields and Rc ^ s rL to be kept on a permanent basis
j/S Health
disease frequency requires careful monitoring within the Master Plan area This will be
issisted by the establishment of diagnostic health centres in the vicinity of major
^pemndments and irrigated areas Incoming workers need to be screened for infectious
creases.
8,5 Monitoring policy
Ethopia sorely needs to classify- lhe quality of its natural streams. The assumption is thai the *aitrs of natural streams are clean, yet this is unlikely given Ethiopia's low access to ^nittuon. Sediment causes rivers to be turbid during the rainy season, indicating water quality a it best seasonal Elsewhere, salinity might be a problem A classification scheme would
sb thresholds below which intrinsic water quality could not be degraded, it would enable t iters to demand polluters refrain from damaging streams
n£
Monitoring costs
tiout USS^in Cost a Sagging station equipped with a recorder and staff gauge is
^servers thi
a S^tiging station equipped solely with a staff gauge and using local
Charge'meS FedUCes to about uss ^500. These costs include design, installation, travel.
qua]j ^T
t
5UrerTieritS’ ratlng curve development, and data processing. The monitoring ot
- Osts about USS 500 per constituent per year
J¢ advan
opgajj’5 in uater quality measurement are reducing the costs of data collection. 1SITIS USe^ to be measured using glassware and the most probable number
b’LG Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Master Plan
4-133,V
__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
ANNEX 4
- -■
gteware bui thc met
pO meters nd'’e
m ainienance
hnuld be implemented .
- "s de,K"t
oraan,sauons currently responsible for data
r
co Un..
Master Plan to conduct work that J*1Cin annex on institutions discusses ho. infcmatlM
I
II !|
!
4-13*environment
,l
anaeemenL aS usecI 'n r^s d°cument. is meant to comprise activities
r ll rne,ltn'. ^he express intent to protect the environment The environment will be most
. - .,iron
L course of design, when government will have the opportunity of oversight to a[ risk M”10 1 ^cations are met. and during construction, when restrictions, BMPs and. even jjsure that 5^CcA|]eC| for. Thereafter, environmental management becomes more the property "^Stglndcorrecrive setion.
c Design review
of Water Resources has an Environmental Impact Assessment and Folio^-lip ? C which as P311 t*ie Design Department, reports to the Vice Minister (Appendix A)
^Teirn reviews project designs to ensure they- comply with the environmental criteria ted by the Ministry, some of which have been elucidated in this report. We understand
■lit other ministries, such as Agriculture, have similar teams whose role is to ensure the pacas undertaken by the ministry are done to a standard that fulfils environmental requirements.
In addition to the Ministry of Water Resources, the Ethiopian Environmental Protection
Authority is mandated at the federal level to ensure that new projects meet national standards
*
cfenwoiunental performance (see Sec 144 of the National Conservation Strategy, vol 2 for a
discussion of the EPA's role) At this writing the Authonty. which is newly founded with
about 30 professional staff, is occupied with formulating the policies, guidelines, standards,
mJ legislation it requires to fulfil its charter Presumably, the Authority would also play a role
^design review. At this time, however, the exact way in which the Authority will collaborate
” ti the Ministry of Water Resources and other ministries is still being established
*
Construction review
turnon review was discussed in the preceding section as part ofmonitoring draining
At
■^ective i ^
n
c lra™n^ has been correctly identified by the Conservation Strategy as a national
' Jl '^proved env}05 this Master Plan, however, two key groups of people are most in need ^tock anne^0CnIa^ avvareness farmers and construction workers The Agriculture and
,
CS
"Natural Resources Volume address asriculturaJ and animal and wffl not be repeated here.
l LG Baro-Akobo River Basic bilegnted Development Mailer Plan
r
4-135riion
V>V
1W>SV(.
desttuct'oxv, they
be agents <* ^hen frst on-sne,
v be\ng * ? ?oU\d tftfMe a vvdeo tape ox sW
. & co^inJ .-jnenuX^ ^rps ^'s s\ aCh\e^ng different consvxuawn
^2^
i
vENVIRONMENT
jO
.gTHEKSTl-PlK
discussed constraints to the formulation ot this Environmental Action dine secd°n 'basing of consultants and a lack of expertise in some Selds means that
A pfn^flicullies in T u fee required Data gaps, indicated by an absence of entries Ln the v>al studieS u ' p (Appendix C). may also require attention
‘Rental
A rch^IoSJcJl
(*PP
laical Studies
,lL
. ; repOrts of cave or rock paintings in the project area, the .Master Plan
i\tiilew'e have VeF tjon about their location. Reservoir areas and dam sites that would be
' uved in*° < l.v
changes
BBlog'f’1 s,"diM
construction should be reviewed as pah of a site-specific
romexpen (198® and 1990), ARDCO-GEOSERV (1995), and the Ethiopian Wildlife ^^vide extensive lists of wildlife sightings in the project area The list needs (o be ^ieXd for rare or endangered species. Basic information is lacking about existing --ulutiojis and population dynamics of minor mammals, amphibians, aquatic life, benthic life, ind birds Site-specific population studies will be required prior to decisions about project irvestmait,
l#3 Sociological Studies
Tse sociological information contained in this Master Plan is suitable for a study of this scope, k pan of investment decision making, however, more detailed investigation is required, PEtiojlariy if resettlement becomes likely
10,4 Water quality.
^’•'ailabV011^'1'0115 arC to degrade water quality at major reservoirs The data were '^perature S f'/IasTer Plan to m°del its occurrence A key missing factor is water
"ties of Selkh C WG Su®®est r^s be measured as part of feasibility studies, the original Geld k^promexport and ARDCO-GEOSERV might provide important information
Ration is L
a
include c l’f 1 aDoin important water constituents related to health and aesthetics. jl °JIn.or®an^Snis. nitrate concentrations, iron, sodium and others Data
'■'^’er $ e as'n will require expansion within the guidelines previously discussed in
' G BarD-AjjQijQ River Busin Integrated Development Master Plan
4-137v rtet^'on
105
u itab\e fw feasA>'W studies In
Ha uon * uB ,n important bearing on wa«
.. . .c abo^ v6g Les ^ave nV J This information wl\ need \0 bt
w
1 teve “ 1M ***environment
1b
C0 ^ S,ONS
11.’
existing st3tllS
are ta*en 1
of the natural environment in the Baro-Akobo Basin is deteriorating and if the effects of a rapidly growing population this deterioration will
‘ nmentai problems that arc facing the Basin concern its vegetation and soil, and The ruinenv1^ causej bv the expanding population The Basin's forests, which cover about
?o th
area are becoming degraded and depleted under the pressure for grazing and
’• 3‘’°fthf t0j the need for fudwood The population, which is growing at an annual rate of (laNe colT1pensaung for a continuing decline in agricultural productivity by a CV i to be halted and the decline in crop productivity reversed Th °SS °f ° Rtai
r
environmental impacts The proposed improvements to small holde^ 416 no implemented in the context of soil conservation and care must be taken the environment.
Livestock, fisheries and bees
t0 rn*n'tttiSe"^
The livestock development programme has been chosen to increase th
region s livestock by improving the general levels of health and nutritioneRProductivity of of overgrazing and consequent soil erosion, this programme is closely
Of the ir
conservation The development of fisheries and bee keeping will also ass' t0 t^at °f sj
of food and in the local economy and will thus tend ro ease the pressm productici
without any significant risk to the environment Forestry, wildlife and tourism
e °n other SectQ.i
The forests of the basin are rapidly being depleted with grave conse environment, particularly for soil conservation The preservation and rehab'?0005 f°r remaining forests will therefore have significant positive environmental im ' 'tall°n °f making a sustainable contribution to the local economy through logging ^Wiidiy w consequence tourism will also be a beneficiary of the forestry programme ~
' 1 e an<*L1
Renewable energy
The development of renewable energy as a partial alternative to the burning of fuelwood could reduce the demand for fuelwood, which at present outstrips supply. The most economic Ion term solution for energy supply of the basin would be electrification however this is a log term solution and in the short to medium terms renewable energy’ could have a significant beneficial effect on the environment
11.2.3 Development of the social infrastructure
The present social infrastructure in the basin is unacceptably low there is only a rudimtr.tir. water supply system in the larger towns, no arrangements for sanitation or solid waste disposal and few roads The development of social infrastructure will not only greatly improve die
quality of life of the population but will be fundamental for the improvement of public health 113 Projects
11.3.1 General
While the component programmes of the basin development are a pre-requisite
for t**^ arr^ to
in the decline in the environmental status of the region, the major projects
exploit the natural resources to the economic benefit of both the region a ^viTonn^1, However, by their nature, the projects are associated with significant negau during [1C impacts which will have to be assessed in detail on a project by project
feasibility studies
na uon
------ ———-- -
____________________________________________________ ___ ------------ It*f
TAMS-1 LG Ban>Akobo River Basin Integrated DevelopmentENVIRONMENT
.-
P
involve the construction of dams and so significant damage to the
rQ e
j ble However, because of the heavy rainfall and favourable topography
Hvl3r0P^ent is ifieVl rOirs required for even major projects. In comparison with elsewhere ef^K- reSC?L impact is small and can mostly be mitigated at a reasonable cost
jjj
ejects are situated in the dryer lower basin where the flat terrain suits
' large irtiga0011 ^
h(sse projecTS will require large reservoirs with the attendant problems
J^hsijs^
evapOra f
sedimentation, waterborne disease and a large land take The irrigation
s will also, to varying degrees, impinge on the wildlife reserves
, 4 Mining
* ■■
' lata exists for the identification of specific mining projects, but clearly mining 1$
Indent
i nmental damage, which is described, together with the appropriate
eriv ro
™^5Ure$ in the report. However the basin does possess significant mineral irJeitiori orrtnierCial exploitation of which could provide a major boost to the local
^tirces m
e cu
ecotiotny
11.4 Conclusion
U di
r
ihe expanding population the environment of the basin will continue to deteriorate at an
jreasiTiq rate unless the measures described in this report are implemented The sustainable iewfopment of the basin therefore comprises
• the arrest of environmental deterioration and the increase in food production by means of the basm development programme
• the economic development of the basin’s resources through a the implementation of a programme of large projects Of these a hydropower project would cause the least damage ™ would make the greatest contribution to the economy and should precede both large ^‘
a e irrigation projects (for which they would supply a regulated water supply) and lining, for which they would supply power
4-141ANNEX 4
12. REFERENCES CITED
Addis Tribune. 1996 Anti-Malaria Campaign to Start Tomorrow fi „
6SCP96 AddlSA
Alum, N.I 993 Gambela Seeds Assessment Report on Agriculture Faa
ARDCO-GEOSERV 1995 Survey and Analysts of the Upper
' Addis Ababa
report, vols 1 thru IV
Da ^Akobo Basin
Armitage, MS 1995 Cropping in the Baro-Akobo Basin First Ch
Agronomy Specialist TAMS-ULG Addis Ababa
^'on Repo j
ri Q
.Armstrong, JC. Susceptibility to vivax malana in Ethiopia Trans R Soc Trop M H
Atwell, B and W Frankenthaler 1995. Draft Environmental Report TAVi<
Ababa
Addis
Ayele, T The distribution of schistosomiasis in Ethiopia: Results of 1978-8"’
Teklemariam Ayele and C T Lo (eds), Schistosomiasis in Ethiopia Proceed^
Symposium on Human Schistosomiasis in Ethiopia Pp 1-8 Addis Ababa Imstruie'-'
Pathobiology. 1982
Uteot
Bradbear, N. 1996 Apiculture: Draft Follow ing Second Mission TAMS-ULG Addis-Ababa
Buden, H Report on the Investigation carried out in November as a WHO short-tenn
Consultant Ministry of Health, Addis Ababa 1981
Centra! Statistics Authority 1984 Census
I
’v.
