zes LO
prevent use of gap graded fitters
» Segregation of filter aunng confiittaOf' snail O? minimum
The grain see curve of the filar fMv*MQ is nearly parallel Io that of the base material
Following crtlena snouid be SeUSfied for wct| graded Sana Peng used in the filler
(J) Cn-eflicient of Uniformity ijDuj =■ — > 1
Ai
'[/} t3
(ii) Co-efTraent of Curvature (Cv) =----------- - — > S
AA
It should not contam SrVy organic materiel end the parbcKS betOw 0.075mm more than 5% by weight
7.6.2.1 Compaction of Fitter
The tompftCtKO of Und in the filter should he dent Dy plate vibratory rollers lit I specific density rt achieved The relative density (RD) of sand after compaction shauid equal lo qr more lhan TO*.
Ln order to ottatn the desired density with mintmum rampaaing efforts, sand may be placed in dry or in saturated condrtxm. In lhe CMt of inclined sand filters lhe sand should no I be allowed to flow Out pl specified width on either soes during compaction It sfwultf be confined
________________ ______________ _______________________________________________________ 71 Water Works Design & Supervision Enterprise
In bwcUUoa with lrKrrwotlAttnJ Csnsultaata and Twfcnwtij Ftl Ltd.Dedtss* Irrigation Project
Dam Appurtenant Works
May 2007
in betwcer two sheets Of plaiteS ihSialleO on either Sides nf the fitter, in order te ensure the specified width of the fitter and 10 avoid Mnteminalteri of fitter due to mining wrlh adjoining material
in order to maintain the prescribed siope or inclination of the filter during me cunstructjon. the impervious core hearting ZOfle ffluSl always be at mgher level than me level Of lhe tiller ano th* down Stream Casing zone must W kept 3t a tevei wh*cn « ■ UH rawer [nan ttte level ot the filler
Ttfit process should be continued m the same fashion fill the end of season *t the end Of
Which. the filter Would be kept *1 toast 1$ cm above IIM adrci nmg zones CO avoid contamination
oi soil with the Filer during rainy season
It muse also be enlurM with Jimos! Mte mat tfie material near the lunction Of Titter »nd (he adjoining zones on either sides of rt is compacted to the eppuiateo densities of (he respearve zones.
7.6.3 Horizontal Filter
The homontsl filter has been provided on stopped ground level downstream o1 the impervious corertransflion zone and has been connected with inclined fitter downstream of impervious clay Ctn A minimum snipe pf 1 m 100 has been provraea towards the toe dram for quick disposal ot seepage water The fitter material Shall satisfy fite filter cnflena T^ugn the thickness of twnzcnni filler required « small but for practical consideration a thickness of 1 5m has tieen prowled. The horizontal fitter has been provided tn coiled seepage from the foundation and the filter and minimizes possibility of pqtmg arang the aam Mat.
7,7 Safety of slope*
7.7-1 Upstream Slop* Protection
Dumped rock nprap by far is the most preferaoi* and adopted type ct protection for the upstream slope, it ha the advantage that the energy dissipation of IM wave u achieved as the wave naes and hence wave run up on the dumpfcl pflcteng is much less B compared io wave run up Oh smooth hand placed pitching or concrete asphah caching The requirement of hand placed roc* rip rsp ter the wme Wive height IS a do jt 1 2 td 1.5 times more than Chat ot dumped rock np rap due lq smoolher surface. However pra«mem of <0Cfc np rap would require wnsKJeraticn of economic aspects.
_____________________________________________________________________________ 73 Water Works Design 4 Snjerrisinii EnterprUe
tfl AitttUd&a with lnEmowOnanlii
and TtefanaeraEi Ptl Lid.Arjo Dedessa irrtiattoa Project
Dajd Appurtenant Works
Hiy 2007
For the Ago Dedessa Dam. dumped rock np rap of 1000mm thickness has been provided over a filter thickness layer oi 500 mm Thukness of rock np rap have Deen computed taking in to account fi) wart tueigm (uj Emoankmenl slope (■) Weignt of average sue of rock
(rv) Rw specific gravity
A well-graded roc* nprap will exert less pressure and stress on the filler
7.7.2 The rock for rip rap
The roc* np rap shall De hard dense ano durable and shall De resistant to weathering and wave pounding It Should not crumble on long exposure to waier frost and air It consists of boulders of basted rock fragments Frfter below rock np ^P have been provided to prevent wart* action from eroding erf the underlying embankment material by the suction efled
7 7 3 The Dumped rock np rap thickness
The rock Size generally provided is given oelow in tabular form
The flumped rock np rap should nave the following characteristics of dumped stone or rock fragments
i) Quality of rack
■) weight or sue Of individual pieces
w} Thickness of rock np rap
ivj Shape of rock fragments or stones
v) Effective nes ano stability of finer on which np np in p’-aced
5e no.
Maximum Wave Minimum Average Height in (m) rock size D 50 In mm
Minimum rock rip rap thickness |mm]
1
0- 1.5
300
600
2
1 5 - 30
400
750
3
3.0 and above
700
1000
For Arjo Deoesw Dam |he minimum thickness of dumped rock rip rap provided is of 1000 mm sue considering the quality of roc* rip rap available in the area
7.7.4 Placing of Rock Rip rap
The roc* np rap need not be compacted but sha ll be placed to grade in a manner to ensure Dial the larger reck fragments are uniformly distributed and the smaller rock fragments serve to fill
_____________________________________________________________________ ______________ 74 Water Works D„lgn & Supervision Enterprise
tn ifiecUUo n wtlh lateral ntlnwtU Co QSulluils ini Techa w*U rvt Ltd.J»flo tedesia InijitioB Project
Dam Appurtenant Warks________________ May 2OT?_
tbt spaces tietween trie larger rack tragmems in such a manner as will resuH m well Keyed
densely placed, uniform layer of np rap of specified thickness Hand p*acmg will be required
Only to lhe extent necessary 10 secure trie results above
In the placement of rock np rap care is taken to prevent segregation wttich court result m erosion of areas wnere small stones are concentrated or m washing ol beodmg materia, through packets of large Slones ft is also necessary to provide a blanket of graded gravei underneatn the np rap to guard against the danger of finer particles being suckCd Out of voids The np rap nas been emended 1 5 m below MDDL. The np cap accordingly for upstream slope has been provided Irom crest elevation Of 1360.6m to 1340 5m
7.7.5 Upstream slope of cofferdam
The upstream slope of the cofferdam is also exposed to the wave action during the rwer diversion and has Deen protected by providing I 5m thick layer of waste material from roc*, quany
The cntena of minimum rock size implies that the np rap should oe composed of rock naff of which sue should be larger than the recommended Dm size for a given height The rock should be weir graded from a maximum size of above 1 5 times the average size varying down to 2.5 cm spells to fill the voids between rock and to provide a reasonable degree of protection to the underlying filler layer The normal size of roc* 'D' <3 determined assuming the rock fragments to have a volume between that of sphere ana a cube or
Where. r-unit weight of stones in kg/m1
and W - wergni of Stone in kg consrtenng r - 2100 kg/mJ
[> 0 08 w,Q
On rhe above basts the thickness ano gradation of tumped rock np rap for Ajia-Dedessa dam
proposed to be adopted are as below
I
Thickness of dumped rock rip rap ■
1000 mm
II
Maximum aize of stones
■
2000 kg or 1000 mm
40% to 50% greater than
1000 kg or BOO mm
50% to 60% for
-
45* 100 kg or 300 mm
upto 10% lew man
45 kg or 300 mm.
Sand end rock dim to oe less than 5% toy weight of the (oral rock np rap material
Water Works Design & Supervision Enterprise
In £uodiflon with tut am mtn* Mil CeUttlUdU and Techiiacn Ls Pvt Lid.AntxDeAeui lrrlcstlon Project
Dam Appurtenant Works
7.8 Stability Analysis
7.8.1 Factor of safety method
May 1007
Different metn&as have Deen developed for computing factor of safety SLOPE/W and SEEPW software Developed by GEOSLOPE mlemationa* (Canadaj for analyzing factor of safety uses different methods ana all these methods are based on emit EquAbnum Formulation except finale element method
The General Unwt EquiMxium GLE formufet»on is cased on two factors of safety equations ana atows for a range of mtersbees shear-Normai force assumptions One equation gives factor of safety with respect to moment equiibrtum (Fm), while the other equation gives the factor of safety with respect to nonzortt# force equittxium (Ff) The General Limit Equilibrium (GLE) method satisfies both moment and force equilibrium by finding the cross over points of the (Fmj and Fr curves The GLE method encompasses all other methods regardless of slip circle shape GtE method in SlOPE/W can accommodate a wide range of differem interstice forces functions & AM the methods are characterized more by the equations of static satisfied and the manner is which the mtersbees forces handled than by the shape of the slip surface
The software analyses targe number of slip circles based on the methodology developed by Fellenius, Btshop. Janou, Spenser GlE, Morgenstern - Pnce Corps of engineers, tower Karafiatn. Sanna and gives the mmimum factor of safety for the critical failure surface The method aeveiopea by Morgenstern - Pnce considers both for the horizontal force equibbnum (F ) and moment equiiibnum (Fmj for grvmg the mewnum factory of safety His method is
r
considered preferable as the moment equilibrium on individual slice is used to calculate interstice shear force
Stability analysis has been earned using SLOPE/W ano SEEP/W software As regards staNrty of siopes of the aam body although earthquake loading is cyclic loading and has dynamic loading effect, lor the feas*>ilrty study report of Arjo-Dedessa Dam, only pseudo static analysis has been earned out by taking the horizontal seismic coefficient value a A ■ 0.05g Vertical coefficient a v is taken as hart of the value of horizontal seismic coefficient which works to be 0 025g These values of seismic coefficient have been adopted from the "Seismic Hazard Map of Ethiopia and rts Northern and Eastern neignbonng countries'
76
Vater Works Design & Supervision Enterprise
in Iswda&oD with Inttrcoatineauj Consuitanti ud Techoocnti Pn Ltd.AflcDt (Lust Lm^itlcD Project
Dfun Appurtsaint Works
7 8 2 Steady State Condition
Dawnjireem Slope
Hiyzw
Sla^ il) analyso for lhe downstream Slope oi Arp-Dede&sa Date under steady *UW WMUJitipn till teen done by consOtring furI reservoir level (FRL| and ftp water level on Iht dOTamjIream side or the dam cclh for With and without earth quane loading condition
Upsiream siope
The upstream jJqpe staulrty under steady SI81& condition has teen cheded for Mtn under Normal c-ondnon and with earthquake wading condition
7.8.1 Conairuction condition
On completion of construction &1 emwnKmend dam ttw port pTVHUV 4 partially tfissrpaiM The reMuai pore pressure depends upon me compaefron methods and lhe morsiirt content during construction period and oepends upon me rate pf raising of the oam The residual port waler pressure is based on the pore water pressure ratio 'Ru' Which is given oy
LU Ru yl Hj
Were = loUi und v#igm
Hs ■ the height of the sod column
The values of 'flu' vanes for 0.1 Io 0.6 In the presanl case the value of 'Ru considered is 0.4 for analysis
7 J.4 Sudden Draw Dawn Cahdttlon
For the stability analysts of upstream slope of the Ai)0 ■ Deoessa dam the critical condition is sudden draw OPwfl tOndmcn and the same has been cons.geren The Factor of safety depends upon the rats Of rjajipenre of pore water pressure and the ute at wh.cn the draw down ures place from the Ml reservoir WrveJ condition to minimum draw down condition ny the discharging capacity liking pace wer the spiltway and of me *ngatiort outlet Swm the wngatior out iti dacharge IS hmrfed. the draw down taking pace Mlow the full retention Jeve* 01 dam at f 356.0m Id MDDL level Of 1360.0 will be lldw with Pte Oiwhirgihg capacity of bgfh the migabon ouwet, being atHJirt 17.0 m’rsec
7.9 Properties of Materials
The following properties pf the day materials have bren adopteo as resign parameter based on me lest result? of day materials from different bonow areas conducted m the CDSCO laboratory. There values have been considered for stability analysis of the dam section
-______________________________________________________________________________ 77
Water Works DesLpt & Supemridii Enterprise
Id IssoditiHi with IfiCSittn Linen l*J CtuuJUhti and Teebri&CriU Pvt Lt4,A-rJo Dtdtisi [rrlfftftga Project
DunAppunotuut Works
Miy 2007
Table 7.1: Properties of The d«ign parameter for the clay core
Properties
Unh
Core Material
..
*1
7 sat {Ma«t Unit Wetgrit)
Khwn7
IB 6
2
r iub (SuDmeroed uM Wagrrt)
KN/m3
3
r mrjtsl (M0151 Unit Weight)
KN/m1-
IB 4
4
Total cohesion C
KN/m1-
M
Is
total angle of internal friction
Degree
26
6
Eledrve cohesion C
KN/m3-
0
7
Effective Angle of fnctiQrt wia»m 51004 Dffrvrftown
I
HMtNAgRl
w1# EQ
[Wripw E.ia m AM-i
V
W1 «IWJ
CMll XTrM* K' IWM i
MMiU 0 J
[>w>qpe-3" flay
MiKiai tataniCauBCHHfc
k«w i«<
C<0^MKA fi
Plw .Bl
Dwwwonc: n m I'
Nfa.W Ma*>C ■■ Jiimiji
W ’•*
Cah#wn *
Pr- W
btarwr« I H
[>Kipo* fhKHoci M«M HMkia-fa
t-^f^TwIir t
•'
55
•
1W
iMOt
sV
t
n 4l<
79
—
le r Worts
i
"" ,. -
._ *.................... ... I*—*"-"Atjft Dedflt ^f
p
Up#njtm 3J-W DHwDflwn 3**1 r EO
<• • •
Lira Skip*- QPD Condition W..
CMac»« Wt 2-1
Co*Mcn D
PH 1ft
Pwjnwwtoc l tfta *
aAawttfft ft
C3m<>rfa» ftetpia.a Wr-w ftadKKv
DlltlOtt (Rl)
sii
Waler Worts Design & Supervision EnterpriseAil a Dedessa Irrigation Project
Dam Appurtenant Works
FIGURE 7.3 DAM SECTION STABILITY ANALYSIS - DOWN STREAM SLOPE
May 2007
Df®
Slala W® EQ
Arjo D*d**«> D*m
Oowriflroarfi Slope SdMdy $l*t* EQ
*i
BbwvBwh T-M®
■Yl "■«
l
H-V K
r UriAAHAi a** *
Ml»*< J
wa» *■ P 5
CMaairtpM* uvfl II 2-*
Mrf Ji
Pw M
FwfwtwBiT. LM »
I
Mb«!F a • ”
[>*< «*•■**" P-F-i
1*3.41 H»-»4X.b
■afefcc <*4> ij,BOweFi^»
UBKWl 4
E8CT5%'”’ '
IWUMI
.'/■■rin^tar Mi Mfr-
wi J>4
I £■** **<■*•■
WWH UasrCsairwr^
“i-S- Nk-HlflOf*
I
Cwm" i
■* > JI
a
a¥ I ■ I
0w M
•■*■•*. i i
n
Mbi M
• ••••
• ••♦
• •Ar] & Dcttessa lntgidon Ftuj ect
Dun AppurttinatiL Works
Tatjlf 7.5 Stability Analysis ■ U p»treim Sl&prt
Miy2D07
Condition of inatysia Circle touching election
Minimum FOS is
per IS code
Minimum FOS as per
stability analysis done
—
Upstreim Slope
a} Swjden Draw Dowr 1320.0 b) Steady state 13300
i) WjUloul EQ 13*06 i) V/rtn EQ 1330.0
T.3
1.3
1 462
1430
15 1 1 560
14W
1
TO
jpiirMtn Slop* stability AnaiyiEj
UpsH&am Slope 2H IV from trust uptQ 13*0 6 m and 25M tv Qpwn words up !o EL. 1320 Qm
FRL EL 1356 00m
MDDL EL 1350 Odm
Tatite 7.4 Stability Analysis - Downstream Slop* Downstream Slope Stability Analysis
Down stream 1.SH IV
FRL EL 1356.0m
Ctmdftlon of anatytbl Circle touching elevation
Minimum FOS as per IS code
Minimum FOS as per
•lability inatyal* dome
DwnSiresm Slope
a) Steady state 1320 0 1 5
Without EG
tij SttMy state
WfrwutEQ
1325 0 1.0
1.6*3
1.517
* FOS Factor of Safety
• EQ : Earthquake
________________ __ _____________________________________________________ S3 Waler Works Design & Superrislon Enterprise
In iMflditlmi Witta Lmertfl DtlatCLSl CmunJtMCj ud TMknflEHU m Ltd4r)»DfdeU4 IrritltiOD Project
Dam Appunenant Works
itay2OT7^
From the above Tables 7.5 S 76 it re seen mat ine factor of safety of upstream slope under Supden Draw Down conation is very dose to the minimum factor of safeiy as prescnbeo in IS COOS Showing that Ine upstream sigpe adopted for the dam section is safe
For the downsiream stope jnoer sleady state condition the factor of safety both for without Earthquake and with Earthquane situation, the factor of safety is very tu.rian with In la mo □ Un n n til CcmuILsbu ud Tedmocrm JhL Ltd.imuHoc Prtijiwt
Dim Appurtenant Works
SAUENT FEATURES
Ml? 2007
The Degessa River. flowing northwest is an important tributary of River Apbay ft origmaies from Mf venmo and Mt A ache ranges and Bows in an easterly direction for about 75 km Thereafter it turns rather sharps to the north until fl reaches the Abeay River The Arjo-
□edessa project command area is largely rotated downstream of this sharp turn The prefect envisages the construction of an earth and rock fill dam, chute spillway facilities located m a saddle No 1 An irrigation oullef with an intake structure in a sadd'e No 2 on the right flank for the Rrgntt Bank Primary Canal and an irrigation out lei with an intake on the left abutment far Left Bank Pnmary Canal taking off from a left bank aoutmcrit of the dam. Other features of the left abutment outlet works are an upstream pressure conduit, a gait chamber ana a RCC conduit discnargmg m a basin from where the left bank primary can» lakes off at a distance away from the aownsueam roe line of the earth and rock fid dam
The pro.Kt envisages imgabon m a command area of >3,665 hectares The project is planned for Irrigation ano generation of nydropower The saltern leaiure Of spinway faculties and imgslipn outlets are oesenbeo as foltows.