Central Statistics Authority 1992. National Rural Nutrition Survey.
Colombi, SB 1995 Socio-Economics: First Mission Report of the Development Economist TAMS-ULG Oct.2
Copeland. V \996 Land Evaluation TAMS-ULG Addis Ababa.
Copeland, OL 1965 Land use and ecological factors in relation to sediment yields Miscellaneous Publication 970. pp 72-84
i f TA^^* Covvx, IG 1995 Fisheries Issues: First Mission Report of the Fisheries Spec
ULG Sep. 28pp
tams-l^ Davnesson, RC 1996 Forestry in the Baro-Akobo Basin, Rough Draft R 9“
Soil IMr Skiflmg Col „„ „
IKm Tcdl CoT
ffj* c'--irtin'c'ri
Bureau of Soils. Harpenden.
„ J social H'Wfy of Ethiopia Addis Ababa Umvemtv. 37 top
p
^53^’^ Cotiservation m Rwanda FAO Rome
0** r Debcle 1993 Consultants' Report; Soil Conservation in Birr and Koga
£ and b
Engineering Consultants Addis Ababa 80 pp
Environmental Impact Assessment: Samanaiaweva Dam and Reservoir Resources Management. London
Stiwert vie 1
qo6 Refill lxavi 1/Se 7he NeedfOr Change m a Growing Problem J.
ConS' P’ib
(r0 ]996 population Aspects TAMS-ULG
v 1996 Actualile medecine: la malaria mise a ma/. No. 948 September
uozproinexpon 1990 Baro-Akobo Basin Master Plan Study of Water and Land
9 Resources of the Gambela Plain Draft final report vols I thru XU
seihozpromexport 1988 Detailed Project Report Alwero Irrigation Project Vo! 8A Moscow.
TAMS-VLG 1995 Baro-A kobo River Basin Integra led Development Master Plan inception Report. 3 vcls f Annexes. Addis Ababa
Fedi Shibm, H. Kloos and Getachew Tilahun (eds). Schistosomiasis in Ethiopia Addis Ababa Addis Ababa University Press. 1989
• H Kebede. J Tesfaye et aJ The prevalence of trachoma in Chorege Proceeding c the Ninth Public Health and Research Conference Pp 13-15 Gondar College of -"edical Sciences. 1988
Woody Biomass Inventory and Strategic Planning Project Executive Min Ag Addis Ababa.
^°Menha uoriServation of Cropland Conservation Farming on Steep Lands.
D 19SS r
.
Conserv ■Gr’ "
ervai]Qn pp 14] _
Report
N W. Hudson, ed World Association of Soil and Water Contribution on Geology, Minerals, and Mining for Inception
ii-.
'PC
L Addis Ababa.
In nee(is assessment survey.
T ^^-ULcTr '_____ ________ —______ —— ------- ------------—
a ro-Akobg River Basin Integrated Dndopment Master Plan
4 - 145lQftc> Erosion research on steep lands in the VW.;. , » ft and 1) Losa" „„ farming on Steep Lande MoUentauc, W C. „
Vd “'U>«i‘ C^^XofSa^WMerConMnftmon
pp2e9 270
.
HudW
n. «
, i c Note on the cia
1913
. ,q 6 /W
,
, r« Ministry of ‘y
Water Resources -
of ^.u-enorgy matathtkm in eMd™ r of Sector Policy Me Ababa January „ pp
Oiinorr TAMS-ULG Addts Ababa.
Dro/i Socio-*conom,C ?° Wicket. E- i" r •
, e:« WH and DD Smith ' _ Wschme’et- planning kS u v »
C
W odd Bank 1^1
•._ A ’ *£
program ^auu diskette)
„,u, , |OQ1 Environments* *
predicting Rainfall Erosion Losses JS Gwj* Io ^Handbook No. 537.
Sourcebook 3 V/aftb DC
[Wfir Agrofore5try A computer
»
I
t 1 \\ENVIRONMENT
fable? w
dFiS“"S
A
J C
D
w- Matm
cental Database Envir°
Costs
/
4-147ANNEX 4
Contents
Climate: Baro-Akobo. Diseases associated with water
Infrastructure
Characteristics of different Resettlement criteria
hydroelectric and irrigation projects,
upper basin
Total Surface
per
water
capita water quality
demand data..
Water quality data for boreholes, springs, and lakes Summary of WHO water quality guideline values
Dam
Reservoir characteristics
Characteristics
Crop budgets, no project scenario
Pa §e I
4
5
6
9
10
12
13
15
18
19
20
*
i
X.
TAMS-ULG Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated DeveJopmcnt Master PTABLES AND h
CCR£s
Climate: Bnro-akoba
jres g‘
giv.
,vc “• stations whose data make up the figures
, cneralized overview of the climate of the project area Table
teristics oi
i?-*
-i’8racl-
—-«fF stations and their characteristics
Altitude
(metres)
Data record
(years)
Latitude
North
Longitude
East
I
Station name
Gambe'3
Didesa
480
50
8.15
34.35
1200
7
9,CO
3606
i
i
aro
1560
17
751
36 38
5
Ag
2130
29
Gore
8.10
35.33
J
Arjo
2565
6
8.45
36 30
:
53?
rrrTE^
Month
Figure 1. Precipitation (mm/monih). Symbol numbers correspond to station numbers listed above, and show the effect of altitude on rainfall amount and distribution
" S'llljG 8^o-akobo mver basn intecisated knim®®" mm®» «*Month
Figure 1 Maximum mean monthly tempeFaiuie kLC) showing-* the effect of altitude, symbols and station names as on previous page
TAMS-LLG 0ARO-AKOBO RIVER BASIN INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENTANNEX A: TABLES AND FIGURES
Fea
Ib± Are
Mocdi
Or
Pm
Figure 4. Mean daiiy sunshine hours, symbols "and station names as on page I Incoming radiation during the summer, especially at high altitudes, is a constraint to plant growth
■
/
Month
1 igure = Mean daily reference evapotranspiration imm d’j as computed by the FAO using the Penman Monteith methodANNEX 4 ENVIRONMENT
Table 2. Diseases associated with water
Class
Vector BACTERIAL
—-
Uj q
WATER-BORNE
Water acts as passive vehicle for the infective agent.
Enterobacteria (jc r ,. j °mp>'/otac^ch ;
0 era
Lcptospiro i ct
Ss c
WATER- WASHED infections that decrease as a result of increasing the volume of available water
VTRAL PARASITIC
ENTERIC
SKIN’
Hepatitis ,V Poliomyeliti. Rotevnusea, Ent^^ Amoebiasis, Giardia^ Tm
E g- a proportion ofdianhw- gastroenteritis
no "‘
s
3pht'"s
Pipelines
pieplants
PjwrLma
uBtuction camps
Hois
i Jirjngnd areas
Mioes
SjPll Juir.ps
lathing ponds
Hiift' codes: (1) Hy dropo wer development
(2) Large-scale irrigation
(3) Flood protection
(4) Water supply and sanitation
(5) Mineral resources extraction
■
■•^AU‘j r ------ ------- -------------------------------------___
''G ^^o-Akobo R ■
' er Basin Integrated Development Master Planof different hydro-electric mill irrigation project*, upper basin
Location
Ancillary works (kin)
Discharge (n/s *)
l ill vol,
aieu. IO* 1
1 Lionel/
Irrigation
Dani/wcir
River
Vai
l-ong
IOf in’
lie
inv siph Catinl PeiiAtock
GWIi (M)
Ave miiiidl Diverted
CO
(l»)
(0
()
(i)
(M
(1)
(in)
Hhbu
1 Jjrpri
K*4G*N
35*241
1 15
7
4
0.71
320
8000*
48.0
36.5
1 ii|««kik*
llirbir
8
0.60
1000
80 0
<4)0
Hiichnno
It.iro
7*5 VN
35°32’f
0 12
K9
1.5
0 II
230
Nil
63.(1
42 6
10.4
0 84
1000
63 0
42.6
(»cl .* (i.ltciil
(icba
X’U N
36*05’l(
1 69
7 5
1 5
0 60
445
Nil
32.0
24 0
6.5
0 25
180
44.8
35.0
Kasliu
Knshu
G*49’N
35'39'E
(1 3|
2 2
2.K’
10
1.58
205
8000’
8.0
6 1
5000*
< iumcin -Ola (iiuncra Ofii ri4 n
35®29T
1 27
1.43
0 863 3.6
2.2 0.27 72 Nil 2.5 0 37 109
70 0.40 121
II
II
1!
9
9
9
Beko
Beko
7°IO’N
35’26‘E
8.069
5.4
15
0 55
46(1
Nil
35.0
26 0
Sesc
Scsc
8*29’N
35’59’E
254
11
3
0 27
41
Nil
7.2
5.5
7
0.37
96
145
/I.O
Snkn (iuda
Siko-Guda
8°28’N
34®39’E
1.68
0.74
2.7
r
54
1.87
122
4600
4 6
3.61
StM
Ser sub-
basin
35*3 IN
1.572
13
108 0.55 3XU Nr/
62.0 28.2
V Vian nlViwa either hydropower from 2 writ diveniuns * works or power from I diversion and irrigation.
1. IM km inverted Mpbon
' Kdu Unp.ntuMi Vrojec.1, water from power |d-n»l
A. Akcdxi
•» 1 l Vm
Project, wntet (tutu 34
Lcilg
A.rmlAtary wcik, Q> m,>
liumcV
V VwJnu'i'^ ty.' s'1 t,
,v
ftjvrr
I-’lJI vol,
IO* m1
NITMLi. tn1
Im
LttV Mtph
(g)
Cuiutl PirTwUic.k. CWh 05
Asms. iuxwuA TiwciVxd
(»}
Lower itipi
Ha.