Type Of Dam
Location
Maximum heignt
Oam Crew width
earth & Rockfill Dam with ctmrai
impervious cere
Latitude 8**31*12" N
Longrtude 36°-4O’-04* E
i) 40 6 m above river two
il) 43.6 m from the deepest foundation
loom
lengtn of crest
512.0 m
WWtn of Dam (mai)
ItW.tJ m
Top Etevrton of Dam
EL 1360.60 m
Upstream Slope
2H. 1V from crest to E L 1340.6 m arw
2.5H:1V
Downstream slopes
1.5H:1V Upto EL 1320.0 m
(7
Water Warks Dssigu L Superrtslan Enterprise
la iuMlittn *uh kitrwntln«nJ ComuHanu u*o TnIujctuli hrL Ltd.Arjolttdesu imgadofl Project
Dam Appurtenant Works
Spillway () Co wilteDU tad TedmtcrUi Pt L Ltd.rnif i n^n Projed
Dun Appurtenant Works
Right Bank Primary Canal
i) Location
hi Oschar je Capacity
jiijCangi FSl
rr) Size of imflauon Otfttef Right Bant Command Area
May 2007
Rigm Bank Saddle No 2
7 52 m’/sec
6L 13430m
1 5m it 1 5 m RCC Dud
7450 na
Water Works Design 4 Supervision Kourpris«
In AmtiidQB wttfi iBtmwMfffiwfitM.1 fjiiKflHa.HH Ind Ttt&cnmu Ptl Ltd.Arja-Dedeui lnl£itign Project
Bam Appurtenant Works
9 INSTRUMENTATION
9.1 General
May 2007
A dam is expected so withstand tremendous forces during its operational life it is therefore unpefativE Chat adequate means are available in lhe dam for providing information on continued assurance of its safety The extent of internal dtatfwi cannot M directly measured in a dam. However diagnostic procedures can provide help In identifying the problems. Effective instrumentation provided m the dam serves INS objective and can provide meaningful information and efues io me various problems and play ano important rote in checking the safely of structures The condition of the clam and rts overall safety needs lo be checked regularly to demonstrate that the dam is performing safely in accordance with the design assumptions
9.2 Purpose of fiistrumerualJon
The monrtonng instruments selected for a given situation are required to function satisfactorily under very nvsh environmental condition and for long periods of time For a good design ft is desirable mat ■nstrumems Detect systems of distress and where possible to relate these Systems lo specific problems at the earliest possible stage Their prime function k. to reveal abnormalities, which may nave the potential to develop info serious incidents or failure. The instruments selected for a given situation should nave the fallowing characteristics
* As simple in concept as is constant wflh their functions
* Suftoeraiy accuracy ano qualify
■ Low maintenance requirements
* Compatibility with construction techniques
* Long term reliability and slaoilily
■ Low cost ano ruggedness
■ Simplicity ano service requirements
■ Durability under adverse environmental and operating conditions
90
Water Works Design & Supervision Enterprise
te Aasadsdoa with lawrconttnenuJ Csnsuilanik ftnd TticluaQcriU Prt. Lid.Arj(> ttfdeij* lrrli»Uon Project
Dam Appurtenant Works
9.3 Types of Measurement
The most significant parameters inai are necessary m monitoring dam Behavior are.
• Pore waler pressure and uplift
• movements i) internal movement
li) External movement
• Seepage and Leakage
• Strains and stresses
• Dynamic Loads (set&mic forces)
9.3.1 Pore water pressure
May 2007
Pore water pressure iis the most important and jsuai measurement in cmoankment flams its measuremems enables snnw the seepage pattern sei up tn the embankment and foundation after the reservoir impoundment Valuable informatwn about the behavior during construction and draw condition Shaft" 9101? hCHd
Vi) Skm CTannflHpcllw»y l¥) Syphon spillway V} Chute spillway
For Aj}i5-CJmws3 cam wruch ts an earth and rocx fiH Mrt 1ne spillway wrfll". pf 125 Om With flood lift of 2 62 m has teen provided The spillway naa sufficient CipaCfly to pass the d&tgn fl&Od as that when the flood discharge impinges at foe time when the reservoir is at FRL, the flow Ml would npi result in ouertoppng Of the Pam. Besides providing sufficient capacity the spdway ts hy*aulicalty and structurally adequate to diSSipare the energy associated with the discharges
tt h« been waled such that spillway discharges will not erode W uhdtmnine the downstream toe of the dam The frequency of spillway use depends upon the Sum Ql characrerizaltnn of the drainage area Spllway flews mH result during floods 0< periods of sustained high run off when tne caps cities of other facilities are exceeded
10.2 Location
The spillway has been located on the nght flank in the natural saddle NO.1 upstream of ArjCr- Dedessa dam un. The location considered for apdlway a sucn that rt does not interfere wtth the fonctwniog and performance of other structure of the project The topography geological set UP ana layout of other structures were lhe main consideration in deciding the location of the spillway in Che natural saodfo ho.l OP the nght flank of lhe dam. The discharge earner iq provided in the excavated rock ano wffo a enute ending in an energy dissipation arrangement The Other alternative arte tor location of spillway exammfrd was Ift a saddle on lhe left flank of the dam. This was nol considered suitable as rt involved large excavations due to rls higher Bleviteri Coftudffing the rock type inc geotechnical investigation report, Stilting basin type of energy dissipation arrangements have ww considered
10.3 Spllh**y Layout
The maximum Spillway discharge tWS been computed by flood routing Studies by the hydrology group. The tpflhrty width and the flood lifts have been worked Pul for venous combinations of
__________________________________________________________________________________ 95 Viter W'otks Design i Supervision Enterprise
In Asmdillfln >LLH tnrsrtoiUciraiil fcosuLLaou sod Teeboacrtii FTL LtiVjoDedeu* irrteados FTcJefl
Dam Appurtenant Work*
discnarges taking into consideration the Topography an-1 upstream of the aam axis on the right flank have provided the location at advantage for the spillway m meeting Hie requirement of being independent in the operation and pcflormance of other components ot the project The spillway at this location is not rrterfering with the location and performance of irrigation outlet from where rvgtrt bank primary canal i* taking ofl in the near by saddle Mo-2.
The downstream docnarge channel from the spillway n» been abgneo along the natural drainage and wilL outfall into over Wama The natural drainage after a distance of about 1 O km trom the stilling pasm has Peen channetiZM The general layout plan and section etc. of sprtvrty is shown in Drawing Nc AD-F-DAM/20.2H 22
10.4 Design inflow Flood Discharge
Sptlway has been designed to have discharging capacity sufficient enough to pass the inflow flood* correspond'ng W probable maximum flood1 (PMF), as from both the Might and storage capacity aspects the proposed ct*m I* classified as a Large dam Indian Stargards specify (hat rf the failure of aam poses danger to human kfer the apiftway must have suffi«n| capacity to accommodate ttie touted flood discharge corresponding to probable maximum Flood (PMF) a«j if the failure of dam would result only in heavy damage to property but does not pose
______________________________ _______________________________ ________________________ .96 Water Works Design & Supervision Enterprise
In itMdsllM with InwtentliiaiitxJ Cnnsuititu sad Technocrats Pn LtdDtdcsji Irrigation JYflJert
Dam Appurtenant Works
May 2007
appreciable s • control weir wn.cn o1 an Ogee ship in profile It is located m saddle Nc:1 on the right flank of the dam and 500 0 m upstream erf dam Snt The geographic location of the spillway structure are defined by coordinates at ns cemrai point
The Ogee profile to be acceptable should provide maximum possible hydraulic efficiency,
structor* SHbdrty and economy and aer 4 m numoer The piers support the 4tee> truss structure walkway of t 50 m width The crest level of Ogee weir tS kept at EL: 1356 0 m The foundation of the spillway structure has been kepi on excavated firm roc* ano is founded at El 133B.0 as revealed by drilling borehole at SP-1 location which is at the bender qf spillway structure.