Buicj
1_5
7 1
No duly Nil
No du tn Nil
Nil
Nil
Null? Nn A-.ila N« iWa
Giln
1.6 Numbung
Atwero
l)7“45’
3 4 “42*
0.4 H
() 27
0 65
12.6
Nil
582
4 2
0.05
Abidws
Alwuiu
07*52'
14*30’
O.HK
Nil
Nil
Nil
10-100
20
StTWT lAMS/IJlAr 1795 Jnc-qjLniri Krport. Vol 1- AJdui Atrnba.
6. Irrigatum idlei native*- 6,400 Im nuwiMJiu-liver; 61,000 hn Itaitg waler workn (lhi« daln row) + Lluro Project; 110.000 Im Ilnng + Burn ^Birbii; 84.000 Im Boro * Bitbir
•1- Gebn Pntcnlirti irrigable atom almul B6.0CXJ hit ocnnrdLug tn Ruisinii aludy
7. AliciTuttivcs; J,5DO ho nm uf-lhe-rivnr; 20,000 ItM iin inp power bruise disdtitrgu from Baku Project
A 7ClimucUihtka of nm-of-the-river hyJriwJcutrfc projccH__________________________________________ __________________________________________ _____ ___________
Loch I ion
Ancillary works (km)
Diun/wcjr
ta) Bares ha weiis No. I
Nu. 2 Na 3 No -1
River
(b)
Beivdm
Lal
Long
bill vol (IQ* mM
Reservoir -
iircu
(KJ1 Im)
Tunnel/
inv nip h
(-until Pern lock
lUi
niwliuvge^ mV
Ave iitniLial Diverted
(c)
7M9 N
7*50 N
(cl) w (D (s) J5*25’E
15’257-
(h)
(i)
(iWh
(i)
(k) 0)
(m)
0 TO (1? H7G Nil
ri.oo
0.2 «76 Nil
7*53’N 35*2 7’H
2.1 0.4 2N3K Nil
1 u 0.2 K7G Nil
( int,lull,! WL‘ilS iJliLU
3.89
No. 1
N"02*N
35*19’
14
0.25
2654
No. 2
7°5R’N
35°2U’
UK
0 45
22l(i
Nn, 3
7°55‘N
J5“I9‘
0.3
035
2654
No. 4
7°53’N
35*21’
2.25
030
44 K2
tii4u[
Gn In I (l i ib
HQ3RI
W1H'
0.40
0.50
iriH/i
■Ml
nf Biibir)
Sor weirs
Sor
1 0
0.2
0.021
622
No. 1
2 25
0.5
0.05.1
«GS
No. 2
; . j m,. u h'il
1
SO UR< ’ E • T A MS AII .C i 1995, luLcptionkepfii. Vo] T ASLlis AEiilmt criteria
object to resettlement should not only maintaui jB
standard
Dri Compensation for the assets of the nonviable enterprises should be used
J
emp luymen!
'■‘‘ previ
e
[) ..s emS . lnlrastructure such as roads, bridges, etc., should be replaced so that se ™ice is maintained or improved
f °Ppartunilies-
^'^annofa
-oiid be a?^S d°es 1101 result in achieving target incomes, some of the labour force erc - n onagri cultural employment opportunities.
ly(J4
Rivf.R haSIN INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT MASTER PLAN A 94. ENVIRONMENT
ANNEX A:
Table 6. Total per capita Water Demand for Vn Cities, and other uses
various
Country'
England and Wales (1971-2 figures) Scotland (1971-2 figures)
Other countries (1967-8 figures)
Denmark
France
USA
0-290
0.415
290
415
to
Sweden
West Ma1aysia
USSR municipal
Johannesburg native housing
Native villages where water is
0.340
0.300
0.250
0.350
0.210
0 , 164
0.164
0.118
340
300
250
35C
210
164
164
118
hand carried
0.015
15
to 0.035
African rural
35
0.050
50
Urban
0.200
200
Cattle
0.020
20
Sheep, goats
0.005
5
Camel
0.035
35
TAMS-ULG BARO-akoro river basin INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENTjjL»±O*r) .
ZdbJo 7,
*»’r» r JC .jrro Wdr.r.'t' qn.i I 1 l~y
nnleCl nd CCiikiit.1 t 'hunt n Ar^er ba-tiiii ,
r
Y\VCli_X_ ? ph (x.)
ICaco^
Gilo intex-
Max
64
fleuve nr
Min
3.0
94
0
174
2.3
4.5
1.5
0
B .3
6.4
7 .2
6.4
1.41
0.14
32B
12 <13
126
Gilo 2
Sleeted constituents
for springs,
and lakes
Birbir River
6,4
4.8
2.0
2 . 0
0
8.3
0.8
.17
408
7 7
Gog spring
24.3
23.0
14.5
1 . 0
1.2
8.4
-
□ .57
390
198
Gambela
■13.7
373.4
4 00
12
-
6,6
-
spring
5.46
*-
3 29 3
Tata lake
3,6
7.2
3,0
-
6.9
-
-
101
NOTE: HJ Tht- preceding max lmum and minimunis reflect values observed from dlr Cerent boreho Tea _
The maximum is the highest recorded value from among a set of boreholes. Thus, [.he lowest may be from a different borehole within the set.
t2) - meana no analysis for that constituent,
l
!
(3) Units mostly in mg 1 except for pH. which is in pH units,- hardness, which is meg I
-
1
Sodium Adsorption Ratio, which is dimensionless, and conductivity which is in uS cm ' SOURCE: Snlkhozpranexport. 1990. Vol 4, App 2.8,
'
*4* ENVIRONMENT
ANNEX A:
____ Table
9. Summary of WHO water
quality giii de 1 □
Quality
1. Bacteriol
ogical quality
Piped
supplies
fa)
Treated water enter ing the distribution
system
(b)
Untreated water
entering the distri
bution system
(c) Water in the distri
bution system
Eapiped suppli
es
faecal ca
lif onus
:
□
coliterm
organisms: io
Berried drinkin
g water
faecal
conforms:
o
coliform
organisms: io
Emergency
supplies
or
drinking
water
faecal
colifarms:
o
coliform, organisms: 0
Inor canic const!tuents of Guideline value (mo Litre1 health, significance
arsenic cadmium chromium cyanide flouride lead mercury
nitrate (as N) selenium
0.05
0.005
0.05
0,1
1.5
0.05
0.001
10
0.01
A
TANIS-L LG BARO-AKOHO RIVER BASIN INTEGRATED DEVELOPMENT MASTERANNEX A:
pesticides •
F aldrin/dieldrm
1 O T d 3 O e
2 4-D
r
DDT
heptachlor and heptachlor epoxide
hexachlorobenzene
lindane
methoxychlor
I. Radioactive materials
Gross alpha activity Gress beta activity
Aesthetic quality
aluminium "hlcride copper
hardness iro* Angaries e s °dium sulfate
2inc°lved solids '°lour
(as CaCO,)
ari d odour
10
3
10
0.3
1C
30
10
10
0.01
30
0.03
0.3
100
1
0.1
0.01
3
30
0.1 Bq litre'1
1,0 Bq litre’1
Guideline value fnia litre-1
0.2
250
1.0
500
0.3
0.1
200
400
1000
5.0 15 true colour units (TCff)
Not offensive to dost consumers
^■AKOBO river B
as[n
j^tegratED DEVELOPMENT MASTER FEAS4. ENVIRONMENT
AWrv 4
kivtk basin integrated development masterTable 10. Datn CharacCerititics
Dam character!aticu
Appurtenant warkn (2)
Catchment trize
00
(i)
0)
(k)
(l)
W
Ol)
COLUMN NOTES:
fa) Project component identifies lhe cause of impact, e g dkim with reservoir, comdr lie I ion camp, righhuf-way. Some coniponojb, such tonxli iiUluii cumpit, will nqjcat across different development inletvcnlions. Rallicr limn repeal previous data, the matrix will LToss-rcfercncc In preceding Lillies.
(IQ Potential impact identifies wlnil tl»c cause could d«j in a wnr iaimhr. thi|h,
flu.
Ammiiii of IbikI occu
pied
Mm n? di raw 1 csl
r
m*
UM
-S’
Al-nmitbl or crops.
Inmpk'd
Nt>l k'MlltlJUicd
•XI-
-l*
1
IhtlairbilllCD in live,
nock
b?m k niintnk-il
-r
-r
GcnefhCly imkunflKmit but
(n« enir4n*ti anfliTMEHi
" ComfiCluMlt dun»g£,
* Beal mJIM)CVrtU 1*1 jwwclteC (BMI ) to control furl *m1 chemical mnli! cuch i*
ilisllmp inuil
Kupc
Neil c-muii.HciI
-M"
Ar-
Soil pnnuiiy, critnfwc-
Lioti, de
Nol cMiuinloJ
•M-
Kmp|ri)Uii;Hl
Nul cdmulol
•r
Polluttoti
Not c»imi*kiird or
Jlli^ill lull uupretl llj UlillV 1J ual In*udfeiFJb
AMIA'Pit o< iloil
Ktfl tllimnk.l
4*
Allkllllld »T MKInlUEll
Hliiull
Mui ritukiiL'ii
-I"
■ l.crre hk'i't vili£[i»tr
pi>ikJaik: hla mH prKliCv
luwl ck+idficu.
- IlMLlfl A link
■ Itcp-U-.k. Iqpriijlw barter
■ RfldHc hl ^ipfUfTIAk
•Lu^irdi |ktv Ltil)
Anunlnl of rtwiikd
Hol CiJWlUtiLd
-J*
■-S*
J, C«iqi pffllfW
JlOltie end
sJrdrit ni iwp'
J*Dr
FfrUwiniL- ihjkc, ftiul
itl Ek1 tmal
Pollution
Air: amount of smoke Not cifwttalcrt
r'nuumtwaici eherm- cat, |4»y«kn1. orhei
piWXHLlutt
See tfcvis, 1972, * rriM<>«k/M>a/»r Hv ttontogy. Wiley
Nnl otuiKMcrf
L-r^ workforce can contnb- utc to polhman urdcaa waste is Ircirfcd- Avoid burning nbnox- imn at Ioxk matenab — ttanipcHl foe ofT-iilc ft carmen*
Compensate for of!-site damages
I be HNtP to control runufl
anil rrmwa
Avoid parallel construction
leihnrqucs
Sewage | 1
Niirf l-MHHBkd
♦M*
tLapr.