10.9 Ogee Weir Profile
The upper curve of (he ogee generaly is made Io conform closely to the profile of the lower nappe of the ventilated sheet falling from a sharp crested weir Flow over the crest is made to adhere to the face of toe profile by preventing access of air to toe urwersiOe of the sheet For discharges ai designeo head, (he flow glides over the crest with no interference from the boundary surface and attains near maximum discharge efficiency The profile betaw the upper curve of the Ogee is COhbflued tangent along * atop to support the sheet on the face of the over flew A reverse curve at the bottom trf the stope toms the flow on to the chute, men to toe sliding basin end thereafter to the spillway discharge channel
- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------« Water Waits Design L SupertUI an Enterprise
la Jkiiodatloa wttt leunoatlauitaJ Canntiaats ud Tachcocrati PrL Ltd.AjJoDttlf sal [m£jition Project
Dam Appmnenant Works
Maj 2007
The jngated spillway crest is kept at FRt EL 1356 0 m The overflow section adopted is Ogee snapea weir to be omit in reinforced concrete 125 0 m w>de with vertical upstream ta-ce The width or lhe tprilway nas been athveo si by various combinatinn ol flood lifts ano widin and urong the oasic weir equation for passing the design flood Abutment ai each cr*d ct the crest has been taken to neigh! above 1Me water profile and providing tree board The Ogee profile has been Designed for upstream and downstream crest profile as per the IS 6934 1373
The upstream crest profile is kept tangent to the vertical face and should nave zero slopes at lhe crest axis to ensure that there is no discontinuity aiong lhe surface of flow
Upstream profile
The upstream profile aoopled conforms to lhe mjuauon
y . OJW + MTWW)' *
1
_ 0 43,
4. O.27dff)o<"
Hd"*i
Where. X,Y = CartaSian coordinates
* Design need
The of * tor vanous values of X are ooiamea Inom the Tabtes in Fig 3 pf the Indian
standard code
Downstream profile
The down stream profile snail conform to lhe equation
i d au
X ■ 2.0 fid. Y
rtbere, WJ = oesign head
and , X & Y are coordinate
The profile has been designed for one value of the design head (Hd) only and h»j been be chosen to give the maximum practicable hydraulic efficiency m neeping with the operational requirement, statdrty ana economy rtmrevar, generally the spiUways are operated under concMions other than the design head and at times sub atmospheric pressures daveio-peu lead 10 cavitations. The lower the design head of the crest profile lhe greater will be the discharge coefficient lor the full range of heads For design head exceeding by 25% np harmful captations K seen io develop. Design head is usually kept at 75% - flO% of maximum head Economy in the oesign of an Ogee crest may sometimes be affected by using a design head which is less than the maximum expected head Use of smaller design head results in
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------<00 Viter Worts Design & SupnrrtslQn Enterprise
In ItuKiilkiB wtU) iDWtODUMsttl Couullants uid TKtaeenU Pvt Ltd.Arj^Dedeua Irrlfattoo Project
Dim Appurtenant Works
May 2007
mcreasetj di scnarg&s from me fulh range of headt The increase in capacity makM 11 possible to Bcfueve economy by reducing til her lhe crest length or the maximum discharge htao
10.10 Spillway Chute
The spillway cnute of 125 0 m width eo pass the design flood discharge has txon provided oolcw 1he spillway giO&S It will envisage excavation tn roc* to math the designed Itirti The Wk is repcneu co m avaiaoie at El 133S.0 m as revealed in me geological 8 geo-technical report The twigmal ground level al Ute saddle anee is around 1350.0 Thfi material ccnsislmg of ovevtiupoen sno IraourwTweathered and iocsc IOC* rS to be removed to lay the foundalrtn for spillway sludies, chule end stilling oasiri on tte firm iekL The Stilling P3S«n foundation has been lak) on firm rock and tnickteis of i5W mm of conertwe floor prpvioed The same n exienoed up si ream to form tpundMipn for the spillway ana Chute the concreie floor is anchored Id Che rock foundation oelow by 25 mm p grout anCTWrs at 1 5 m tfc and 3-0 m deep Over the Concrete floor cyclopean concrete with 60 % stone *40% concrete df C-30 grade ts placed and well compacted conforming Io the shape of spillway. 1500 mm thfcltnm ol reinforced cement concrete (M-50j grace is paced over the Ogee spillway and chute all around with 25 mm p 1 5 m efe ano 3 0 m deep grout anchors as sncwn n the drawings ol spillway structure Under drainage arrgngemenl has been provided 1o prevent 1he foundation mgienal from being cached into the pipe below For reducing the uplift pressure, Grout curtain 25mm £■ of 3.0 m depth Q 1 5 m cte nave wen prpvqeo In the entire spillway xmglh upslream ol lhe Ogee Werr to prevent any seepage from lhe reservoir side taking place pod te prevent Building up Of uplift pressure under the spillway chute and Stillmg basin foundafion. The general teyoui of lhe spillway facilities is Vrdwn m Gnawing No AD-F-DAM/20
10.11 Structural Requirements
The retaining wans for sides of entrance cnann&, d scharge channel and smiling basin have been assignee Io with stand all poss-tHe combinaMn ol venous loading hke back fill earth, of W* pressure water pressure. live low roo^iarije, upfrft pressure ano forces due to horizontal ana vertical s&smic acceleration. The structural steel Mails hM not been indicates Irt the drawings and is W be provKSea at desa-.lea Assign scage
10.12 Floor lining
Duong ftte spillway flows the floor fining «j subjected 1o hydrostatic fprc«, boundary drag IWC«. uplift and dynamic forces dua Io flow impmgemenl When there is no spiirthe lining H
-------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------101 Wittr Works Design & Supenrtolon Emerprtse
In IsHdxaouwtQL iKHnnOMiitU Cc rjnJtiirj ini Ttt.tiiLotT.su rvt LLLMotwiMsa Irrlgtitoa Project
Dam Appmtenani Works
May 2007
subjected tp the action oi expansion and contraction due io temperature variations weathering ana Chemical deterioration, effects of settlement ano buckling or 10 uplift pressure due lo under seepage 0* high grouno water condition II is recognized in the IS coae that fl it not possible to evaluate these uanous forces that mignl occur and aiso not to make the lining heavy the thickness ot lining ts made on more or less empirical basis and reliance is made on providing
■jnder drams, ancnors. cut arts etc. to stabilize lining.
The IS oqob provides intcuness of Immg m me approach channel of 15 cm 10 3G cm mice concrete unaer normal conditions (n the inclined chute the concrete lining thickness as been sepf as 1 5 m In the stilling basin the floor lining thickness a Kept 1 50 m
in the inclined chute, the cN* profile of Ogee wwr, very high velocities of flow iane place causing abrasion aue to suspended wit load Once pitting starts, repairs become cMficuil It is proposed that well oesigned m» of high perrormance concrete jsmg silica fumes «S used. Like wise, m stilling basin also, where nydraulic lump forms Sucn concrete shOukJ be used
10,13 Water stops and joints
Water stops ano joints are provided as per (he IS cooe which specifies that lining should be laid m panels so as to mane the entrance cnannei lining a reasonably water ng nt upstream tb reduce upifl pressure on the control structure see pints in the lining have been provided with water stop? The water slops ar* also to be prodded in longitudinal joints. transverse joints and in the joints of Side walls where seepage behmd the walls tated below
Sr
No
Location
Compressive stnagni of
concrete (N/mm2) 28 day
strength
Maximum size of
Aggregate inim)
1
Spillway Ogct cresi spillway glacis, chute, end sill 6 Ch-Ute raefcj etfenor 2 0m IhicknesS
25
40
2
Stifling basin exterior 1.5 m IhwJcnras
fid
(Using silica fumes.
20
3
Spillway ptera. RCC relain ng watts stilling basin except 1.5 rn manor ihvAness
20
40
4
The lovndation lor filling up CIWlCH
15
20
5
Gravrty MCtiW l&r retaining wsls
20
40
6
Approach channe i fifoor
IS
20
l(M
Water Works Dsdgn & Saparristan Enterprise
til LiuanUnn wlUi teuroanUBnul DOMUJtlnls ud Tschoacnta PtL. t**iHydraulic Design Computation
for
Spillway facilities
Water Works Design & Supervision Enterprise
In AjsodJtion with Interttttlaifrtnl CcnsuManlj ud Tecbnoenii Pvt LUL
105Mo-D®(essi IrrlgiaQii Project
Dam Appurtenant Works
11 HYDRAULIC DESIGN
11 d Hydraulic Design of Spilfway Facility
May 2007
rhe spillway i& da-signed co pass a discharge of 1 in 10.000 year return pe/iM or M PMF whren ever 4 greater The discharge of (he 1 in 1Q.DD0 year return period is computes as 11(55 0 misec and gives a ritgtier value Therefore this value of discharge has wen considered in (he hydraulic design gf spillway
The routed out flow discharge as computed = 1165 (rn^gec) For a spillway wroth of 125 0 m ano the Surcharge heigh! for 1hi& Computed = 2.62 m
Where, Q - cd L H”
L= 125 00 m
Le = effective width Df spillway ana is detained by considering abutment and pter
contraction erleci.
Q - H65 m^sec
The surcharge neight for routed out flow discharge of 1165 m^/sec ano width of
125.0 m = 2.62 m
le ■ L - 2 Ha (NKp t Kaj - width of pier
= 125 - 2 « 2.62 (4xOT7’B
-116.23 m
Va Ftewsea - 1165/8 74 x 118.23 - 1 147 mfsec
106
Water Works Design it Supervision Enterprise
tn moeuUon WMD ImanactUoflEtiJ Canxultutt lad Techs g m u Prt Ltfl.Arjo Dedessa Irrigation Prejan
Darn Appartenant Works
Miy2OT7
l J.J47*
‘ 2 X9SI
= 0.067
H„ - He - Ha
*2 74-0.067
■ 2 673 ni
For aesign erf Ogee snaps □ lower design head is used as rt increases the discharge coefficient for nrgner flows than me design flow
Adopting 98.0 % of heap
Crest of Ogee ■ 1356 0 m
Depth of water over Ogee ria = 2.673 x O.SB
-2.62 m
The computabon for the Ogee spillway profile for both upstream ana downstream nave oeen done and are contained m Ta&ie 111
For Arjp-Dedessa Oam spillway the gooo rock is availaote at 1336 0m as per the spillway drill note data at spillway location SP-i
Therefore floor of stifling basin 13 proposed TO be kept at EL 1336 0 m The chute Is proposed with slope of 2H:1V
Velocity at crest of Ogee weir
V = Qi'A = 1165>'116.23x2.54 = 3 95nVsec
Calculation for dj
By using Bernoulli's theorem and neglecting all losses
TELUfS -TEL + n
Ll/STEL - AZ+ di + ha
Water Works Design & Supervision Enterprise
!□ ixBodxdiii! wlii InurMnllmtrfU COdsuLt*u« and. Tochn^rsu PrL Ltrt,
107Dedem [mgattan Project
Dim Appurtenant Works
= (1358-1339}+ 2 54+ 0 795
s 18 * 3 335
= 21335
D/S TEL = dj + ha?
na2 = Vj /2g
VayZflO?
z
Vj = Q.'A = 11B5/125jtdr
V,= 9.32/d?
a ha =
9.32J
d }x 2x9.Si
= 4 42/C/
SutMlrtLrtnfl values in (he equation aoove Qs tel »ch + n#j
21.335 =d + 4.424/j/
1
21.335 d:3 •< +4.42
ar< + 21.335 +4.42 = 0 Saving the equation for d ,
t
dj ■ 0.46 m
^=116^125x0.46
= 20.28 m.'sec
20.26
= 9 54
Water Works Design 4 Supervision Enterprise
li iuactxDpn wtlk totm until nta] Cctualluu ud Totfanctnu m LliL
I0KUjo tafassa Irrijatiaa Project
Dun Appurtenant Works
Using horizontal type of Hydraulic jump
dj= 0 5 +a/2 - >1
= 0.5 X 0.4b [/l +8*(954)1 -1]
• 0.5 j 0 46x26.00
= 5.98 m
M»y3M7
Since Frouoe nurmber is more than 4.5 Basm Type II shall be used From the graph DeTween Frauen s number and length of Basin for Ffoudte number 9 54
Length of Basin =43x596 = 25,7 say 26.0 m
Mmimun Tail water depth required from graph between Froude Number and Tail water depth (Design of small oam oy USBR/
7j<7 wn/enfepfh
0.46
Min Tail water depth >13 4 x 0 46 To be acmeveo
= 6.18 m
say 6.2 m
Basm Appurtenances (From the IS standard)
• Chuis block. height. Width and spacing
D. = C 46m say. 0 50 m
Spacing from side wall — ■ —- - 0 J5 m
*22
■ 0.25 m
Chute Blocks snail be provided at junction of horizontal floor and slope of chute
Basin Blocks snail Pe provided at a distance of 0 B DT farm the juncbcn of horizontal flow and slope ot chute ■ 0 B x 5 98
= 4 7B m. say 5.0 m
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IG9 Waler Warks Design & Superrislan Enterprise
li AMO tilth) n with InlarrnnUMnul CoasaltMts ud TBchnotrau m Ltd.Irrigation Project
Dint Appnrtenint Works
* Basin Block
Height of Basin Block snail be taken from Graph of Froude Number versus — i$ Lode 4997- 1960
For Frourfe Number 9.54
^--235
A
At-235x0.50
= 1 17 say 1.20 ma*
Provide ho = 1.20 m
Top width = 0.02 ho
= 0.02 x 1 2 m
■ 0.24 m
Provide 0 25 rr
Stope DfS snail be 1.1 ancf .
= 0.375 x 1.20
= 0 45
Provide 0 5m
* End Detail Sill Heigni (h»)= D.2 D,
= 0.2 X 5 98
* 1.196m
Provide 1 25 m
Top width ■ 002 D,
-0.02x59®
Witer Work! Design & Supervision Enterprise
tn kMocladen with InwcntUmical Can»ltuu and Tecii noeri u Pvt Lu.
ItoAiJo-DedesH Irmtaaon Projeci
Dam Appurtenant Works
= 0 119 m
Provide 0 125 m
Spacing and length at bottom = 0 15 D;
-0 15x5 98
-0 79 m
Provide 0 90 m
CMS Slope 3 l u/S Slope vertical
May 2007
End sill shall start nght from side wall ano no gap from side wail shah be provided The Appurtenances far stilling Basrn II are snpwn in Feg 111
* Tall Channel Design
It is assumed that in the tail channel the velocity shall be Kepi at 1.5 iwsec The width of the channel is Kept the same as kept for the spillway chute
The width provided shall Be 125 0 m Assume depth of water of 5.0 m in tail channel The discharge in tne ted channel is given by
Q=AtV
11-65
1.5
W776 7 sq m
That is area of cross section of the tad cnarmei required is 776.7 sq m and area provided in the tail channel rs.
Area of 6.0 m depth Of channel with side slopes i: 1
A = (b + nd} d
= (125 + 15x6) 6.0
» 784 0 m/ sec
The area provided is more than required area
The bed Stope a cattuiared by using Manning s Icvmua as given beipw
where
n
n - is the rugosity coefficient ana taken as 0 025 for rough surface
IH
Water Works Design & Supervision Enterprise
b tMocteUnn wttb lutercotulnEiiti) Cflosultects ud Tcctmarrats Fn. Lld.Miotefassi irrijidoD Project
Pun Appurtemm Works
HVBMT
Wetted Penmew a computed as fl -
j? - * -
784 q
‘ P " 125 - 2 j 1.41x6.0
784.0
125 + 1&W
= 6.52 m
R1 ’ = (5.52/ 1
= 3 123
1.5 x 0.025
3 123
= 0 012
Say 1 in 7000
Al the end or 500 m length after the twin, beo drop will be
= = 0.070 n
7000
Bea Elevation ■ i33fi - 0 07 m
= 1337 93 m
■ Free Boa rd In the Channel
Free board in the channel conauoed flaw at supercntcai stage, surface roughness, wave action nr bulking and spray are retalM to the velocity ana energy content ana is given by the emptficai relation as uetow.
____________________________________________________ _________________ 112 Water Works Design & Supervision Euterpris e
to *3Md»oon with lntertindBflQt*] Consultants and Tnehoocrus ptl LuLMo Dtdas si Intgiliac Fnijnei
£amAppurtenant Works
Free Board (infeet) = 20 + DO25 v tfd
= 20*0 0?5 x 1 5 X V«.D
= 2 0 * 0 025 x 1 5 x 1 fll
= 2 06 It or
■08m
say 1 0 m
Top or Bank elevation or channel
= Water elevation + Free ooaro
- 1344 0* 1 0
= 1345 0 m
■ Elevation at dlttarent places
Bea frevation of Tail waier channel = 1344.00 - 5 9B
■ i33BO2m
say 1338.0 m
Water elevaton in the tnannel -1J3B0 + TWL
= 13380*60
* 1344 00
Water itvflr in Tail waler cnanrwi ai 500 m Djs
D/S = 1344.0 -0.07
= 1344 0-007
= 1443 93
Bed level at 500 m OS in tail water crwnneL = 1343 93-6 0
= 1337 93 m
« Fr>« Board in still I ng Basin; (from USBRj:
Free bean) in staling basin is provider] so that stilling basin walls are not overtopped Py the surges splashes ano sprays and wave action set up by the turbulence ol the jump The surface roughness Cl flow is related to the energy dissipated in the jump and tn the depth of flow m the basin.