An*-*** In ii|.ii|L«H
Aointmi i*r mu<*BLil
HCCO1
Nut L'llliiuieil
*$•
■ Keep i igM-oL-n'fly Io
milHIIIllIlL
a Nil pnrn'ild. CNUihutlwn
kckiHiqun
* CLmi|>{iU4tim aehenw RikhI rrdkiwi tfrtgintcial duBijp. iiul akMigri Uy
H|Kinlni
1“
7 |>1«14HP
Soil aiutiwi rfllll «e<.liiiKHl
jriudui I inn
l.'iiHi trtlJiwi jiiohlc
Nail niMiiatal
-s«
• V
ihiiiiiBitc w « iiMfnr
cim« ad atiil
i
| ltir>lllK4|'ii ;i >I>I hahuL ahaiiir-
|
ll
J ii|l|gltl’dlBI«l dwllllipc
Mui OlMHBUll
-s*
-5*
-S‘
|UUIL<
1
Siivmii kfidaiiiR*
Nut I S lillriBMd
-SB
-s*
5*
• Ikliglk drMIMigt.
■ CilfiaillKl iv*d Bill IRaJeij
kJ Ilk JVHUt *T£M.
■ h'ki^CUlrat* jwru|i«l*te
JUT il, .»j’n kla nf iliULlMit ,
ami ml.
CwiitriKl tai|i|iar>r) iriwh J k> pemuiniiir iptfc#; ilwy J
-
wdl rrnriflln k ute by Mc*| 1
|K‘Ujfck.
1
1
1 C l Mill JI Rikli jqijrt«1cil*lflll WlM Lt
(c)
(4)
(■)
U)
to
<10
<0
fl
fl) |
t")
I, 1 jiiiil L trail-*>E
.Sivil ci hi kit And vFiilhwm
j*dv-li>-nuiri
A’iin»iM4 ol Jniiil
ckMWd
«ji|iimiilnu;
dlHWIiipi
-N*
-ar
•M*
•r
lu -
1
’** 1
Ni ’
3f
ANImju^U a Ireland nru,
|
jialrkl (knrwj m minimal
n. tpurenmtfa.
I
.1
«<4innM prwlueltm witl k |
liIf!Ik jmhI ftihi<« tin Ifuillcy i*E , wjtfrr |i< ili ip ml unim ihhb I l.orai Kii|ifo}tBfeHii h Kk^iy hi | t>D »OW
—
1 Cannot assess B5
Annex B, Table WRD-2
■’ *.W
I
Un j VI-
>K WM 1HX KM ST- I
IF n WKL
/
i
•ec VcmX Cut c&uriitiJ Ri* kiuHi til
Mie lulriCnciU
Sricih-* licit
■ KimiiIht nt |lcn'
pfe
Amii-iuiid nf |*iii|
rind cuiilM'cai
foil.
AlUK5 A
sS*
*S’*
i'c-qUc dnlMMCil Ihwu l||dl
li'iniCx u.-i |K1 Idle C Illd Wnl |.|| Iwntifrg jnfllihrftf l*n il anil
IwiiiKi lhey luny lv * uiurc uf khirti lu ilic uu'ri ili>l ns
1 cejvei litem
I iMNBHirilwd inrahKlWWl
Ullltl
N'H t*tteiLa|i.*d
•S*
* rinlk|itu5alnn(’. |>ir Inil
IdflbircE*
♦ .Asint in llif h mslrr nJy ilclMiiii. Rewnnw FwJ Mid
dllilVIKjJ kkiuiw
v rrcei mciwlr
■ref ■«•■!
In^iam, tlr
X4AJK /J.fL/JF -45 II J.
4/JU2F
W M 2 -FWFK
J.
FL TphrdIi (illvrritaMi heii tojMiwn rlfllmi)
1 B.7
Cannot assess
Annex B. Tnblc WRD-2
, (i -XAssessment
Project component
Ax te "merit criteria
Potential impact
Dita
HjU
Air
Sn|
Vej
Fns
Soc
Arc
Rae
Signiticancc
Mitigation
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(0
(8)
(M
(i)
0)
(k)
<0
(m)
W
funnel bfailmg and
boring
PolhilKMi from tunnel waste
Amount and location of tunnel waste
Not estimated
•r
-S’
-$•
1
i
Liswcrnrty u| water table
• Waler-fable depth
• Number nl
dry Well'
• Number of corn-
ploinlv
Knmv rock w frac-
lured Hil no cktnih
-s*
-$•
i
Not cslimateil almut lioiKctmld wvlh
Tunnel* acl» i conduit of
subsurface flow and can
dciinter surnninding strata
Vibration from
coiwtiuctioti or blasting can
trigger bmhfalc* which, in
mm, can contribute large
1 • Line funnel with ail imper
meable liner.
• Monitor and osscm well*
in area.
• Allow landslide ri*k.
• ranker Inkk wala lu
limwclmld* nlmsc wclh
amounts of sediment Io Bream have gone dry
chsiinck
• t ‘ompcnsJte for damage*
Lnmhlidc* triggered by Unit ing m cutiniucisuti
Number nl bmbliile*
Data ate tcaniy know dopes me sleep uimI lainfaH n 1
Ini'll
-r
-M*
to •
r
-!•
I*. Canals and mvulet 1 'iplwuu
I
Cimal b'lakhnv
Access - huniait, livestock,
Ammud o| access
Nnl estimated
iJlttklge nl existing rood' nr
Awes* cxislnu; k«m
excavation, and
nildlilc blocked
blocked
migl alary roads and cnn'ilor*
Build small builfci Its
ran mtindiKc 'tins to
minimize diMUplion.
lining
Number of com-
pfaintc
Isomchrikl*. live* lock and
wildlife ami represent an
increase in die coif of market-
Not estimated
Canal* tint partition field'
Dengn mute to mininiize
Pail it toning nf field' by canal*
Number nl field*
incrcMC the diflic ully of farm
dtthirfuiKe tn ex nt mg
and a**ocralcil roads
I nut limned
ing. lliosc dial change mod
fields
Number nf com
dtnmagc may affect Ihcir
plaint'
nuinlcnarKC
Canal* fcuni)
!nlcnup*»ofi of exwrmg drain-
Not estimated
('■uh widi inadcqciak gnsdi- ent luve low Bo* itlocifie* ami provide good IwbiUl lot
iltciiunw hncts i uch a* wwib
I learn* decline* d*M U* «hv eatc« «t*iK.iatcd With water
Number of com- piafati
DllCMC fie-
Ser tcpml div
c«m frequency
C'^nont nt'vrHn
««*••***-,1 pMMii«ri^ crwBi i*
a
f
■’.Upidli.MIt—
Dai-
«L
nil
l7_ /'iTiaA-KAJ
An. i.i'Jrfii .'i
-------------- -
.\r.i^fit.*inui ■'! ^nJKtaf.-
Aihua 1
-1*
r
■r
-r
r
■i*
i
I'Wtllftuk Ik U|VnnVJk IW Ik '
■niili iidiiin'irl jtalnali-MiiM
Skit lufvAl M'4 Kfbcc - y
1 it ennuim Mx-d-i '-I'-sL a*, ill Mp I tx rilahliAb Ok m’£-
it J'ihi rjJniu
L
•S*
X Vtegttkln ill
clt'M Mice
AnuilUit III cl;*Kil
,ii Vil
Na ililD iitaiDl Lilxjlili 1 Ilf |lll[MI IU*|J Iri IL-H
pukfilliiir*
-V
•s*
41*
-[•
1
—
Ve^Mlwu hu Io K ctaval w
!ic|qbv |UIH-j||iie loci Ev«Ih
live deflilWI'JJ -.Jill l-MllHt.' liWkl viiHh: I’m oilub
• CmdiiK ck«ih|j
iwwcilmc li iriilm
" Ell'fi kniu.nl ShmI ccuHEiIVn- 1 it’ll «in ICHMliViS sli>|V«
1 f jbt^enjih ioi£aliiiul
J. Aixvsfc riM-l, and mi J atari
cunxtrKiliMi
[See Ji iMiii J' /'ir> I'ifi’fljgJ
1
(•,'hirf ?■ /u n- iw'fiix^
(•Ac* r f* i’i vtfrHtf)
6Vr* ! / reuL'iZ ngj
r
f.S’rr f- j.'fK+.fov')
11
J 1 And kxilLii^
I «|JH!>iL»II I'E lllifatflll
♦ UlkllKM i*l
tiyiaii 1 Mill |ii i%1L-
cnl.
Annimiiri id ■kili-
■Hf
‘Hill I.1l kvl l|il H'U*
r
MJ -
M*
1
J nod IcvdliklU |,|,h
IhM t A|MMiii[j HiihkMiraec
CunifaU «LiklhWwr tu (l-S,|lk on I 1,1 jtirt JiBaill H-aiui-ildn IlKPipii- f *i- »it| I E y o4McrVrili*NM. in
tavtllhmjt ^"l11
------- J
.
1 i k:ti*4 Hurtt id
1, Acpcrn riudl
Cuiun ik^hi lid* IiMTiiw (111
mil pUwcintht
P*U .'J /irecfjin^.1
4 ]L * 1I|MIlih«i id liiiil tiy Liiiitnw p«l
f,W if jwiwri/mj* J
Airnnmc ml limull
■il i taplcdl
fA** Ji /irn^rJn^J
Huh lam jutrpm u J. 4
I III dike Hl < Jfil|iha| lii
■lull unknown hdllgjUii
r>** u /ii-4s-ri/r>^
i nod
f-£rr Jt jfr
by biiit-uis
twin ar itikLt iimv ronovt
l.iicitu licurlttW pita mi Hid
Ui *r arc iiibiiUMlita lor
i2k£Mf||
Lruua piuiiik-Uiui
1 Cannot assess
D.9
Annex B. Table
VVRD-2
,r xAweismcnt
Project component
Attoumcnl criteria
Potential impact
Data
H.O
Air
Sol
VcS
IlUI
Arc
R&C
Mitigation
(•)
(b)
Employment
(c)
(
A>
dnlhik|f and
per handpump, then
initaJhlion
population year 2010
mH rccpiiic about
P,000 pumps.
2. Pumped sur
A will sites of icligtimi, cul
Occupation rd lite, pipeline
Amount of land af
Not ciriiiMlcd
II
Although the cntnpmxnr will
face waler,
tural. |»cnil
——-------------------
B .11
A
t
rt Zi t?
ik
Vt O
s
■ ■•Assessment
Project component
Assessment criteria
Potential impact
Data
HjO
Air
So1
Veg
K
Soc
Arc
RAC
Significance
Mitigation
(•)
(M
(c)
(•)
(0
(K)
(b)
(i)
0)
(0
(m)
(n)
IJ. Resavou elicits ll|*Sllcam of (hill
fiigiiKnUiion of acccaa
■ Reduction of aicns
routes
• Numta of com
plaints
Annex A
-s*
Die reservoir may pmc a hoarier tn long-standing access.