_
______________________________________________________________________113
Water Works Design & Supervision Enterprise
H AssQCUhan wtli tarmondneolxl ConsultxDls tad Technocrats Kt LUMo-Deduss [rTljitlon Project
Dim Appurtenant Worts
Free board x 3 2S
=B6n
26 m
Top eevadon of stilling basin walls
■ Water elevation in basin ♦ free tx>ara
= 1344 00* 2 50m
= 1346 60 m
» Layout p»an of spillway is shailin Fig 11.2
11.2 Irrigation Outlets
Miy 2O(F
Two Itngabon outlets, one near the left abutment for the Lett Bank Primary Canal ano the other on tne ng nt flarw. saddle - 2 along with the intake structure for the Right Bank Primary tana - are provided for withdrawal of water supplies front the reservoir in a regulated manner tor meeting the irrigation demana in the respective command areas The control gate structure for each is provided on the upstream for regiaabng 1he releases as per toe requirement of irrigation canal The gates are operated by a hydraulic hoist. As emergency gale upstream of the control gate has been provided for emergency operation if requireo
11.3 irrigation Outlet for Right Bank Primary Canal
The irrigation outlet fo< the Rignt Bank Primary Canai has been located in the right flank saddle No-2. The original ground level ait tfos location is at EL 1358.0 m The drill hole ADS-2 has indicated the over buraen of about 20.0 m at this section The Irrigation outlet has been designed as a cut and cover conduit and placed on hard excavatec root stratum to carry dudiaige to meet the imgabon demands for command of 7450 hectare as per the data provided by the imgaton gro^ The invert level of the outlet has been kept such that lhere a always a dnving heao of 0 6 m available curing the lean period to meet the maximum peak demand of irrigation The WOOL of the reservoir is at EL 1350.0 m ana accordingly the invert level of the ngtit bank imgabon out let has own fated at EL 134S 0 m.
114
Water Works Design & Supervision Enterprise
in Auotiaifon with latecnadauiial CtDioftuts and Tadutncrtu Prt Ltd.Arjo Detain [trtgiikn Projaei
D«n Appunenant Works
May2W?
An RCC duct of 1 5 m x 1.5 m square m seclion has been prowdeo to carrying tne discharge value of 7 52 m-’fsec The fnqban losses in the conveyance system have peen computed using Manning's equation Siaunchmg nngs to increase the seepage path have been provided at each pf the construction jcwit at 5m c/c interval m the impervious care downstream of comoi gate structure The RCC conduit section after the consmidKin, is back filled property to raise rt to the rep eievation of EL 136C 6 m The arrangement d! the imgabon out have oeen shown in the Drawing Mo. AD-F-DAM^
11.4 Irrigation Outlet for Left Bank Primary Canal
The irrigation outlet for the Left Sank Primary Canai have been located near the left abutment The alignment has oeen fixed much that the Rcc conduct of provided to irrigation pullet is m cut and cover section ano is aligned away for the downstream toe of the dam The Rcc duct section of 1 7 m * i.7m square shape has been designed 10 carry a discharge of 9.QIS m3rsec for meeting The water demand to imgatioh of the ieft bank primary canai The MDDL of the reservoir is at EL 1350 0 The inlet tavei of the irrigate outlet nas been fixed such that the duct is always carrying discharge 1o in the peak irrigation demand in tne lean season for this the iwet nas been nepi at a level so that there s always a dnvmg head of 0 6 m
The layout of the imgabon outlet and intake structure with a control gate i3 shown in the layout d rawing No. ACHP.rDAM/27 & 2B
11.5 Hydraulic Design of Irrigation Outlet
Right Ba nk Primary Canal
Location: Right Hank Saddle ha 2
Design Ducnarge proposed through this rrngaDon outlet as provided by irrigation group ■ 7 521 m’/aec to designing the irrigation outlet and providing a minimum head of 0.6m during the leanwl penod and ensuring the imgatran outlet discharges to meei the peak demand The velocity with the mimmun driving head of 0.6 m is computed by the relation
115
Witer Works Design & Supontetan Inurprise
In Assottatl-DD wtth tDleroottiiadla] Coosultaiiis and,Tecbnncrsts hft. Ltd*ijo Dedeui Irrigation ProjBrt
Dun Appurtenant Works
Vtlooty ■ ^2 x h
- 3 43 m/Sec
Area of x-secbon tne of imgsfron oufiet required A’ ■ —
v
7,521
MjitZOOT
—; Hifai
3.43
~2 19 sq m
Aocpbng g square duct of RCC of Mt 2.0 m * 1 5m for meeting the requirement of water
7 52 L
Area o! cross section requireo for discharge of 7.521 m3/sec is =
x-areg of X'section of the duct proviaeo *20*1 5 sq m
= 3 0 sq m
7 521 Velocity generated with inis area = ——
• =2.19 sq m Area of
of cross section provided
Faction slope V = *5‘ ‘
H
A = 3sq m
P * 7m
- 2.507 m/sec
o
3
P7
R =0.57
w
V* —^—*10.57) 5”
0.016
355 35 5
2.5
" 35.5
q ■ 0.071
______________ _ _____________ __ ______________________________ _____________116
Water Works Design fc Supervision Enterprise tn IsMcliMan wilh IntettouUflenud Cfluuliints nd TecLtidcratn Ptl Lui.Mum Irrtf idao Project
Dim Appurtenifll Works
S- 1071}1
= 0 005
□r stope = im
Length of Due? = 1C0 * 105
= 205 m
MayZOT?
. 205
Head loss due to fraction - —
200
= 1.03m
The gate and groove tosses ar# assumw to be negligible
_ . oir
Entry loss = ——
2X
s Q_3x2.fi’
■ 2x881
■ 0 10 m
loss d neaa through Bw irasn raw is assumed negligible
r1
veooty head ai ent = —
2f
= 0.2x2.507*
2x9,81
= 0 06 m
Totai head loss = 1 03 + 010 + 0 06
■ 1.19m
say 1.20 m
Frf supply levels will be Kept below the leve> = 1350 -1 2 ■ 0.6 m
-1348 2 m
Bui Actual FSL provujed a 1348 0 m and n ok
The tap itvft of the RCC duct will be Kept at EL - 1348.00 - 0.15 tconstdenng Q 15 m depth
below canai FSL for dud to run hit)
= 1347 BSm
Bottom levei taking into account the thinness from EL: 1347.85
i.e 1347.85 '(0.5* 0.5 ’1 5)
- 1347 85- 2 5 ■ 1345 35m
_________________________________________________________________________________ 117
Witer Works Design & Supervision Enterprise It Asodanon with totercnndDinuJ CaMuhuia ud Tachawrati Ptt Ltd.AjjG Ih dea» I rrtfitJMi PreJett
Dam Appurtenant Works
Depth c' water in me canal = 1 4 m (assumed) Canal level a 1346 00 -1 4 m
= 1348 40 m
JUyZMJJ
The general arrangement el layout plan end sectional elevation and other details of the imganon cxrUei for the Right Sank Primary Canai >s shewn m the Drawing No AD-F-DAW25 a 26
11.6 Hydraulic Design of Irrigation Outlet for
Left Bank Primary Canal
Location: At the left Afcutment near the crest of the aam
The discharge foe the irrigation outlet for left Bank Primary Canal as has been provided dy the mgaUon group has been considered for the design of irrigation outlet
Discharge = 9 02 m’rsec
WOOL of reservoir EL. 1350 00 m
Minimum Dnving head provided = 0.6 m
A cut and cover reinforced concrete duct is provided Im irrigation cut let from the reservoir Velooty v ■
= Vlr9Jiri>.6