Offer alternative rubles wherever icservoirs block csublnlicd routes
ol travel
1 mi of diy-seavhi glaz
ing
Reduction of grazing
iiicm
Not esti
mated
-!♦
to •
S‘
-r
Io -
s-
w
to -
S»
Duting the dry season, livestock owners move their animals to areas iBHuifabk* for farming
Assess situation, develop alk-malive sites, petImps m drawdown wets.
Inc feme of wntcr-associ- nlcd discsacs
Disease frequency
Mcdh.nl
reemds
•S’
Mtinliy aieas favinu insects ami alternative Innts for many diseases
Remove ill marshy vegetation on the icscivoir fringe. Adjust operat ing rules to as to minimize its
growth
Hflcclt ia|WMi hiodivtfsitv
■Specks composition and density
Not esti
mated
Numbers of migialoiy fall arc likely to ckcline.
Stock rcsetvnin * iih suitable spe cies. i’omliikl fall ladders.
I
Upsliram rcwnir
effects (eoMl)
Hooding
Hunding ficqiienc)
•M*
•1*
•I*
•r
-!•
1
lopset beds nf sediment 11 1 landing prtli Educate rciHknh 3tol Rt uniruic ul •vartirr
1 Jll E«-1.Clllt MllltMiHill
fauifj
r.iublllftrHta
NvT Mil
IfuMkd
1| ligated fiekl* may blo.k Ittiig- LLII'ilkull*, *tccu I OUIl:*
■ IIIei b'llcrnahvd runtmi/s
SlKFt.ui.il InbuiN mil
inuniK
liLntiutilk HIS4lilMa|£
Nul mH-
lltard
Nita
i
•r
»«•
StiGCEulUfl [irnjcul uii|ila 1^11*1^1 Will iiurttoc Uircftho
inl|il md nuliiliun
NuirililklUi nHJLUEJIHIg
N®iw
•i*
in
hS*
SlKCCarfidly wvpkincMkd, like pnjc£t atotruttt fxid Mtppiy
Nuiw
»f bindn c4,1*y
I'xIMb Mil [Icira '•nnciy
»nd feMllY
Nol Ullr-
PHBkll
-S’
•X*
•I*
to ■
M’
fliiinp* la life l»idis.«|ia and i|k
«l n ns cd era In *|fe( 1 ill# m kid IbncH aim! f*mw trf "Ik
fae.k
1 lfcl«SEI¥W >IC4I nllCTV lhtJ4 GPMJlI-
ETRlWMU wifi ITIRIHin U|*»n*«kll.
Wim ■q.unliiy
Water pUyiK*l, d'Bi»kc4 diiil lipik^rt *1 enter**
NW «N-
retail
•M"
to •
S«
•S»
Ik'hECiWil Ikiini wul H|li iJ<4J|ji«mB^i|I 111 kUiMki llirt* • ||MJ alfm
1|k habitat u 11 ell ■■ i||M lUuibiLily
4lf 1* tai.
BncicsHH: icteim i«ii Him nmnltiM 1 iIIipmr 1<-|min ilwvg albiwabh
llwta, IflEJCRM dUlMinil il |«Mimfu| ccuKcsdEiikwH *m nwehed
Sail 4|MBlii)'
,">ud gdi.> r k hL_ dtcrnkA &*d bitshgul kfiMite
N<»l ewlk-
n*tad
•M*
to .
S*
NlfepUfAlHMI ail d MtoliNlInn
if IXQKti tato^ll ImhM It Mwt» SouHun*. rttar ctaiflci iujr in
duce the UI£«hUll)r l»r IIMMC fickfe.
Motiliat ihe *Hu*ikto Otar «rih-
ukal rdvfcc vdbae toimvrt
ihnkultie* wkli n«Mf' ^lfg*J lttd «ibrr nr|*IIVG nslpnsU
IL I'kird ttMilrol
Hedutfd bKhlrvcnri)
CfinipMVfkm n>1 depifty id lluol »*J l*uiul
xiimniitfidkl
N<»i eiiP
IlIBMd
4P
W
to -
3*
-5“
Annual iJosdnifl iiuy be in euu* • lb! CCMipinim nf'Im istamd u( autne jiImI Mid muul caiNlliMb
Ik*
MiffiNar ihu linuikitt. kLtldililh, inaVa rf nre or cidinfrrTd
I Ipcck* MV lIllWlCTWd-
I Cannot assess B. 13
Aiuwx Tnhlc WRD-3r
Assessment
F'lojcct component
Aueuincnl cnlciu
Potential impact
Dola
H,O
Air
So1
Veg F
See
Arc
l«C
Significance
Mitigation
(«)
(M
(0
H)
(o)
(1)
(c)
(h)
(0
(i)
(k)
(I)
(m)
A Neral income source
Practice ol llood reces sion |4» ilcdfaki
Civnlihnn ij nnlm *1 ilnndi
DadcMiin, 1794
tS*
1 ucLmoiM C&IUCIal linwk |il«niiilkm4 will EtplKtf riwl |«k.u hum nilUL.il
1 •iju.'uh
AlIa ily u i Tiiufiga«Ir-o
SMe Irjihiihuicii-' uhmT||4«W|
Mipra-vtB
♦ llumi-iir
‘ ScdimWM Jiukarge
IMfai tMinwJeil
l\*
-V
*N*
■ s-
pLukl,v» iu» fcinkdu IhmuIiW in nun} KECkifr
Afltffay fa a miiijjlRHk
I'udwMhJ MVlIIlly ilnfiiireCT
UiaimilUMI
IMvmiuwi, IWC
•S’
1 Ml ^n.ivuiji nj| liimfeto a Eiuitc ik-jxml* ibk i jpiih
rUliVtfV H a HHIigllMMI
ItmlIwiiciiIi pkwilailrwia
| ihMBT and iKHHSlwild In- Wfflfl HlkqllOML-V
■ |'m|ilnyiMuil iKcorth
- 11oii*ciw4J KKMlkr
Hot mLhmu J
l£m|,ikwrtKiil ilk lhs plan ledgn wilL rtpifeM Im JcjicRjililc faillM i*f Wutk
Adfiiy u ■ niKkgifMMn
i-ki pUhlalllMII
IfVuiUm: c d ijmcki nwgt.l Hilled fiifitlivinlly
Fared iikVEirtw?
UM munatatl
-!• »u
-S'
jiklrodw. cJ ipEckit wwj‘ ccwihliciE k||Hb|wt will LliHikttuiii« nMui4 mrwttai
Mouiku wnH.mhMK umtiij txr-rirci in itrfli fflEW EJIt>r|t-lMrllrlE|Hi
Slew (onJ« irw^ wrrciic iCdlHKNl lluciurfi:
iJfaiavwikai
1 Ji>| L'llkHLiJqii
-M'
lia
-S*
-Ll-
io -.V
• I-
Nt ■■ riJliiki i4« be n
A<
Sal
VCC
Sk
Arc
■...........
■?
1w
(N
(C)
(U)
<*)
tl)
Cri
(M
pd< wrth n il'lfak, which tfcdn^
Wlidlllr c«nUttC«
No* mimed
M-
Ai (itAiif land* IMu
uVc< liiidli ii\£il liv njkl- lilc, lllCtf EUlllkbcJi will
Jet law
Improve |hm k anil ton- imlkil hurtling bcm kmiogmirni rd Ihar
W'ilkDile Jukx |iinl< Jinn
Ijidbhuk iniltiitfiin, lk'nNh
illljl uve*
1 iVi-iukIe, IujIiIi
Vcl ECh-iii 1L4
• M*
FltllCT IlfllTl II PH will k'lld
Ilf JunpfiiVed Iwnlili nint nlhn ipiii Idu i
HrtM hc^liicvkl
S. ImgntOv livriln:i
C-KKlIhikHL
FMulHHfn ni;ertLlivcilJMd
ac
VcjUi liwy rrradi
J.'.H MHCMCd
*S*
Omh wafcr will pcndiltc Iwilaky livtiMKk
Nvaitf rtcpjurtd
Lk'biibdk pc exhaeInity in*
errmti
.‘hnveiyi., utiuiviHufl
Hfll mimed
*M7
Wiehuui Hie atfti in w*lt
J'IC1|L dbkliinCCI Id WRkf, many lotitoik bcftatiii
will cmmc
Matta jnyaaed
C- ApfcuHurc
B 17
Annex B, Table INRD-1Assessment
Project cnm|K>nenl
Assessment criteria
Pnicntud impact
Data
HjU
Air
Sol
Veg
F
Soe
Arc
R&
C
Significance
Mitigation
(b)
(c)
(<■)
(c)
(0
(8)
00
(1)
ffl
(M
(I)
(m)
(")
liiqnme udigew/us Ikc miMuigiwiil practices
1, Assistance In Jxmcy
htmim
2 AsMtlance to cutting beckcc|X'n
3. Develop marketing cooperatives
Bee health increases
Observation
Not estimated
IS*
lire wax and honey aic
ini|XMtont components of I'lhwpia'a ratal economy. Il b relleckd in home* hold income and nuui-
linn.
None
Bee hummg declinci while management improves
Monika mg repeals
Not csl muled
♦s*
Ihnc) production increases
Monitoring reports
Riondbcar, 19%
•s*
Household iiuuruc wild nutii’ion increases
Observation
Not estimated
IS*
D. fisher fck development
1 Monitor Mini contra!
f’r.h catch
Knowledge «f fall popula tion increases
C’akli records
Cow.t, 1995
♦s*
Management r. cuntiriy hampered by inadequate lion dynamics
None
Ability to mnnif,c popula tion improves
C ’Meh records
Not ewiinudcil
is*
2. Improve laJte ami
cafcli
Fish CAkh increases
Catch records
Nut isiniialcd
♦s’
Imprmed catch is re flected in household health and income
Nome
2. (cunt)
Human nutrition and house- Ikuld income increases
• Medical records
• Income lutvey
Not estimated
♦s*
As abase
None
1 1 Install fish ladder*
Migratory population spawns above donut md wein
Observation and monitoring
Not estimated
♦S’
Diwtw pose a risk to popubiiioni of migratory
liili
None
I
1 F. Wildlife wild luurnm
1 1 C««l«ducl held suf- 1 lnqnovcd nbility Io rnaMjc
I veyi, studies, and 1 wildlife moorccs ui Lthio-
l leieetch U» define
I wreaa for iccognmon
\ and management o»
\ • vi<>4*ricd m«*«
\ * imyulmn %«w*UV«ta
\ • a*fMt «m«
1
1 * Res iden| and migtalory
Itumaii (xipulwliunt
| * Ilabrtwt cotsdilinn
| • Refugee number!.
lutMunw, and aclwiticw
(tnckmlioK tomring)
1 • wildlife number*,
luiulfckiH. M*uv«(i>«nla
• Refugee numbers
mid loca-
IMM1
• Current
pMh Mill
QO«Ulolk)
w
«)
(I)
(■)
(J) |
ik)
(m)
(D \
1 2. Hedcfine cflh'ln*
piidity Im
- uwruie wildlife
i mnrLuailitii frt|wmd ki paopk ! JK+4«-,
MhI
• lihiIiuI jiniifel tan In 1 cftigtsji a* id |>ini.Li-
Cll
liiipruK 1 r.htnyir.i'l aiulMj io
Ni.wlafiff d* wiklPifii itwUTCci .
• policy ilnMuml* ibiidljjcE altfiuil iwt*
’ atai r dluLaliiHti
■ WlIrmliVtLdii n«I iimlrrinh a||ncHliiwit
1
Emiimy: policy ikn.-iHiAcinh
JviiHikic limlijd- dr)' nid Oliver
■IlncalKni
L n-l'jcivs inn khc irtinwc, W lIlIIlIc jmlk.y rknqUu li icfklNkilion and impmved ability fe ciuid: given iIk ilailUknlLfid link n| wild life iranurrea Hl Illi
innjert aura
At ritaiVE
3. Impi < hl a|T it in Huuiaitaneitf id lr
* wildlife uirvtya
* IvUHKial VlJUrJIkUiHs
» hu ■! {0ininvltaLt Mid lheir comnnkuu'iwi
PfeilW
iJ6*
SVillmul cikiuve iHikm hi Mln icibkir, llw pcittil link uf KlhkipWa nild- lilc [ainrcca Kpccurid lp«l rcwiMn niiJ tMlkCT
Thu aLiliMt H i itiinga*
IMI
5 iXnfeji Jfrdrf Ven lune AfTIWIMMI In devtksp <|bf inuriii
jK>l±i&hl ul Lake
llbiliui Wak a llavl
■ <'4i*|kl|lWI Mid fipLI - 1 ale Hlttrtfcl l-nlflfl
| • npdnl* Inwrial Mil*
N ML>i 1*1 Id-iwuca Litijll IBiUl: , iii cifenaliinklJim
1 M4IIW Of IFIOtllCtiH hefnrc am| allhcr ciiniliwtkfiji
Nrri ck 1 imaled
fe
•M
•M-
io -Ji*
•M*
Hr *3*
■M*
k> -3*
i
I
Ilia Wu u 4 lauurce impurtaul ikMiw rI beputy Nutwilkekii, 4« iiwulirji.ML a iisgilr.
* FnaWhhaMfe pnifetMl wtt mil
bailer rww.
• IlinEl VWMlHKiMWI OtaWciLiJi IrcHki
niriixk dm bullcr
/mic.
I Cannot assess B 19
Annex □, Table INRD-1
>< jCAncitmcnl
Project component
AmcvMitciit critenn
Pidiniinl trnpucl
Dll la
IM)
Air
Sn|
Vctf
F
Soc
Arc
R&
C
Significance
Mitigation
to
to
to
to
to
(0
to
to
(0
(1)
w
(1)
(m)
W
Tniinil dcvdofMicjits al Lake Bnhan (coni)
Tout nt operations iffat tlx
• h)drufogy of die laic
• ib vegetation mid oilier natural resources
• Water quantity and
quality
• Vegetation quantity and quality
• Fauna densify, disinbu* lion ...
Not estimated
-8*
-M*
to -S*
•M*
In $•
•M*
to .$•
Water, vegetation, and fauna ic|h esenb ley elements of liar lake’s beauty
• Abstract water from areas nut lulled to die lake's hydiol-
ogy.
• Primary lew age treatment
• Implement tourist and operator Code
of ethics
focal cmpInpiKHl snd rcvcnuei hiqirovc
Lnlxmr and employment
recordi
Nol estimated
11* In
Local participation ui die development will generate employment and revenues
None
6 Develop lower bmin
wildlife canoe aafa*
th.
1'cnii.minl cniii{nik*5 detract from tlw area's nuiuial beauty: litter is scalkred, human waste lillen tlic
bush
ToUfnl complaints
Not estimMed
1*
In
•M*
A normal pail of lounst opcnltom in wild rets n to preserve the natural aesthetics of the site
Implement lour nt and a (Kia tor code uf ethics
1
!• Ilx tractive Induslttca (min
ei and mining)
I 1 and clewing and
construction
Habitat driftikf»on
Amount of hod occupied
Not citii imlcd
•M*
lo-S*
•M*
to 4*
1
Use amount nt land occupied by mining anti its infirm Iruemrc replace' laiwl used by flora and Inion and for alternative economic putruits
• Keep land require* merits Io the icq
rninuntuii ,
• Establish a buffer Arne rurroundinc the cencnsinn.
1 jmd clearing
Soil crukion increase, am!
■oil quality wmscui
• Soil tons
• Sediment diKhugc
• Olltct
Nol estimated
•S*
•S#
Bare «nl h exposed to oil crus iuii
Employ suit conservation 1
Wain quality wonctM
■ Waler quality ciUcila
Nol estimated
•S*
I
Annual |mi|>uWUhu* (Udine
Pupulaiiun itemiiy and n impost non
Not eilimatfd
M*
1
________
.above J Atabuvv
kl~.-
AucnilKIli
/ l*nfrnri»r imp* '
D«b
H/J
Al
Jtlhl
V«jj
Srili.
Arc 1
kA I
c1
... ....................-
’---------------------------------------------
(10
1 (d
CO
(0
to
(hl
(•)
GJ
Ik)
0)
4
2 Miti4 opcnlimT kjehirjj, Uilin^k
Skn.1 ipiJiiy ike Iiiki
Sail if uldi criicrM
Sul cytinaafaiil
-s*
2
I.CftthMC ilatd 1u tqifMik me Urik tula muI&cc and
’ 1 huJctlic koclialc pctbih Vt dll biipcr- 1
ilJhpilajll, kianhliMJ
WiAif qiM.lity ifc dines
Writer ljujIIIji niteiii
f-!i?l c llauiillrd
-.1*
|£l iMlluIllV MCl Mil kt ClklH num cin trifled «ir. tail, kitd cvKhltinlly Writer
iheiAiIu hniiwi.
i ’ llDirill anil inikiilaui ILblI riktublMIl
Ahrtnd iM^iMbrinm decline
Altittb*l jKiMltfiOTi fiewily and uimpoti irmii
S’ul eittaftleil
-S*
ifulily. Tiding! bcJckilc c«4 BiMMbrily llu? emiroiwitciM
■ ftolMe tftilkiigs J a ilkty iuCviVl* iw nnwill ^imIuikilI
Air ipwlri¥ ■kvhindi
Air ipirihly crilcrin
Mui xil united
Ihtrtl willk hii ink*
[Ml |kh> nlik llrlu
[ Wil Lllipklyil'.llL lll»|H«Ve»
huild^i |J |iL'nyi|e iJkiphryLil
NmI nJtiwtfril
*r ba
*M“
L'laul iialjvti tiLtkii >h INL like dike.
.1 Miu ilL-rnniiiiiRRii'n-
nit
JCctiofc LTrniit mil vrprt*- llPH m du t.tlfinnl t ondilfan
(/C pie ill ciiKdllMif qiulily ul
1ntwl inJ. vegetal Im, Jlmn,
r
mil (jihid
• Plbriii-
i;ra|i|ii
■ tiltVi.)
ICvMiIr
* ObniiVi-
ijiHla
■ Ji*
1 Ji*
1 %■
iS«
•V
♦M*
to
To ihd eJilcflt |hw»iSik. id Irmrci o| kiuiunt iliould
■bH-apfwir jbhI Him Lain] be iritofvd in ii« uti^iml.
Cuvuliflurik
• Rctuuip-ir ovci liuj- klCll lU niigiilAl
prulik.
■ ttcpIlKC topiltal
• J’kril kactlMu pin Willi ■uprtiwMiilik
mirier ml
■ Sc.il spoil dumps with kiijiinn*r *liJy iHikilal over iiJinh
itifMtuil n bin,
• 1U|i4mU all di»- lucbtd mrlKU.
{.Util ■. ll!r|IMI ViilSliM MILl'CHUk
yJmnKi >■! «iit|ilii>«d
Nm ri1lul*kd
hi
♦3*
IJast ta.nl IntiiiiH ui mmiw irthmiiaai wait
Smie
I
This assessment assumes that mining will be by open-easi or underground methods: buckci dredging is not an alternative
2. Cannot assess B2I
Annex Ik Table INKU-1
.i 1»I
Aucismcnt
1’inject component
Aucssmcnl criteria
Potential DllpACl
Data
!I.O
Air
Sol
Veg
F
Sne
Arc
R4
C
Significance
Mitigation
(•)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(c)
(0
(£1
(h)
(0
0)
(M
(1)
(m)
(«)
I. Improve ngiicultorill extension
Agricultural productivity’ increases
Number of extension agent; and extension agenVfnniicr ratio
Harris, 19%
>P to
xr
None
Meavranam of on-farm production
Not estimated
Agriculture is frozen in line technology of the last century. Improved lech- nology can ameliorate some kinds of conslinnib*
Financinl layouts for person nel and equipment
Hanis, 1996
2 Exfclld AflKdllUlAl
credit
Whciew Khali to ptaclicc
•giicullurc iivcr cases
Hank records
Nat estimated
•P io
«M*
Agricultural credit h n recognized constinml It requires new fount ol hanking to Ik effective, hem ever.
* Loan defaults smcc live collapse or die last government require mitigation
• New methods ot fanner collators! need tn be estab
lished
1 Expand land hut* bandry practices
land unsuitable lor agrieul- lure is removed from prn-
ductiun
Monitoring and observation
Uni is. 1996
*r
m
IS*
H* tn
IS*
tp to
4S*
-M*
tn
•S*
Taking marginal farm lands mil nf production requires an economic rational tlial h acceptable to often poorly educated farmers Can Ilin uile- grilled project expand employment in other
sectors'*
Provide employment opportunities in sectors other dun agriculture
Soil erosion and other farms of land dcgTMlaliou stabilize «r possibly improve
Monitoring and observation
Hanis. 19%
•Pio
to
•S*
-Pro
«M*
Appropriate soil comes- cation practices can prevent (or worsen) some twins of soil loss Ac ceptance ratio is likely h> be low. however. due to nutlayv dial arv Iris product! w rluin crops
1
11
• railnr soil conser vation practices lo I soil landscape and 1
crop.
• Devine incentives 1 i/u»< cnlumcv acccp- / ranee ralnn for »or! / uoniovwiKMi fwac- /
lie cm.