’ 3 43nVsec
Area of doss section of the dud required for carrying the above discharge of 9.02 m3/$ec
902
=--------m/Sec
3.43
= 2 63sq m Provide RCC duct of size 1.7 mr 1.7m
X'SccOon area of the Rec duct -1.7xl7$qfn
■ 2 69 sq m
Water Wortai Dwlgn 1 SuperrUhn Enterprise
in UiocUtiflQ Till iataitMjtJBtnt*| Cmutuais TKhieenti Fvl LULArjft Detent Irrigation Project
Own Appurtenant Works
Actual ueiocrty of flow generated m the duct = —
_ w
= 2(9
e 3 12 fTu'wc Provide srfi level of the duct at = 13-50 - 0 6 -1 7
= El 1347 7 m Layout and alijnmem gftha ROC Square Dud
Miy 2007
Since tre ground level is nsing on trie downstream side of lhe dam abutment. rt is proposed to cake the irrigation outlet dud in excavation in rock The concrete duct wilt ne in straight alignment for the initial 18.0 m lengtn from the center ol control gate shaft and there after the Oud will M alined at an angle of 145° with the center line of the outlet and taken straight for
110.0m length The oud will then open out in the canal at a ground eievauon of about 1353 0 This point will be at d-stance of about 110 0 meter from the dam axis and snout 50 0 m away from the center line of the asm axis. A genergr layout ptan of the imgabon outlet ouct s snown
m the Drawing No AD-F-DAM/27 (, 28
A control gate operated Uy a hoist is prowled al the upstream of the gate shaft An emergency
gate on the upstream of the control gate ra provided for operation in an emergency situabon
The diameter of the control gate shaft housing for the control and emergency gate is proposed
to be of 8.0m internal diameter and centre of the weft snail be st a distance of 15 0 rr. from the
ms edge of lhe dam
v-312--KinS‘ri
a
Where
n ■ rugosity coefficient and is taken = 0 Q16
P ■ Welted penmeter of duct
A = Area of the cuct
S = Slope of lhe duct
1 7x1.7
* ? 4x1.7
- 0.425
__________________________________________________________________________________i 19 Water Worts Design & Saperrtslon Enterprise
Id i»od4iiofi wltls iBiermnUceDtil Consultants iDd Todmocnts PtL Lid.ArjoIMun Irrigation Project
Dim Appurtemt Works
R; ' =0.565
3.12 = —!— f 0.565 x S' ’
0.016
., , = 3.12*0.016
0.565
= 0009
S = 0 0070
Total length of tne over =20*110
= 130m
Lus? of head due to friction = 0.0070 x 130
-1.01 m
Adding 10 % for oenfl and turn x»S of head
Total ©ss* 1.10 m
The sill leva pn the downstream wilt be
■1347.7*1.10
= 13*66 m
F JI supply of canal assuming I 4 m deoth of water m the canai = 1346.6 + 1 4
■ 1348 00 m which is in order
Hay2M7
120
Water Works Design & Supervision Enterprise
In AsHdatton with InteroontlBsntxl Consultants ud Tectaocnu Prt LU*d«-D?dflss« IrrltatScn Project
Dam Appurtenant Works
Table 11.1 Aijo Dedessa Irrigation Project
May £007
Com^MWIon Gf 07M SpifeBy frofle
& ‘1 BS ■ 2 as- y
H O 2E2m
Upywi
fqc ^jQwnjiream peofi-e
Dowtuireiro
JL
Yi
XI Yi
■OTO7
■OTC2 -O6A:
-owe
■oam
■06+2
-0629
■C.6O3 0.576
0.560 -0 524 O49B
-Q.472 -D.445
-0.410 -DM7
4J.314 43252
0210
-0157
-0106
■0.052 0.000
-0.310
■0.3C5
■0 206 -0 2K
-0 246
■0233
■0 219 -0.206 O 1«4
-&1W -0 146 O 129
•0 114 43lOl
■DM9
0.075
■OOM 0.041
-O.D28
■o.oia -0.010 43.KK
-0.001 0.000
OOOO' 0 000
0 250 0017
0500 >0 061
0 750 43 130
1 COO •0.221
1 2M •0 333
1 500 -0 467
1750 -0-62X 2 000 -0 795 2 250 -09U 2 $00 -1301 ??S0 -1 413 3000 -1 M3 3 250 -1 952 3 734 ■2.523
Tirnjtnl Pcwrt CwrdiMlfrt
TW ik?pf At<»ri-Ai t*-Cipii2Jrj Cur*# for Arjo Dtoril# F**»FMok
,
i
Return ■ iM-'ilon Cw.Mji
Figure 12.1;
E/ewtfon-ArBa-Ci'jMcfiy Curves of Ago Dedesss ffittservou
L25
Waur Works Design & Supervision Enterprise
la AiMdlttau with LnureqijUtientil CiMuluuts utd TschnacriLi Pm LtdArjfrD! titifi intEitlon Project
Dam Appurtrnxnt Works
REFERENCES
1 Land and Wjter Resources of Blue Nile Basm 1964 by USSR
May 20d7
2 Preliminary Water Resources Ertvet&pment Master Plan for Ethiopia 1990 hy WAFCOS 3 Aboay River Basin Investigation Development master Plan 199S by BCEOM
fl 'design of Small dams' by United states Department of interior. Bureau of Reclamation
5
J
US Army Manual Eanfi Embankment EM 1110-2300' 3151 cmy 1994
6
US Army Msnuai Engineering and Design - Hydraulic design of reservoir cutlet structure
Engineering Manual EM 1110-2 - 1602 lit August 1963
7
US Army Engineer Manual EM 1110-2- 1603 Hydraulic design of SpiltwayS 3l" March
1965
? US Army Engineer Manua. Engineering ana Design Stability of Earth and Roc* fill Cams
EM 1110-2-1902151 April 1970
9
ICOLD-1994 Embankment Dams - Granular Fillars ano Drams - Review ano
Recommendaljan
10
Sneram JL, Dunnigan lP and Talbot JR 1984 (a) Basic properties of sand and granuiar
filler^ journal U hr Ltd*rtoDtide is* con Project
Dim Appurtenant Works
May2AOT
hf) IS im -1984 Catena far earth quake resistant design of structure (TWd Edibon)
v) IS 6934-1973
vil IS 1S51B8 - 1994 "Criteria for Design of Cnute spillways”
*•> IS 14815-2000
wiij (S 7500 - 2000 "Coae uf Practice far installation anti observation of cores anu fcr measurement of internal vertical Moment m Earth Oams (First RevESi.on}"
ix) IS 9429-1999 Tootle of Practice Drainage System For Earth ano Roc3< fill Dam- First Revision"
x) IS 7356 (Part-1) - "Code of Practice Tor installation, maintenance and observation of Instruments lor pore pressure measurements m Dam & Roon fill dam"
xi} IS t2200' 1987 "Code of practice for provision of water slops out transverse contraction joints in Masonry ana concrete oams"
127
Witw Works Dealpi & Supervision EaHflfpris t laAuHUtferi with Intett&ndDemii CmiitMti and TMhnwmts Prt UdArje Deden* lrrtfttion Project Dim Appwtfitiint Wortj
Project Ar7° ’ &♦<*•••■ Irrlg^kMi Feeelblllty
■ludy
Cknl J- BBrilrtry OfWttW Reeourcee
LoceBon:- Arjo Deweese Object :* SelleerRplee
1 Soli eemplee
M*y2OO7
LAMFWOflY I£3T Witt OF CUAY »AMPUE
Grain etie
dlitrfoution
G««v*n3Md
Atterberfl limit
Compectkm
Sheer ■trangth
r
Lociflo* O<
Bore bole
Depth kn
Specific
Brevity
%
%
Fine
%
LL
IM
PL
CM
PI
JM
Free
Swell
IM
llneer
v hr Inhere
CM
Nitunl m(%L
OMC
%
MOD
kgiml
PffmeeblBty
cnVtec
c
KNrm2
□
DEG.
C
KMIm2
,1
DEG.
4effUf*«
i
ATB TP 1
0 25-0 M
2 70
0
2
98
64 20
138 00
26 20
80
-
*
-
-
?
ATB TP 2
0 20-0 90
3.M
.0
7
93
6060
34 80
26 00
40
*
-
-
a
_
r3
ATB TP 3
0 20-2 10
l.M
0
1
IM 20
38 10
30 10
50
5 ID
34 89’
1340
4 61*10*~
-■
-
1
4
ATB TP 4
010-080
2.58
-
-
62 6C
•3860
24 00
.«
*
12 T6
36 20!
M&6
2 31x10’’
-
-
-—- - ——i
r
a
5
ATB TP 5
030-1 10
2M
-
-_
64 20j40 20
24 00
L*o
18 20
38 12
1326
*
24
29 '
a
ATB TP 6
0 20 2 40
2M
0
f
92
58MJ41 50
17 30
M
-
1545
43 Or
12? 3
164x10'
,P
7
ATB TP 7
0 30 1 BO
2.54
0
2
98
61 80
_38 44,
23 36
I-
4G
18 34^
143 50
1214
-
35
19
a
8
ATB TP 8
0 30-0 90
2 54
0
2
I 98
64 00
38 10
25 90
50
10 34
43 50
1214
30
77
a
1
9
ATB TP 0
0.25-1 30
256
0
8
92
60 40 j35 26
2514
40
11 Bfl
35 00
1360 '
-
44
30
a.
a
10
ATB TP ID
0 25-1 20
2 59
-
ir
-
COteJfl 20
22 68
40
1? M
39 03
1122,
a
a.