\ ttuyfrty .if n«4 »1pn-
V“~Z_
MmSuUum «Uu, fanitet
\ Uuowlvwa
1 Not
if
<»!
■M"
__
*!• ta>
4 I* b>
J
• !••• 1 ♦ M* I
/A
•fm 1
-■“1
n
J: / aniwtVm*
riTxkM-hw »«cds amJ. m / Mtoe suns mMV*Mte / iocthi caaro. tmrvaaot / f*J aa* M /
Vtrtea r«M bear / the au* am J k> fan**M /
/
Jr~
AMMiinaak
1
[ AmcmuimI arierrf
/ FntaihiiF irrijtfii
Dili
11,0
Aw
Sul
Vujecl:- men iiMla in lumL- |Kled by ■ Inch d it>ii»
-------------------------------------------. Ilic mi'hni i» 4 niiiiiji
licitii ihil tnnnlfcuimii
SIWflllBt
Mhik»y.diw»i uf iwqjeci imUi
Soil ph.hhadtekj
A* hIkivu, t%- |MI1ll Hl uiIk 1
riteii
Hl
• XL*
ki
II (.Uimmd cud tiUHrt
1 luithll nwl of*4f*K cmfuiu at i ll ciiitea (ciif
Ft, tc«, insist de )
1 IhlHldT »nd Mlil CIIBMW dCLIVDMd
“ DrttlMrgA KiIiMhfil
Nd
«K*
»«•
♦s*
>kM
1 • VikRial miuinfcJii
CohwkicmI tvlKki pinvide 3 bcnctn.pl qnlnlily ul ImwI inc
The cr-Mk- it»alf M j iilriftrtibfi nwtaixe
1 Lncil mill mvC" JMCt ICMCIW*
* NmiuIki "1 profile
i ji>|ihiyeJ
• EiiipteiynMnl ictadi
Nvt calunilcul
•s*
Annex D» Table IN RD* I
13.2J
u» 1>ANNEX 4 ENVIRONMENT
Ap PENDIXc
ENVIRONMENTAL DATABASE
Table of Contents
ENVIRONMENTAL DATABASE WATER
CLIMATE
GEOMORPHOLOGY
SOIL AND LAND
................................. J
********** *****•••••-
.......... ~~...... 2
....^ J
FAUNA
Aquatic (by species)
.
Insects
.
Wildlife
VEGETATION
,
Plantation6
Population structure and dynamics by wereda7
Natural vegetation by type and location j SOCIO-ECONOMIC, ANTHROPOLOGIC7
Refugees.........................................................................................................................................................J
Government services..................................................................................................................S
Religious considerations that might be affected by the project9
SITES OF ARCHAEOLOGICAL OR CULTURAL SIGNIFICANCE >
f"
cl
TAMS-ULG Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Master Pl^1ENVIRONMENT
APPENDIX C
A-
water
Discharge by station, monthly series, penod of record
plow duration curve by station
Sediment discharge b) station, monthly series, penod of record
Water quality' by station* monthly series:
• Physical * Chemical
database
Reference
TAMS-ULG. 1995, Inception Report Table 2.
TAMS-ULG. 1995. Inception Report. Annex 7.
Sdkhozpromex pc rt. 1990.
.As above and 1988
Remark*
Gives the frequency of observed
monthly discharge between 1967
and 1993 (12 stations for 27 years) Gives the results of stochastically- generated flow and compares to observed discharge.
Consists of raw data as yet unprocessed
As above
Sei khozpromex port. 1990. Barn-Akobo Basm
Master Plan Study of Hater and Land Resources of the Gambela Plain. Draft final report
Results of chemical analyses
* Biological
CLIMATE
Precipitation by station, monthly scries, period of record
Temperature (as above) Wind
Sunshine hours (as above)
TAMS fChethoun). 1996;
Armitage, 1995 TAMS (Chetboun), 1996
Armitage. 1995 Armitage, 1995
TAMS (Chetbaun), 1996
Monthly scries data and analyses
Monthly scries max. min, avg for
20 stations as well as annual series. 1952-1958.
Used by FAO to assess reference evapotranspiration
Summary’ of FAO-supplied climatic data including rainfall, evapotranspiration, wind etc for 30 stations in and close to Bare Akobo basin.
Mean annual sunshine — statistics for 7 stations as well as monthly series data, 1976-1988.
^S-ULG Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Master Plan
C2ANNEX 4 ENVIRONMENT
Component
appendix C
Reference
Remarks
Reference evapotranspiration fas above)
Design storm frequency depth-duration by station (incl 2-yr, 6-hr depth)
TAMS (Chelboun), 1996 • Humidity for 6 stations'"""
• Average humidity, 1952-19&8
• Monthly distribution of « humidity.
r Or^
Climatic index of rainfall erosivity by station
Air quality by station, monthly series
Soil Conservation Research Project, MOA and U of Berne
Not measured in Ethiopia
Many stations throughout Ethiopa
• Pollen count Not measured
• Nitrous oxide concentrations
• CO2 concentrations, other gasses
Acid rainfall
GEOMORPHOLOGY
Stream form dynamics by stream and location and sensitivity to changes of
• discharge
Not measured
Not measured
Not measured
Not measured
Not assessed
see above
• sediment discharge see above
SOIL AND LAND
Soil landscapes or other mapping unit that allows a logical process of soil identification and analysis
ARDCO-GEOSERV. 1995. Soil Survey, Vol
III, Agriculture
Representative soil profile descriptions for the above
As above
Selkhozpromexport. 1990. Vol V. Annex 4:
While discharge is measured, its impact upon stream form has not been assessed
See above
Annex 3.B.3, Methods of Chemical Soil Analysis
Annex 3.B.4, Description of Mapping Units
Land Mapping Unit Characteristics of the Upper-Baro Basin (j>p 33- 37)
Results of Agro-chemicaJ analyst Hydrophysical Properties of Soils
TAMS-ULG Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Master PlansNEX4 ENVIRONMENT
Ct>mp0QCIlt.
$ il degrad ation hazard
APPENDIX C
Reference
Soils and Possible Use
Remarks
Soil texture and structure
o
for each soil landscape
. oil erosion by water (soil credibility)
s
. oii erosion by wind
S
Soil Conservation Research Project, MO A and U of Beme
FAO. 1978.4
Provisional Methodology for Soil Degradation Assessment. Rome As above
As above
Many observations throughout Ethiopia
Regional study including project area
■ salinization and sodication
• chemical degradation (loss of bases
through leaching)
• physical degradation (sealing, crusting, limitations to
rooting, ..„
• biological degradation (loss of organic matter)
Land use by type of use, location and trends
As above
Agro-chemical use by lypc, location, and amount
As above
Copeland, V. 1996. Land Evaluation. TAMS-
ULG. Addis Ababa. First Mission Report of the Development Economist. TAMS-
L'LG. 1995 Armitage, M.S. 1996. Cropping in the Baro- Akobo Basin TAMS- ULG.
No information
Land use classes and areas of the project area
Agro-chemicals by type only (p 64)
Agro-chemical by type (pH)
Other chemical use, e.g. by mines
^Ms-ULG Baro-Akobo River Basin tolerated Development Master Plan
<4ANNEX 4 ENVIRONMENT
Component
FAUNA
Aquatic (by species)
Reference
Cowx, IG. 1995. Fisheries Issues First Mission Report of the Fisheries Specialist. TAMS-ULG. Sep. 28pp.
• population levels, dynamics and trends
• migratory habits
• habitat requirements and acceptability limits
• response to reservoirs and other infrastructure
■ response to fish ladders
As above
appendix Q
Remarks
Few data derived from catch statistics at Gambela and sitings from following:
ARDCO-GEOSERV. 1995 , Survey
and Analysis of the Upper Baro.
Akobo Basin. Final report. Volumes I to IV.
Selkhozpromexpon. 1990. Baro-
Akobo Basin Master Plan Study of
Water and Land Resources of the
Gambela Plain. Draft final report Volumes I to Xll.
V ery sketchy information
Insects
• population levels, dynamics, and trends
• habitat preferences
As above
As above
As above
As above
Bradbear, N. 1996.
Apiculture: Draft Following Second Mission. TAMS-ULG. Addis Ababa.
And
Michem, T. 1996. Livestock: Interim Rep. TAMS-ULG. Addis Ababa
Information inadequate
Information restricted to bees and bee keeping.
Information restricted to vectors livestock diseases, ticks, tsetse
• migratory habits As above
TAMS-ULG Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Master Plan^eX4 ENV1RONMF.N1
APPENDIX C
Remarks
No information about birds, small mammals, reptiles, amphibians.
» population levels, distribution, dynamics, and trends
Reference
Atwell. B. and W, Frankenthalcr. 1995.
Draft Environmental
Report. TAMS-ULG. Addis Ababa
S c lkhozpromexport. 1990. Baro-Akabo Basin
Master Plan Study of Water and Land Resources of the
Gambetta Plain Draft final report, vols 1 thru
Population data contains large mammal sightings from 25 years ago until 1988 Prepared lists require analysis for rare and endangered species.
xn.
• habitat preferences and acceptance limits
• migratory habits
VEGETATION
ARDCO-GEOSERV. 1995. Survey and
Analysis of the Upper Baro-Akobo Basin Final report, vols 1 thru TV.
Daviesson, RC. 1996.
Forestry in the Baro- Akobo Basin, Rough
Draft Report TAMS- ULG. Addis Ababa.
Natural vegetation by type and location
• productivity
* biomass
Plan/at ton
• productivity
■ biomass Pasture
Daviesson
Daviesson
Daviesson
Daviesson refers to previous studies, for which he provides basic information.
.As above. Mast data are old or developed from old information. Their quality is questionable.
Michem, 1996. TAMS/ULG
1 ^S-ulg Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Master Plan C.6ANNEX 4 ENVIRONMENT
appendix
Component
Ref
erence
Remarks
Colombi.
1995.
SOCIO-ECONOMIC,
ANTHROPOLOGIC
Population structure
and dynamics by we re da
• age distribution by number and sex; trends
• household
composition by sex
TAMS/ULG As above
Roger. 1996. Population Aspects (appendix to Inception Report). Annex.
Roger. 1996. Population
Aspects (appendix to
Age distribution by number and sex.
Population and households by wereda in November 1993.
and age
• household income
by source and trends
• employment
Inception Report) pp 1— 5.
As above. See also
Colombi.
As above.
patterns
• education by sex and trends
• disease frequency by sex, age, and trends
• nutrition by sex and age
• potable water supply by type, distance, quality
• land access by practice
• household assets other than land
Mekonnen Abenha.
1990. Education by Sex and Trends. Ministry of Education report
Education by sex and trends
Roger. 1996. Population Asspects (annex to
Inception Report), pp 4— 7.