.fl
ATB TP 11
020-1 50
2 69
-
54.20
134 00
30 20
60
-
19 93
38 00
1349
39
37
-
12
ATB TP 12
020-1 90
2 65
*
■=
-
60 80 MOO
30.60
60
»
16 24
40 20
1421
4(1
30
tr
13
ATB TP 15
010-1 30
285
-
53 40
40.20
26 20
80
-
13 n
27 25
1515
«
-
a
29
31
14
ATB TP 17
0 10-0 90
269
-■
■
62 BO
44 10
18 70
40
20 22
J5 00
UM
-
a.
15
CH0 TP 1
0100.90
37®
0
4
■----
96
56 7
35.M
21 62
-
T
562
32 31
1377
a
34
27
'W
CHB TP 2
0 15-1
277
0
10
90
53 8 .33 44
20 36
•
-
-
-
>
a,
a
17
CHBTP 3
0 35 1 90
2 76
0
5
96
55 2.
J27
22 5
-
*
562
33 16
1409
*
r
a.
T
18
€HBTP4
2-525
2 75
0
4
«
65 2
38 89
, 1631
-
-
613
33 00
1412
ji
37
30
iJK
CMB TP 5
0 20-1 7 5
2 79
Q
7
93
591
42 S2T 16 M
T
50 54
8 24
34 50
3311
i &9*ior
iJ0
.
CHB TP 6
0 301 30
2 77
0
7
93
59 7
40 76 18 94
«
*
CHBTP?
0 25 0 BO
2.74
-
■
55 00
12.W,
22 06
J5 24
41 DO
1624
a
(Bj
CMB TP fl
040130
2 78
0
7
93
55 00
32 94
22 06
*
-
Ll
■
-
*
*
CHB TP 9
0.20-1 60
2 75
0
2
98
565
31 34
27 16
-
45 M
B24
_
30 00
1432
•
37
25
a
a
24
OHB TPl
0 10 2 10
2 69
0
4
96
6D BO
40 53,
20 22
40
-
12 02
3? 50
1370
3 14*10 ‘
------ —
25
0HBTP2 1
0 50
2 68
■
*
63 80
43 88.
20 12
-
-
-
I. "■
..
26
OHB TP 3
0 25-1 75
2 69
0
1
59
71 40
46 9
22 5
50
l^
*
l?R
welter Works [)P!tllrn A SHriArridnn Fnt^rnrkaA rj p-DeAm* imeiaen Project
Dam AppnrtBam Worts May 2007
27
DHB TP 4
1 0 30-190
JW
.
p
I
M70
39 53
29 17
flO
a,
a.
a.
IB
DHB TP 5
DK3M
269
0
9
91
54 90
,51 09
3£1
4D
_
29
OHB TP fl
0 15-1 4Q
2,W
a
63 60
p
45.fl2
I™.
,B
30
□HB TPT
[ QJ0T90
?M
■
B
r.
63 50
4371
1979
50
11 97
36 Dd
U40
a
37
24
31
DHB TP fl
020-100
J Bl
■■
.
-
007
40 23
20 47
a.
5213
*
-
32
DHB TP 9
085 1 45
2 09
i
i
B6 9
IB 79
48 11
a
a.
x
■
33
DHB TP 10
0 2D 2 80
209
0
4
96
80 3
39 51
20 79
a
a
13 27
4150
1760
34
DHB TPll
0 M2 10
2 59
1
2
98
05 3
k 37 fl?
27 43
a
a.
25 72
,38 61
1420
ir
30
31
35
DH0 TP 12
0 KM 75
285
0
1
99
02 4
41 TH
17 61
40
x
a
a.
40
30
36
M0TP1
020 1.40
2.70
.at
B
a
MOO
42 69
23 91
40
a.
14 26
*1 DO
1650
6 2x10*
46
2B
37
MH?PJ
0 2*1 M
2.52
-
a.
72 BO
41 22
31 30
SO
a.
.
,
.
35
MBTP4
0 15170
7M
a.
67 30f
43JM
23 46
50
57 04
12 02
4Q 13
1365
39
M0TP5
030 1 70
2.84
+
H.
.a.
84 62
».
2S2
a
a.
w
B
-J
40
MBTP7
0 70-1 30
2 64
0
2
98
61 10
38 92
22 18
40
*
JI
M-BTP43
0.2D-1 90
204
0
2
«
71 30
32 03
30 47
50
a
a
42
MBTP9
0 1M 40
2B4
2
2
94
65 BO
39 46
26 47
40
a.
43
24 00
1795
a.
43
MBTP10
1 T&2 20
2.04
?
B
94
64 00
<2
24 32
70
a.
15 62
36 25
1420
44
Ofl TP 1
1-1 50
B
62 20
*0 25
2195
50
■a
B
at
45
OB TP 2
09CM 10
ni
B
T
63 50
*3 n
2026
60
a
a
B
46
0 9 IP 3
fl«M 30
-
-
-
-
63 00
<0 75
22 25
60
-
-
-■
«
a.
a
Wore: Tlw necessary graphs and data sheets fw Grain srJfl chstritmlwn. 1 rta*ial. Ccmpari cn and consohdal;on teste are attached
Watsr Works Design 1 Supervision EnterprisearjM umjui irrigation Project
Dim Appurtenant Wort*
LABORATORY TEST RESULTS OF SAND SAMPLE
2 Sand Semple*
May 2007
Grain ak»
distribution
Organic Content
Unit
weighl ( Kg/m3 I
R- density
N*
Location of
Bora hole
Depth
In
( m)
Specific
gravity
Gravel
%
Sand
%
Fine
%
(%)
1%}
Free
Swell
<%)
Loose
Field
m
Dense
cmJse
c
C
KW
m2
□
OEG, |
—— ■
c
KNJ
m2
6
DEG
Rema
rka
47
Lokosefera 1
2 55
4
90
6
A
-
*
-
•
*
4
60
48
Lokosefera 2
2 55
0
95
5
3
62
49
I oko bridge 1
2 55
6
80
14
w
-
•
-
•
-
•
4
59
50
Loko bridge 2
2.55
6
94
0
51
BOfche 1
2 55
5
98
7
52
iBorche 2
2 55
4
78
18 1 ■
Water Works Design & Supervision Enterprise
in AHKlitfoB wllll lntercwitisssl-1 amounts Md Teehnornti Pvt HiDim Appurtenant Works Laboratory T«t result of Rock Sample
May 2007
TF
I PcMlOT ef
Bera beta
Depth k*
1%)
'UflH wwio.- 1 *«A" l
r
1 WHH
*2rt-e>rpfl L*J
Spline gravity
A pint L Md
1
I KWm" i
Dry | 6SD
SET" (NWmJf
AbraikM
(%>
SIUJIHNMM
r*J
Orgwnk
tflftltiM
v
Leeat
Unh vh
T
IUW
h'yhrt | ig
danee
mJ 1
' ■-
R.Deniry
1
ADI
11 63-11.0J
360
..
2
ADI
12 75-12 BB
797
622
-
T
ALU
13 56 13 70
M4
920
2MM
4
ADI
17.15-17 »
420
372
■GBDO
3 99
" $■
AD2
11 WJ2M
F30
243M
AO2
1« 16TH.30
Md
732
23122
y
23 30 23 50
634
f»fr3
26720
4 14
B
25 25-25 IS
962
M2
22216
V
AD2
M.UXtt
640
726
3H20
10
ADJ
13 55-13 66
970
MO
27542
If
2! 00 22 13
022
070
92102
12
AD3
24 30 24 W
1455
UM
36376
2 16
13
M33
u 22.10 27.23
303
6W
21002
-
H
ADJ
30 733110
92J
070
276W
15
w
13.10 un
25264
1*
ad*
1T.16 17.35
07fl
724
21012
-
a?
10 00 1010
W2
066
21015
10 I
21 30 21 47
31436
•
2F.S2 27 75
25220
324
20
05
21 50-2163
032
MO
26340
-
21 ads
16 55-16 6J
640
736
24036
U15
34.70 3« 05
740
620
22540
-
23 ?
©5
40.75 40 M
936
M3
20420
-
24
05
41 13-4133
713
6B4
20346
25 AD5
39 40 30 50
610
721
23130
26 >
D5
30 00 30 00
fl 20
912
313*2
2 26
2? a
051
10 30-15 02
■
24136
20 jWSl
16 60 rfl 70
036
724
22)40
29 ADS1
22.70 2343
-
19116
-
acTSpw
20 40 20 67
-
64336
Ji ADM
20 40 2067
1267
1124
55136
:
3? C.RQ tfl
4.24
2790
1 76
2 76
»
32
z th
33JRO 1/2
320
2742
’1 24
2 77
■
-1
31
241
L
Tested by
Date
Checked by
Date
Getachew and Mulu
30/07/06
Abrahma Assefa
30/07/06
Date
Water Works Design & Supervision Enterprise
In Association with Intercontinental Consuftanta and Technocrats Pn Ltd.Dale Due
AUTHOB
rrTil
call no.
edition
VOLUME
CA«. no.