Sobrino. G. Water
Supply and Sanitation.
TAMS/ULG
Wicket, E. 1995. Draft
Socio-Economic Report, TAMS/ULG
Nutritional status of children.
1AMS-ULG Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Master PlanConipODent
Refugee5
APPENDIX C
Remarks
Limited information about camp populations vs. lime, land use, policy issues,
. age distribution by number and sex; trends
• household composition by sex and age
• household income
by source and trends
• employment
patterns
• education by sex and trends
■ disease frequency by sex, age, and trends
• nutrition by sex and age
■ potable water supply by type, distance, quality
' land access by practice
' household assets other than land
Government services
* hospitals and aid centres, by location and capacity
' schools (as above)
Reference Daviesson, RC. 1996 Forestry' in the Baro- Akobo Basin. Rough Draft Report. TAMS- ULG. Addis Ababa.
Colombi. SB. 1995. Socio-Economics: First Mission Report of the Development Economist TAMS-ULG. Oct.
Roger, G. 1996. Population Aspects.
TAMS-ULG.
See above See above See above See above
Sobrino, G. JEa/er
Supply and Sanitation Water Supply Annex. TAMS/ULG
Set Colombi and Roger reports.
agricultural and Harris, D. 1996. Land
other extensi o n Husbandry. TAMS/ULG
1 AMS-ULG Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Master Plan
C8ANNEX 4 ENVIRONMENT
Component
(structure, capacity)
• veterinary services (structure, location, capacity)
• forest nurseries
• subsidies (food,
feed, other)
Religious considerations that might be affected by the project
• earth deities
• burial practices, cemetery locations
SITES OF
ARCHAEOLOGICAL
OR CULTURAL
SIGNIFICANCE
Location and description
appendix c
Reference
Michem, T. 1996. Livestock. TAMS/CJLG
Daviessen, R. 1996. Forestry. TAMS/ULG
Wicket, E. 1995. Draft Socio-economic Report.
TAMS-ULG
T.AMS-ULG Baro-Akobo River Basin Integrated Development Master Plan
CQ4. ENVIRONMENT
APPENDIX D
APPENDIX D; COSTS
A, Investment costs: dsms and reservoirs
No.
Item Quantity
Unit Unit cost Total cost
fOOO USS} COW) USS) fOOO Birr)
h------- 1.
BMPs: core drilling
Giimcro 1 each 5.000
5 00 31.25
Geba-A 1
each
5.000
5.00 31.25
Baro-A ]
each
5.000 5.00
31.25
Itang
1
each
5.000
5.00 3135
Abobo
Dumbcmg
1 each
5.000 5.00
3! 25
Gilo-2 1
each 5.000
5.00 3135
Subtotal
2. BMPs: road sediment
30.00
187 50
Gumer o
10 0 Jan
10.000
100.00
625.00
Geba-A
69 0
km
10 000
690.00
4,312 50
Baro-A 36 5
km
10.000
365.00
2,28125
M 30,0
km
3.000
90.00
562.50
Abobo
Dumbong
20.0 km 5.000
100.00 625 00
Gito-2
11.0 km 3.000 33.00
206.25
Subtotal
1378.00
8,612.50
3.
Household relocation
Gurnero 7
household 0.618 433
27.04
Geba-A
28
household 0.618
1730
ri08.15
Baro-A
65
household 0.618
40.17
251.06
Itang
711
household 0 878 624 26
3,901.61
_____
Abobo
Dumbong
0
household 0.878
OjOO 0.00
Gilo-2 Unknown
household 50 00 312.50
1-------------------------------------
Subtotal
736.06 4.60036
4. Reservoir clearing
Gumero 30.9 kml __ Geba-A 68.5 km2
Baro-A 78.5 km2
60.000 1,854.00 11,587.50
60.000
4.110.00 25.687.50
60.000
4,710.00 29.437.50
-
Jtan^
71.0
km2
60.000 4.260.00 26.625.00
—
Abobo
Diirnbong
13.9
km2 60.000 834.00 5212.50
Gil o-2
ISO .7
knfl 60.000 9,042.00 56.51250
—_
Subtoiai
24.810.00 155.062.50
5. Additional outlets
----- _ J Gumero 1
■■ Geba-A 2
No
5.00 5.00 T3I.25
No
1000 20.00 125.00
1 ^MS-TlT.n Raro-Akcihri Ki ver Basin IntePTAted Devtlnnment Master Plan
D 14. ENV7RONMENT
appendix
No.
Item
Quantity
Unit
Unit cost
Total cost
------ -- ------------
r
1
('000 USS)
(*000 USS)
(’000 Birr)~
Baro-A
2
No
10.00
20 00
I tang
0
No
No
1
1
0.00
125 00 ~ 0.00 ’
Abobo
0
0.00
6.00
Dumbong
2
No
10.00
20.00
125 00
Gilo-2
2
No
10.00
20.00
.
125 00 ' ' -
Subtotal
85.00
.
531 2? ------
.
6'
Channel protection
1
Gumero
1
Section
100.000
100 00
Gcba-A
625 00
1
Section
100.000
100.00
Baro-A
1
Section
100.000
.
625 00 ”
100.00
.
625.00
Itang
1
Section
100.000
100.00
Abobo
625 00
.
Dumbong
I
Section
100.000
100.00
625.00
Gilo-2
1
Section
100.000
100.00
625.00
__ ____
7.
—
L
Subtotal
-
600.00
3.750.00
Fish ladder, hatchery
■ '
Gumero
1
No
250.000
250.00
1.562.50
Geba-A
1
No
250.000
250.00
1.562.50
Baro-A
1
No
250.000
250.00
1.562.50
Itang
1
No
250.000
250.00
1,562.50
Abobo
1
No
250.000
250.00
11,562.50
______
Dumbong
1
No
250.000
250.00
1.562.50
Gilo-2
1
No
250.000
250.00
1.562.50
Subtotal
1,750.00
10,937.50
8
-
Diagnostic health centres
1
Gumero
0
No
20.000
0.00
0.00
Geba-A
1
No
20.000
20.00
125.00
Baro-A
1
No
20.000
20.00
125.00
Itang
1
No
20.000
20.00
125.00
Abobo
1
No
20.000
20.00
125.00
Dumbong
0
No
20.000
0.00
0.00
Gilo-2
1
No
20.000
20.00
125.00
Subtotal
100.00
625.00
—--- ----
“ “i
Canal construction and linin
gs
Itang
56
Km
30,800.00
192.500.00
Abobo
21
11,550.00
72,187.50
Dumbong
34
10,030.00
62.687.50 .
Gilo-2
61
000
To.oo
Subtotal
52,380.00
327.375_.00__..
10
Canal crossings
____________ -
1
Itang
50
No
10.000
500.00
3.125.00______
Abobo
18
No
10.000
180.00
l,125.0p___
Dumbong
30
No
10.000
300.00
I 1.875PP_ —
______
Gilo-2
50
No
10.000
500.00
Subtotal
1.480.00
3,125.00___
’ 9.250.00______
TOTAL
L.
83,349.06 _
520.93h6.-_-----
p2
TAMS-l 1T.G Raro-Akoho River Rasin Integrated Develrvnment Master PlanIROlVMtI
APPENDIX D: COSTS
• dams and reservoirs
5o.
Item
Quantity
Unit
Unit cost
Total cost
(’000 USS)
(’000 USS)
fOOO Birr)
’iV~| Fish ladder
r------- -
Gumero
1
No
25.00
25.00
156.25
---------
Geba-A
1
No
25.00
25.00
156.25
Baro-A
1
[No
25.00
25.00
15625
Ittuig
I
No
25.00
25.00
156.25
Abobo
1
No
25.00
25.00
156.25
•——
Dumboni!
1
No
25.00
25.00
156.25
—■—
Gilo-2
'J-
No
25.00
25.00
156.25
Subtotal
175.00
1.093.75
12
Diagnostic beallh centre
Gumerd
0
No
11.000
0.00
0.00
Geba-A
1
No
11.000
11.00
68.75
*—‘ ■
Baro-A
1
No
11.000
11.00
68.75
r "
I tang
1
No
11 000
11.00
68.75
Abo bo
1
No
I’ .DOO
11.00
68.75
Dumbong
0
No
11.000
0.00
0.00
Gilo-2
1
No
11.000
11.00
68.75
1------
Subtotal
55.00
343.75
1
TOTAL
230.00
1.437.50
Ram-A kobo River Rasnn Integrated Develonmenf Master Plan4. ENVIRONMENT
B. Investment costs: Electric Power Transmission Systems
APPENDIX D:
COSTS
1 N»-
Item
Quantity
Unit
Unit cost Total cost
1
r
L
_
(■000 USS) (’000 USS) (’000 Birr)
*•
BMPs: Road sediment
I
—
Gumero 280 Km
0.500 140.00
Geba-A 190
Km
0.500
875 00
iL
95.00
Baro-A 025
Km 0.500
.
117.50 734.38
593 75
Subtotal
352.50 2.203.13 1
2 Replanting disturbed areas
-
— —“ —i—______
Gumero
Geba-A
280 Km
190 Km
0.10 VoiInV
28.00 175.00 1 i r\ aa
Baro-A
235 1 Km
.
0.10
19.00 118 75
Subtotal
23.50
146 88
Total
1
________________
70.50
440 63
J
.
423.00 2.643.75
C Investment costs: Irrigated agriculture
1 Required size reductions to preserve Gambela National Park
Itang 50 per cent
Abobo
100
Dumbong
90
Gilo-2
75
D. Investment costs: Water supply and wastewater
No.
Item
Quantity
Unit
Unit cost
Total cost
(’000 USS)
( 000 USS)
('000 Birr)
1
BMPs: channel disturbances
Large towns
9
Each
5.00
45.00
28125
Medium towns
15
Each
4.00
60.00
375.00
Small towns
28
Each
12.00
56.00
350.00
Villages
7
Each
0.50
3.50
21.88
Wells and
boreholes
6000
Each
0.50
3,000.00
18,750.00
----- .
TOTAL
3,164.50
19,778.13
E. Investment costs. Flood protection
No.
Item
Quantity*
Unit
Unit cost
Total cost
---------------
1
(•000 USS)
(’000 USS)
('000 Birr)
1-
Relocations of people (reserved
fund)
Unknown
1
30.00
□ 87.50
I
E. investment costs: Road Construction
No.
Item
Quantity
Unit
Unit cost
Total cost
----
('000 USS)
(’000 USS)
('000 Birr)_____
J
I
TAMS-ULG Raro-Akobo River Basin Inreorated Development Master Plan4. EMMKUNMENT
APPENDIX D: COSTS
JJ_G Rare Akobci River Rusin Integrated Develnnmem Master Plan
<
|